Abstract
The place of Georg Simmel in the thought of Talcott Parsons has come under increasing scrutiny, a concern fuelled by a “Simmel Renaissance” on the one hand, and by a resurgence of interest in Parsons’s early writings on the other. This paper raises some questions about Parsons’s interpretation of Simmel in light of the discovery of a second manuscript on Simmel that Parsons wrote in 1939. This document (which was unknown until quite recently) may best be seen as an elaboration and reworking of the fragment on Simmel that had been left out of The Structure of Social Action (1937). After summarizing and comparing the two documents, the paper demonstrates that Parsons blurred them in his recollections. This means that interpretations of his engagement with Simmel—which have often drawn on Parsons’s later testimony (1968-1979)—need to be reconsidered. The discovery of the second manuscript also underscores the importance of examining how Simmel fit into Parsons’s evolving thought, rather than narrowly focusing on why he left Simmel out of the convergence in European social thought that he traced in Structure. Taking the former approach as a point of reference, the paper outlines some interpretive issues that arise from the discovery of Parsons’s second Simmel document.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abel, Theodore. 1926. Systematic Sociology in Germany. New York: Columbia University Press.
Alexander, Jeffrey C. 1993. “Formal Sociology’ Is not Multidimensional: Breaking the Code in Parsons’ Fragment on Simmel.” Teoria Sociologica 1,1:101–114.
Aronowitz, Stanley. 1994. “The Simmel Revival: A Challenge to American Social Science.” Sociological Quarterly 35,3:397–414.
Baldner, Jean-Marie and Lucien Gillard (eds.). 1996. Simmel et les Normes Sociales. Actes du Colloque Simmel, Penseur des Normes Sociales, Paris, 16 et 17 December, 1993.
Bell, Daniel. 1995. “Social Science: An Imperfect Art.” Tocqueville Review 16,2.
Blegvad, Mogens. 1989. “A Simmel Renaissance? Review Essay.” Acta Sociologica 32,2:203–209.
Brick, Howard. 1993. “The Reformist Dimension of Talcott Parsons’s Early Social Theory.” Pp. 357–396 In Thomas I. Haskell and Richard F. Telchgraber III (eds.), The Culture of tbe Market: Historical Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brinton, Crane. 1939. “What’s the Matter with Sociology?” Saturday Review of Literature (6 May):l-4,14.
Buxton, William. 1985. Talcott Parsons and tbe Capitalist Nation-State: Political Sociology as a Strategic Vocation. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
—. 1991. “The Marshall Lectures and Social-Scientific Practice.” Sociological Inquiry 61(February):81–88.
—. 1994. “Academic Dispute or Clash of Commitments: the Schutz-Parsons Exchange Reconsidered.” Human Studies 17,2(April):267–275.
—. 1995. “Snakes and Ladders: Parsons and Sorokin at Harvard.” Pp. 39–55 in Joseph B. Ford, Michel P. Richard and Palmer C. Talbutt Jr. (eds.), Sorokin and Civilization: A Centennial Assessment. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
—, and David Rehorick. 1988. “Recasting the Parsons-Schutz Dialogue: The Hidden Participation of Eric Voegelin.” Pp. 151–163 in L. Embree (ed.), Worldly Phenomenology. Washington, D.C.: The Center for Advanced Research and University Press of America.
—, and Stephen P. Turner. 1992. ‘Education and Expertise: Sociology as a ‘Profession‘.” Pp. 373–407 in Terence C. Halliday and Morris Janowitz (eds.), Sociology and its Publics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Camic, Charles. 1987. “The Making of a Method: A Historical Reinterpretatlon of the Early Parsons,” American Sociological Review 52 (August):421–439.
—. 1989. “Structure After Fifty Years: The Anatomy of a Charter,” American Journal of Sociology 95,1:38–107.
—. 1990. “An Historical Prologue,” American Sociological Review 55(June);313–319.
