Skip to main content

Philosophical and Communicative Turns in the Study of Language

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Language Learning, Discourse and Communication

Part of the book series: Second Language Learning and Teaching ((SLLT))

Abstract

The main aim of our chapter is to offer a brief overview of selected turns in contemporary philosophy of language and the study of language, concentrating especially on the ‘formal’, ‘cognitive’ and ‘communicative’ turns. We discuss the most important turns in the philosophy of language (concentrating especially on Frege), next the cognitive turns associated with, on the one hand, Chomsky and the generative enterprise, and Cognitive Linguistics on the other, and we conclude with an overview of the communicative turn, and its more applied implications, including cognitive approach to language analysis, and communicative language teaching.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Sections 25 of our chapter use the material from the introductions in Stalmaszczyk (2010a, b, 2011), and from Stalmaszczyk (2012).

  2. 2.

    On the origin of the term ‘linguistic turn' in philosophy, see Rorty (1967); see also the chapters in Sawyer (2010).

  3. 3.

    According to Dummett (1993: 5) “analytical philosophy was born when the ‘linguistic turn' was taken”.

  4. 4.

    The classic study on Frege and philosophy of language is Dummett (1981). For more recent discussion of Frege's influence upon modern thought, including linguistics and philosophy of language, see Carl (1994), Kenny (1995), Beaney (1997), Pietroski (2004), and Mendelsohn (2005).

  5. 5.

    See, for example, the chapters collected in Sawyer (2010).

  6. 6.

    More precisely, this is the "second cognitive revolution", as the first one should be associated with the Cartesian tradition, cf. Chomsky (2002: 69). Cognitive Linguistics might be thus considered as contributing to the third wave of the cognitive revolution.

  7. 7.

    Also cf. Wodak et al. (2011) for comments on the relationship between Hymes' notion of ‘communicative competence', Habermas' notion of ‘communicative action', and the work of Austin and Searle.

  8. 8.

    Cf. Johnston and Marcellino (2011) for comments on Hymes' perception of Chomsky's approach, see also Beuzeville (2012).

