Abstract
One of the big questions in psychology is when and how psychology disentangled from philosophy. Usually it is referred to the laboratory Wundt established in Leipzig in 1879 as the birth for psychology as an independent science. However this separation process can also be traced in other ways, like by focusing on how the two sciences approach and understand thinking. Although thinking and language were not included in the research in this laboratory, Wundt (1897) regarded thinking as the core of psychology. As a commentary to Papanicolaou (Integr Psychol Behav Sci doi:10.1007/s12124-014-9273-3, 2014), this paper investigates the differences in how psychology and philosophy conceptualized thinking in early Western modernity. Thus one of the findings is that the separation process between the two was more or less initiated by Immanuel Kant. By defining thinking in terms of the pure reason he excluded the psychological understanding of thinking because psychology basically defined thinking in terms of ideas derived from qualia and sensation. Another finding is that psychology itself has not completely realized the differences between the philosophical and the psychological understanding of thinking by having been influenced by Kant’s ideal of the pure reason. This may also explain some of the crises psychology went through during the twentieth century.
References
Baumgarten, A. G. (1739/2004). Metaphysik. Jena, Dietrich Scheglmann Reprints.
Cassirer, E. (1932/1968). The philosophy of enlightenment. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Judd, C. H. (1897). Translator’s Preface, in Wundt, W. (1897) Outlines of psychology, Translated by C. H. Judd, Wilhelm Engelmann, Leipzig.
Kant, I. (1781/87). Critique of pure reason, trans. J. M. D. Meiklejohn, Jim Manis, Editor, PSU-Hazleton, Hazleton, PA 18202, The Electronic Classics Series.
Kierkegaard, S. (2009). Repetition and philosophical crumbs, Translation by M. G. Piety, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Kierkegaard, S. (1849). The sickness unto death. A Christian psychological exposition for upbuilding and awakening, translated by H. V. Hong and E. H. Hong, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
Klempe, S. H. (2014). Kierkegaard and the rise of modern psychology, New Brunswick & London, Transaction Pub.
Lazarsfeld, P. (1959). Amerikanische Beobachtungen eines Bühler-Schülers. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle und Angewandte Psychologie, 6, 69–76.
Luginbühl, J. (1946). Die Axiomatik bei Giambattista Vico, Inaugural-Dissertation zur Erlangung der Doktorwürde an der philosphischen fakultät I, der Universität Bern. Bern: Buchdrückerei Neukomm & Salchrath.
Papanicolaou, A. C. (2014). Beyond Eddington’s argument. Integrative Psychological and Behavioural Science, doi:10.1007/s12124-014-9273-3.
Smith, N. K. (1962). A commentary to Kant’s “critique of pure reason”. New York: Humanities Press.
Vico, G. (1710/1988). On the most ancient wisdom of the Italians. Unearthed from the origins of the Latin language, Transl. by L.M. Palmer, Itacha & London, Cornell University Press.
Wolff, Chr. (1732). Psychologia Empirica, Methodo Scientifica Pertractata, que ea quæ de Anima Humana indubia Experientiæ Fide Constant, Continentur et ad Solidam Universæ Philosophiæ Practicæ ac Theologiæ Naturalis Tractationem via Sternitur, Editio Nova Priori Emendiatorcum Privilegiis, Francfurti et Lipsi, Prostat in Officina Libraria Rengeriana.
Wundt, W. (1897). Outlines of psychology, Translated by C.H. Judd, Wilhelm Engelmann, Leipzig.
Wundt, W. (1920). Erlebtes und Erkanntes. Stuttgart: Alfred Kroner Verlag.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Klempe, S.H. Thinking in Early Modernity and the Separation Process Between Philosophy and Psychology. Integr. psych. behav. 49, 44–52 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-014-9286-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-014-9286-y