Abstract
In this article modern qualitative and mixed methods approaches are criticized from the standpoint of structural-systemic epistemology. It is suggested that modern qualitative methodologies suffer from several fallacies: some of them are grounded on inherently contradictory epistemology, the others ask scientific questions after the methods have been chosen, conduct studies inductively so that not only answers but even questions are often supposed to be discovered, do not create artificial situations and constraints on study-situations, are adevelopmental by nature, study not the external things and phenomena but symbols and representations—often the object of studies turns out to be the researcher rather than researched, rely on ambiguous data interpretation methods based to a large degree on feelings and opinions, aim to understand unique which is theoretically impossible, or have theoretical problems with sampling. Any one of these fallacies would be sufficient to exclude any possibility to achieve structural-systemic understanding of the studied things and phenomena. It also turns out that modern qualitative methodologies share several fallacies with the quantitative methodology. Therefore mixed methods approaches are not able to overcome the fundamental difficulties that characterize mixed methods taken separately. It is proposed that structural-systemic methodology that dominated psychological thought in the pre-WWII continental Europe is philosophically and theoretically better grounded than the other methodologies that can be distinguished in psychology today. Future psychology should be based on structural-systemic methodology.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alise, M. A., & Teddlie, C. (2010). A continuation of the paradigm wars? Prevalence rates of methodological approaches across the social/behavioral sciences. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 4, 103–126.
Anfara, V. A., & Mertz, N. T. (Eds.). (2006). Theoretical frameworks in qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Anokhin, P. K. (1975). Ocherki po fiziologii funktsional’nykh sistem. Moscow: Medicina.
Aristotle. (1941). Posterior analytics. In R. McKeon (Ed.), The basic works of Aristotle (pp. 110–186). New York: Random House.
Berrios, R., & Lucca, N. (2006). Qualitative methodology in counseling research: recent contributions and challenges for a new century. Journal of Counseling and Development, 84, 174–186.
Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research. Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Los Angeles: Sage.
Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design. Choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Denscombe, M. (2008). Communities of practice: a research paradigm for the mixed methods approach. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 2, 270–283.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2005a). Introduction. The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 1–32). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2005b). Preface. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. ix–xix). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2005c). The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Dooremalen, H., & Borsboom, D. (2010). Metaphors in psychological conceptualization and explanation. In A. Toomela & J. Valsiner (Eds.), Methodological thinking in psychology: 60 years gone astray? Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.
Essex, C., & Smythe, W. E. (1999). Between numbers and notions. A critique of psychological measurement. Theory and Psychology, 9, 739–767.
Fielding, N. (2010). Mixed methods research in the real world. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 13, 127–138.
Flick, U., von Kardoff, E., & Steinke, I. (2004a). What is qualitative research? An introduction to the field. In U. Flick, E. von Kardoff, & I. Steinke (Eds.), A companion to qualitative research (pp. 3–11). Los Angeles: Sage.
Flick, U., von Kardoff, E., & Steinke, I. (Eds.). (2004b). A companion to qualitative research. Los Angeles: Sage.
Gelo, O., Braakmann, D., & Benetka, G. (2008). Quantitative and qualitative research: beyond the debate. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 42, 266–290.
Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 191–215). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Gwyther, G., & Possamai-Inesedy, A. (2009). Methodologies a la carte: an examination of emerging qualitative methodologies in social research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 12, 99–115.
Hall, B., & Howard, K. (2008). A synergistic approach. Conducting mixed methods research with typological and systemic design considerations. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 2, 248–269.
Hegel, G. W. F. (2008). Encyclopedia of the philosophical sciences. Philosophy of mind. (Originally published in 1830). In W. Wallace (Ed.), Georg H. W. Hegel. Philosophy of mind. Translated from the encyclopedia of the philosophical sciences. New York: Cosimo Classics.
Hobhouse, L. T. (1901). Mind in evolution. London: MacMillan and Co.
Hume, D. (1999). An enquiry concerning human understanding. (Originally published in 1748). In T. L. Beauchamp (Ed.), David Hume. An enquiry concerning human understanding. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Johnson, R. B., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Turner, L. A. (2007). Toward a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1, 112–133.