References

  • Ardener, E. ed. 1971. Social Anthropology and Language. ASA Monographs 10. London: Tavistock Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arendt, H. 1978. Thinking. New York: Harcourt, Brace Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, J. L. 1962. How to do things with words. The William James Lectures delivered at Harvard University. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Edited by J. O. Urmson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaney, M. 1997. Introduction. In The frege reader, ed. M. Beaney, 1–47. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beuzeville de, L. 2012. Review of The sage handbook of sociolinguistics, eds. R. Wodak et al. London: Sage Publications, Inc. Discourse and Communication 6(3): 356–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canale, M. and M. Swain. 1980. Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics 1: 1–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, J. 2009. Philosophical logic. Princeton and Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carl, W. 1994. Frege’s theory of sense and reference. Its origins and scope. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. 1965. Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. 1991. Linguistics and adjacent fields: A personal view. In The Chomskyan turn, ed. A. Kasher, 3–25. Cambridge, MA and Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. 2000. New horizons in the study of language and mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. 2002. On nature and language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Constantinou, C. et al. 2008. Cultures and politics of global communication. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, M. 2006. Foundational issues in the philosophy of language. In The Blackwell guide to the philosophy of language, eds. M. Devitt and R. Hanley, 19–40. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devitt, M. and R. Hanley. 2006. The Blackwell guide to the philosophy of language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dummett, M. 1981. Frege: Philosophy of language (2nd ed.). London: Duckworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dummett, M. 1993. Origins of analytical philosophy. London: Duckworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duranti, A. 2009. Linguistic anthropology: History, ideas, and issues. In Linguistic anthropology. A reader, ed. A. Duranti. Chichester: Wiley- Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frege, G. 1879/1997. Begriffsschrift (translated by M. Beaney). In The Frege reader, ed. M. Beaney, 47–78. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frege, G. 1884/1953. The Foundations of arithmetic (translated by J. L. Austin), New York: Blackwell. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Frege, G. 1897/1997. Logic (translated by P. Long and R. White). In The Frege reader, ed. M. Beaney, 227–250. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frege, G. 1906/1997. Letters to Husserl, 1906 (translated by H. Kaal). In The Frege reader, ed. M. Beaney, 301–307. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gumperz, J. and D. Hymes. 1972. The ethnography of communication. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Healey, P. 1992. Planning through debate: The communicative turn in planning theory. Town Planning Review 63(2): 143–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. 1989. Structural transformations of the public sphere. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horlick-Jones, T. and J. Farre. 2010. On the communicative constitution of risk objects in mediated times. Catalan Journal of Communication and Cultural Studies 2. Special Issue The communicative turn in risk communication: Theory and practice 131–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hymes, D. 1962. The ethnography of speaking. In Anthropology and human behavior, eds. Th. Gladwin and W. C. Sturtevant, 13–53. Washington, D.C.: Anthropological Society of Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hymes, D. 1964a. Introduction: Toward ethnographies of communication. In The ethnography of communication, eds. J. Gumperz and D. Hymes, 1–34. American Anthropologist 66, 6. II.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hymes, D. H. 1964b. Language in culture and society: A reader in linguistics and anthropology. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hymes, D. 1967. Models of the interaction of language and social setting. Journal of Social Issues 23(2): 8–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hymes, D. 1971. Sociolinguistics and the ethnography of speaking. In Social anthropology and linguistics, ed. E. Ardener, 47–93. London: Tavistock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hymes D. 1972a. Towards communicative competence. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hymes, D. 1972b. On communicative competence. In Sociolinguistics, eds. B. Pride and J. Holmes, 269–293. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hymes, D. 1972c. Models of the interaction of language and social life.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hymes, D. H. 1989. Ways of speaking. In Explorations in the ethnography of speaking, eds. R. Bauman and J. Sherzer, 433–451. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone, B. and W. Marcellino. 2011. Dell Hymes and the ethnography of communication. In The Sage handbook of sociolinguistics, eds. R. Wodak et al., 57–67. London: Sage Publications, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenny, A. 1995. Frege. An introduction to the founder of modern analytic philosophy. London: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langacker, R. 2002. Theory, method and description in cognitive grammar: A case study. In Cognitive linguistics today, eds. B. Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk and K. Turewicz, 13–40. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lepore, E. and B. C. Smith. 2006. The Oxford handbook of philosophy of language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lycan, W. 2000. Philosophy of language. A contemporary introduction. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Łukasiewicz, J. 1957. Aristotle’s syllogistic from the standpoint of modern formal logic (2nd enlarged edition). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackenzie, I. 1997. Introduction to linguistic philosophy. Thousand Oakes: Sage Publications, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinich, A. P. 2001. The philosophy of language (4th ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinich, A. P. 2009a. Philosophy of language. Critical concepts in philosophy. Volumes I-IV. London and New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinich, A. P. 2009b. General introduction. In Philosophy of language. Volume 1, ed. A. Martinich,1–18. London and New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathis, A. et al. 2008. On order and conflict: International relations and the ‘communicative turn’. Review of International Studies 34(4): 43–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendelsohn, R. 2005. The philosophy of Gottlob Frege. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, A. 2007. Philosophy of language. Second edition. London and New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montague, R. 1970. Universal grammar. Reprinted in Formal philosophy. Selected papers of Richard Montague, ed. R. H. Thomason, 222–246. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, Ch. 1971. Writings on the general theory of signs. The Hague: Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, M. 2007. Introduction to the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulston, C. 1974. Linguistic and communicative competence. TESOL Quarterly 8(4): 347–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pietroski, P. M. 2004. Events and semantic architecture. Oxford: Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, J. 2006. Communicative language teaching today. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, R. 1967. Introduction. Metaphilosophical difficulties of linguistic philosophy. In The linguistic turn. Recent essays in philosophical method, ed. R. Rorty, 1–39. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, R. 1992. Twenty-five years later. In The linguistic turn. Recent essays in philosophical method. With two retrospective essays, ed. R. Rorty, 371–374. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer, S. 2010. New waves in philosophy of language. New York: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J. 1967. Human communication theory and the philosophy of language: Some remarks. In Human communication theory, ed. F. Dance, 27–41. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J. 2004. Mind: A brief introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soames, S. 2010. Philosophy of Language. Princeton and Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stalmaszczyk, P. 2012. Turns in the contemporary philosophy of language. In Der Mensch un Seine Sprachen, eds. M. Olpińska-Szkiełko et al., 569–576. Frankfurt am Main,: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stalmaszczyk, P. 2010a. Philosophy of language and linguistics. Volume 1: The formal turn. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stalmaszczyk, P. 2010b. Philosophy of language and linguistics. Volume 2: The philosophical turn. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stalmaszczyk, P. 2011. Turning points in the philosophy of language and linguistics. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swan, M. 2007. Grammar, meaning and pragmatics: Sorting out the muddle. TESL-EJ 11/2. September, A3

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, K. 1998. Truth and meaning. An introduction to the philosophy of language. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Ek, J. and L. G. Alexander. 1980. Threshold level English. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vendler, Z. 1974. Linguistics in philosophy. Ithaca and London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkins, D. 1976. Notional syllabuses. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. 1953/2001. Philosophical investigations (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wodak, R. et al. 2011. Introduction. In The Sage handbook of sociolinguistics, eds. R. Wodak et al., 1–9. London: Sage Publications, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wodak, R. et al. 2011. The Sage handbook of sociolinguistics. London: Sage Publications, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Piotr Stalmaszczyk .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Stalmaszczyk, P., Oleksy, W. (2014). Philosophical and Communicative Turns in the Study of Language. In: Szubko-Sitarek, W., Salski, Ł., Stalmaszczyk, P. (eds) Language Learning, Discourse and Communication. Second Language Learning and Teaching. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00419-8_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics