Abstract
In this article, I consider the way the as yet unrealized peace between Israelis and Palestinians has been conceptualized by Western scholarship and also by the elite Israeli peace camp. Their approach to reconciliation is liberal, in that it is secular, individualistic, looks to human rights discourse for its sense of justice and for a model for citizenship. The liberal peace culture is laden with social norms, values, and ethical demands, many of which are not necessarily inherent to “peace”, but rather related to the taken-for-granted liberal social expectations of the people who run these initiatives, and often of scholars who write about peace. By contrast, much of the Israeli and Palestinian population, are far more religious, culturally traditional and community oriented, experience a sacred connection to the land, and look to their religious traditions for their sense of justice and ideas about citizenship. They are, in other words, non-liberal subjects. These non-liberal groups are also beginning to re-envision peace through their own cultural, Middle Eastern, lens. Not only do liberal approaches differ from non-liberal ones, but they also misrepresent non-liberal approaches as both anachronistic and authoritarian. This misrecognition is not mal-intentioned, but its consequences are grave nonetheless. This paper suggests that in order for academia to make a substantial or meaningful contribution to the topics of peace and conflict resolution, it needs to do far more self-reflection on the ideological assumptions inherent in its current approach, so as not to reproduce Euro-centric models and concepts.
Similar content being viewed by others
Availability of Data and Material
Not applicable.
Code Availability
Not applicable.
Notes
The first Intifada, or Palestinian uprising, lasted from 1987–1993. The second lasted from 2000–2005.
The participants in these groups could themselves be considered elites by virtue of their political power and social status. Yet, secular liberals are cast as elites pejoratively within this community, which refers to historical status and cultural capital.
References
Abboud, S. (2021). Making peace to sustain war: the Astana process and Syria’s illiberal peace. Peacebuilding, 9(3), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/21647259.2021.1895609
Alpher, R. (2014). Israel is my home, but I can no longer live here. Haaretz. Aug 31. https://www.haaretz.com/opinion/.premium-leaving-my-homeland-1.5262278
Baglione, L. (2008). Post-settlement Chechnya: a case of authoritarian peace-building. Conference Paper, International Studies Association Annual Convention, San Francisco.
Bar-On, D. Litvak-Hirsh, T, & Othman, R. (2007). Within-group variance as a facilitator of dialogue: a Jewish-Arab Israeli encounter group focused on family stories. Journal of International Cooperation in Education, 10(1), 33–51. https://cice.hiroshima-u.ac.jp/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/10-1-3.pdf
Bekerman, Z., & Maoz, I. (2005). Troubles with identity: Obstacles to coexistence education in conflict ridden societies. Identity, 5(4), 341–357. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532706xid0504_3
Bell, D. (2016). Reordering the world: Essays on liberalism and empire. Princeton University Press.
Ben-Eliezer, U. (2019). War over peace: One hundred years of Israel’s militaristic nationalism. University of California Press.
Berda, Y. (2017). New horizons for peace between Israelis and Palestinians. Talk Jerusalem Press Club. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=20MbhQXQAAk&ab_channel=JerusalemPressClub
Cohen, U., & Leon, N. (2008). The new Mizrahi middle class: Ethnic mobility and class integration in Israel. Journal of Israeli History, 27(1), 51–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/13531040801902823
Cipriani, R. (2016). Sociological knowledge of the other: Wolff’s ‘surrender and catch’ methodology. The American Sociologist, 48(1), 67–85. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44982705
Chakrabarty, D. (2000). Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial thought and historical difference. Princeton University Press.
Chaitin, J. (2011). Peacebuilding in Israel and Palestine: Social psychology and grassroots initiatives. Palgrave.
Clinton, W. (1998). Remarks by President Clinton to the Palestinian National Council and other Palestinian organizations. https://mfa.Gov.il/MFA/ForeignPolicy/MFADocuments/Yearbook12/Pages/119%20Remarks%20by%20President%20Clinton%20to%20the%20Palestinia.Aspx#:~:Text=Our%20great%20American%20prophet%2C%20Martin,and%20changes%20in%20the%20heart. 119.
Dalsheim, J. (2013). Anachronism and morality: Israeli settlement, Palestinian nationalism, and human liberation. Theory, Culture & Society, 30(3), 29–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/026327641246069
Dalsheim, J. (2014). Producing spoilers: Peacemaking and the production of enmity in a secular age. Oxford University Press.
De Oliveira, R. S. (2011). Illiberal peacebuilding in Angola. The Journal of Modern African Studies, 49(2), 287–314. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23018923
Doyle, M. W. (1983). Kant, liberal legacies, and foreign affairs. Philosophy and Public Affairs., 12(3), 205–235.
Evans, M. (2003). The sacred: Differentiating, clarifying and extending concepts. Review of Religious Research., 45(1), 32–47.
Feige, M. (2009). Settling in the hearts: Jewish fundamentalism in the occupied territories. Wayne State University Press.
Feige, M. (2013). Soft power: the meaning of home for Gush Emunim settlers. Journal of Israeli History, 32(1), 109–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/13531042.2013.768041
Fisher, E. (2017). Hindu pluralism: Religion and the public sphere in early modern South India. University of California Press.
Forrester, K. (2019). In the shadow of justice: Postwar liberalism and the remaking of political philosophy. Princeton University Press.
Fukuyama, F. (1989). The end of history? The National Interest, 16, 3–18. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24027184
Galston, W. A. (1995). Two concepts of liberalism. Ethics, 105(3), 516–534. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2382140
Gawerc, M. (2012). Prefiguring peace: Israeli and Palestinian peacebuilding partnerships. Lexington Books.
Gellner, E. (2008). Nations and nationalism. Cornell University Press.
Ginty, R. M. (2010). Hybrid peace: The interaction between top-down and bottom-up peace. Security Dialogue, 41(4), 391–412. https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010610374312
Goodman, Y., & Witztum, E. (2002). Cross-cultural encounters between care providers: Rabbis' referral letters to a psychiatric clinic in Israel. Social Science & Medicine, 55(8), 1309–1323. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(01)00278-7
Grey, J. (2000). The two faces of liberalism. The New Press.
Greenhouse, C. J. (2011). The paradox of relevance: Ethnography and citizenship in the United States. University of Pennsylvania Press.
Haider, A. (2021). The new Arab middle class in Israel: Economic, socio-cultural, and political aspects. Van Leer Institute Press. (Hebrew).
Hermann, T. S. (2009). The Israeli peace movement: a shattered dream. Cambridge University Press.
Herzog, B. (2019). Presenting ethnicity: Israeli citizenship discourse. Contemporary Review of the Middle East, 6(3–4). https://doi.org/10.1177/2347798919872840
Joffe, E. G. H. (1983). Arab nationalism and Palestine. Journal of Peace Research, 20(2), 157–170. https://doi.org/10.1177/002234338302000204
Kant, I. (1983). Perpetual peace and other essays. Hackett Publishing.
Katsman, H. (2020). The hyphen cannot hold: Contemporary trends in religious Zionism. Israeli Studies Review, 35(2), 154–174. https://doi.org/10.3167/isr.2020.350210
Keane, W. (2013). Secularism as a moral narrative of modernity. Transit: Europaische Revue, 43, 159–170.
Keane, W. (2018). Saba Mahmood and the paradoxes of self-parochialization. Public Books. https://www.publicbooks.org/saba-mahmood-and-the-paradoxes-of-self-parochialization/
Kelman, T. (2019). The spectrum of war and peace: Lessons from Northern Ireland for the Israeli Palestinian conflict. Blog Post. Religion and Global Society. https://blogs.Lse.Ac.uk/religionglobalsociety/2019/03/the-Spectrum-of-War-and-Peace-Lessons-from-Northern-Ireland-for-the-Israeli-Palestinian-Conflict/. 2019.
Kidron, C. A. (2021). The politics of glocalised post-traumatic emotion worlds and the limits of Cambodian therapeutic subjectivity. Emotions and Society., 3(1), 133–153. https://doi.org/10.1332/263169021X16137268997795
Kimmerling, B. (2001). The invention and decline of Israeliness: State, society, and the military. University of California Press.
Kowal, E. (2008). The politics of the gap: Indigenous Australians, liberal multiculturalism, and the end of the self-determination era. American Anthropologist, 110(3), 338–348. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1433.2008.00043.x
Kuriansky, J. (2007). Beyond bullets and bombs: Grassroots peacebuilding between Israelis and Palestinians. Praeger.
Kymlicka, W. (2018). The minority question in international relations. In C. Brown, & R. Eckersley (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Political Theory. Oxford University Press.
Laidlaw, J. (2013). The Subject of Virtue. Cambridge University Press.
Leon, N. (2010). The transformation of Israel’s religious-Zionist middle class. Politics, Society, Culture., 2(1), 67–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/13531041003594921
Lewis, D. (2010). The failure of a liberal peace: Sri Lanka’s counter-insurgency in global perspective. Conflict, Security, & Development, 10(5), 647–671. https://doi.org/10.1080/14678802.2010.511509
Lewis, D. (2020). Sri Lanka’s Schmittian peace: Sovereignty, enmity and illiberal order. Conflict, Security, & Development, 20(1), 15–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/14678802.2019.1705067
Lewis, D., Heathershaw, J., & Megoran, N. (2018). Illiberal peace? Authoritarian modes of conflict management. Cooperation and Conflict, 53(4), 486–506. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010836718765902
Mahmood, S. (2015). Religious difference in a secular age: a minority report. Princeton University Press.
Mahmood, S. (2004). Politics of piety: the Islamic revival and the feminist subject. Princeton University Press.
Malkki, L. (1992). National geographic: The rooting of peoples and the territorialization of national identity among scholars and refugees. CulturalAnthropology, 7(1), 24–44.
Mehta, U. S. (1999). Liberalism and empire: a study in nineteenth-century British liberal thought. Chicago University Press.
Mizrachi, N. & Weiss, E. (2020). ‘We do not want to assimilate!’: Rethinking the role of group boundaries in peace initiatives between Muslims and Jews in Israel and in the West Bank. European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology, 7(2), 172–197.
Nair, S. (2020). Translating wisdom. University of California Press.
Needleman, J. (2009). The new religions. Penguin.
Owen, C., Juraev, S., Lewis, D., Megoran, N., & Heathershaw, J. (2018). Interrogating illiberal peace in Eurasia: Critical perspectives on peace and conflict. Rowman & Littlefield.
Paris, R. (2010). Saving liberal peacebuilding. Review of International Studies, 36(2), 337–365. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210510000057
Paye, J.-C. (2015). The end of history, or messianic time. Telos, 173, 181–190. https://doi.org/10.3817/1215173181
Peetush, A. K. (2003). Kymlicka, multiculturalism, and non-western nations: The problem with liberalism. Public Affairs Quarterly, 17(4), 291–318. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40441362
Pfeil, H. (2015). Understanding the dynamics of Israeli-Palestinian dialogue workshops: the contribution of a Habermasian approach. International Journal of Politics, Culture and Society, 29, 119–141. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24712995
Povinelli, E. A. (2002). The cunning of recognition: Indigenous alterities and the making of Australian multiculturalism. Duke University Press.
Ravitzky, R. (2017). The national religious public and the prospects of peace with the Palestinians. Mosaica. Blog Post. http://religiouspeaceinitiative.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/Between_Scuttling_and_Leading.pdf
Richmond, O. (2011). A post-liberal peace. Routledge.
Smith, C. Q. (2014). Illiberal peace-building in hybrid political orders: Managing violence during Indonesia’s contested political transition. Third World Quarterly, 35(8), 1509–1528. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2014.946277
Smith, C. Q., Waldorf, L., Venugopal, R., & McCarthy, G. (2020). Illiberal peace-building in Asia: a comparative overview. Conflict, Security and Development., 20(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/14678802.2019.1705066
Taragin-Zeller, L. (2021). A rabbi of one’s own? Navigating religious authority and ethical freedom in everyday Judaism. American Anthropologist, 123(4), 833–845. https://doi.org/10.1111/aman.13603
Weiss, E., & Mizrachi, N. (2019). A time of peace: Divergent temporalities in Jewish-Palestinian peace initiatives. Hau., 9(3), 565–587.
Funding
This research was supported by the Israel Science Foundation Grant No. 765/17.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Not applicable.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics Approval
Not applicable.
Consent to Participate
All interlocutors provided oral informed consent to participate in this research project.
Consent for Publication
Not applicable.
Conflicts of Interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Weiss, E. Peace and Liberal Misrecognition: Non-liberal Peace Initiatives in Israel-Palestine. Am Soc 53, 604–624 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-022-09541-4
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-022-09541-4