Abstract
The paper aims to discuss how school psychology broadly is influenced by neoliberalism. Neoliberalism has attracted great attention among sociologists and economist, but less so among psychologists. This is a paradox since the psychological reach of neoliberalism is massive. The paper analyzes how new (neoliberal) school reforms place new professional demands on schools and therefore also new kinds of professional demands on school psychologists. Among other things, it is discussed whether the notion of resilience can act as a future guiding principle for school psychologists. The paper concludes with three suggestions as to how school psychologists can cope with some of the challenges imposed by neoliberalism. I suggest that school psychologists; 1) have to start asking educational questions to educational matters, 2) that they have to be aware of the political aspects of school psychology and 3) that they start acting against the corrosion of professional identity.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ball, S. J. (2012). Performativity, commodification and commitment: I-spy guide to the neoliberal university. British Journal of Educational Studies, 60(1), 17–28.
Baviskar, S., Dyssegaard, C.B., Egelund, N., Lausten, M. Lynggaard, M & Tetler, S. (2013). Dokumentaitonsprojektet: Kommunernes omstilling til øget inklusion pr. marts 2013. Copenhagen: SFI og Aarhus Universitet.
Biebricher, T. (2014). Power in neoliberal thought. Journal of Political Power., 7(2), 193–210.
Biesta, B. J. J. (2014). The beautiful risk of education. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.
Brinkmann, S. (2014). Stå fast Et opgør med tidens udviklingstvang. København: Gyldendal Business.
Brinkmann, S. (2016). Cultural psychology and its values. Culture & Psychology., 22(3), 376–386.
De Vos, J. (2015). Deneurologizing education? From Psychologisation to Neurologisation and back. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 34(3), 279–295.
Farrell, P. (2010). School Psychology: Learning Lessons from History and Moving Forward. School Psychology International, 31(6), 581-598.
Harrison, E. (2012). Bouncing back? Recession, resilience and everyday lives. Critical Social Policy, 33(1), 97–113.
Innis, R. E. (2016). Between philosophy and cultural psychology: Pragmatist and semiotic reflections on the thresholds of sense. Culture & Psychology, 22(3), 331–361.
Joseph, J. (2016). Governing through failure and denial: The new resilience agenda. Millenium: Journal of International Studies., 44(3), 370–390.
Kvale, S. (1976). The psychology of learning as ideology and technology. Behaviorism, 4, 97–116.
Martin, J., & McLellan, A. (2013). The education of selves: How psychology transformed students. New York: Oxford University Press.
Matthiesen, N.C.L. & Szulevicz, T. (in press). Mom, Dad and the research object: The ethics of conducting research based on your own children’s everyday life. Anthropology & Education Quaterly.
Nielsen, K. (2016). On defining learning from a socio-ontological perspective. On the Definition of Learning. Odense: University Press of Southern Denmark.
O’Donnell, A., & Shaw, M. (2016). Resilience and resistance on the road to recovery in mental health. CONCEPT. The Journal of Contemporary Community Education Practice Theory, 7(3), 1–188.
Sahlberg, P. (2011). The fourth way of Finland. Journal of Educational Change, 12(2), 173–185.
Shriberg, D., & Clinton, A. (2016). The application of social justice principles to global school psychology practice. School Psychology International, 37(4), 323–339.
Sugarman, J. (2015). Neoliberalism and psychological ethics. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 35(2), 103–116.
Szulevicz, T., & Tanggaard, L. (2014). Inclusion and budget cuts - The contours of educational psychology in the marketplace. Nordic Psychology, 36(1), 36-52.
Szulevicz, T. & Tanggaard. L. (2016). Educational psychology practice. A new theoretical framework. Switzerland: Springer.
Szulevicz, T., Eckerdal, R. M., Marsico, G., & Vaalsiner, J. (2016). When disruptive behavior meets outcome-based education. PSIHOLOGIJA., 49(4), 447–468.
Theron, L. C. (2016). The everyday ways that school ecologies facilitate resilience: Implications for school psychologists. School Psychology International, 37(2), 87–103.
Toland, J., & Carrigan, D. (2011). Educational psychology and resilience: New concept, new opportunities. School Psychology International, 32(1), 95–106.
Vassallo, S. (2012). Critical pedagogy and neoliberalism: Concerns with teaching self-regulated learning. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 32(6), 563–580.
Vostanis, P., Humphrey, N., Fitzgeral, N., Deighton, J., & Wolpert, M. (2013). How do schools promote emotional well-being among their pupils? Findings from a national scoping survey of mental health provision in English shools. Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 18(3), 151–157.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical Approval
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Szulevicz, T. Psychologists in (Neoliberal) Schools – What Kind of Marriage?. Integr. psych. behav. 52, 366–376 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-018-9444-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-018-9444-8