Skip to main content
Log in

How Winning an International Scientific Award Affects Publishing Behavior of Laureates: the Case of Derek de Solla Price Medal in Scientometrics

  • Published:
Publishing Research Quarterly Aims and scope

Abstract

This research aims to investigate the effect of the Derek de Solla Price memorial award reception on publishing behavior of medalists through comparing their research performance in 5 years before and after the prize. The current study was conducted using scientometric indicators. The population of the study was comprised of all scholarly output of 26 Price medalists. Web of Science and Journal Citation Reports were utilized for data collection. Results of the study revealed that the research performance of medalists in all five studied indicators, namely the number of publications, the number of citations received, the quality of journals in which their articles have been published, the number of research collaborations and the number of research collaborators, improved after prize reception, but not in a statistically significant level. Moreover, the tendency of prize winners to international research collaboration has increased in a notable manner upon prize reception. We can conclude that he reception of Price medal in scientometrics has no statistically significant effect on the medalists’ scientific publication, citation impact and research collaboration patterns.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. http://issi-society.org/awards/derek-de-solla-price-memorial-medal/.

References

  1. Borjas GJ, Doran KB. Prizes and productivity how winning the fields medal affects scientific output. J Hum Resour. 2015;50(3):728–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chan HF, Önder AS, Torgler B. Do Nobel laureates change their patterns of collaboration following prize reception? Scientometrics. 2015;105(3):2215–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Frandsen TF, Nicolaisen J. The ripple effect: citation chain reactions of a nobel prize. J Am Soc Inform Sci Technol. 2013;64(3):437–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Garfield E. From the science of science to Scientometrics visualizing the history of science with HistCite software. J Informetr. 2009;3(3):173–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gingras Y, Wallace M. Why it has become more difficult to predict Nobel Prize winners: a bibliometric analysis of nominees and winners of the chemistry and physics prizes (1901–2007). Scientometrics. 2009;82(2):401–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Glänzel W, Persson O. H-index for Price medalists. ISSI newsletter. 2005;1(4):15–8.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hugget S. Does a Nobel Prize lead to more citations. Res Trends. 2010;20:5–6.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kademani BS, Kalyane VL, Kumar V, Mohan L. Nobel laureates: their publication productivity, collaboration and authorship status. Scientometrics. 2005;62(2):261–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Levitt J, Thelwall M (2014) Investigating the impact of the award of the Nobel Prize on tweets. In: Proceedings of the science and technology indicators conference, Leiden, Netherlands, September 2014.

  10. Ma C, Su C, Yuan J, Wu Y. Papers written by Nobel Prize winners in physics before they won the prize: an analysis of their language and journal of publication. Scientometrics. 2012;93(3):1151–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mazloumian A, Eom YH, Helbing D, Lozano S, Fortunato S. How citation boosts promote scientific paradigm shifts and nobel prizes. PLoS ONE. 2011;6(5):e18975.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. de Solla PDJ. Little science, big science. New York: Columbia University Press; 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  13. de Solla PDJ. Networks of scientific papers. Science. 1965;149:510–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. de Solla PDJ. A general theory of bibliometric and other cumulative advantage processes. J Am Soc Inf Sci. 1976;27:292–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Vanclay JK. Publication patterns of award-winning forest scientists and implications for the Australian ERA journal ranking. J Informetr. 2012;6(1):19–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wagner CS, Horlings E, Whetsell TA, Mattsson P, Nordqvist K. Do Nobel Laureates create prize-winning networks? An analysis of collaborative research in physiology or medicine. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(7):e0134164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zheng J, Liu N. Mapping of important international academic awards. Scientometrics. 2015;104(3):763–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Zuckerman H. Nobel laureates in science: patterns of productivity, collaboration, and authorship. Am Sociol Rev. 1967;32(3):391–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zuckerman H. Scientific elite: Nobel laureates in the United States. Piscataway: Transaction Publishers; 1977.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammadamin Erfanmanesh.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Erfanmanesh, M., Moghiseh, Z. How Winning an International Scientific Award Affects Publishing Behavior of Laureates: the Case of Derek de Solla Price Medal in Scientometrics. Pub Res Q 35, 201–212 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12109-018-9619-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12109-018-9619-7

Keywords

Navigation