—. 1991. “Introduction” to Tbe Early Essays of Talcott Parsons, Charles Camic (ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
—. 1992. “Reputation and Predecessor Selection: Parsons and the Instltutlonalists,” American Sociological Review 57 (August):421–445.
Cohen, Jere, Lawrence E. Hazelrigg, and Whitney Pope. 1975. “De-Parsonizing Weber: A Critique of Parsons’ Interpretation of Weber’s Sociology.” American Sociological Review 40,4:229–241.
Coleman, James. 1957. Community Conflict. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
—. 1990. Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Coser, Lewis. 1956. Tbe Functions of Social Conflict. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
Deroche-Gurcel, Lilyane. 1997. Simmel et la modernité. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Faught, Jim. 1985. “Neglected Affinities: Max Weber and Georg Simmel,” British Journal of Sociology 36,2:155–174.
Frisby, David. 1981. Sociological Impressionism: A Reassessment of Georg Simmel’s Social Theory. London: Heinemann.
—. 1984. Georg Simmel. London and New York: Tavistock.
—. 1984a. “Georg Simmel and Social Psychology,” Journal of tbe History of tbe Behavioral Sciences 20,2:107–127.
—. 1985. Fragments of Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
—. 1992. Simmel and Since. New York and London: Routledge.
—(ed.). 1994. Georg Simmel: Critical Assessments. London and New York: Routledge.
Gerhardt, Uta (ed.) 1993. Talcott Parsons on National Socialism. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
Gould, Mark. 1991. “The Structure of Social Action: At Least Sixty Years Ahead of its Time.” Pp. 85-107 in Roland
Robertson and Bryan S. Turner (eds.), Talcott Parsons: Theorist of Modernity. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Grathof, Richard (ed.). 1978. Tbe Theory of Social Action: The Correspondence of Alfred Schutz and Talcott Parsons. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Hamilton, Peter. 1983. Talcott Parsons. London and New York: Tavistock.
Hamilton, Peter(ed.). 1992. Talcott Parsons: Critical Assessments. 4 vols. New York: Routledge.
Hein, Peter Ulrich (ed.). 1990. Georg Simmel. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
Helle, Horst Jürgen. 1988. Soziologie und Erkenntnistheorie bei Georg Simmel. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft (ErtrÄge der Forschung, Band 259).
Holmwood, John. 1996. Founding Sociology: Talcott Parsons and the Idea of General Theory. London and New York: Longman.
Holton, R.J. and Bryan S. Turner (eds.). 1986. Talcott Parsons on Economy and Society. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Horowitz, Irving Louis. 1993. The Decomposition of Sociology. New York: Oxford University Press.
Jaworskl, Gary D. 1989. “The Fate of Georg Simmel in Functionalist Sociology, 1937-1961: A Study in the Historical Sociology of Sociology.” Unpublished Dissertation, New School of Social Research.
Jaworskl, Gary D. 1990. “Simmel’s Contribution to Parsons’ Action Theory and its Fate.” Pp. 109–30 in Georg Simmel and Contemporary Sociology, Michael Kaern, Bernard S. Phillips, and Robert S. Cohen (eds.). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
— 1991. “Parsons, Simmel and The Eclipse of Religious Values.” Simmel Newsletter 1, 2(Winter):90–102.
—. 1995. “Simmel in Early American Sociology: Translation as Social Action.” International Journal of Politics, Culture and Society 8,3:389–417.
—. 1997. Georg Simmel and the American Prospect. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Johnston, Barry. 1986. “Sorokin and Parsons at Harvard: Institutional Conflict and the Origin of a Hegemonic Tradition.” Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 22 (April): 107–127.
—. 1995. Pitirim A. Sorokin: An Intellectual Biography. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
Kaern, Michael, Bernard S. Phillips and Robert S. Cohen (eds.). 1990. Georg Simmel and Contemporary Sociology. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Kassab, Elizabeth Suzanne. 1991. The Theory of Social Action in the Scbutz-Parsons Debate. Fribourg: Editions Universitaires Fribourg Suisse.
Klausner, Samuel Z. and Victor M. Lidz (eds.). 1986. The Nationalization of the Social Sciences. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Lassman, Peter and Irving Velody (eds.). 1989. Max Weber’s ’Science as a Vocation”. London: Unwin Hyman.
Léger, FranÇois. 1989. La Pensée de Georg Simmel: Contribution à l’histoire des idées en Allemagne au début du XXe siècle. Paris: Kimé.
Levine, Donald. [1957] 1980. Simmel and Panons: Two Approaches to the Study of Society. New York: Arno.
—. 1959. “The Structure of Simmel’s Social Thought.” Pp. 9–32 in Kurt H. Wolff (ed.), Georg Simmel. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
—. 1981. “Sociology’s Quest for the Classics: The Case of Simmel.” Pp. 60–80 in Buford Rhea (ed.), The Future of the Sociological Classics. London: Allen & Unwin.
—. 1984. “Ambivalente Begegnungen: ’Negationen’ Simmeis durch Durkheim, Weber, Lukacs, Park, und Parsons.” Pp. 318–37 in H. H. Dahme and O. Rammstedt (eds.), Georg Simmel und die Moderne. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
—. 1985. The Flight from Ambiguity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
—. 1991. “Simmel as a Resource for Sociological Metatheory,” Sociological Theory 7:161–174.
—. 1991a. “Simmel and Parsons Reconsidered.” American Journal of Sociology 96,5:1097–1116.
—. 1993. “Further Comments Regarding Parsons’s Chapter on Simmel and Tönnies: A Response to Teoria Sociologist 1/93, pp. 13–156.” Teoria Soclologica 1,2:360-374.
—. 1995. Visions of the Sociological Tradition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
-. 1997. “On the Critique of Economistic Thinking: Newly Identified Convergences among Simmel, Weber, and Parsons.” Paper presented at the conference at the University of Heidelberg (Germany, June 26–28) on “A Legacy of ‘Verantwortungsethik’: Talcott Parsons’s Structure of Social Action after Sixty Years.” Levine, Donald N., E. B. Carter, and E.M. Gorman. 1976. “Simmel’s Influence on American Sociology, parts 1 and 2,” American Journal of Sociology 81:813-45, 1112-32.
Lidz, Victor. 1993. “Parsons and Simmel: Convergence, Difference, and Missed Opportunity,” Teoria Soclologica 1,1:130–142.
Meriam, Richard, Talcott Parsons and Louis Wirth. 1937. “Shaping the Future.” (22 August). Parsons Papers, Harvard University Archives, HUG (FP) 42.8.2, Box 2.
Merton, Robert K. 1939. “Comments on Talcott Parsons’s, ’Simmel and the Methodological Problems of Formal Sociology.” Parsons Papers, Harvard University Archives, HUG (FP) 42.42, Box 2.
-. 1998a. Letter to William J. Buxton, 12 March.
-. 1998b. Letter to William J. Buxton, 25 July.
Merton, Robert K.. 1957. Social Theory and Social Structure. Revised and enlarged edition. New York: Free Press.
Merz- Benz, Peter- Ulrich. 1995 “’Form’ and ’Connection’ as Basic Concepts of Theoretical Explanation [’Form’ und ’Verbindung’ als Grundbegriffe theoretischer HandlunkserklÄrung]. Simmel Newsletter 5,2(Winter):121–135.
Nielsen, Jens Kaalhauge. 1991. “The Political Orientation of Talcott Parsons: the Second World War and its Aftermath.” Pp. 217–233 in R. Robertson and B. Turner (eds.),ra/coff Parsons: Theorist of Modernity. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Nichols, Lawrence. 1992. “The Establishment of Sociology at Harvard: A Case of Organizational Ambivalence and Scientific Vulnerability.” Pp. 191–222 in Clark A. Elliot and Margaret W. Rossiter (eds.), Science at Harvard University: Historical Perspectives. Bethlehem, PA.: Lehigh University Press.
-. 1997. “Parsons, Simmel and Structure: Sociological Paradigms in Organizational Context.” Unpublished manuscript.
Park, Robert E., and Ernest Burgess. 1921. An Introduction to the Science of Sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Parsons, Talcott. 1934. Letter to Kenneth B. Murdock, 28 April. Parsons Papers, Harvard University Archives, HUG (FP) 42.8.2.
-. 1935a. Letter to Edward Hartshorne, 1 April. Parsons Papers, Harvard University Archives, HUG (FP) 42.10, Box 1.
-. 1935b. Letter to Alexander von Schelting, 24 October. Parsons Papers, Harvard University Archives, HUG (FP) 42.10, Box 1.
-. 1936. Letter to Frank Knight, 6 June. Parsons Papers, Harvard University Archives, HUG (FP) 42.8.2, Box 2.
—. [1937] 1968. The Structure of Social Action. New York: Free Press.
—. 1937a. “Education and the Professions,” International Journal of Ethics 47:365–569.
-. 1937b. “The Role of Ritual in Social Action.” University Public Lecture delivered at the University of Chicago, 1 July.
-. 1937c. “Analysis of the Nonrational Aspects of Human Action.” Address to the Annual Institute of the Society for Social Research, University of Chicago, 18 August.
—. 1937d. “The Role of Theory in Social Research.” Address to the Annual Institute of the Society for Social Research, Univesity of Chicago, 21 August. Published in The American Sociological Review 3:652–664.
-. 1937e. “The Unity of Contemporary Social Theory.” Address given to the Annual Institute of the Society for Social Research, University of Chicago, 25 August.
-. 1939a. “Simmel and the Methodological Problems of Formal Sociology.” Parsons Papers, Harvard University Archives, HUG (FP) 42.42, Box 2.
-. 1939b. Letter to Crane Brinton, 11 July. Parsons Papers, Harvard University Archives, HUG (FP) 42.8.2, Box 2.
-. 1939c. Letter to Edward Shils, 17 May. Parsons Papers, Harvard University Archives, HUG (FP) 42.8.2, Box 2.
—. 1939d. “The Professions and Social Structure,” Social I’orces 17:457–467.
—. 1940a. “An Analytical Approach to the Theory of Social Stratification,” American Journal of Sociology 45:841–862.
—. 1940b. “The Motivation of Economic Activities,” Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science 6:187–203. Reprinted in Essays in Sociological Theory (1949;1954).
-. 1940c. “Reply to Professor Knight,” Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science (August): 466-472.
—(ed.). 1947. Max Weber: The Theory of Social and Economic Organization. (Co-edited and translated with A.M. Henderson.) Oxford: Oxford University Press.
—. 1951. The Social System. New York: Free Press.
—. 1964. Essays in Sociological Theory, revised edition. New York: Free Press.
-. 1978. Letter to David Frisby, 17 May. Parsons Papers, Harvard University Archives, HUG (FP) 42.8.8, Box 5.
-. 1979. Letter to Jeffrey Alexander, 19 January. Parsons Papers, Harvard University Archives, HUG (FP) 42.8.8, Box 1.
—. 1990. “Prolegomena to a Theory of Social Institutions by Talcott Parsons, with Prologue and Commentary by Charles Camic,” American Sociological Review 55(June):313–345.
—. 1991a. The Early Essays. Edited with an introduction by Charles Camic. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
—. 1991b. “The Integration of Economic and Sociological Theory, The Marshall Lectures.” Edited with an introduction by Richard Swedberg. Sociological Inquiry 61,1:10–59.
—. 1993. “Georg Simmel and Ferdinand Toennies: Social Relationships and the Elements of Action,” Teoria Sociologica 1,1:45–71.
-. 1994. “Georg Simmel and Ferdinand Tönnies: Social Relationships and the Elements of Action.” Simmel Newsletter 4, 1.
-. 1998. Chapter XVIII. Georg Simmel and Ferdinand Tönnies: Social Relationships and the Elements of Action (pp. 1-16 of draft chapter XVIII of Structure of Social Action, Parsons Papers, Harvard University Archives, HUG (FP) 42.41, Box 2). The American Sociologist 28, 2 (Summer) 39-48.
Poggi, Gianfranco. 1993. Money and the Modern Mind: Georg Simmel’s Philosophy of Money. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Pope, Whitney. 1973. “Classic on Classic: Parsons’ Interpretation of Durkheim.” American Sociological Review 38,4:399–415.
—, Jere Cohen, and Lawrence Hazelrigg. 1975. “On the Divergence of Weber and Durkheim: A Critique of Parsons’ Convergence Thesis.” American Sociological Review 40,4:417–427.
Rammstedt, Otthein and Patrick Watier. (eds.) G. Simmel et les sciences humaines. Actes du Colloque G. Simmel et les sciences humaines, 14–15 Septembre 1988. Paris: Méridiens Klincksieck.
Ray, Larry (ed.). 1991. Formal Sociology: The Sociology of Georg Simmel. Brookfield, VT: Elgar.
Remy, Jean. 1995. Georg Simmel: Ville et modernite. Paris: L’Harmattan.
Roberts, David. 1996. “Philosophy of Money: Reflexions on the Relation between Philosophy and History, “ Thesis-Eleven 44:12–27.
Robertson, Roland and Bryan Turner (eds.). 1991. Talcott Parsons: Theorist of Modernity. London: Sage.
Sciortino, Giuseppe. 1993. “Introduzione: un capitolo inedito de La struttura dell’azione sociale. Teoria Sociologica 1,2:13–40.
Scott, Donald. 1934-35. “Lecture Notes on Sociology 21 (course given by Talcott Parsons).” Harvard University Archives, HUG (FP) 47691247, Box 2.
Sellenberg, Anne-Marie. 1994. A Blend of Contradictions: Georg Simtnel in Theory and Practice. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
Shils, Edward. 1939?. Letter to Talcott Parsons. In the Parsons Papers, Harvard University Archives. HUG (FP) 42.8.2, Box 2.
-. 1939a. “Comments on Talcott Parsons, ’Simmel and the Methodological Problems of Formal Sociology, “ Parsons Papers, Harvard University Archives, HUG (FP) 42.42, Box 2.
Simmel, Georg. 1949. “The Sociology of Sociability.” Translated by Everett C. Hughes. American Journal of Sociology 55:254–61.
—. 1896. “Superiority and Subordination as Subject-Matter of Sociology, I and II.” American Journal of Sociology 2:167–89; 392-415.
-. 1931. Soziologische Vorlesungen... gehalten an der UniversitÄt Berlin im Wintersemester 1899. Society for Social Research, University of Chicago, Series 1, Number 1 (a mimeographed reproduction of Robert Park’s notes, published by his pupils).
—. 1950. The Sociology of Georg Simmel. Translated, edited and with an introduction by Kurt H. Wolff. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.
—. 1955. Conflict and the Web of Group Affiliations. Translated by Kurt H. Wolff and R. Bendix, with a foreward by Everett C. Hughes, Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
—. 1959. Sociology of Religion. Translated by C. Rosenthal with an introduction by F. Gross. New York: Philosophical Library.
—. 1976. Georg Simmel: Sociologist and European. Translated by DE. Jenkinson et al. with an introduction by P.A. Lawrence. New York: Barnes and Noble.
—. 1977. The Problem of the Philosophy of History. Translated and edited with an introduction by Guy Oakes. New York: Free Press.
—. 1980. Essays on Interpretation in Social Science. Translated and edited with an introduction by Guy Oakes. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield.
—. 1984. Georg Simmel on Women, Sexuality, and Love. Translated and edited with an introduction by Guy Oakes. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
—. 1986. Schopenhauer and Nietzsche. Translated by Helmut Loiskandl, Deena Weinstein and Michael Weinstein. Amtierst: University of Massachusetts Press.
—. 1988. Philosophie de l’amour. Traduit de l’allemand par Sabine Cornille et Philippe Ivernel. Paris: Editions Rivages.
—. 1990. The Philosophy of Money. 2nd enlarged edition. Edited by David Frisby and translated by Tom Bottomore and David Frisby. London and New York: Routledge.
David Frisby. 1991. Sociologie et epistemologie/Georg Simmel. (Traduction de Grundfragen der Soziologie.) Introduction by Julien Freund. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.
David Frisby. 1996. Hauptprobleme der Philosophie: Philosophische Kultur. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
David Frisby. 1997a. Georg Simmel: Essays on Religion. Edited and translated by Horst Jürgen Helle in collaboration with Ludwig Nieder, forward by Phillip E. Hammond. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
David Frisby. 1997b. Soziologische Aesthetik. Bodenheim: Philo.
Sociologie et Societes. 1989. “Special Issue: Rereading Talcott Parsons. “
Sorokin, Pitirim. 1928. Contemporary Sociological Theories. New York and London: Harper and Brothers.
Turner, Stephen P. and Jonathan H. Turner. 1990. The Impossible Science: An Institutional History of American Sociology. Newbury Park, CA.: Sage.
Vidich, Arthur J. and Stanford M. Lyman. 1985. American Sociology: Worldly Rejections of Religion and Their Directions. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press,
von Wiese, Leopold and Howard Becker. 1932. Systematic Sociology: On the Basis of the Beziehungslehre and Gebildelehre of Leopold von Wiese. Adapted and amplified by Howard Becker. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
Wearne, Bruce C. 1981. “Talcott Parsons’s Appraisal and Critique of Alfred Marshall,” Social Research 48 (Winter):8l6–851.
—. 1989. The Theory and Scholarship of Talcott Parsons to1951: A Critical Commentary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- (ed.). 1996. “Talcott Parsons’ Undergraduate Exploration in Sociology,” The American Sociologist 27, 4 (Winter):8–60.
Weber, Max. 1922. Gesammelte AufsÄtze zur Wissenschaftslehre. Tübingen:J.C.B. Mohr.
Weinstein, Deena and Michael A. Weinstein. 1989. “Simmel and the Dialectics of the Double Boundary,” Sociological Inquiry 59:48–59.
— 1993. Postmodern(ized) Simmel. London and New York: Routledge. Wenzel, Harold. 1990. Die Ordnung des Handelns: Talcott Parsons’s Theorie des Allgemenelnen Handlungssystems. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Wolff, Kurt H. (ed.). 1959. Georg Simmel, 1858-1918: A Collection of Essays, with Translations and a Bibliography. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
Yui, Kiyomitsu. 1998a. “Parsons’s ‘Lost Fragment’ on Simmel: Pivoting Around an Unpublished Manuscript,” Annual Reports of Humanities and Social Sciences, Kobe University 17 (March): 1-22.
-. 1998b. “In Search of the ’Lost Fragment.” Kobe University (15th January).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
He is currently researching the development of social science at Harvard in the 1930s and 1940s, as well as the impact of Rockefeller philanthropy on the humanities and communications. Buxton is also preparing a volume of material from Parsons’s faculty papers for publication.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Buxton, W.J. From the “missing fragment” to the “lost manuscript ”: Reflections on Parsons’s engagement with Simmel. Am Soc 29, 57–76 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-998-1029-4
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-998-1029-4