Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Dollar Cycle of International Development, 1973–2017

  • Published:
Studies in Comparative International Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 09 December 2021

This article has been updated

Abstract

Since the 1970s, developing countries across the world have collectively experienced a series of economic upswings and downturns. Existing theories of international development, which mostly focus on country-specific factors that facilitate or hinder growth, cannot explain this across-the-board cycle. We argue that the cycle is driven by changes in the global supply of the US dollar, the default currency of transaction and foreign exchange reserves in the world economy. Based on a time-series—cross-section analysis with fixed effects on 170 developing countries from 1973 to 2017, we find that an increase in the global dollar supply brings lower borrowing costs and greater availability of external financial resources, enabling higher growth rates in the developing world. Conversely, a contraction in the global dollar supply increases borrowing costs and dries up financial resources, slowing down growth in developing countries. The vagaries of the dollar supply, determined largely by the domestic political economy of the USA, have formed the context for international development contributing to the “golden age of development” in the 1970s, the international debt crisis of the 1980s, the Asian Financial Crisis of 1997–1998, and the beginning and end of rapid growth in the 2000s, among others.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Source: Bank of International Settlements Triannual Survey

Fig. 4

Source: IMF COFER

Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

Notes

  1. For developing countries that succeeded in becoming wealthy, we do not include the time periods after they firmly attained high-income status in our dataset. We consider a former middle-income country to have firmly attained high-income status when it retained its high-income status until 2017. There are cases where a developing country briefly attained high-income status but then slid back to its former state. In these cases, we still include in our dataset the period when the country held high income status, though it was lost later.

  2. Inverse hyperbolic sine is defined by the equation: arsinh x = ln (x + √(x2 + 1)).

  3. As Kentor and Boswell (2003) show, the concentration of trading partners and trading sectors is significant in shaping development. But as these variables mainly show cross-country variation and do not vary a lot over time, they should be absorbed by the fixed effect intercept already in the model.

  4. This is corroborated by the bureaucratic quality index and statehistn05, which many social scientists use to measure state capacity. Data for these two indicators show much variation across countries but little variation over time. We attempted to incorporate these variables in our model, but as expected, their effects were absorbed in the fixed effect intercepts.

References

  • Acherton M. “Why the weak dollar is good for emerging markets’ funds.” Sunday Times, August 22, 2020. 2020

  • Amsden AH. Asia’s next giant: South Korea and late industrialization. New York: Oxford University Press; 1992.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Amsden Alice H. Why isn’t the whole world experimenting with the East Asian model to Develop?: Review of the East Asian miracle. World Development. 1994;22(4):627–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aneshensel CS. Theory-based data analysis for the social sciences. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2002.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Arrighi G. The long twentieth century: money, power, and the origins of our times. New York: Verso; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck Nathaniel, Katz Jonathan N. What to do (and not to do) with time-series cross-section data. American Political Science Review. 1995;89(3):634–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernanke, Ben S, Harold J. “The gold standard, deflation, and financial crisis in the Great Depression: an international comparison.” In Financial Markets and Financial Crises, edited by R. Glenn Hubbard, 1991;33–68. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • Bernanke Ben S, Blinder Alan S. Credit, money, and aggregate demand. The American Economic Review. 1988;78(2):435–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binder, Sarah. The federal reserve as a ‘political’ institution. Bulletin of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences. 2016; Vol. LXVIX, No. 3 (Spring 2016): 47–49.

  • Binder S, Spindel M. The myth of independence: how congress governs the federal reserve. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2017.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Block F. The origins of international economic disorder: a study of United States international monetary policy from World War II to the present. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boz E, Gita G, Plagborg-Møller M. “Global trade and the dollar.” NBER Working Paper 23988, National Bureau of Economic Research, November. 2017. https://doi.org/10.3386/w23988.

  • Boz Emine, Tesar Linda. The global financial cycle. IMF Economic Review. 2019;67(1):1–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cafiso, Gianluca. GDP growth, private debt and monetary policy.” CESifo Working Paper Series No. 6500, Munich Society for the Promotion of Economic Research, June 6.  2017. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2990902. Accessed 16 Oct 2021.

  • Cardoso FH, Faletto E. Dependency and development in Latin America. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1979.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Carrasco Enrique R. The 1980’s: the debt crisis and the lost decade of development. Transnational Law & Contemporary Problems. 1999;9(1):119–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chase-Dunn Christopher. The effects of international economic dependence on development and inequality: a cross-national study. American Sociological Review. 1975;40(6):720–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chase-Dunn, Christopher. 1998. Global formations: structures of the world economy. Lantham: Roman and Littlefield.

  • Chen K, Patrick H, Waggoner DF, Tao Z. “Impacts of monetary stimulus on credit allocation and the macroeconomy: evidence from China.” NBER Working Paper 22650, National Bureau of Economic Research, 2016. https://doi.org/10.3386/w22650.

