Abstract
This essay proposes to contribute with a continuing discussion on Grossen’s paper (2010) establishing a link between the analysis of interactions and dialogical perspective using what I call simplication-for-approaching-complexity (SFAC). This approach conceives of dialogical dynamics as a dynamic system of relationship that construct patterns. Moreover, these emergent patterns allow inferring the features of dialogical partners as relational agencies. The specific characteristics of the relational agency at any moment in dialogue can be inferred from the analysis of the specific pattern of order achieved by the historical development of dialogue. This proposal is illustrated by the analysis of mother-infant interactions.
References
Bakhtin, M. (1981). Discourse in the novel (C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Trans). In M. Holquist (Ed.), The dialogical imagination: four essays by M.M. Bakhtin (pp. 259–422 ). Austin: University of Texas Press. (Original work published 1935).
Bakhtin, M. (1986). Speech genre and other late essays (C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Trans). Austin: University of Texas Press. (Original work published 1953).
Fogel, A., Garvey, A., Hsu, H., & West-Stroming, D. (2006). Change processes in relationships: A relational-historical research approach. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Grossen, M. (2010). Interaction analysis and psychology: A dialogical perspective. IPBS: Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science, 44, 1–22. doi:10.1007/s12124-009-9108-9.
Lauro-Grotto, R., Salvatore, S., Gennaro A. & Gelo, O. (2009). The unbearable dynamicity of psychological processes: Highlights of psychodynamic theories. In J.Valsiner, P. C.M. Molenaar, M.C.D.P.Lyra & N. Chaudhary, Dynamic process methodology in the social and developmental sciences. New York: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-95922-1_1.
Lewis, M. D. (2000). The promise of dynamic systems approaches for an integrated account of human development. Child Development, 71, 36–43. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00116.
Lyra, M. C. D. P. (2007). On abbreviation: Dialogue in early life. International Journal for Dialogical Science, 2 (1), 15–44. Retrieved 4-May-10 from http://ijds.lemoyne.edu/journal/2_1/IJDS.2.1.02.Lyra.html
Lyra, M. C. D. P., & Bertau, M.-C. (2008). Dialogical practices as basis for self. Studia Psychologica, 8, 173–193.
Lyra, M.C.D.P., & Winegar, L. T. (1997). Processual dynamics of interactions through time: Adult-child interactions and process of development. In A. Fogel, M. C. D. P. Lyra, & J. Valsiner (Eds.), Dynamics and indeterminism in developmental and social processes (pp. 93–109). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum/.
Marková, I. (2003). Dialogicality and social representations. The dynamics of mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Marková, I. (2006). On “the inner alter” in dialogue. International Journal for Dialogical Science, 1(1), 125–147.
Maturana, H. R., & Varela, F. J. (1980). Autopoesis and cognition: The realization of the living. Dodordrecht: Reidel Publishing Company.
Rommetveit, R. (1990). On axiomatic features of a dialogical approach to language and mind. In Marková, I. & Foppa, K. (Eds.) The dynamics of dialogue. New York:/London: Harvester Wheatsheat, p. 83–104.
Valsiner, J. (2006). Developmental epistemology and implications for methodology. In W. Damon & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology. Theoretical models of human development (pp. 166–209). Haboken: John Wiley and Sons.
Van Geert, P. (2003). Dynamic systems approaches and modeling of developmental processes. In J. Valsiner & K. Connolly (Eds.), Handbook of Developmental Psychology (pp. 640–672). London: Sage.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lyra, M.C.D.P. On Interaction Analysis and Dialogical Perspective: Emergent Patterns of Order and Relational Agency. Integr. psych. behav. 44, 273–280 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-010-9130-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-010-9130-y