Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Missing the Revolution Beneath Their Feet: The Significance of the Slave Revolution of the Civil War to the Black Power Movement in the USA

  • ARTICLES
  • Published:
Journal of African American Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

At the outset of the Black Power Movement (BPM), Malcolm X called for both a black political and cultural revolution; however, he never developed his thesis on the latter and did not adequately explain the relationship between the two. Like many BPM revolutionists, he drew on cases of revolutions from abroad which were ill-fitted to the peculiar history and contemporary challenges of black America. W.E.B. Du Bois (1935) historicized a black political revolution in the USA in his Black Reconstruction, and Alain Locke theorized cultural revolution in the USA a decade later; thus, prior to the BPM, theses on black political and cultural revolution in the USA were available to BPM revolutionists, but they were ignored. They suggested the salience of the Slave Revolution in the Civil War as an exemplar of subsequent black revolutions in the USA. In this essay, I examine Du Bois’ and Locke’s arguments and their relevance to the BPM, focusing less on the revolutionary theory the BPM adopted and more on this one it neglected.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Marx’s, Weber’s, and Polanyi’s are the most popular articulations of economic revolution.

  2. On revolutionary theory in the BPM, see Bracey et al. (1970), Van Deburg (1992).

  3. In his last days, Malcolm did not distance himself from black nationalism but revised and reconciled his black nationalism with his revolutionary thesis that drew from it (Henderson 2012).

  4. On this point, Moses converges with Stuckey (1987) and Franklin (1992), but there are important divergences, as well. Most notably, Stuckey viewed black nationalism arising from “slave culture”—a pan-Africanist amalgam of African cultures whose remnants were manifest in folk customs and retentions that ultimately were given African American institutional forms, and these customs provided the bedrock of African American culture, which provided the foundation of black national consciousness. Franklin insists that black national consciousness was reinforced by the commonality of racial oppression and resistance to it, eventuating in a syncretic “Aframerican” culture, which provided a sense of national identity for African Americans. Stuckey’s and Franklin’s perspectives are in contrast with Moses’ view that African American culture derived less from “slave culture” of the South and more from the “high culture” of free black intellectuals in the North situated in prominent black institutions such as the AME Church.

  5. Approximately 186,000 black troops served in the Union Army, and about 10,000 served in the Union Navy. They fought in more than 400 engagements including 40 major battles, and even in the racist context of the time, 16 blacks received the Medal of Honor, the country’s highest military honor.

  6. Sexism in the BPM—as in the CRM, and the White Left—was widespread (Bukhari 2010). Woodard (1999: 123) notes that while Malcolm elevated women to leadership in the OAAU, “no clear pattern of women’s leadership was established for the organizations that claimed Malcolm’s legacy.”

  7. Cruse’s thesis targeted the cultural apparatus—primarily the mass communications media—of the USA, but it inadequately focused on the cultural apparatus of the black community, itself, as a precursor to—or concomitant of—the cultural revolution. This is evident in its inattention to the major black cultural institution, the Black Church, and its ignoring of the major cultural contradiction in black communities, sexism, as a key aspect of the cultural revolution it envisioned. It was also inattentive to substantive cultural demands of black America, such as reparations, which would ramify into the political and economic sphere to augur cultural revolution.

  8. The evolutionary approach focused on developing parallel black institutions (i.e., Afrocentric colleges, churches, businesses/cooperatives) to provide for black national development.

References

  • Alkebulan, P. (2007). Surviving pending revolution. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baraka, A. [LeRoi Jones]. (1963). Blues people. Negro music in white America. New York: William Morrow and Co.

  • Bracey, J., Meier, A., & Rudwick, E. (Eds.). (1970). Black nationalism in America. New York: Bobbs-Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S. (2003). Fighting for US. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buck, C. (2005). Alain Locke: faith & philosophy. Los Angeles: Kalimat Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bukhari, S. (2010). The war before. New York: The Feminist Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruse, H. (1967). The crisis of the negro intellectual. New York: William Morrow & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruse, H. (1968). Rebellion or revolution? New York: William Morrow & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Du Bois, W. E. B. (1961) [1903]. The souls of black folk. New York: Fawcett.