  • Chow Julian T, Florence J, Seok-gil P, Zhang YS. “Spillovers from dollar appreciation.” IMF Policy Discussion Paper, International Monetary Fund, 2015; 27. https://doi.org/10.5089/9781475541427.062.

  • Christiano LJ, Eichenbaum M, Evans CL. Monetary policy shocks: what have we learned and to what end? In: Taylor JB, Woodford M, editors. Handbook of Macroeconomics. Amsterdam: North-Holland; 1999. p. 65–148.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Core Charles. The global recession of 2009 in a long-term development perspective. Journal of International Development. 2010;22(6):714–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon William J, Boswell Terry. Dependency, disarticulation, and denominator effects: another look at foreign capital penetration. American Journal of Sociology. 1996;102(2):543–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dollar David. Outward-oriented developing economies really do grow more rapidly: evidence from 95 LDCs, 1976–1985. Economic Development and Cultural Change. 1992;40(3):523–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Druck, Pablo, Nicolás E. Magud, and Rodrigo Mariscal. Collateral damage: dollar strength and emerging markets’ growth. IMF Working Paper No.15/179, International Monetary Fund, July. 2015. https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2015/wp15179.pdf. Accessed 16 Oct 2021.

  • Eichengreen B. Golden fetters: the gold standard and the Great Depression, 1919–1939. Oxford and NY: Oxford University Press; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eichengreen B. Exorbitant privilege: the rise and fall of the dollar and the future of the international monetary system. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans PB. Embedded autonomy: states and industrial transformation. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Firebaugh G. The new geography of global income inequality. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank AG. Capitalism and underdevelopment in Latin America. New York: Monthly Review Press; 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freiden J. Global capitalism: its fall and rise in the twentieth century. New York: W. W. Norton & Company; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman Milton. A theoretical framework for monetary analysis. Journal of Political Economy. 1970;78(2):193–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman Milton. A monetary theory of nominal income. Journal of Political Economy. 1971;79(2):323–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallup JL, Sachs JD, Mellinger AD. Geography and economic development. Int Reg Sci Rev. 1999;22(2):179–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gavin FJ. Ideas, power, and the politics of America’s international monetary policy during the 1960s. In: Kirshner J, editor. Monetary Orders: Ambiguous Economics, Ubiquitous Politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press; 2003. p. 195–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerschenkron A. Economic backwardness in historical perspective: a book of essays. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press; 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goertz G, Mahoney J. A tale of two cultures: qualitative and quantitative research in the social sciences. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2012.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gowan P. The global gamble: Washington’s Faustian bid for world dominance. New York: Verso; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton EJ. American treasure and the rise of capitalism (1500–1700). Economica. 1929;27(November):338–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey DI, Kellard NM, Madsen JB, Wohar ME. Long-run commodity prices, economic growth, and interest rates: 17th century to the present day. World Dev. 2017;89(January):57–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hicks Raymond, Tingley Dustin. Causal mediation analysis. The Stata Journal. 2011;11(4):605–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey Thomas. The quantity theory of money: its historical evolution and role in policy debates. FRB Richmond Economic Review. 1974;60:2–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hung Ho-fung, Kucinskas Jaime. Globalization and global inequality: assessing the impact of the rise of China and India, 1980–2005. American Journal of Sociology. 2011;116(5):1478–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hung Ho-fung, Thompson Daniel. Money supply, class power, and inflation: monetarism reassessed. American Sociological Review. 2016;81(3):447–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hur Jung, Park Cheolbeom. Do free trade agreements increase economic growth of the member countries? World Development. 2012;40(7):1283–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jordà Òscar, Schularick Moritz, Taylor Alan M, Ward Felix. Global financial cycles and risk premiums. IMF Economic Review. 2019;67(1):109–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jomo KS. Development in Southeast Asia: myths and realities. In: Jomo KS, editor. Southeast Asian Paper Tigers? Abingdon: Routledge; 2003. p. 191–213.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kenny Charles. Best. Decade. Ever. The first 10 years of the 21st century were humanity’s finest - even for the world’s bottom billion. Foreign Policy. 2010;9:2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenny C. Getting better: why global development is succeeding—and how we can improve the world even more. New York: Basic Books; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kentor Jeffrey, Boswell Terry. Foreign capital dependence and development: a new direction. American Sociological Review. 2003;68(2):301–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maynard K. 1930. A treatise on money vol. 2: applied theory of money. London: Macmillan.

