Journal of Labor Research

, Volume 37, Issue 4, pp 412–440 | Cite as

The Effect of Private Sector Work Opportunities in Prison on Labor Market Outcomes of the Formerly Incarcerated

Article
  • 623 Downloads

Abstract

This paper examines the effects of a private-sector prison work program called the Prison Industry Enhancement Certification Program (PIECP) on formal unemployment duration, duration of formal employment, and earnings of men and women released from various state prisons between 1996 and 2001. It also investigates the labor market dynamics of formerly incarcerated men and women. The program is found to increase reported earnings and formal employment on the extensive margin, with a stronger impact on the formal employment of women. There is little evidence that it increases formal employment along the intensive margin (i.e., duration of formal employment). Contrary to segmented labor market theories, superior employment (i.e., higher-paying jobs) does not lead to increased job stability. Roughly 92 % of individuals who obtained formal employment in the sample experienced job loss; however, reincarceration rates are too low to explain this fact. An evaluation of labor market dynamics reveals that traditional human capital variables, criminogenic factors, and a few demographic characteristics determine job loss. In addition, black women, single women, and women with more extensive criminal histories face greater barriers in the labor market than their male counterparts.

Keywords

Prison labor Incarceration Prisoner reentry Unemployment duration Employment duration Formerly incarcerated Earnings Prison industry enhancement certification program Job training programs 