Kirk, G. S., Raven, J. E., & Schofield, M. (2007). The presocratic philosophers. A critical history with a selection of texts (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Koffka, K. (1935). Principles of Gestalt psychology. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Köhler, W. (1959). Gestalt psychology. An introduction to new concepts in modern psychology. New York: Mentor Books.
Lather, P. (2004). This IS your father’s paradigm: government intrusion and the case of qualitative research in education. Qualitative Inquiry, 10, 15–34.
Lewin, K. (1935). A dynamic theory of personality. Selected papers. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Lewin, K. (1997). Frontiers in group dynamics. (Originally published in 1947). In K. Lewin (Ed.), Resolving social conflicts and field theory in social science (pp. 301–336). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Lewin, K. (1999). Cassirer’s philosophy of science and the social sciences. (Originally published in 1949). In M. Gold (Ed.), The complete social scientist: A Kurt Lewin reader (pp. 23–36). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Luria, A. R. (1948). Vosstanovlenije funkcii mozga posle vojennoi travmy. (Restoration of brain functions after war trauma. In Russian). Moscow: Izdatel’stvo Akademii Medicinskih Nauk SSSR.
Mahn, H. (2010). Vygotsky’s methodological approach: A blueprint for the future of psychology. In A. Toomela & J. Valsiner (Eds.), Methodological thinking in psychology: 60 years gone astray? Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.
Michell, J. (2000). Normal science, pathological science and psychometrics. Theory and Psychology, 10, 639–667.
Michell, J. (2010). The quantity/quality interchange: A blind spot on the highway of science. In A. Toomela & J. Valsiner (Eds.), Methodological thinking in psychology: 60 years gone astray? Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.
Pearson, K. (1902). On the systematic fitting of curves to observations and measurements. Biometrika, 1, 265–303.
Pearson, K. (1904). Mathematical contributions to the theory of evolution. XII. On a generalised theory of alternative inheritance, with special reference to Mendel’s laws. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical or Physical Character, 203, 53–86.
Plato. (1997). Cratylus. In J. M. Cooper (Ed.), Plato. Complete works (pp. 101–156). Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.
Poincare, H. (1905). Science and hypothesis. London: Walter Scott Publishing.
Poincare, H. (1914). Science and method. New York: Cosimo.
Popper, K. (1994). Conjectures and refutations. London: Routledge.
Popper, K. (2002). The logic of scientific discovery. (Originally published in German in 1935). London: Routledge.
Rennie, D. L., Watson, K. D., & Monteiro, A. M. (2002). The rise of qualitative research in psychology. Canadian Psychology, 43, 179–189.
Richards, K. (2009). Trends in qualitative research in language teaching since 2009. Language Teaching, 42, 147–180.
Silverman, D. (2007). A very short, fairly interesting and reasonably cheap book about qualitative research. Los Angeles: Sage.
Sohn, D. (1999). Experimental effects. Are they constant or variable across individuals? Theory and Psychology, 9, 625–638.
Spearman, C. (1930). “G” and after–A school to end schools. In C. Murchison (Ed.), Psychologies of 1930 (pp. 339–365). Worcester: Clark University Press.
Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2006). A general typology of research designs featuring mixed methods. Research in the Schools, 13, 12–28.
Thurstone, L. L. (1935). The vectors of mind: Multiple-factor analysis for the isolation of primary traits. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Thurstone, L. L. (1948). Psychological implications of factor analysis. The American Psychologist, 3, 402–408.
Toomela, A. (2007a). Culture of science: strange history of the methodological thinking in psychology. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 41, 6–20.
Toomela, A. (2007b). Unifying psychology: Absolutely necessary, not only useful. In A. V. B. Bastos & N. M. D. Rocha (Eds.), Psicologia: Novas direcoes no dialogo com outros campos de saber (pp. 449–464). Sao Paulo: Casa do Psicologo.
Toomela, A. (2008a). Kurt Lewin’s contribution to the methodology of psychology: From past to future skipping the present. In J. Clegg (Ed.), The observation of human systems. Lessons from the History of Anti-Reductionistic Empirical Psychology (pp. 101–116). New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.
Toomela, A. (2008b). Variables in psychology: a critique of quantitative psychology. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 42, 245–265.