  • Keynes M. The general theory of employment, interest, and money. New York: Harcourt Brace & Company; 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krause George A. Federal reserve policy decision making: political and bureaucratic influences. American Journal of Political Science. 1994;38(1):124–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann H. The Polish growth miracle: outcome of persistent reform efforts.” IZA Policy Paper No. 40, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), April. 2012. http://ftp.iza.org/pp40.pdf. Accessed 16 Oct 2021

  • Leith CJ. Why Botswana prospered. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lobell David B, Field Christopher B. Global scale climate–crop yield relationships and the impacts of recent warming. Environmental Research Letters. 2007;2(1):1–7. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/2/1/014002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzetti Laura. End of an era as the Fed ends its huge bond-buying program. Fortune. 2014;29:2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon David P, Fairchild Amanda J, Fritz Matthew S. Mediation analysis. Annual Review of Psychology. 2007;58(1):593–614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKinnon RI. The unloved dollar standard: from Bretton Woods to the rise of China. New York: Oxford University Press; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milanovic Branko. the two faces of globalization: against globalization as we know it. World Development. 2003;31(4):667–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milanovic B. Worlds apart: measuring international and global inequality. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Obstfeld M, Rogoff K. Global imbalances and the financial crisis: products of common causes. Prepared for The Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco Asia Economic Policy Conference, Santa Barbara, CA, 2009; October 18–20. https://eml.berkeley.edu/~obstfeld/santabarbara.pdf. Accessed 16 Oct 2021.

  • Ocampo JA, Parra MA. The dual divergence: growth successes and collapses in the developing world since 1980. DESA Working Paper No. 24, United Nations, Department of Economics and Social Affairs, 2006; June 1. https://www.un.org/esa/desa/papers/2006/wp24_2006.pdf. Accessed 16 Oct 2021.

  • Panitch L, Gindin S. The making of global capitalism: the political economy of American empire. New York: Verso; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patel Surendra J. In tribute to the golden age of the South’s development. World Development. 1992;20(5):767–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Posen AS. 2008. Why the euro will not rival the dollar. International Finance. 2008;11(1): 75–100.

  • Pozsar Z 2011. Institutional cash pools and the Triffin dilemma of the US banking system. IMF Working Paper No. 11/190, International Monetary Fund, August 1. http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/cat/longres.aspx?sk=25155.0. Accessed 16 Oct 2021.

  • Prasad ES. The dollar trap: how the US dollar tightened its grip on global finance. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radelet S, Sachs JD, Cooper RN, Bosworth BP. The East Asian financial crisis: diagnosis, remedies, prospects. Brook Pap Econ Act. 1998;1998(1):1–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ray Deepak K, Gerber James S, MacDonald Graham K, West Paul C. Climate variation explains a third of global crop yield variability. Nature Communications. 2015;6(5989):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms6989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rostow WW. (1960) 1991. The stages of economic growth: a non-communist manifesto New York: Cambridge University Press.

  • Schulmeister Stephan. Globalization without global money: the double role of the dollar as national currency and world currency. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics. 2000;22(3 Spring):365–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Setser B 2020. Addressing the global dollar shortage: more swap lines? A New Fed Repo Facility for Central Banks? More IMF Lending? Council on Foreign Relations (blog), March 17. https://www.cfr.org/blog/addressing-global-dollar-shortage-more-swap-lines-new-fed-repo-facility-central-banks-more-imf. Accessed 16 Oct 2021.

  • Spiro DE. The hidden hand of American hegemony: petrodollar recycling and international markets. Ithaca: Cornell University Press; 1999.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stallings B. Global change, regional response: the new international context of development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1995.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Strange S. Sterling and British policy: a political study of an international currency in decline. London: Oxford University Press; 1971a.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strange Susan. The politics of international currencies. World Politics. 1971;23(2):215–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strange S. Germany and the world monetary system. In: Kohl W, Basevi G, editors. West Germany: A European and Global Power. Lexington: Lexington Books; 1980. p. 45–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wade R. Governing the market: economic theory and the role of government in East Asian industrialization. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1990.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wallerstein IM. World-systems analysis: an introduction. Durham: Duke University Press; 2004.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, Andrea. 2016 .“The untold story behind Saudi Arabia’s 41-year US debt secret.” Bloomberg. May 30, 2016.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the participants of the Institute of Sociology Colloquium at Taiwan’s Academia Sinica and UCLA’s Theory and Research in Comparative Social Analysis seminar for their comments on different versions of the paper. We also thank Julia Burdick-Will, the editors of SCID, and the anonymous reviewers for their suggestions. They are not responsible for any mistakes herein.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ho-fung Hung.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The original version of this article was revised due to the mismatch of the HTML and PDF versions of Table 2 and Table 3.

Appendix

Appendix

Fig. 7
figure 7figure 7figure 7figure 7

Scatter plots and fitted line plots of USD index and GDP per capita growth rate for selected countries, 1973–2017

Fig. 8
figure 8

Residual plots of regression models 2–5

Table 4 List of countries included in the analysis
Table 5 Descriptive statistics
Table 6 Correlation between independent variables and intervening variables
Table 7 Causal mediation analysis on intervening variables

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hung, Hf., Liu, M. The Dollar Cycle of International Development, 1973–2017. St Comp Int Dev 57, 1–35 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12116-021-09346-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12116-021-09346-5

Keywords

Navigation