Abstract
Referential gestures are of pivotal importance to the human species. We effortlessly make use of each others’ referential gestures to attend to the same things, and our ability to use these gestures show themselves from very early in life. Almost 20 years ago, James Anderson and colleagues presented an experimental paradigm with which to examine the use of referential gestures in non-human primates: the object-choice task. Since then, numerous object-choice studies have been made, not only with primates but also with a range of other animal taxa. Surprisingly, several non-primate species appear to perform better in the object-choice task than primates do. Different hypotheses have been offered to explain the results. Some of these have employed generalizations about primates or subsets of primate taxa that do not take into account the unparalleled diversity that exists between species within the primate order on parameters relevant to the requirements of the object-choice task, such as social structure, feeding ecology, and general morphology. To examine whether these broad primate generalizations offer a fruitful organizing framework within which to interpret the results, a review was made of all published primate results on the use of gazing and glancing cues with species ordered along the primate phylogenetic tree. It was concluded that differences between species may be larger than differences between ancestry taxa, and it is suggested that we need to start rethinking why we are testing animals on experimental paradigms that do not take into account what are the challenges of their natural habitat.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Rearing categories (after Call and Tomasello (1996). Captive: Many zoo animals and some from laboratories. Have interacted directly with humans only minimally such as, for instance, during feeding and cleaning situations; Nursery-raised: Have been raised from an early age in a nursery setting with peer conspecifics and much contact with human caretakers; Laboratory-trained: Have been raised in captivity and trained in particular tasks, often many kinds, over the years; Home-raised: Also termed enculturated. Have been raised by humans and have participated extensively and intensively in interactions with them and their artifacts in a home-like cultural environment. Many home-raised individuals have also been exposed to some kind of language-training.
References
Amici, F., Aureli, F., Visalberghi, E., & Call, J. (2009). Spider monkeys (Ateles geoffroyi) and capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) follow gaze around barriers: evidence for perspective taking? Journal of Comparative Psychology, 123, 368–374.
Anderson, J. R., Sallaberry, P., & Barbier, H. (1995). Use of experimenter-given cues during object-choice tasks by capuchin monkeys. Animal Behaviour, 49, 201–208.
Anderson, J. R., Montant, M., & Schmitt, D. (1996). Rhesus monkeys fail to use gaze direction as an experimenter-given cue in an object-choice task. Behavioural Processes, 37, 47–55.
Barth, J., Reaux, J. E., & Povinelli, D. J. (2005). Chimpanzees’ (Pan troglodytes) use of Gaze cues in object-choice tasks: different methods yield different results. Animal Cognition, 8, 84–92.
Behne, T., Carpenter, M., & Tomasello, M. (2005). One-year-olds comprehend the communicative intentions behind gestures in a hiding game. Developmental Science, 8, 492–499.
Bering, J. M. (2004). A critical review of the “enculturation hypothesis”: the effects of human rearing on great ape social cognition. Animal Cognition, 7, 201–212.
Bräuer, J., Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2005). All great ape species follow gaze to distant locations and around barriers. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 119, 145–154.
Bräuer, J., Kaminski, J., Riedel, J., Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2006). Making inferences about the location of hidden food: social dog, causal ape. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 120, 38–47.
Bretherton, I., & Beeghly, M. (1982). Talking about internal states. Developmental Psychology, 18, 906–921.
Burkart, J., & Heschl, A. (2006). Geometrical gaze following in common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 120, 120–130.
Butterworth, G., & Cochran, E. (1980). Towards a mechanism of joint visual attention in human infancy. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 3, 253–272.
Byrnit, J. T. (2004). Nonenculturated orangutans’ (Pongo pygmaeus) use of experimenter-given manual and facial cues in an object-choice task. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 118, 309–315.
Byrnit, J.T. (2005). Primate theory of mind: a comparative psychological analysis. Published Ph.D. monograph. Department of Psychology, Aarhus University, 2005, 3.
Byrnit, J. T. (2009). Gorillas’ (Gorilla gorilla) use of experimenter-given manual and facial cues in an object-choice task. Animal Cognition, 12, 401–404.
Byrnit, J.T., Høgh-Olesen, H., Makransky, G. (2015). Chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) and bonobo (Pan paniscus) willingness to share highly attractive, monopolizable food sources. J of Comp Psych. doi:10.1037/a0039351
Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (1996). The effect of humans on the cognitive development of apes. In A. E. Russon, K. A. Bard, & S. T. Parker (Eds.), Reaching into thought: The minds of the great apes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Call, J., Hare, B. A., & Tomasello, M. (1998). Chimpanzee gaze following in an object-choice task. Animal Cognition, 1, 89–99.
