Abstract
On the level of collective culture, sexuality and sensuality are interpreted as zero signifiers, i.e., areas of human life, which gain their power through being purposefully kept invisible and unverbalized. Explicit transgressions (e.g., curse words) only refer to culturally “illegitimate” forms of sexuality, while the respective figure – in terms of the figure-ground principle – of “legitimate” meaning and feeling fields has to be constructively inferred by the person him- or herself. The present paper gives some examples of personal meaning making in the field of sexuality. For studying the semiotic regulation of sexuality and sensuality on the personal level, microgenetic investigations are proposed. Only they can offer an online access to the powerful process of culturally mediated sign construction and reconstruction.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abbey, E., & Valsiner, J. (2004). Emergence of meanings through ambivalence. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 6(1), Art. 23 (on-line journal). Retrieved from http://www.qualitative-research.net/fqs-texte/1-05/05-1-23-e.htm.
Josephs, I. E., & Valsiner, L. (1998). How does autodialogue work? Miracles of meaning maintenance and circumvention strategies. Social Psychology Quarterly, 61, 68–83.
Ohnuki-Tierney, E. (1993). Rice as self. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Ohnuki-Tierney, E. (1994). The power of absence: Zero signifiers and their transgressions. L’Homme, 34, 59–76.
Sherif, M. (1936). The psychology of social norms. New York: Harper & Brothers.
Valsiner, J. (2000). Culture and human development. London: Sage.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Josephs, I.E. The Semiotic Regulation of Sexuality from a Microgenetic Perspective. Integr. psych. behav. 41, 319–325 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-007-9028-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-007-9028-5