  • Du Bois, W. E. B. (1969) [1935]. Black reconstruction in the United States, 1860–1880. New York: Atheneum.

  • Du Bois, W. E. B. (1985) [1936]. The negro and social reconstruction. In H. Aptheker (Ed.), Against racism (pp. 103–159). Amherst: University of Massachusetts.

  • Fila-Bakabadio, S. (2018). Against the empire: the Black Panthers in Congo, insurgent cosmopolitanism and the fluidity of revolutions. African Identities, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/14725843.2018.1449720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, V. P. (1992). Black self-determination: A cultural history of African-American resistance (2nd ed.). New York: Lawrence Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, N. (1999). Another pragmatism: Alain Locke, critical ‘race’ theory, and the politics of culture. In L. Harris (Ed.), The Critical Pragmatism of Alain Locke (pp. 3–20). Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, L., & Molesworth, C. (2008). Alain L. Locke: the biography of a philosopher. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, E. (2012). The toothless pursuit of a revolutionary’s truth: Marable’s Malcolm X. In H. Boyd et al. (Eds.), By any means necessary (pp. 163–177). Chicago: Third World Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, E. (2015). Slave religion, slave hiring, and the incipient proletarianization of enslaved black labor. Journal of African American Studies, 19(2), 192–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, E. (2017). African realism? Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, E. (2018). Unintended consequences of cosmopolitanism: Malcolm X, Africa, and revolutionary theorizing in the black power movement in the US. African Identities, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/14725843.2018.1449721.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaye, A. (2007). Joining places. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan-Cullors, P., & Bandele, A. (2018). When they call you a terrorist: a black lives matter memoir. New York: St. Martin’s.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, A. (1951). [1927]. “The high cost of prejudice”. In H. Aptheker (Ed.), A documentary history of the Negro people in the United States, Vol. 3: From the N.A.A.C.P. to the New Deal (pp. 553–564). New York: Citadel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, A. (1992) [1916]. Race contacts and interracial relations. Edited by J. Stewart. Washington, DC: Howard University Press.

  • Moses, W. (1978). The golden age of black nationalism, 1850–1925. Hamden: Archon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moses, W. (1989). Alexander Crummell. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moses, W. (1993). Black messiahs and Uncle Toms. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, C. (1983). Black Marxism. London: Zed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, J. (1992). Introduction. In J. Stewart (Ed.), Alain Locke. Race contacts and interracial relations (pp. xix–lix). Washington, DC: Howard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuckey, S. (1987). Slave culture. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J. (2011). Black nationalism in the United States. Boulder: Lynne Reinner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Deburg, W. (1992). New day in Babylon. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkerson, I. (2010). The warmth of other suns: the epic story of America’s great migration. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodard, K. (1999). A nation within a nation. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • X, Malcolm 1970 [1964]. The organization of Afro-American unity: ‘for human rights and dignity’ [statement of basic aims of the Organization of Afro-American Unity]. In J. Bracey, A. Meier, and E. Rudwick, (eds.), Black nationalism in America. New York: Bobbs-Merrill. pp. 421–7.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author thanks Clovis Semmes, Wilson Moses, Robert Smith, Muhammad Ahmad, Cruz Caridad Bueno, Robert Packer, Akua Njeri, Frank Reid, Marian Kramer, James Taylor, Scott Brown, and Mack Jones for their comments and/or suggestions on earlier drafts of this article. Special thanks to Rev. Frank Reid and the congregants of Bethel AME Church in Baltimore, Rev. Wendell Anthony and the congregants of Fellowship Chapel in Detroit for providing venues to present this work and continuous inspiration to carry it out. This essay is dedicated to the student organizers and activists of the Penn State University Black Caucus to encourage both their scholarship and activism; and to my former professor at the University of Michigan who encouraged me as a student to engage W.E.B. Du Bois’ and Alain Locke's research: Professor Harold Cruse.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Errol A. Henderson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Henderson, E.A. Missing the Revolution Beneath Their Feet: The Significance of the Slave Revolution of the Civil War to the Black Power Movement in the USA. J Afr Am St 22, 174–190 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12111-018-9400-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12111-018-9400-1

Keywords

Navigation