Call, J., Agnetta, B., & Tomasello, M. (2000). Cues that chimpanzees do and do not use to find hidden objects. Animal Cognition, 3, 23–34.
Corkum, V., & Moore, C. (1995). Development of joint visual attention in infants. In C. Moore & P. Dunham (Eds.), Joint attention: Its origin and role in development. New Jersey: Erlbaum.
Deaner, R. O., van Schaik, C. P., & Johnson, V. (2006). Do some taxa have better domain-general cognition than others? A meta-analysis of nonhuman primate studies. Evolutionary Psychology, 4, 149–196.
Dorey, N. R., Udell, M. A. R., & Wynne, C. D. L. (2010). When do domestic dogs, Canis familiaris, start to understand human pointing? The role of ontogeny in the development of interspecies communication. Animal Behaviour, 79, 37–41.
Dunbar, R. I. M. (1988). Primate social systems. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Dunbar, R. I. M. (1992). Neocortex size as a constraint on group size in primates. Journal of Human Evolution, 20, 469–493.
Emery, N. J. (2000). The eyes have it: the neuroethology, function and evolution of social gaze. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 24, 581–604.
Giret, N., Miklósi, Á., Kreutzer, M., & Bovet, D. (2008). Use of experimenter-given cues by African gray parrots (Psittacus erithacus). Animal Cognition. doi:10.1007/s 10071-008-0163-2.
Hall, N. J., Udell, M. A. R., Dorey, N. R., Walsh, A. L., & Wynne, C. D. L. (2011). Megachiropteran bats (Pteropus) utilize human referential stimuli to locate hidden food. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 125, 341–346.
Hare, B., & Tomasello, M. (1999). Domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) use human and conspecific social cues to locate hidden food. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 113, 173–177.
Hare, B., & Tomasello, M. (2004). Chimpanzees are more skilful in competitive than in cooperative cognitive tasks. Animal Behaviour, 68, 571–581.
Hare, B., Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2001). Do chimpanzees know what conspecifics know? Animal Behaviour, 61, 139–151.
Hare, B., Brown, M., Williamson, C., & Tomasello, M. (2002). The domestication of social cognition in dogs. Science, 298, 1634–1636.
Hare, B., Plyusnina, I., Ignacio, N., Schepina, O., Stepika, A., Wrangham, R., & Trut, L. (2005). Social cognitive evolution in captive foxes is a correlated by-product of experimental domestication. Current Biology, 15, 226–230.
Hare, B., Melis, A. P., Woods, V., Hastings, S., & Wrangham, R. (2007). Tolerance allows bonobos to outperform chimpanzees on a cooperative task. Current Biology, 17, 619–623.
Hare, B., Rosati, A., Kaminski, J., Bräuer, J., Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2010). The domestication hypothesis for dogs’ skills with human communication: a response to Udell et al. (2008) and Wynne et al. (2008). Animal Behaviour, 79, e1–e6.
Hauser, M. D., Glynn, D., & Wood, J. (2007). Rhesus monkeys correctly read the goal-relevant gestures of a human agent. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 274, 1913–1918.
Heilbronner, S. R., Rosati, A. G., Stevens, J. R., Hare, B., & Hauser, M. D. (2008). A fruit in the hand or two in the bush? Divergent risk preferences in chimpanzees and bonobos. Biology Letters, 4, 246–249.
Herrmann, E., & Tomasello, M. (2006). Apes’ and children’s understanding of cooperative and competitive motives in a communicative situation. Developmental Science, 9, 518–529.
Herrmann, E., Call, J., Hernández-Lloreda, M. V., Hare, B., & Tomasello, M. (2007). Humans have evolved specialized skills of social cognition: the cultural intelligence hypothesis. Science, 317, 1360–1366.
Hostetter, A. B., Russell, J. L., Freeman, H., & Hopkins, W. D. (2007). Now you see me, now you don’t: evidence that chimpanzees understand the role of the eyes in attention. Animal Cognition, 10, 55–62.
Inoue, Y., Inoue, E., & Itakura, S. (2004). Use of experimenter-given directional cues by a young white-handed gibbon (Hylobates lar). Japanese Psychological Research, 46, 262–267.
Itakura, S., & Anderson, J. R. (1996). Learning to use experimenter-given cues during an object-choice task by a capuchin monkey. Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive, 15, 103–112.
