Skip to main content
Log in

Rediscovering Fei Xiaotong: Blending Indigenous Chinese Thought and Western Social Science

  • Published:
The American Sociologist Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The assimilation of the theoretical and methodological constructions of Western sociology into the investigation of primarily reform oriented social research problems of twentieth century China, is the background to the work done by most of the pioneering Chinese sociologists such as Fei Xiaotong. The aim of this paper is to analyse the movement of ideas and research methods in the global circulation of knowledge and the formulation of distinct traditions of academic enquiry, in this case, Chinese sociology. This article uses the chronology of Fei’s life to present the interactions between American (Robert Parks and the Chicago School), British (Malinowski and social anthropology of 1930s), Russian (Shirokogoroff) and Chinese (Wu Wenzao and Yenching school) sociological traditions and their influences in Fei’s works, primarily his most famous work, From the Soil. Fei’s indigenous concept of Chaxugeju, presents a clear distinction between Chinese and Western societies. In this article, we apply Chaxugeju in some of the fairly common social research questions on family structure, gender and state- society relations to bring out the nuanced distinctions in the American and Chinese theoretical traditions. We also look into the problems in Fei’s theorising in the use of community studies, in tackling the colonialism aspect and with respect to the cultural context in Chinese sociology and its similarities in its challenges with Chicago school.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Antolln, J. B. (1998). The Chinese in Europe (F. Benton, Gregor & Pieke (ed.)). Macmillan; St. Martin’s Press.

  • Arkush, R. D. (1981). Family Background and Early Schooling. In R. D. Arkush, Fei Xiaotong and Sociology in Revolutionary China (1st ed., Vol. 98, pp. 1–22). Cambridge and London: Harvard University Asia Centre, Harvard University. Retrieved 11 Sep 2018

  • Arkush, R. D. (2006). Fei Xiaotong [Hsiao-tung Fei] (1910–2005). American Anthropologist, 108(2), 452–456. Retrieved 26 Sep 2018, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3804858

  • Barbalet, J. (2017). Confucianism and the Chinese self. Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6289-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbalet, J. (2020). The Analysis of Chinese Rural Society: Fei Xiaotong Revisited. Modern China, 47(4), 355–382. https://doi.org/10.1177/0097700419894921

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbalet, J. (2021). Tripartite guanxi: Resolving kin and non-kin discontinuities in Chinese connections. Theory and Society, 50(1), 151–173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-020-09399-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buxton, W. J., & Nichols, L. T. (2000). Talcott Parsons and the Far East at Harvard, 1941–48: Comparative Institutions and National Policy. The American Sociologist, 31(2), 5–17. Retrieved 14 Sep 2021, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/27698949

  • Candela, A. M. (2015). Sociology in times of crisis: Chen Da, national salvation and the indigenization of knowledge. Journal of World - Systems Research, 21(2), 362–386. https://doi.org/10.5195/JWSR.2015.10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Celarent, B. (2013). Review of Peasant Life in China by Fei Xiaotong; Earthbound China by Fei Xiaotong; Zhang Zhiyi. American Journal of Sociology, 118(4), 1153–1160. Retrieved 25 Aug 2018, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/https://doi.org/10.1086/669921

  • Chen, H. F. (2018a). Chinese sociology: State-building and the institutionalization of globally circulated knowledge. In Palgrave Pivot CN - HM477.C55 C44 2018. Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Chen, H. F. (2018b). Dramatic rebirth: the suspension, reestablishment, and institutionalization of Chinese sociology. In Chinese Sociology, (pp. 29–52). Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58220-1_3

  • Chen, T. H. (1960). Thought Reform of the Chinese Intellectuals. Hong Kong University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, H., Zhang, Q. F., & Donaldson, J. A. (2015). On the Social and Political Effects of Opening in Rural China: Contemporary Chinese Political Economy and Strategic Relations, 1(3), 609–VIII.

  • Ching, H. (1908). The classic of filial duty (I. Chen, Trans.) London: Hazell, Watson and Viney.

  • Dawson, R. (1978). Confucianism and the ancient Chinese world-view. In R. Dawson (Ed.), The Chinese experience (pp. 71–94). New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.

  • Dirlik, A., Guannan, L., & Yen, X. (Eds.). (2012). Sociology and Anthropology in Twentieth-Century China: Between Universalism and Indigenism. The Chinese University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberhard, W., & Liu, W. (1967). Chinese society under communism: A reader. American Sociological Review, 32(5), 838. https://doi.org/10.2307/2092047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fang, Y., & Weitian, Q. (1981). Sociologist Chen Da. Chinese Sociology & Anthropology, 13(3), 59–74. https://doi.org/10.2753/csa0009-4625130359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feenstra, R. C., & Hamilton, G. G. (2006). Emergent economies, divergent paths: economic organization and international trade in South Korea and Taiwan. In Structural analysis in the social sciences CN - HC467. F44 2006. Cambridge University Press.

  • Fei, X. (1953). China's Gentry: Essays in Rural-Urban Relations. (M. P. Redfield, Ed.) Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • Fei, X. (1980a). Peasant life in China: A field study of country life in the Yangtze Valley (Reprinted). Routledge & Kegan Paul.

  • Fei, X. (1980b). Toward a people's anthropology. Human Organization, 39(2), 115–120. Retrieved Jan 2020, from from http://www.jstor.org/stable/44125750.

  • Fei, X. (1992a). Bringing Literacy to the Countryside. In F. Xiaotong, From the Soil: The Foundations of Chinese Society (G. G. Hamilton, & Z. Wang, Trans., pp. 45–52). Berkeley: University of California Press.

  • Fei, X. (1992b). Chaxugeju: The Differential Mode of Association. In F. Xiaotong (Ed.), From the Soil: The Foundations of Chinese Society (pp. 60–70). University of Berkeley Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fei, X. (1992c). From the soil: The foundations of chinese society. (G. G. Hamilton, & W. Zheng, Trans.) Berkeley: University of California Press.

  • Fei, X. (1992d). Special characteristics of rural society. In F. Xiaotong (Ed.), From the Soil: The Foundations of Chinese Society (pp. 37–44). University of California Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fei, X. (2015). Globalization and cultural self-awareness. In China Academic Library. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-662-46648-3

  • Fei, X., Chang, C. I., Cooper, P., & Redfield, M. P. (1949). Earthbound China: A study of rural economy in Yunnan. London.

  • Feuchtwang, S. (2005). Obituary: Fei Xiaotong- Anthropologist and reformer. The Guardian. Retrieved Jan 13 from http://www.theguardian.com/news/2005/may/05/guardianobituaries.obituaries1

  • Feuchtwang, S. (2015a). A practically minded person: Fei Xiaotong’ s anthropological calling and Edmund Leach’s game. Journal of China in Comparative Perspective, 1(2), 14–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feuchtwang, S. (2015b). Social egoism and individualism: Surprises and questions that arise from reading Fei Xiaotong’ s idea of ‘the opposition between East and West’. Journal of China in Comparative Perspective, 128–145. Retrieved from http://gci-uk.org/source/files/JCCP-1-1-feuchtwang.pdf.

  • Feuchtwang, S., Rowland, M., & Wang, M. (2010). Some Chinese directions in anthropology. Anthropological Quarterly, 83(4), 897–925. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/40890844

  • Freedman, M. (1962a). Sociology in China: A brief survey. The China Quarterly, 10, 166–173. https://doi.org/10.1017/S030574100000285X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, M. (1962b). Sociology in and of China. The British Journal of Sociology, 13(2), 106. https://doi.org/10.2307/587887

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, M. (1963). A Chinese phase in social anthropology. The British Journal of Sociology, 14(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.2307/587316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gransow, B. (2001). Non-translatable: Indigenous concepts in social science research on China. Asian Journal of Social Science, 29(2), 262–284. Retrieved 25 Aug 2018, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/23653937

  • Guldin, G. E. (1987). Anthropology in the People's Republic of China: The winds of change. Social Research, 54(4), 757–778. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/40970482

  • Hamilton, G. G. (2015). What Western social scientists can learn from the writings of Fei Xiaotong? Journal of China in Comparative Perspective, 1(1), 107–127. https://doi.org/10.24103/JCCP/2015/1/7

  • Hamilton, G. G., & Zheng, W. (1992). Introduction: Fei Xiaotong and the beginnings of a Chinese sociology. In F. Xiaotong (Ed.), From the Soil: The Foundations of Chinese Society (pp. 1–36). University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, G., & Chang, X. (2011). China and world anthropology: A conversation on the legacy of Fei Xiaotong (1910–2005). 20–23. (Z. Wu, Interviewer) anthropology today Vol 27 No 6. Retrieved 3 Sep 2018, from http://www.ccpn-global.com/kcfinder/upload/files/fei_AT.pdf

  • Harrell, S. (2001). The anthropology of reform and the reform of anthropology: Anthropological narratives of recovery and progress in China. Annual Review of Anthropology, 30, 139–161. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3069212

  • Harrell, S. (2015). Fei Xiaotong and the vocabulary of anthropology in China. Journal of China in Comparative Perspective, 1(1), 77–89. Retrieved August 31, 2018

  • Herrmann-Pillath, C. (2016). Fei Xiaotong’ s comparative theory of Chinese culture: Its relevance for contemporary cross-disciplinary research on Chinese collectivism. The Copenhagen Journal of Asian Studies, 34(1), 25–57. https://doi.org/10.22439/cjas.v34i1.5187

  • Hon, F. C. (2018a). Achievement without coherence: The rise of Chinese sociology. In F. C. Hon (Ed.), Chinese Sociology: State-Building and the Institutionalization of Globally Circulated Knowledge (pp. 9–28). Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hon, F. C. (2018b). Introduction. In F. C. Hon (Ed.), Chinese Sociology: State-Building and the Institutionalization of Globally Circulated Knowledge (pp. 1–8). Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janku, A. (2016). China: A hydrological history. Nature, 536(7614), 28–29. https://doi.org/10.1038/536028a

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jijiao, Z., & Wu, Y. (2021). Seventy years of Chinese anthropology. International Journal of Anthropology and Ethnology, 5(7). Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1186/s41257-021-00048-3

  • King, A.Y. C., & Tse-Sang, W., with the collaboration (1978). The development and death of Chinese academic sociology: A chapter in the sociology of sociology. Modern Asian Studies, 12(1), 37–58. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0026749X00008131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Legge, J. (1861). The great learning. In J. Legge (Ed.), The Chinese classics. With a translation, critical and exegetical notes, prolegomena, and copious indexes (Vol. 1, pp. 219–245). London, Hong Kong: Trubner & Go.

  • Legge, J. (1879). The sacred books of China: The texts of Confucianism (Vol. 3). In F. M. Müller (Ed.). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

  • Lekner, D. (2018). A chill in spring: Literary exchange and political struggle in the hundred flowers and anti-rightist campaigns of 1956–1958. Modern China, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0097700418783280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, D. (1999). Reconstructing Chinese sociology: A quest for an applied science. Sociological Practice, 1(4), 273–284. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022857722121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, H., Fang, M., Wang, Y., Sun, B., & Qi, W. (1987). Chinese sociology, 1898–1986. Social Forces, 65(3), 612–640. https://doi.org/10.2307/2578521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, Z., & Palmer, J. C. (2016). A critical review of sociological dialogue between China and the West. Chinese Sociological Dialogue, 1(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/2397200916669698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, S. (2020). Origin and expansion of Chinese sociology. Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lizhong, X. (2021). Post-Western sociologies: what and why? The Journal of Chinese Sociology, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40711-020-00141-8

  • Malighetti, R. (2019). Anthropologies from China. Learning from the Past, Prospects for the Future. In Bérose - Encyclopédie internationale des histoires de l’anthropologie, Paris.

  • Malinowski, B. (2005). Subject, Method and Scope. In B. Malinowski, Argonauts of the Western Pacific: An account of native enterprise and adventure in the archipelagos of Melanesian New Guinea (p. 19). London: Taylor & Francis.

  • McConaghy, M. (2020). Where you labor is where you sing: The new folksong movement of 1958 and the fissured mediascape of maoist China. Modern China, 47(5), 475–509. https://doi.org/10.1177/0097700420943586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ming, Y. (1989). Chronology of Chinese sociology 1895–1989. Chinese Sociology & Anthropology, 22(2), 88–103. https://doi.org/10.2753/csa0009-4625220288

  • Morgan, W. J. (2014). Fei Xiaotong: A public intellectual in Communist China. Anthropology Today, 30(6), 18–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8322.12143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ormerod, R. (2019). The history and ideas of sociological functionalism: Talcott Parsons, modern sociological theory, and the relevance for OR. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2019.1640590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pan, G. (2015). Socio-biological implications of Confucianism. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44575-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T., & Bales, R. F. (1955). Family. Glencoe, Illinois: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pasternak, B. (1988). A Conversation with Fei Xiaotong. Current Anthropology, 29(4), 637–662. Retrieved 10 Sep 2018, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2743517

  • Pye, L. W. (1985). East Asia: Varieties of Confucian authority. In L. Pye (Ed.), Asian power and politics: The cultural dimensions of authority (pp. 55–89). Cambridge, Massachussets: The Belknap Press of the Harvard University Press.

  • Redfield, R. (1953). Introduction. In X. Fei (Ed.), China’s Gentry: Essays in Rural-Urban Relations (pp. 1–16). University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renmin, R. (1983). China report: Political, sociological and military affairs no. 439. Foreign Broadcast Information Service. Retrieved 27 Aug 2018.

