Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Effects of Being Out of the Labor Market on Subsequent Wages: Evidence for Uruguay

  • Published:
Journal of Labor Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Based on administrative data combining workers’ earnings histories and unemployment insurance benefits, we document short and long term wage losses for a large sample of Uruguayan formal workers with high tenure. The contribution of this paper is to provide original evidence about job separation costs in a developing country, based on a unique array of social security and unemployment insurance administrative micro-data. Our main findings indicate that workers lose around 38 % of their previous wages in the first quarter after separation, and 1 year after, losses are still more than 14 %. If we consider earnings plus unemployment insurance benefits, losses at the quarter of separation are considerable lower, amounting 22 % of previous wages. We also provide original evidence about how wage losses vary across age groups, gender, industry and size of the firm. Differences between switchers and non switchers, as well as the effects of the economic cycle are also analyzed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Graph 1
Graph 2
Graph 3
Graph 4
Graph 5
Graph 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. This study also finds that more than a third of displaced workers are not employed 2 years later, around 13 % of those who lost a full time job are subsequently holding part-time jobs.

  2. The distribution of our sample by age and sex is very similar to that of formal workers in the household survey, reflecting the representativeness quality of our sample. Comparisons are available upon request.

  3. The unemployment insurance program depends on the Ministry of Labor but is administered by the social security institution, Banco de Previsión Social.

  4. An approach also based on comparison of treatment and control groups was previously used by Ruhm (1991). These estimations consisted of cross sectional regressions for post displacement earnings, and pre displacement earnings were included among the independent variables. The control group included workers displaced at other dates.

  5. Robustness checks for this assumption are carried out.

  6. We report standard errors for estimations at certain points in time in the tables. Standard errors for all estimations presented in the graphs are available upon request.

  7. Young workers are those aged 25 and lower and middle aged include those aged 26 to 55. We did not include any age restriction for older workers (from 56 on).

  8. Results are almost unchanged when switchers are defined at one or three digit ISIC classification.

  9. This is a similar criteria as that used in JLS, although we considered firms with 20 or more workers, whereas in JLS the firm size threshold was 50 workers. This difference is explained by the scarcity of bigger firms in Uruguay. Even with this inferior threshold, the sample size is considerably reduced.

  10. For these estimations, year dummy variables could not be included, and this explains the slower path of recovery of both groups when compared to the general results.

  11. The threshold was set at 0.40, which corresponds to an equal proportion of mass layoffs in both groups, being that proportion 60.2 %.

References

  • Addison J, Portugal P (1989) Job displacement, relative wage changes and duration of unemployment. J Labor Econ 7:281–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Appelqvist J (2007) Wage and earnings losses of displaced workers in Finland. VATT Discussion papers N° 422

  • Bucheli M, Furtado M (2001) Impacto del desempleo sobre el salario: una estimación de la pérdida salarial para Uruguay. Rev Desarro Econ 42, Nº 165

  • Carneiro A, Portugal P (2006) Earnings losses of displaced workers: evidence from a matched employer-employee data set. IZA Discussion Papers 2289

  • Couch K, Placzek D (2010) Earnings losses of displaced workers revisited. Am Econ Rev 100(1):572–589

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Couch K, Jolly N, Placzek D (2009) Earnings losses of older displaced workers. A detailed analysis with administrative data. Res Aging 31(1):17–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Couch K, Jolly N, Placzek D (2011) Earnings losses of displaced workers in the business cycle: an analysis with administrative data. Econ Lett Elsevier 111(1):16–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis S, von Wachter T (2011) Recessions and the cost of job loss. NBER Working Papers 17638, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc

  • Eliason M (2011) Income after job loss: the role of the family and the welfare state. Appl Econ 43(5):603–618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eliason M (2012) Lost jobs, broken marriages. J Popul Econ 25(4):1365–1397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eliason M, Storrie D (2009) Does job loss shorten life? J Hum Resour 44(2):277–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fallick BC (1996) A review of recent empirical literature on displaced workers. Ind Labor Relat Rev 50(1):5–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farber H (2005) What do we know about job loss in the United States? Evidence from the displaced workers survey, 1984–2004. Econ Perspect, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, issue Q II:13–28

  • Galiani S, Sturzenegger F (2005) The impact of privatization on the earnings of restructured workers. Business School Working Papers 05/2006, Universidad Torcuato di Tella

  • Hammermesh D (1989) What do we know about worker displacement in the U.S.? Ind Relat 28:51–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hijzen A, Upward R, Wright P (2010) The income losses of displaced workers. J Hum Resour 45(1):243–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson L, LaLonde R, Sullivan D (1993a) Earnings losses from displaced workers. Am Econ Rev 83:685–709

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson L, LaLonde R, Sullivan D (1993b) The costs of worker dislocation. W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research, Kalamazoo

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan D, Martinez G, Robertson R (2005) What happens to wages after displacement? Econ J Latin Am Caribb Econ Assoc 5(2):197–234

    Google Scholar 

  • Kletzer LG (1989) Returns to seniority after a permanent job loss. Am Econ Rev 79:536–543

    Google Scholar 

  • Kletzer LG (1998) Job displacement. J Econ Perspect 12(1):115–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lockwood B (1991) Information externalities in the labor market and the duration of unemployment. Rev Econ Stud 58(4):733–753

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruhm C (1991) Are workers permanently scarred by job displacements? Am Econ Rev 81(1):319–324

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Watcher T, Sullivan D (2009) Job displacement and mortality: an analysis using administrative data. Q J Econ 124(3):1265–1306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Von Watcher T, Song J, Manchester J (2008) Long term earnings losses due to job separation during the 1982 recession: an analysis using longitudinal administrative data from 1974 to 2004. Discussion papers 0708-16, Columbia University, Department of Economics

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Verónica Amarante.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 7 Distribution of workers by categories
Table 8 Losses for separated workers
Table 9 Losses in crisis and mass layoffs
Table 10 Sensitivity analysis
Graph 7
figure 7

Earnings losses. All separations and (probit estimated) layoffs. Source: authors’ calculations using administrative records from Banco de Previsión Social

Graph 8
figure 8

Earnings losses. All separations and workers with only one job. Source: authors’ calculations using administrative records from Banco de Previsión Social

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Amarante, V., Arim, R. & Dean, A. The Effects of Being Out of the Labor Market on Subsequent Wages: Evidence for Uruguay. J Labor Res 35, 39–62 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12122-013-9171-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12122-013-9171-3

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation