Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Childhood Teaching and Learning among Savanna Pumé Hunter-Gatherers

Mismatch between Foraging and Postindustrial Societies

  • Published:
Human Nature Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Research in nonindustrial small-scale societies challenges the common perception that human childhood is universally characterized by a long period of intensive adult investment and dedicated instruction. Using return rate and time allocation data for the Savanna Pumé, a group of South American hunter-gatherers, age patterns in how children learn to become productive foragers and from whom they learn are observed across the transition from childhood to adolescence. Results show that Savanna Pumé children care for their siblings, are important economic contributors, learn by doing rather than by instruction, and spend their time principally in the company of other children. This developmental experience contrasts with that of children in postindustrial societies, who are dependent on adults, often well past maturity; learn in formal settings; and spend much of their time in the company of adults. These differences raise questions about whether normative behaviors observed in postindustrial societies are representative of human children. This comparison also identifies the potential mismatch between hunter-gatherer and postindustrial societies in the extent to which children may be well adapted to learn from and teach each other. In particular, spending time in autonomous work and play groups develops the cooperation and coordination skills that are foundational to human subsistence and growing up to be socially and productively adept adults and parents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article can be made available by the contacting the author.

Notes

  1. For simplicity, “postindustrial” is used throughout to refer to contemporary industrialized societies, in contrast to “traditional” societies. “Nonindustrial” is sometimes the preferred term, however it suggests a historical trajectory and takes the perspective of “us compared with them,” rather than the other way around, the more evolutionarily relevant perspective. Both are used here to refer to natural-fertility, small-scale societies that use technologies, foods, and strategies consistent with their recent past—e.g., societies that have little access to the market labor economy, market foods, wage labor, health care, or education. Unfortunately, no term describes either society fully, in its variation or without bias.

  2. Childhood and juvenility are variously defined in the literature. As a shared mammalian trait, juvenility is bracketed by weaning and sexual maturity. Human juvenility is often developmentally more narrowly defined as the period between childhood (weaning to eruption of M1) and adolescence (onset of the growth spurt). In its specialized reference to the unique human stage, childhood (sensu Bogin, 1999) specifically defines the period that follows weaning and ends with the eruption of the first permanent molar and ability to consume adult foods (approximately 3–7 years of age). Here childhood is used more broadly and interchangeably with juvenility to reference the general developmental period from weaning to sexual maturity. Infant refers to a nursing child and adult to a reproductive-aged individual.

  3. Fruit returns (large fruit returns) include a variety of species, but predominately feral mango. Caloric estimates are based on analyses of Mangifera indica, with a wet weight estimate of 675 kcal/kg skinless, pitless fruit (Gebhardt & Thomas, 2002). The edible portion of fruit (skinless, pitless) is estimated at 82% of total weight. Thus, the 13.5 kg average child’s return * .82 edible portion * 675 kcal/kg = 7472 edible kcal.

    Fish returns include a variety of species, with Hoplias malabaricus predominating. Caloric values are based on analysis for catfish (Leung, 1961), which is a reasonable analog for the fish that dominate Pumé fishing returns. Kcal values for fish = 139 kcal/100 g. Edible portion of Pumé returns is estimated as 65% raw weight. Thus, a 1.3 kg average child’s return * .65 edible portion * 1390 kcal/kg = 1175 edible kcal.

    Meat returns (hunting returns) include a variety of species, with armadillo (Dasypus sabanicola), tegu lizard (Tupinamibis teguixin), and small teiid lizards (Ameiva ameiva) being the predominate species (68% of all hunting kills; Greaves, 1997b). Estimates are based on an edible portion of 76% (what the Pumé actually eat, adjusted from Saadoun & Cabrera, 2008) and 1306 kcal/k (Caldironi & Manes, 2006). Thus, .9 k * .76 edible portion * 1306 kcal/kg = 893 kcal. Based an edible portion of 50% for armadillo and 2183 kcal for digestible energy (Gómez‑Ortiz et al. 2011), a 0.9 k average child’s return * .5 digestible portion * 2183 kcal/kg = 982 edible kcal.

    Root returns (large root returns) predominately consist of changuango (Dracontium margaretae). Return weights have no waste weight; only a small amount of boiled roots is discarded. D. margaretae = 349 kcal/100 g (raw) and 324 kcal/100 g, boiled (analyses of raw samples at Nutritional Ecology Laboratory at Harvard University; Greaves & Kramer, 2013). Most roots are boiled before being eaten. Thus, a 3.0 kg average child’s return * 1 edible portion * 3240 kcal/kg = 9720 edible kcal.

References

  • Altmann, J. (1974). Observational study of behavior: Sampling methods. Behaviour, 49, 227–266.

  • Alvarez, H. P. (2000). Grandmother hypothesis and primate life histories. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 113, 435–450.

  • Bjorklund, D. F., & Pellegrini, A. D. (2000). Child development and evolutionary psychology. Child Development, 71, 1687–1708.

  • Bliege Bird, R., & Bird, D. (2002). Constraints of knowing or constraints of growing? Fishing and collecting by the children of Mer. Human Nature, 13, 239–267.

  • Blurton Jones, N., & Marlowe, F. W. (2002). Selection for delayed maturity: Does it take 20 years to hunt and gather? Human Nature, 13, 199–238.

  • Blurton Jones, N., Hawkes, K., & O’Connell, J. (1989). Measuring and modeling costs of children in two foraging societies: Implications for schedule of reproduction. In V. Standen & R. Foley (Eds.), Comparative socioecology: The behavorial ecology of humans and other mammals (pp. 367–390). Blackwell Scientific.

  • Blurton Jones, N., Hawkes, K., & Draper, P. (1994). Differences between Hadza and !Kung children’s work: Affluence or practical reason. In E. S. Burch & L. J. Ellana (Eds.), Key issues in hunter-gatherer research (pp. 189–215). Berg.

  • Blurton Jones, N., Hawkes, K., & O’Connell, J. (1997). Why do Hadza children forage? In N. Segal, G. E. Weisfeld, & C. C. Weisfeld (Eds.), Uniting psychology and biology: Integrative perspectives on human development (pp. 164–183). American Psychological Association.

  • Bock, J. (2002). Learning, life history and productivity: Children’s lives in the Okavango Delta, Botswana. Human Nature, 13, 161–197.

  • Bock, J. C., & Johnson, S. E. (2004). Subsistence ecology and play among the Okavango Delta peoples of Botswana. Human Nature, 15, 63–81.

  • Bogin, B. (1999). Patterns of human growth. Cambridge University Press.

  • Bogin, B. (2006). Modern life history: The evolution of human childhood and fertility. In K. Hawkes & R. R. Paine (Eds.), The evolution of human life history (pp. 197–230). SAR Press.

  • Bonawitz, E., Shafto, P., Gweon, H., Goodman, N. D., Spelke, E., & Schulz, L. (2011). The double-edged sword of pedagogy: Instruction limits spontaneous exploration and discovery. Cognition, 120, 322–330.

  • Bove, R. B., Valeggia, C. R., & Ellison, P. T. (2002). Girl helpers and time allocation of nursing women among the Toba of Argentina. Human Nature, 13, 457–472.

  • Boyette, A. H. (2016). Children’s play and culture learning in an egalitarian foraging society. Child Development, 87, 759–769.

  • Boyette, A. H. (2019). Play in foraging societies. In P. K. Smith & J. L. Roopnarine (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of play (pp. 302–321). University of Cambridge Press.

  • Boyette, A. H., & Hewlett, B. S. (2017). Autonomy, equality, and teaching among Aka foragers and Ngandu farmers of the Congo Basin. Human Nature, 28, 289–322.

  • Brooks, A. S. and J. E. Yellen (2018). Social learning among recent hunter-gatherers: Jun/wasi examples. Paper presented at the 83rd annual meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, April 13, Washington, DC.

  • Caldironi, H. A., & Manes, M. E. (2006). Proximate composition, fatty acids and cholesterol content of meat cut from tegu lizard Tupinambis merianae. Journal of Food Composition and Analyses, 19, 711–714.

  • Charnov, E. L. (1993). Life history invariants: Some explorations of symmetry in evolutionary ecology. Oxford University Press.

  • Chick, G. (2010). Play, work and learning. In D. F. Lancy, J. C. Bock, & S. Gaskins (Eds.), The anthropology of learning in childhood (pp. 119–144). Alta Mira Press.

  • Cristia, A., Dupoux, E., Gurven, M., & Stieglitz, J. (2019). Child-directed speech is infrequent in a forager-farmer population: A time allocation study. Child Development, 90, 759–773.

  • Crittenden, A. (2016). Children’s foraging and play among the Hadza. In C. L. Meehan & A. N. Crittenden (Eds.), Childhood: Origins, evolution and implications (pp. 155–172). SAR Press.

  • Crittenden, A. N., & Marlowe, F. W. (2008). Allomaternal care among the Hadza of Tanzania. Human Nature, 19, 249–262.

  • Crittenden, A. N., Conklin-Brittain, N. L., Zes, D. A., Schoeninger, M. J., & Marlowe, F. W. (2013). Juvenile foraging among the Hadza: Implications for human life history. Evolution and Human Behavior, 34, 299–304.

  • d’Errico, F., & Banks, W. E. (2015). The archaeology of teaching: A conceptual framework. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 25, 859–866.

  • Davis, H. E., & Cashdan, E. (2019). Spatial cognition, navigation, and mobility among children in a forager-horticulturalist population: the Tsimané of Bolivia. Cognitive Development, 52, 100800.

  • Draper, P., & Cashdan, E. (1988). Technological change and child behavior among the !Kung. Ethnology, 27, 339–365.

  • Dunbar, R. I. M. (1976). Some aspects of research design and their implications in the observational study of behaviour. Behaviour, 58(1-2), 58–78.

  • Dunbar, R. I. M. (2003). The social brain: Mind, language and society in evolutionary perspective. Annual Review of Anthropology, 3, 163–181.

  • Endicott, K. L., & Endicott, K. M. (2014). Batek childrearing and morality. In D. Narvaez, K. Valentino, A. Fuentes, J. J. McKenna, & P. Gray (Eds.), Ancestral landscapes in human evolution (pp. 108–125). Oxford University Press.

  • Flinn, M. V., & Ward, C. V. (2005). Ontogeny and evolution of the social child. In B. J. Ellis & D. F. Bjorklund (Eds.), Origins of the social mind: Evolutionary psychology and child development (pp. 19–44). The Guilford Press.

  • Fouts, H. N., & Lamb, M. (2009). Cultural and developmental variation in toddlers’ interactions with other children in two small-scale societies in Central Africa. International Journal of Developmental Science, 3, 389–407.

  • Froehle, A. W., Wells, G. K., Pollom, T. R., Mabulla, A. Z. P., Lew-Levy, S., & Crittenden, A. N. (2019). Physical activity and time budgets of Hadza forager children: Implications for self-provisioning and the ontogeny of the sexual division of labor. American Journal of Human Biology, 31, e23209.

  • Gebhardt, S. E. and R. G. Thomas (2002). Nutritive value of foods. Agricultural Research Service, Home and Garden Bulletin 72. USDA Agricultural Research Service, Nutrient Data Laboratory.

  • Ginsburg, K. R. (2007). The importance of play in promoting healthy child development and maintaining strong parent-child bonds. Pediatrics, 119, 182–191.

  • Gómez-Ortiz, Y., Monroy-Vilchis, O., Fajardo, V., Mendoza, G. D., & Urios, V. (2011). Is food quality important for carnivores? The case of Puma concolor. Animal Biology, 61, 277–288.

  • Gragson, T. L. (1992). Strategic procurement of fish by the Pumé: A south American “fishing culture.” Human Ecology, 20, 109−130.

  • Gray, P. (2012). The value of a play-filled childhood in development of the hunter-gatherer individual. In D. Narváez, J. Panksepp, A. N. Schore, & T. R. Gleason (Eds.), Evolution, early experience and human development: From research to practice and policy (pp. 352–370). Oxford University Press.

  • Greaves, R. D. (1997a). Ethnoarchaeological investigation of subsistence mobility, resource targeting, and technological organization among Pumé foragers of Venezuela. PhD dissertation, University of New Mexico.

  • Greaves, R. D. (1997b). Hunting and multifunctional use of bows and arrows: Ethnoarchaeology of technological organization among Pumé hunters of Venezuela. In H. Knecht (Ed.), Projectile technology (pp. 287–320). Plenum Press.

  • Greaves, R. D. (2015). Forager landscape use and residential organization. In F. Sellet, R. D. Greaves, & P. L. Yu (Eds.), Archaeology and ethnoarchaeology of mobility (2nd ed., pp. 127–152). University Press of Florida.

  • Greaves, R. D., & Kramer, K. L. (2013). Hunter-gatherer use of wild plants and domesticates: Archaeological implications for mixed economies before agricultural intensification. Journal of Archaeological Science, 41, 263–271.

  • Gurven, M., & Kaplan, H. (2006). Determinants of time allocation across the lifespan. Human Nature, 17, 1–49.

  • Hames, R. B. (1992). Time allocation. In E. A. Smith and B. Winterhalder (Eds.), Evolutionary ecology and human behavior. Aldine de Gruyter.

  • Hawkes, K., O’Connell, J., & Blurton Jones, N. (1995). Hadza children’s foraging: Juvenile dependency, social arrangements, and mobility among hunter-gatherers. Current Anthropology, 36, 688–700.

  • Hawkes, K., O’Connell, J., Blurton Jones, N., Alvarez, H., & Charnov, E. (1998). Grandmothering, menopause and the evolution of human life histories. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 95, 1336–1339.

  • Hewlett, B. S. (1991). Intimate fathers. The nature and context of Aka Pgymy paternal infant care. University of Michigan Press.

  • Hewlett, B. S. (2017). Hunter-gatherer childhoods: Evolutionary, developmental, and cultural perspectives. Routledge.

  • Hewlett, B. S., Fouts, H. N., Boyette, A. H., & Hewlett, B. L. (2011). Social learning among Congo Basin hunter-gatherers. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 366(1567), 1168–1178.

  • Hill, K., & Hurtado, A. M. (1996). Ache life history. Aldine de Gruyter.

  • Hill, K., & Kaplan, H. (1999). Life history traits in humans: Theory and empirical studies. Annual Review of Anthropology, 28, 397–430.

  • Hilton, C. E., & Greaves, R. D. (2008). Seasonality and sex differences in travel distance and resource transport in Venezuelan foragers. Current Anthropology, 49, 144–153.

  • Hofferth, S. L., & Sandberg, J. F. (2001). How American children spend their time. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63, 295–308.

  • Howell, N. (2000). Demography of the Dobe !Kung. Academic Press. (Originally published in 1979)

  • Howell, N. (2010). Life histories of the Dobe !Kung. University of California Press.

  • Ivey, P. K. (2000). Cooperative reproduction in Ituri Forest hunter-gatherers: Who cares for Efe infants? Current Anthropology, 41, 856–866.

  • Janson, C. H., & van Schaik, C. P. (1993). Ecological risk aversion in juvenile primates: Slow and steady wins the race. In M. E. Pereira & L. Fairbanks (Eds.), Juvenile primates (pp. 57–74). Oxford University Press.

  • Johnson, A. (1975). Time allocation in a Machiguenga community. Ethnology, 14, 301–310.

  • Kaplan, H. (1996). A theory of fertility and parental investment in traditional and modern human societies. Yearbook of Physical Anthropology, 39, 91–135.

  • Kaplan, H. (1997). The evolution of the human life course. In K. W. Wackter & C. E. Finch (Eds.), Between Zeus and the salmon: The biodemography of longevity (pp. 175–211). National Academy of Sciences.

  • Kaplan, H., Hill, K., Lancaster, J. B., & Hurtado, A. M. (2000). A theory of human life history evolution: Diet, intelligence, and longevity. Evolutionary Anthropology, 9(4), 156–185.

  • Keller, H., & Kärtner, J. (2013). Development: The cultural solution of universal developmental tasks. In M. J. Gelfand, C.-Y. Chiu, & Y.-Y. Hong (Eds.), Advances in culture and psychology (pp. 63–116). Oxford University Press.

  • Konner, M. (1976). Relations among infants and juveniles in comparative perspective. Social Science Information, 15, 371–402.

  • Konner, M. (2005). Hunter-gatherer infancy and childhood. In B. S. Hewlett and M. E. Lamb (Eds.), Hunter-gatherer childhoods: Evolutionary, developmental and cultural perspectives (pp. 19–64). Aldine Transaction.

  • Kramer, K. L. (1998). Variation in children’s work among modern Maya subsistence agriculturalists. PhD dissertation, University of New Mexico.

  • Kramer, K. L. (2005). Maya children: Helpers at the farm. Harvard University Press.

  • Kramer, K. L. (2008). Early sexual maturity among Pumé foragers of Venezuela: Fitness implications of teen motherhood. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 136, 338–350.

  • Kramer, K. L. (2010). Cooperative breeding and its significance to the demographic success of humans. Annual Review of Anthropology, 39, 414–436.

  • Kramer, K. L. (2011). The evolution of human parental care and recruitment of juvenile help. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 26, 533–540.

  • Kramer, K. L. (2014). Why what juveniles do matters in the evolution of cooperative breeding. Human Nature, 25, 49–65.

  • Kramer, K. L., & Ellison, P. T. (2010). Pooled energy budgets: Resituating human energy allocation tradeoffs. Evolutionary Anthropology, 19, 136–147.

  • Kramer, K. L., & Greaves, R. D. (2007). Changing patterns of infant mortality and fertility among Pumé foragers and horticulturalists. American Anthropologist, 109, 713–726.

  • Kramer, K. L., & Greaves, R. D. (2011). Juvenile subsistence effort, activity levels and growth patterns: Middle childhood among Pumé foragers. Human Nature, 22, 303–326.

  • Kramer, K. L., & Greaves, R. D. (2016). Diversity or replace? What happens to wild foods when cultigens are introduced into hunter-gatherer diets. In B. Codding & K. L. Kramer (Eds.), Why forage? Hunters and gatherers living in the 21st century (pp. 15–42). SAR Press and University of New Mexico Press.

  • Kramer, K. L., & McMillan, G. P. (2006). The effect of labor saving technology on longitudinal fertility changes. Current Anthropology, 47, 165–172.

  • Kramer, K. L., & Russell, A. F. (2014). Cooperative breeding without monogamy: Human insights and animal implications. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 29, 600–606.

  • Kramer, K. L., & Veile, A. (2018). Infant allocare in traditional societies. Physiology and Behavior, 193(A), 117–126.

  • Lancaster, J. B., Kaplan, H., Hill, K., & Hurtado, A. M. (2000). The evolution of life history, intelligence and diet among chimpanzees and human foragers. In F. Tonneau & N. S. Thompson (Eds.), Perspectives in ethology: Evolution, culture and behavior (pp. 47–72). Kluwer Academic.

  • Lancy, D. F. (2014). The anthropology of childhood: Cherubs, chattel, changelings. Cambridge University Press.

  • Lancy, D. F. (2016a). Ethnographic perspectives on culture acquisition. In C. L. Meehan & A. N. Crittenden (Eds.), Childhood: Origins, evolution and implications (pp. 173–195). SAR Press and University of New Mexico Press.

  • Lancy, D. F. (2016b). Playing with knives: The socialization of self-initiated learners. Child Development, 87, 654–665.

  • Lancy, D. F. (2018). Anthropological perspectives on children as helpers, workers, artisans, and laborers. Springer.

  • Lancy, D. F. (2020). Child helpers: A multdisciplinary perspective. Cambridge University Press.

  • Lancy, D. F., Bock, J., & Gaskins, S. (2010). The anthropology of learning in childhood. Rowman Altamira.

  • Lee, R. B. (1979). The !Kung San: Men, women and work in a foraging society. Cambridge University Press.

  • Lee, R. D., & Kramer, K. L. (2002). Children’s economic roles in the Maya family life cycle: Cain, Caldwell and Chayanov revisited. Population and Development Review, 28, 475–499.

  • Leung, W.-T. W. (1961). Food composition table for use in Latin America. International Committee on Nutrition for National Defense. Washington, DC: National Institutes for Health, US Govt. Printing Office.

  • Lew-Levy, S., & Boyette, A. H. (2018). Evidence for the adaptive learning function of work and work-themed play among Aka forager and Ngandu farmer children from the Congo Basin. Human Nature, 29, 157–185.

  • Lew-Levy, S., Reckin, R., Lavi, N., Cristóbal-Azkarate, J., & Ellis-Davies, K. (2017). How do hunter-gatherer children learn subsistence skills? Human Nature, 28, 367–394.

  • Lew-Levy, S., Crittenden, A. N., Boyette, A. H., Mabulla, I. A., Hewlett, B. S., & Lamb, M. E. (2019). Inter- and intracultural variation in learning-through-participation among Hadza and BaYaka forager children and adolescents from Tanzania and the Republic of Congo. Journal of Psychology in Africa, 29(4), 309–318.

  • Maloney, T. R. (2019). Towards quantifying teaching and learning in prehistory using stone artifact reduction sequences. Lithic Technology, 44, 36–51.

  • Martin, P. and T. M. Caro (1985). On the functions of play and its role in behavioral development. Advances in the Study of Behavior, 15, 59-103. Elsevier.

  • Maynard, A. E. (2002). Cultural teaching: The development of teaching skills in Maya sibling interactions. Child Development, 73, 969–982.

  • Maynard, A. E., & Tovote, K. E. (2010). Learning from other children. In D. F. Lancy, J. C. Bock, & S. Gaskins (Eds.), The anthropology of learning in childhood (pp. 181–205). Alta Mira Press.

  • Morelli, G. A., Rogoff, B., & Angelillo, C. (2003). Cultural variation in young children’s access to work or involvement in specialised child-focused activities. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 27, 264–274.

  • Morelli, G., Henry, P. I., & Foerster, S. (2014). Relationships and resource uncertainty. In D. Narvaez, K. Valentino, A. Fuentes, J. J. McKenna, & P. Gray (Eds.), Ancestral landscapes in human evolution (pp. 69–103). Oxford University Press.

  • Morelli, G., Bard, K., Chaudhary, N., Gottlieb, A., Keller, H., Murray, M., Quinn, N., Rosabal-Coto, M., Scheidecker, G., & Takada, A. (2018a). Bringing the real world into developmental science: A commentary on Weber, Fernald, and Diop (2017). Child Development, 89, e594–e603.

  • Morelli, G., Quinn, N., Chaudhary, N., Vicedo, M., Rosabal-Coto, M., Keller, H., Murray, M., Gottlieb, A., Scheidecker, G., & Takada, A. (2018b). Ethical challenges of parenting interventions in low-to middle-income countries. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 49, 5–24.

  • Morelli, G., Henry, P. I., & Spielvogel, B. (2019). Learning prosociality: Insights from young forager and subsistence farmer children’s food sharing with mothers and others. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 73, 86.

  • Munroe, R. H., Munroe, R. L., & Shimmin, H. S. (1984). Children’s work in four cultures: Determinants and consequences. American Anthropologist, 86, 339–379.

  • Nag, M., White, B., & Peet, R. (1978). An anthropological approach to the study of the economic value of children in Java and Nepal. Current Anthropology, 19, 293–306.

  • O’Connell, J. F., Hawkes, K., & Blurton Jones, N. G. (1999). Grandmothering and the evolution of Homo erectus. Journal of Human Evolution, 36, 461–485.

  • Paradise, R., & Rogoff, B. (2009). Side by side: Learning by observing and pitching in. Ethos, 37, 102–138.

  • Pellegrini, A. D. (2013). Play. In P. D. Zelazo (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of developmental psychology, Vol. 2: Self and other (pp. 276–299). Oxford University Press.

  • Rad, M. S., Martingano, A. J., & Ginges, J. (2018). Toward a psychology of Homo sapiens: Making psychological science more representative of the human population. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115, 11401–11405.

  • Reiches, M. W., Ellison, P. T., Lipson, S. F., Sharrock, K. C., Gardiner, E., & Duncan, L. G. (2009). Pooled energy budget and human life history. American Journal of Human Biology, 21, 421–429.

  • Reynolds, P. (1991). Dance civet cat: Child labour in the Zambezi Valley. Ohio University Press.

  • Rivero, O. (2016). Master and apprentice: Evidence for learning on Paleolithic portable art. Journal of Archaeological Science, 75, 89–100.

  • Saadoun, A., & Cabrera, M. C. (2008). A review of nutritional content and technological parameters of indigenous sources of meat in South America. Meat Science, 80, 570–581.

  • Sandberg, J. F., & Hofferth, S. L. (2001). Changes in children’s time with parents: United States, 1981–1997. Demography, 38(3), 423–436.

  • Simpson, M., & Simpson, A. (1977). One-zero and scan methods for sampling behaviour. Animal Behaviour, 25, 726–731.

  • Tejada-Vera, B., & Sutton, P. D. (2010). Births, marriages, divorces, and deaths: Provisional data for 2009. National Vital Statistics Reports, 58(25), 1–6. National Center for Health Statistics.

  • Tucker, B., & Young, A. (2005). Growing up Mikea: Children’s time allocation and tuber foraging in southwest Madagascar. In B. S. Hewlett & M. E. Lamb (Eds.), Hunter-gatherer children (pp. 147–171). Aldine/Transaction.

  • Turke, P. (1988). Helpers at the nest: Childcare networks on Ifaluk. In L. Betzig, M. Borgerhoff Mulder, & P. Turke (Eds.), Human reproductive behavior (pp. 173–188). Cambridge University Press.

  • Walker, R., Gurven, M., Hill, K., Migliano, A., Chagnon, N., De Souza, R., Djurovic, G., Hames, R., Hurtado, A. M., Kaplan, H., Kramer, K., Oliver, W. J., Valeggia, C., & Yamauchi, T. (2006). Growth rates and life histories in twenty-two smale-scale societies. American Journal of Human Biology, 18, 295–311.

  • Whiting, B. B., & Edwards, C. P. (1988). Children of different worlds: The formation of social behavior. Harvard University Press.

  • World Bank. (2019). Population ages 0-14 (% of population), 1960-2019. Retrieved 7/20/2020 from https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.POP.0014.TO.ZS?name_desc=true.

  • Worthman, C. M. (1993). Biocultural interactions in human development. In M. E. Pereira & L. A. Fairbanks (Eds.), Juvenile primates (pp. 339–358). Oxford University Press.

  • Zarger, R. K. (2002). Children’s ethnoecological knowledge: Situated learning and the cultural transmission of subsistence knowledge and skills among Q’eqchi’Maya. PhD dissertation, University of Georgia.

  • Zarger, R. K. (2010). Learning the environment. In D. F. Lancy, J. C. Bock, & S. Gaskins (Eds.), The anthropology of learning in childhood (pp. 341–370). AltaMira Press.

Download references

Acknowledgments

I am grateful to the Savanna Pumé, who graciously allowed us to observe their children at work and play for many years. In particular, I thank Dr. Russell D. Greaves, who started working with the Savanna Pumé in the 1990s and collected much of the data used in these analyses. I also greatly appreciate the contribution of Dr. Joe Hackman, Department of Anthropology, University of Utah, who produced a number of the graphs in this manuscript. I wish to acknowledge the editors of this special edition for recognizing the importance of the topic of childhood learning in traditional societies, and for organizing the AAA symposium on which this issue is based. Funding for the Savanna Pumé research was provided by the National Science Foundation (0349963 and DBS-9123875), the L.S.B. Leakey Foundation (awarded to Russell Greaves), the Milton Fund, and Harvard University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karen L. Kramer.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kramer, K.L. Childhood Teaching and Learning among Savanna Pumé Hunter-Gatherers. Hum Nat 32, 87–114 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-021-09392-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-021-09392-x

Keywords

Navigation