Skip to main content
Log in

Sociological Aesthetics, or How to Make Sense of Symbolic Forms

  • Published:
The American Sociologist Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This articles questions some of the basic assumptions of sociological aesthetics. Taking the “linguistic turn” with Susanne Langer, it assumes throughout that art is a social phenomenon that involves body, emotions and symbolism. To understand the experience of art today, it takes an articulation between phenomenology, hermeneutics and critical theory. The synthesis of Georg Simmel, Talcott Parsons and Theodor Adorno can only work if the social forms are explicitly brought into the cultural system and meanings and power are not evacuated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Code Availability

N/A.

References

  • Adorno, T. W. (1972) [1962]. Introduction to the Sociology of Music. New York: Seabury Press.

  • Adorno, T. W. (1997) [1970]. Aesthetic Theory. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

  • Alexander, J. (2003). The Meanings of Social Life. A Cultural Sociology. Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, J. C. (1982–1983). Theoretical Logic in Sociology. Vol. 4: The Modern Reconstruction of Classical Thought: Talcott Parsons. Berkeley: University of California Press.

  • Alexander, J. C. (1993). Formal Sociology Is not Multidimensional: Breaking the Code in Parsons’ Fragment on Simmel. Teoria Sociologica, 1(1), 101–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amat, M. (2018). Le relationnisme philosophique de Georg Simmel. Une idée de la culture. Honoré Champion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buxton, W. (1998). From the ‘Missing Fragment’ to the ‘Lost Manuscript’: Reflections on Parsons’s Engagement with Simmel. The American Sociologist, 29, 57–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cordeiro de Farias, A. (2022). Estética sociológica, de Kant a Simmel. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis. Rio de Janeiro: IESP-UERJ.

  • Geertz, C. (1973). The Interpretation of Cultures. Selected Essays. Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodstein, E. (2017). Georg Simmel and the Disciplinary Imaginary. Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husserl, E. (1989) [1952]. Ideas pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy. Book II: Studies in the Phenomenology of Constitution. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

  • Knoblauch, H. (2020). The Communicative Construction of Reality. London: Routledge. Kracauer, S. (2004) [1919]. Georg Simmel. Ein Beitrag zur Deutung des geistigen Lebens unserer Zeit, pp. 139–281 in Frühe Schriften aus dem Nachlaß, Band 9.2. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.

  • Kracauer, S. (2004). “Georg Simmel” in Werke in neun Bänden. Bd. 9: Frühe Schriften aus dem Nachlass. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

  • Langer, S. (1948). Philosophy in a new key. A study in the symbolism of reason, rite and art. New York: New American Library.

  • Le Breton, D. (2017). Sensing the World: An Anthropology of the Senses. London: Routledge.

  • Levine, D. (1991). Simmel and Parsons reconsidered. American Journal of Sociology, 96(5), 1097–1116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lichtblau, K. (1996). Kulturkrise und Soziologie um die Jahrhundertwende. Zur Genealogie der Kultursoziologie in Deutschland. Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lukács, G. (2012). Heidelberger Aesthetics (Literature, Culture, Theory). Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, M., & Eisenmann, C. (2022). Transposing gestalt phenomena from visual fields to practical and interactional work: Garfinkel’s and Sacks’ Social praxeology. Philosophia Scientiae, 26–3, 95–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merleau-Ponty, M. (2012) [1945]. Phenomenology of Perception. London: Routledge.

  • Parsons, T. (1937). The Structure of Social Action. McGrawHill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosa, H. (2016). Resonanz. Eine Soziologie der Weltbeziehung. Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosa, H. (2023). When Monsters Roar and Angels Sing. Eine kleine Soziologie des Heavy Metal. Kohlhammer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schütz, A. (1964). Making Music Together. A Study in Social Relationship, pp. 159–178 in Collected Papers, II. Studies in Social Theory. The Hague: M. Nijhoff.

  • Seigworth, G., & Gregg, (Eds.). (2010). The Affect Theory Reader. Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmel, G. (2004) [1900]. The Philosophy of Money. London; Routledge.

  • Simmel, G. (2007). Ed. by Frisby, D. and Featherstone, M. Simmel on Culture. London: Sage.

  • Simmel, G. (2009) [1908]. Sociology: Inquiries into the Construction of Social Forms. Leiden: Brill.

  • Simmel, G. (2020). Essays on Arts and Aesthetics. Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staubmann, H. (2022). Sociology in a New Key. Essays in Social Theory and Aesthetics. Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Vandenberghe, F. (2001). La sociologie de Georg Simmel. La Découverte.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vandenberghe, F. (2023). Le corps-contient. Hommage à David Le Breton. Revue Du MAUSS, 61, 201–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (2009) [1915]. The Religious Rejections of the World and their Directions, pp. 323–359 in Gerth, H. and Mills, C.W. (eds) From Max Weber. Essays in Sociology. London: Routledge.

Download references

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

N/A.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frédéric Vandenberghe.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval

N/A.

Consent to Participate

N/A.

Conflicts of Interest/Competing Interests

N/A.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vandenberghe, F. Sociological Aesthetics, or How to Make Sense of Symbolic Forms. Am Soc (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-023-09598-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-023-09598-9

Keywords

Navigation