Toomela, A. (2009). How methodology became a toolbox - and how it escapes from that box. In J. Valsiner, P. Molenaar, M. Lyra, & N. Chaudhary (Eds.), Dynamic process methodology in the social and developmental sciences (pp. 45–66). New York: Springer.
Toomela, A. (2010a). Biological roots of foresight and mental time travel. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 44, 97–125.
Toomela, A. (2010b). Methodology of idiographic science: Limits of single-case studies and the role of typology. In S. Salvatore, J. Valsiner, A. Gennaro, & J. B. Simon Travers (Eds.), Yearbook of idiographic science (Vol. 2). Rome: Firera & Liuzzo Group.
Toomela, A. (2010c). Modern mainstream psychology is the best? Noncumulative, historically blind, fragmented, atheoretical. In A. Toomela & J. Valsiner (Eds.), Methodological thinking in psychology: 60 years gone astray? (pp. 1–26). Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.
Toomela, A. (2010d). Poverty of modern mainstream psychology in autobiography. Reflections on A History of Psychology in Autobiography, vol IX. Culture and Psychology, 16, 127–144.
Toomela, A. (2010e). Quantitative methods in psychology: Inevitable and useless. Frontiers in Quantitative Psychology and Measurement, 1, 29, 1–14.
Toomela, A. (2010f). Systemic person-oriented approach to child development: Introduction to the study. In A. Toomela (Ed.), Systemic person-oriented study of child development in early primary school (pp. 1–24). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
Toomela, A. (2010g). What is the psyche? The answer depends on the particular epistemology adopted by the scholar. In S. Salvatore, J. Valsiner, A. Gennaro, & J. B. Simon Travers (Eds.), Yearbook of idiographic science (Vol. 2). Rome: Firera & Liuzzo Group.
Toomela, A. (2011). Guesses on the future of cultural psychology: Past, present, and past. In J. Valsiner (Ed.), Oxford handbook of culture and psychology. New York: Oxford University Press (In Press).
Toomela, A., & Valsiner, J. (Eds.). (2010). Methodological thinking in psychology: 60 years gone astray? Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.
Trendler, G. (2009). Measurement theory, psychology and the revolution that cannot happen. Theory and Psychology, 19, 579–599.
Tsvetkova, L. S. (1985). Neiropsikhologicheskaja reabilitatsija bol’nykh. Rech i intellektual’naja dejatel’nost. (Neuropsychological rehabilitation of a sick person. Speech and intellectual activity. In Russian.). Moscow: Izdatel’stvo Moskovskogo Universiteta.
Veresov, N. (2010). Forgotten methodology: Vygotsky’s case. In A. Toomela & J. Valsiner (Eds.), Methodological thinking in psychology: 60 years gone astray? Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1982). Istoricheski smysl psikhologicheskogo krizisa. Metodologicheskoje issledovanije. (Historical meaning of the crisis in psychology. A methodological study. Originally written in 1927; First published in 1982). In A. R. Luria & M. G. Jaroshevskii (Eds.), L. S. Vygotsky. Sobranije sochinenii. Tom 1. Voprosy teorii i istorii psikhologii (pp. 291–436). Moscow: Pedagogika.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1994). The problem of the environment. (Originally published in 1935). In R. van der Veer & J. Valsiner (Eds.), The Vygotsky reader (pp. 338–354). Oxford: Blackwell.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1996). Myshlenije i rech. (Thinking and speech. Originally published in 1934). Moscow: Labirint.
Vygotsky, L. S., & Luria, A. (1994). Tool and symbol in child development. (Originally written in 1930). In R. van der Veer & J. Valsiner (Eds.), The Vygotsky reader (pp. 99–174). Oxford: Blackwell.
Yamazaki, H., Slingsby, B. T., Takahashi, M., Hayashi, Y., Sugimori, H., & Nakayama, T. (2009). Characteristics of qualitative studies in influential journals of general medicine: a critical review. BioScience Trends, 3, 202–209.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the Estonian Science Foundation Grant No. 7490.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Toomela, A. Travel Into a Fairy Land: A Critique of Modern Qualitative and Mixed Methods Psychologies. Integr. psych. behav. 45, 21–47 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-010-9152-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-010-9152-5