JEL Classification

J30 J31 J64 J68 K42 K49 

References

  1. Angrist JD, Pischke JS (2009) Mostly harmless econometrics: an empiricist’s companion. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  2. Auerbach BJ (2001) Emerging practices: wage policies and practices for the Prison Industries Enhancement Certification Program (PIECP). Bureau of Justice Assistance, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  3. Bayer P, Hjalmarsson R, Pozen D (2009) Building criminal capital behind bars: peer effects in juvenile corrections. Q J Econ 124(1):105–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bureau of Justice Assistance (1999) Prison industry enhancement certification program guideline (RIN 1121–AA36). Fed Regist 64(66):17000–17014Google Scholar
  5. Bureau of Justice Assistance (2004) Prison industry enhancement certification program (NCJ 203483). U.S. Department of Justice. http://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/bja/203483.pdf.
  6. Bushway S, Reuter P (2002) Labor markets and crime risk factors. In: Farrington DP, McKenzie DL, Sherman L, Welsh BC (eds) Evidenced-based crime prevention. Routledge, London, pp 198–240Google Scholar
  7. Bushway SD, Stoll MA, Weiman D (eds) (2007) Barriers to reentry? the labor market for released prisoners in post-industrial America. Russell Sage, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. Cain GG (1976) The challenge of segmented labor market theories to orthodox theory: a survey. J Econ Lit 14(4):1215–1257Google Scholar
  9. Cameron AC, Trivedi PK (2005) Microeconometrics: methods and applications. Cambridge University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Card D, Chetty R, Feldstein M, Saez E (2010) Expanding access to administrative data for research in the United States. Soc Sci Res Netw. doi:10.2139/ssrn.1888586 Google Scholar
  11. Carson EA (2015) Prisoners in 2014 (NCJ 248955). U.S. Department of Justice. http://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/p14.pdf
  12. Cox R (2009) An economic analysis of prison labor (doctoral dissertation). Economics Dissertations. http://works.bepress.com/robynn_cox/1
  13. Cox R (2010) Crime, incarceration, and employment in light of the great recession. Rev Black Polit Econ 37(3–4):283–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cox R (2012) The impact of mass incarceration on the lives of African American women. Rev Black Polit Econ 39(2):203–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cox R (2015) The effect of private sector work opportunities in prison on labor market outcomes of the formerly incarcerated (Working Paper No. 2015–014). USC Center for Economic and Social Research and Schaeffer Center for Health Policy and Economics. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2628780
  16. Gallagher DJ, Edwards ME (1997) Prison industries and the private sector. Atl Econ J 25(1):91–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gould ED, Weinberg BA, Mustard DB (2002) Crime rates and local labor market opportunities in the United States: 1979–1997. Rev Econ Stat 84(1):45–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Grubb F (2001) The market evaluation of criminality: evidence from the auction of British convict labor in America, 1767–1775. Am Econ Rev 91(1):295–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Heckman JJ, Hotz VJ (1989) Choosing among alternative nonexperimental methods for estimating the impact of social programs: the case of manpower training. J Am Stat Assoc 84(408):862–874CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Heckman JJ, Stixrud J, Urzua S (2006) The effects of cognitive and noncognitive abilities on labor market outcomes and social behavior. J Labor Econ 24(3):411–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Holzer HJ (2007) Collateral costs: the effects of incarceration on the employment and earnings of young workers. Institute for the Study of Labor, BonnGoogle Scholar
  22. Holzer HJ, Raphael S, Stoll MA (2004) How willing are employers to hire ex-offenders? Focus 23(2):40–43Google Scholar
  23. Hughes TA, Wilson DJ (2003) Reentry trends in the United States. U.S. Department of Justice. http://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/reentry.pdf
  24. Imben, G, Rubin D (2012) Causal inference in statistics and social sciences (unpublished manuscript)Google Scholar
  25. Imbens G (2013) Lectures on evaluation methods. Lecture resented at the 2013 main causal inference workshop. Northwestern University, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  26. Jung H (2011) Increase in the length of incarceration and the subsequent labor market outcomes: evidence from men released from Illinois state prisons. J Policy Anal Manage 30(3):499–533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lalonde RJ, Cho RM (2008) The impact of incarceration in state prison on the employment prospects of women. J Quant Criminol 24(3):243–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Langan PA, Levin DJ (2002) Recidivism of prisoners released in 1994 (NCJ 193427). U.S. Department of Justice. http://bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov/content/pub/pdf/rpr94.pdf
  29. Machin S, Meghir C (2004) Crime and economic incentives. J Hum Resour 39(4):958–979CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Maltz MD (2001) Recidivism. Academic Press, Orlando. http://www.uic.edu/depts/lib/forr/pdf/crimjust/recidivism.pdf
  31. Mocan HN, Billups SC, Overland J (2005) A dynamic model of differential human capital and criminal activity. Economica 72(288):655–681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Myers SL Jr (1983) Estimating the economic model of crime: employment versus punishment effects. Q J Econ 98(1):157–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pencavel J (1986) Labor supply of men: a survey. In: Layard R (ed) Handbook of labor economics, vol 1. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, pp 3–102Google Scholar
  34. Pettit B, Lyons CJ (2007) Status and the stigma of incarceration: the labor-market effects of incarceration, by race, class, and criminal involvement. In: Bushway SD, Stoll MA, Weiman D (eds) Barriers to reentry? The labor market for released prisoners in post-industrial America. Russell Sage, New York, pp 203–226Google Scholar
  35. Piehl A (2003) Crime, work, and reentry. Paper presented at the Urban Institute Reentry Roundtable. New York University Law School. http://www.urban.org/UploadedPDF/410856_Piehl.pdf
  36. Piehl A (2009) Preparing prisoners for employment: the power of small rewards (Civic Report No. 57). Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  37. Raphael S, Winter‐Ebmer R (2001) Identifying the effect of unemployment on crime. J Law Econ 44(1):259–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Roman CG, Travis J (2006) Where will I sleep tomorrow? Housing, homelessness, and the returning prisoner. Hous Policy Debate 17(2):389–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Saylor WG, Gaes GG (1997) Training inmates through industrial work participation and vocational and apprenticeship instruction. Correct Manag Q 1(2):32–43Google Scholar
  40. Schmidt P, Witte AD (1984) An economic analysis of crime and justice. Academic, OrlandoGoogle Scholar
  41. Smith CJ (2009) National Evaluation of Prison Industry Enhancement Certification Program (PIECP), 1996–2003 [United States]. ICPSR20740-v1. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]Google Scholar
  42. Smith CJ, Bechtel J, Patrick A, Smith RR, Wilson-Gentry L (2006) Correctional industries preparing inmates for re-entry: recidivism & post-release employment. U.S. Department of Justice. http://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/214608.pdf
  43. Tyler JH, Kling JR (2007) Prison-based education and re-entry into the mainstream labor market. In: Bushway SD, Stoll MA, Weiman D (eds) Barriers to reentry? The labor market for released prisoners in post-industrial America. Russell Sage, New York, pp 227–256Google Scholar
  44. Uggen C (2000) Work as a turning point in the life course of criminals: a duration model of age, employment, and recidivism. Am Sociol Rev 65(4):529–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Waldfogel J (1994) The effect of criminal conviction on income and the trust “reposed in the workmen.”. J Hum Resour 29(1):62–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. West HC, Sabol WJ (2008) Prisoners in 2007 (NCJ 224280). U.S. Department of Justice. http://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/p07.pdf
  47. Western B, Kling JR, Weiman DF (2001) The labor market consequences of incarceration. Crime Delinq 47(3):410–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wilson DB, Gallagher CA, MacKenzie DL (2000) A meta-analysis of corrections-based education, vocation, and work programs for adult offenders. J Res Crime Delinq 37(4):347–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.USC School of Social WorkLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations