Abstract
Contemporary semiotic approaches in cultural psychology tend to narrow down Peirce’s constellation of signs to symbols, just one besides icons and indexes. Such reduction confuses representation (Darstellung) with presentation (Vorstellung) and ultimately leads to overlooking a proto-symbolic dimension of human experience. In this chapter, I explore the nature and aspects of the originary situation where signs are born: the I-You-It minimal social encounter. In this situation, it becomes apparent that symbols acquire their meaning motivated by the proto-symbolic dimension of sentience. This can be described in semiotic terms by noting that human encounters do not rely exclusively on symbols, but also suppose the permanent participation of icons and indexes. It is only by acknowledging that a true rendition of social symbolic life cannot be given if separated from vitality in human experience that we will reach an integration of what now stands distinguished as sociocultural and psychical processes.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Elsewhere I have argued that this framework of common sense does not work as propositional contents that we know. Instead, we take the framework for granted, i.e., we trust in people (Cornejo, 2013).
- 2.
“Followers of any theoretical system are dangerous. They turn their cherished theory into an orthodoxy--to be followed, rather that developed further. As a result what was a tool for thought becomes an object to cherish. The cherishers become proud of their ardent following of the traditions--they claim to be ‘Vygotskyan’ or ‘Piagetian’ or ‘Skinnerian’--any other variety but being themselves. Some even consider themselves to be ‘Valsinerians’--a step that I observe with mild irony and amusement. I certainly refuse to be ‘Valsinerian’ myself--it would mean that I accept having finished my journey as a traveler in the world of ideas, and become just a follower. The only way I see how to follow Valsiner is not to follow him--and I hope to continue my efforts in that kind of following” (Valsiner, 2017, p. 117; italics in the original).
- 3.
References
Bühler, K. (2011). Theory of language: The representational function of language. John Benjamins. [Originally published in 1934].
Buytendijk, F. J. J. (1958). Mensch und Tier: Ein Beitrag zur vergleichenden Psychologie [Man and animal: A contribution to comparative psychology]. Rowohlt Taschenbuch.
Cornejo, C. (2008). Intersubjectivity as co-phenomenology: From the holism of meaning to the being-in-the-world-with-others. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 42, 171–178.
Cornejo, C. (2013). On trust and distrust in the lifeworld. In P. Linell & I. Marková (Eds.), Dialogical perspectives on trust (pp. 237–256). Information Age Publishers.
Goldstein, K. (1948). Language and language disturbances: Aphasic symptom complexes and their significance for medicine and theory of language. Grune & Stratton.
Graumann, H. M. (1982). Das Verstehen: Versuch einer historisch-kritischen Einleitung in die Phänomenologie des Verstehens [The understanding: sketch of a historical-critical introduction to the phenomenology of the understanding]. In H. Balmer (Ed.), Geschichte der Psychologie, Vol. 1: Geisteswissenschaftliche Grundlagen[History of psychology, vol. 1: Basics from the human sciences] (pp. 135–247). Beltz Verlag.
Habermas, J. (1984). Theory of communicative action, Volume 1: Reason and the rationalization of society. Beacon Press. [Originally published in 1981].
Koch, S. (1981). The nature and limits of psychological knowledge: Lessons of a century qua “science”. American Psychologist, 36, 257–269.
Langer, S. K. (1942). Philosophy in a new key: A study in the symbolism of reason, rite, and art. Harvard University Press.
Lassègue, J., Rosenthal, V., & Visetti, Y.-M. (2009). Économie symbolique et phylogenèse du langage. L’Homme, 192, 67–100.
Lotman, Y. (2005). On the semiosphere. Sign Systems Studies, 33(1), 205–229.
Nagel, T. (1986). The view from nowhere. Oxford University Press.
Peirce, C. S. (1998). The essential Peirce (Vol. 2). Indiana University Press.
Peirce, C. S. (1932a). Division of signs. In C. Hartshorne & P. Weiss (Eds.), Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Vol. 2 Elements of logic (pp. 134–155). Harvard University Press. [Originally published in 1897].
Peirce, C. S. (1932b). The icon, index, and symbol. In C. Hartshorne & P. Weiss (Eds.), Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Vol. 2 Elements of logic (pp. 156–173). Harvard University Press.
Portmann, A. (1953). Das Tier als sozialen Wesen. Rhein-Verlag AG.
Rojas, P. (2021). Reprising craftsmanship: An expressive approach to skill. Springer.
Rorty, R. (Ed.). (1967). The linguistic turn: Essays in philosophical method. The University of Chicago Press.
Rosenthal, V. (2004). Perception comme anticipation: vie perceptive et microgenèse. In R. Sock & B. Vaxelaire (Eds.), L’anticipation à l’horizon du présent (pp. 13–32). Mardaga.
Sellars, W. (1956). Empiricism and the philosophy of mind. In H. Feigl & M. Scriven (Eds.), Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science (Vol. I, pp. 253–329). University of Minnesota Press.
Shanon, B. (1993). The representational and the presentational: An essay on cognition and the study of the mind. Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Taylor, C. (2016). The language animal: The full shape of the human linguistic capacity. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Valsiner, J. (1987). Culture and the development of children’s action. Wiley.
Valsiner, J. (1998). The guided mind. Harvard University Press.
Valsiner, J. (2000). Culture and human development. Sage.
Valsiner, J. (Ed.). (2005). Heinz Werner and developmental science. Springer.
Valsiner, J. (2017). Between self and societies. Tallinn University Press.
Valsiner, J. (2019). Ornamented lives. Information Age Publishers.
Valsiner, J. (2020). Sensuality in human living: The cultural psychology of affect. Springer.
Valsiner, J., & van der Veer, R. (2000). The social mind: Construction of the idea. Cambridge University Press.
van der Veer, R., & Valsiner, J. (Eds.). (1994). The Vygotsky reader. Blackwell.
Vesey, G. N. A. (1956). Seeing and seeing as. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 56(1), 109–124.
Voloshinov, V. N. (1973). Marxism and the philosophy of language. Harvard University Press. [Originally published in 1929].
von Uexküll, J. (1957). A stroll through the worlds of animals and men: A picture book of invisible worlds. In C. H. Schiller (Ed. & tr.), Instinctive behavior: The development of a modern concept (pp. 5–80). International Universities Press. [Originally published in 1934].
Vorderer, P., & Valsiner, J. (1999). (Sozial-)Psychologie und Soziologie – Oder: Das Mikro-Makro-Problem(-Bewußtsein) [(Social) psychology and sociology - Or: (Consciousness of) the micro-macro-problem]. In N. Groeben (Ed.), Zur Programmatik einer sozialwissenschaftlichen Psychologie. Bd. 1: Metatheoretische Perspektiven. 2. Halbband: Theoriehistorie, Praxisrelevanz, Interdisziplinarität, Methodenintegration. [Towards a programmatic view for a cultural psychology, vol. 1: metatheoretical perspectives, 2nd half volume: history of the theories, practical relevance, interdisciplinarity and methodological integration] (pp. 115–149). Aschendorff.
Werner, H., & Kaplan, B. (1963). Symbol formation: An organismic-developmental approach to language and the expression of thought. John Wiley & Sons.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cornejo, C. (2021). A Stroll Through the Birthplace of Signs. In: Wagoner, B., Christensen, B.A., Demuth, C. (eds) Culture as Process. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77892-7_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77892-7_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-77891-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-77892-7
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)