Itakura, S., & Tanaka, M. (1998). Use of experimenter-given cues during object-choice tasks by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), an orangutan (Pongo pygmaeus), and human infants (Homo sapiens). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 112, 119–126.
Itakura, S., Agnetta, B., Hare, B., & Tomasello, M. (1999). Chimpanzee use of human and conspecific social cues to locate hidden food. Developmental Science, 2, 448–456.
Kaminski, J., Riedel, J., Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2005). Domestic goats, Capra hircus, follow gaze direction and use social cues in an object choice task. Animal Behaviour, 69, 11–18.
Kaplan, G., & Rogers, L. J. (2002). Patterns of gazing in orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus). International Journal of Primatology, 23, 501–526.
Kappeler, P. M., & van Schaik, C. P. (2002). Evolution of primate social systems. International Journal of Primatology, 23, 707–740.
Kirchhofer, K. C., Zimmermann, F., Kaminski, J., & Tomasello, M. (2012). Dogs (Canis familiaris), but not chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), understand imperative pointing. PLoS ONE, 7, 2.
Liebal, K., & Kaminski, J. (2012). Gibbons (Hylobates pileatus, H. moloch, H. lar, Symphalangus syndactylus) follow human gaze, but do not take the visual perspective of others. Animal Cognition. doi:10.1007/s10071-012-0543-5.
Lyn, H., Russell, J. L., & Hopkins, W. D. (2010). The impact of environment on the comprehension of declarative communication in apes. Psychological Science, 21, 360–365.
MacLean, E. L., Matthews, L. J., Hare, B. A., et al. (2011). How does cognition evolve? Phylogenetic comparative psychology. Animal Cognition, 15, 223–238.
Maros, K., Gácsi, M., & Miklósi, A. (2008). Comprehension of human pointing gestures in horses (Equus caballus). Animal Cognition, 11, 457–466.
Melis, A. P., Hare, B., & Tomasello, M. (2006). Engineering cooperation in chimpanzees: tolerance constraints on cooperation. Animal Behaviour, 72, 275–286.
Miklósi, Á., & Soproni, K. (2006). A comparative analysis of animals’ understanding of the human pointing gesture. Animal Cognition, 9, 81–93.
Miklósi, A., Pongrácz, P., Lakatos, G., Topál, J., & Csányi, V. (2005). A comparative study of the use of visual communicative signals in interactions between dogs (Canis familiaris) and humans and cats (Felis catus) and humans. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 119, 179–186.
Morissette, P., Ricard, M., & Décarie, T. G. (1995). Joint visual attention and pointing in infancy: a longitudinal study of comprehension. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 13, 163–175.
Mulcahy, N., & Call, J. (2009). The performance of bonobos (Pan paniscus), chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), and orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus) in two versions of an object-choice task. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 123, 304–309.
Mulcahy, N. J., & Hedge, N. J. (2012). Are great apes tested with an abject object-choice task? Animal Behaviour, 83, 313–321.
Mulcahy, N., & Suddendorf, T. (2011). An obedient orangutan (Pongo abelii) performs perfectly in peripheral object-choice tasks but fails the standard centrally presented versions. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 125, 112–115.
Neiworth, J. J., Burman, M. A., Basile, B. M., & Lickteig, M. T. (2002). Use of experimenter-given cues in visual co-orienting and in an object-choice task by a New World monkey species, cotton top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 116, 3–11.
Okamoto-Barth, S., Tomonaga, M., Tanaka, M., & Matsuzawa, T. (2008). Development of using experimenter-given cues in infant chimpanzees: longitudinal changes in behavior and cognitive development. Developmental Science, 11, 98–108.
Pack, A. A., & Herman, L. M. (2004). Bottlenosed dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) comprehend the referent of both static and dynamic human gazing and pointing in an object-choice task. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 118, 160–171.
Peignot, P., & Anderson, J. R. (1999). Use of experimenter-given manual and facial cues by gorillas (Gorilla gorilla) in an object-choice task. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 113, 253–260.
Plotnik, J. M., Shaw, R. C., Brubaker, D. L., Tiller, L. N., & Clayton, N. S. (2014). Thinking with their trunks: elephants use smell but not sound to locate food and exclude nonrewarding alternatives. Animal Behaviour, 88, 91–98.
Povinelli, D. J., & Eddy, T. J. (1996a). Chimpanzees: joint visual attention. Psychological Science, 7, 129–135.
