Abstract
The psychological basis of homophobia (Madureira, Integr Psych Behav, 2007, doi:10.1007/s12124-007-9024-9) analyzes the relationships between sexuality, gender, culture and power as they relate to the phenomena of homophobia. Two theoretical models, the Semiotic Regulatory System and the two processes of Heimweh and Fernweh, are employed to demonstrate the embodiment of homophobic prejudices internalized through affective meaning making processes. These models are integrated in a self-organizational approach to describe in more detail top-to-bottom and bottom-to-top processes, which embody homophobic prejudices with sexual orientations and a sense of identity. The same case proposed by Madureira is chosen to be reinterpreted, and clarify the new distinctions that could be part of strategies of intervention against homophobia.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Internalization is the process of analysis of externally existing semiotic materials and their synthesis in the novel form in the intrapsychological domain.
Externalization is the process of analysis of intrapsychologically existing (subjective) personal–cultural materials during their transposition from inside to outside of the person, and the modification of the external environment as a form of new synthesis of these materials.
“the meaning-making processes: (a) express the unit of cognition and affect; (b) relate to the flow of personal experiences; (c) the internal relational have to be in tension {A and non-A} to be transformed” p. 25.
See example p. 25–27.
See example of p. 32 for a more clear understanding of how this theory is being used.
“Although, sometimes, I have had the desire to tell, I thought it would be better not to… you do not know how the person will react, you will endanger one friendship for millions of years through one a small detail or another small detail, I think it is not important”.
“If there is a necessity, I will tell, but if there is not, I think I will not… there is no motive. I do not feel pressure from them related to a girlfriend, for example. So there is no need to tell”.
For instance the achievement of a fourth order of consciousness according to Kegan.
References
Bakhtin, M. (1981). The dialogic imagination (M. Holquist, Ed; C. Emerson & M. Holquist Trans). Austin: University of Texas Press.
Bosma, H. A., & Kunnen, E. S. (2001). Determinants and mechanisms in ego identity development: A review and synthesis. Developmental Review, 21, 39–66.
Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity: Youth, and crisis. New York: Norton.
Fogel, A. (2001). A relational perspective on the development of self and emotion. In H. A. Bosma & E. S. Cuneen (Eds.), Identity and emotion (pp. 93–114). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. New York: Prentice Hall.
Hermans, H. J. M. (2001). The dialogical self: Towards a theory of personal and cultural positioning. Culture & Psychology, 7(3), 243–282.
Huckabay, M. A. (1996). Lesbian identity and the context of shame. In R. G. Lee & G. Wheeler (Eds.), The voice of shame: Silence and connection in psychotherapy (pp. 143–176). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
Iborra, A. (2005). Beyond identity and ideology: Processes of transcendence associated with the experience of conversion. Culture & Psychology, 11, 89–100.
Karen, R. (1992). Shame. Atlantic Monthly, 269, 40–70.
Kegan, R. (1994). In over our heads. The mental demands of modern life. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
Kunnen, E. S., Bosma, H. A., Van Halen, C. P., & Van der Meulen, M. (2001). A self-organizational approach to identity and emotions: An overview and implications. In H. Bosma & S. Kunnen (Eds.), Identity and emotion:Development through self-organization (pp. 202–230). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Madureira, A. F. (2007). The psychological basis of homophobia: Cultural construction of a barrier. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, doi:10.1007/s12124-007-9024-9.
Margolies, L., Becker, M., & Jackson-Brewer, K. (1987). Internalized homophobia: Identifying and treating the oppressor within. In Boston Lesbian Psychologies Collective (Ed.), Lesbian psychologies. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
McWhirter, J. (1998). Re-modelling NLP, Part 1—Models and modelling. Rapport (43). Retrieved from: http://www.sensorysystems.co.uk/RemodellingNLPPart1.pdf.
McWhirter, J. (2000). Re-modelling NLP, Part 6—Understanding change. Rapport (48). Retrieved from: http://www.sensorysystems.co.uk/RemodellingNLPPart6%20.pdf.
McWhirter, J. (2002). Re-modelling NLP, Part 12B—Hypnotic inductions and hypnotherapy. Rapport (55). Retrieved from: http://www.sensorysystems.co.uk/RemodellingNLPPart12PartB.pdf.
Phelan, J. (1993). (Be) Coming out: Lesbian identity and politics. Sings, 18(4), 765–791.
Plummer, K. (1995). Telling sexual stories. Power, change and social words. London: Routledge.
Singer, A. (1996). Homosexuality and shame: Clinical meditations on the cultural violation of self. In R. G. Lee & G. Wheeler (Eds.), The voice of shame: Silence and connection in psychotherapy (pp. 123–142). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
Valsiner, J. (2001). Comparative study of human cultural development. Madrid: Fundación Infancia y Aprendizaje.
Valsiner, J. (2003). Sensuality and sense: Cultural construction of the human nature. Human Affairs 13, 151–162.
Viñuales, O. (2006). Identidades lésbicas (Lesbic identities). Barcelona: Bellaterra.
Acknowledgment
I want to thank Erik la Chapelle for his invaluable corrections of my poor English. I hope that thanks to him my ideas (thought and developed in Spanish language) will be better understood.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Iborra, A. Dealing with Homosexuality in a Homophobic Culture: A Self-Organization Approach. Integr. psych. behav. 41, 285–295 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-007-9030-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-007-9030-y