Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The impact of institutional factors on officially reported sexual assaults in prisons

  • Articles
  • Published:
Sexuality and Culture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Not only has research on prison sexual assault been rather scarce the past four decades, but few of these studies have ascertained the number of officially reported inmate-on-inmate sexual assaults. In addiition, no study exists which has rigorously examined which, if any, institutional factors impact the number of officially reported inmate-on-inmate sexual assaults in prisons. Using data from a national sample of 226 prison wardens, this study examines the impact of institutional factors on officially reported sexual assaults. The most salient variables in the study were current number of inmates and wardens’ perceptions of inmate fear of sexual assault. Wardens overseeing institutions with higher numbers of inmates were more likely to report that inmates had been sexually assaulted and those who ran minimum-security prisons were less likely to report sexual assaults within their facilities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Correctional Association. (2000). 2000 Juvenile and Adult Correctional Departments, Institutions, Agencies, and Paroling Authorities Directory. Lanham, MD: American Correctional Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amnesty International (2001). Broken Bodies, Shattered Minds: Torture and Ill-Treatment of Women. London: Amnesty International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amnesty International. (1999). Not Part of my Sentence: Violations of the Human Rights of Women in Custody. New York: Amnesty International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowker, L. (1980). Prison Victimization. New York: Elsevier North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camp, C. & Camp, G. (1998). The Corrections Yearbook, 1998. Middletown, CT: Criminal Justice Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, A. (1968). Sexual Assaults in the Philadelphia Prison System and Sheriff’s Vans. Trans-Action, 8–16.

  • Fuller, D. & Orsagh, T. (1977). “Violence and Victimization within a State Prison System. Criminal Justice Review, 2(2), 35–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hensley, C. (ed.). (2002). Prison Sex: Practice and Policy. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hensley, C., Castle, T., & Tewksbury, R. (2003). Inmate-to-Inmate Sexual Coercion in a Prison for Women. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 37(2), 67–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hensley, C., Tewksbury, R., & Castle, T. (2003). “Characteristics of Prison Sexual Assault Targets in Male Oklahoma Correctional Facilities.” Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 18(6), 595–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Human Rights Watch. (2001). United States: No Escape, Male Rape in U.S. Prisons. Online. Available at: http://www.hrw.org/reports/2001/prison/report1.html.

  • Human Rights Watch. (1996). All Too Familiar: Sexual Abuse of Women in U.S. State Prisons. New York: Human Rights Watch.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehrer, E. (2002). No Joke: Prison Rape is, Finally Taken Seriously. On-line. Available at: http://www.nationalreview.com/comment/commentlehrer062002asp.

  • Lockwood, D. (1980). Prison Sexual Violence. New York: Elsevier Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nacci, P. & Kane, T. (1984b). Inmate Sexual Aggression: Some Evolving Propositions, Empirical Findings, and Mitigating Counter-Forces. Journal of Offender Counseling, Services, and Rehabilitation, 9 (1/2), 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nacci, P. & Kane, T. (1984a). Sex and Sexual Aggression in Federal Prisons: Inmate Involvement and Employee Impact. Federal Probation, 48(1), 46–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nacci, P. & Kane, T. (1983). The Incidence of Sex and Sexual Aggression in Federal Prisons. Federal Probation, 47(4), 31–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saum, C., Surratt, H., Inciardi, J., & Bennett, R. (1995). Sex in Prison: Exploring the Myths and Realities. The Prison Journal, 75(4), 413–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stemple, L. (2002). Stop Prison Rape Accuses FBI of Ignoring Male Rape Victims in New Crime Report. Online. Available at: http://www.spr.org.

  • Stop Prison Rape. (2001). Wolf-Scott Prison Rape Reform Act of 2001. Online. Available at: http://www.spr.org.

  • Struckman-Johnson, C. & Struckman-Johnson, D. (2002). Sexual Coercion Reported by Women in Three Midwestern Prisons. The Journal of Sex Research, 39(3), 217–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Struckman-Johnson, C. & Struckman-Johnson, D. (2000). Sexual coercion rates in seven Midwestern prison facilities for men. The Prison Journal, 80(4), 379–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Struckman-Johnson, C., Struckman-Johnson, D., Rucker, L., Bumby, K., & Donaldson, S. (1996). Sexual coercion reported by men and women in prison. The Journal of Sex Research, 33(1), 67–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wooden, W. & Parker, J. (1982). Men Behind Bars: Sexual Exploitation in Prison. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hensley, C., Koscheski, M. & Tewksbury, R. The impact of institutional factors on officially reported sexual assaults in prisons. Sex Cult 7, 16–26 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-003-1016-4

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-003-1016-4

Keywords

Navigation