Povinelli, D. J., & Eddy, T. J. (1996b). What young chimpanzees know about seeing. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 61, 3.
Povinelli, D. J., Reaux, J. E., Bierschwale, D. T., Allain, A. D., & Simon, B. B. (1997). Exploitation of pointing as a referential gesture in young children, but not adolescent chimpanzees. Cognitive Development, 12, 423–461.
Povinelli, D. J., Bierschwale, D. T., & Cech, C. G. (1999). Comprehension of seeing as a referential act in young children, but not juvenile chimpanzees. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 17, 37–60.
Rosati, A. G., & Hare, B. (2009). Looking past the model species: diversity in gaze- following skills across primates. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 19, 45–51.
Ruiz, A., Gómez, J. C., Roeder, J. J., & Byrne, R. W. (2009). Gaze following and gaze priming in lemurs. Animal Cognition, 12, 427–434.
Scheumann, M., & Call, J. (2004). The use of experimenter-given cues by South African fur seals (Arctocephalus pusillus). Animal Cognition, 7, 224–230.
Schloegl, C., Kotrschal, K., & Bugnyar, T. (2007). Gaze following in common ravens, Corvus corax: ontogeny and habituation. Animal Behaviour, 74, 769–778.
Schmitt, V., Pankau, B., & Fischer, J. (2012). Old World Monkeys compare to apes in the primate cognition test battery. PLoS ONE, 7, e32024. doi: 10.13/1/journal.pone.0032024.
Smuts, B. B., Cheney, D. L., Seyfarth, R. M., Wrangham, R. W., & Struhsaker, T. T. (Eds.). (1987). Primate societies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Tan, J., Ruoting, T., & Yanjie, S. (2013). Testing the cognition of the forgotten colobines: a first look at golden snub-nosed monkeys (Rhinopithecus roxellana). International Journal of Primatology. doi:10.1007/s10764-013-9741-5.
Tomasello, M., & Call, J. (1997). Primate cognition. New York: Oxford University Press.
Tomasello, M., & Call, J. (2004). The role of humans in the cognitive development of apes revisited. Animal Cognition, 7, 213–215.
Tomasello, M., Call, J., & Hare, B. (1998). Five primate species follow the visual gaze of conspecifics. Animal Behaviour, 55, 1063–1069.
Tomasello, M., Hare, B., Lehmann, H., & Call, J. (2007). Reliance on head versus eyes in the gaze following of great apes and human infants: the cooperative eye hypothesis. Journal of Human Evolution, 52, 314–320.
Udell, M. A. R., Dorey, N. R., & Wynne, C. D. (2008). Wolves outperform dogs in following human social cues. Animal Behaviour, 76, 1767–1773.
Udell, M. A. R., Dorey, N. R., & Wynne, C. D. L. (2010). What did domestication do to dogs? A new account of dogs’ sensitivity to human actions. Biological Reviews, 85, 327–345.
Verhulst, J. (2003). Developmental dynamics in human and other primates. New York: Adonis Press.
Vick, S.-J., & Anderson, J. R. (2000). Learning and limits of use of eye gaze by capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) in an object-choice task. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 114, 200–207.
Vick, S.-J., & Anderson, J. R. (2003). Use of human visual attention cues by olive baboons (Papio anubis) in a competitive task. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 117, 209–216.
Vick, S.-J., Bovet, D., & Anderson, J. R. (2001). Gaze discrimination learning in olive baboons (Papio anubis). Animal Cognition, 4, 1–10.
Vlamings, P. H. J. M., Hare, B., & Call, J. (2009). Reaching around barriers: the performance of the great apes and 3-5-year-old children. Animal Cognition. doi:10.1007/s10071-009-0265-5.
Wilkinson, A., Mandl, I., Bugnyar, T., & Huber, L. (2010). Gaze-following in the red-footed tortoise (Geochelone carbonaria). Animal Cognition, 13, 765–769.
Wynne, C. D. L., Udell, M. A. R., & Lord, K. A. (2008). Ontogeny’s impacts on human-dog communication. Animal Behaviour. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.03.010.
Acknowledgments
I would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for helpful comments on this paper. Furthermore, as usual, many thanks to Henriette Westh, Timothy Wooller, and Jennifer Nevile for dedicated proofreading, and inspiring and insightful suggestions on my work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Byrnit, J.T. Primates’ Socio-Cognitive Abilities: What Kind of Comparisons Makes Sense?. Integr. psych. behav. 49, 485–511 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-015-9312-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-015-9312-8