Skip to main content
Log in

The Connection Between Language and the World: A Paradox of the Linguistic Turn?

  • Published:
Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Alex Gillespie and Flora Cornish draw on the dialogic turn as they consider that, in order to interpret the meaning of an utterance, it is necessary to emphasize its contextual nature. Among other aspects, they address what context is and what is being done while speaking. Taking these two issues as point of departure, it is worth pondering on (1) what revolves around language and what the status of nonlinguistic semiotic systems is for the philosophers of language, (2) Umberto Eco’s critique of the Philosophy of Language, which has not problematized the pre-linguistic relationship with things, and (3) how ontogenesis may shed light on this scheme where linguistic and nonlinguistic aspects are inevitably interrelated. I will reflect on the pragmatic aspects in adult-child communication at its pre-linguistic level. I will underscore the key role played by the object as a complex referent and as a tool for communication.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aizpún, T. (2001a). La necesidad del lenguaje simbólico. In D. Romero de Solís (Ed.), Símbolos estéticos (pp. 311–321). Sevilla: Universidad de Sevilla.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aizpún, T. (2001b). Quelques considérations à propos du concept de vérité. Revue Tunisienne des Études Philosophiques, 28(29), 59–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, J. L. (1962/1990). Cómo hacer cosas con palabras. Barcelona: Paidós.

  • Barthes, R. (1985). L’aventure sémiologique. Paris: Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basilio, M., & Rodríguez, C. (2011). Usos, gestos y vocalizaciones privadas. De la interacción social a la autorregulación. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 34(2), 181–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bates, E., Camaioni, L., & Volterra, V. (1975). The acquisition of performatives prior to speech. Merril-Palmer Quarterly, 21(3), 205–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bjorklund, D. F., & Gardiner, A. K. (2011). Object play and tool use: Developmental and evolutionary perspectives. In A. D. Pellegrini (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of the development of play (pp. 153–171). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronckart, J.-P., & Bota, C. (2013/2011). Bajtín desenmascarado. Historia de un mentiroso, una estafa y un delirio colectivo. Madrid: Antonio Machado. [Original: Bakhtine démasqué. Histoire d’un menteur, d’une escroquerie et d’un délire collectif. Genève: Librairie Droz].

  • Cárdenas, K., Rodríguez, C., & Palacios, P. (2014). First symbols in a girl with Down syndrome: a longitudinal study from 12 to 18 months. Infant, Behavior and Development (in press).

  • Casla, M. (2012). El desarrollo del lenguaje es más de lo que los niños pueden decir. Padres y Maestros, 344, 9–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castañares, W. (1985). El signo: Problemas semióticos y filosóficos. Tesis doctoral. Universidad Complutense de Madrid.

  • Castañares, W. (1994). De la interpretación a la lectura. Madrid: Iberediciones.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castañares, W. (2002). Signo y representación en las teorías semióticas. Estudios de Psicología, 23(3), 339–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, H. (2003). Pointing and placing. In S. Kita (Ed.), Pointing. Where language, culture and cognition meet (pp. 243–268). Mahwah: LEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbalis, M. (2002). From hand to mouth. The origins of language. Oxfordshire: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • De los Reyes Leoz, J. L. (2009). Del patrimonio cultural al museo infantil. Tarbiya. Revista de Investigación e Innovación Educativa, 40, 107–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dimitrova, N. (2013). It takes more than mean-end differentiation to intentionally communicate in infancy. A semiotic perspective on early communication development. Cultural-Historical Psychology, 3, 81–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dimitrova, N., & Moro, C. (2013). Common ground on object use associates with caregivers’ gesturese. Infant Behavior and Development, 36, 618–626.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eco, U. (1997/1999). Kant y el ornitorrinco. Barcelona: Lumen.

  • Español, S. (2004). Cómo hacer cosas sin palabras. Gesto y ficción en la infancia temprana. Madrid: Antonio Machado.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernyhough, C. (2009). Dialogic thinking. In A. Wimsler, C. Fernyhough, & I. Montero (Eds.), Private speech, executive functioning, and the development of verbal self-regulation (pp. 42–52). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole (comp.). Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts, (pp. 41–58). Ciudad: Elsevier.

  • Grice, H. P. (1981/1998). Presuposición e implicatura conversacional. In M. T. Julio & R. Muñoz (comp.). Textos clásicos de pragmática, (pp. 105–124). Madrid: Arco/Libros.

  • Groupe μ. (1992). Traité du signe visual. Pour une réthorique de l’image. Paris: Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guidetti, M. (2003). Pragmatique et psychologie du développement. Comment communiquent les jeunes enfants. Paris: Belin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1976). What is universal in pragmatics? In M. Cooke (Ed.), On the pragmatics of communication (pp. 21–103). Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1988). Actions, speech acts, linguistically mediated interactions, and the lifeworld. In M. Cooke (Ed.), On the pragmatics of communication (pp. 215–255). Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hierro, J. (1986). Principios de Filosofía del Lenguaje. Madrid: Alianza.

    Google Scholar 

  • Julio, M. T. (1998). Introducción. In M. T. Julio & R. Muñoz (comp.). Textos clásicos de pragmática, (pp. 7–10). Madrid: Arco/Libros.

  • Kendon, A. (2000). Language and gesture: Unity or duality? In D. McNeill (Ed.), Language and gesture (pp. 47–63). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • McNeill, D. (2000). Introduction. In D. McNeill (Ed.), Language and gesture (pp. 1–10). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Moreno, A., Rodríguez, C. & del Olmo, M. J. (submitted). The rhythmic, sonorous and melodic components of adult-child-object interactions between age 2 and 6 months. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Sciences.

  • Moro, C., & Rodríguez, C. (1991). Por qué el niño tiende el objeto hacia el adulto? La construcción social de la significación de los objetos. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 53, 99–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moro, C., & Rodríguez, C. (2005). L’objet et la construction de son usage. Une approche sémiotique du développement préverbal. Berne: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palacios, P., & Rodríguez, C. (2014). The development of symbolic uses of objects in infants in a triadic context: a pragmatic and semiotic perspective. Infant and Child Development. doi: 10.1002/icd.1873.

  • Quine, W. (1960/2001). Palabra y Objeto. Barcelona: Herder. [Título original:Word and Object. Cambridge Mass: The MIT].

  • Quine, W. (1995). From stimulus to science. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riba, C. (2003). Del triángulo mágico y de sus pérdidas y conservaciones. Algunas notas sobre la invisibilidad de Ch. S. Peirce en la historia de la Psicología. Anuario de Psicología, 64, 83–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivière, A. (1985). La Psicología de Vygotski. Madrid: Antonio Machado.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez, C. (2006). Del ritmo al símbolo. Los signos en el nacimiento de la inteligencia. Barcelona: Horsori/ICE Univ. de Barcelona.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez, C. (2007a). Object, communication and signs. The triadic basis of early cognitive development. In J. Valsiner & A. Rosa (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of socio-cultural psychology (pp. 257–276). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez, C. (2007b). El ojo de Dios no mira signos. Desarrollo temprano y semiótica. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 30(3), 343–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez, C. (2009). The ‘circumstances’ of gestures: proto-interrogatives and private gestures. New Ideas in Psychology, 27, 288–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez, C. (2012). The functional permanence of the object: A product of consensus. In E. Martí & C. Íguez (Eds.), After Piaget (pp. 123–150). Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez, C., Moreno, A., Basilio, M. & Sosa, N. (submitted). Ostensive gestures come first. Their role in the beginning of the shared reference. Semiotic Development: Special Issue. Cognitive Development.

  • Rodríguez, C., & Moro, C. (1998). El mágico número tres. Cuando los niños aún no hablan. Barcelona: Paidós.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez, C., & Moro, C. (2008). Coming to agreement: Object use by infants and adults. In J. Zlatev, T. Racine, C. Sinha, & E. Itkonen (Eds.), The shared mind: Perspectives on intersubjectivety (pp. 89–114). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sériot, P. (2010). Préface. Volosinov, La Philosophie de l’enthymème et la double nature du signe. In V. N. Volosinov (2010/1930). Marxisme et Philosophie du Langage. Les problèmes fondamentaux de la méthode sociologique dans la science du langage, (pp. 13–109). Condé-sur-Noireau: Lambert-Lucas/Université de Lausanne.

  • Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1986). Relevance. Communication and cognition. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterner, A., & Rodríguez, C. (2012). Valoración de signos de alarma en autismo entre los 9 y los 16 meses de edad. Psicología Educativa, 18(2), 145–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomasello, M. (1999). The cultural origins of human cognition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomasello, M., Carpenter, M., & Liszkowsky, U. (2007). A new look at infant pointing. Child Development, 78(3), 705–722.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Valsiner, J. (2014). An invitation to cultural psychology. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volosinov, V. N. (1930/2010). Marxisme et Philosophie du Langage. Les problèmes fondamentaux de la method sociologique dans la science du langage. Condé-sur-Noireau: Lambert-Lucas/Université de Lausanne.

  • Williams, E., & Kennedy-Scott, L. (2006). Autism and object use: The mutuality of the social and material in children’s developing understanding and use of everyday objects. In A. Costall & O. Dreier (Eds.), Doing things with things. The design and use of everyday objects (pp. 51–66). Hampshire: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, D., & Sperber, D. (1981/1989). Sobre la teoría de la conversación de Grice. In M. T. Julio, & R. Muñoz (comp.). Textos clásicos de pragmática, (pp. 145–172). Madrid: Arco/Libros.

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1953/1988). Investigaciones Filosóficas. Barcelona: Crítica.

Download references

Acknowledgments

This paper was supported by the project EDU2011-27840, I + D + I from the Ministry of Science and Innovation, Spain.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cintia Rodríguez.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rodríguez, C. The Connection Between Language and the World: A Paradox of the Linguistic Turn?. Integr. psych. behav. 49, 89–103 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-014-9274-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-014-9274-2

Keywords

Navigation