  • Ritzer, G. (1992) Sociological Theory, 3rd edition, New York, McGraw-Hill, HM24 R4938.

  • Roulleau-Berger, L. (2021a). Introduction: On post-western sociology. The Journal of Chinese Sociology, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40711-021-00148-9

  • Roulleau-Berger, L. (2021b). The fabric of post-western sociology: Ecologies of knowledge beyond the East and the West. The Journal of Chinese Sociology, 8(10), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40711-021-00144-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez, A. R., & Wong, S. L. (1974). On an interview with Chinese anthropologists. The China Quarterly, 60, 775. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0305741000025777

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaojie, L. (2020). Origin and expansion of Chinese sociology. Singapore: Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-3094-4

  • Skinner G, W. (1951). The new sociology in China. The Far Eastern Quarterly, 10(4), 365–371. https://doi.org/10.2307/2049008

  • Song, J. (2020). The differential mode of association in cyberspace: Sociological research on crowdfunding BT - the internet society in China: A 2016 report (S. Liu & J. Wang (eds.); pp. 199–230). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8237-6_7

  • Song, Y. (2013). Fei Xiaotong. In Y. Song, biographical dictionary of the People's Republic of China (pp. 80–82). McFarland.

  • Stockman, N. (2000a). Chinese family: Continuity and change. In N. Stockman (Ed.), Understanding Chinese Society (pp. 120–148). Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stockman, N. (2000b). The study of Chinese society. In N. Stockman (Ed.), Understanding Chinese Society (pp. 1–22). Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun, A. (2017). Fei Xiaotong’ s humanism infuses from the soil: An appreciation of from the soil: The foundations of Chinese Society (a translation of Fei Xiaotong’ s Xiangtu Zhongguo). Harvard Divinity Bulletin, 45(1 & 2). Retrieved 3 Sep 2018, from https://bulletin.hds.harvard.edu/articles/springsummer2017/fei-xiaotongs-humanism-infuses-from-the-soil

  • Sun, P. W. (1949). Sociology in China. Social Forces, 27(3), 247–251. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.2307/2572173

  • Tang, Y. (2008). The contemporary significance of confucianism. Frontiers of Philosophy in China, 3(4), 477–501. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11466-008-0031-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thurston, A. F. (2005). An optimist’s life. The Wilson Quarterly, 29(4), 68–75. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40261492

  • Tsang, A., & Lamont, M. (2018). How can cultural sociology help us understand contemporary Chinese society? The Journal of Chinese Sociology, 5(15). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40711-018-0086-5

  • Uberoi, P. (1974). Trends in the sociology and anthropology of modern China. China Report, 10(5–6), 38–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/000944557401000504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, M. (2021). Inheritance and reflection: Re-study of three anthropology fieldwork sites in China’s Yunnan Province. International Journal of Anthropology and Ethnology, 5(9). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41257-021-00050-9

  • Weaver, T. (2002). Fei Xiaotong: Policy in the service of minorities. In the dynamics of applied anthropology in the twentieth century: The Malinowski Award papers (pp. 138–140). Society for Applied Anthropology.

  • Wei-pang, C. (1979). The reactionary nature of the functionalist social anthropology imported by Fei Hsiao-t’ung and others. Chinese Sociology & Anthropology, 11(3–4), 98–112. https://doi.org/10.2753/CSA0009-462511030496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, G. (2019). Disciplines and politics: From Malinowski to People’s anthropology. In Narrating southern Chinese minority nationalities: politics, disciplines, and public history: New Directions in East Asian History (pp. 43–74). Springer Singapore. http://link.springer.com/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6022-0

  • Xu, X., Png, I. P. L., Chu, J., & Chen, Y. N. (2018). When things were falling apart: Tocqueville, Fei Xiaotong and the agrarian causes of the Chinese revolution. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3214959

  • Xudong, Z. (2011). Transcending existing traditions of sociology—A review of Fei Xiaotong’s reflections on sociological method in his old age. Social Sciences in China, 32(3), 62–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/02529203.2011.598299

  • Yan, F. (2021). Identity of China’s modern academic system: A Chinese-Western interaction perspective. Journal of Educational Change, 22(2), 157–174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-020-09389-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, S. (2017). A review of Chinese ethnology in the past hundred years and its summary in the new era. International Journal of Anthropology and Ethnology, 1(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41257-017-0002-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yanjie, B., & Lei, Z. (2008). Sociology in China. Contexts, 7(3), 20–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zedong, M. (1961). Talks at the Yenan forum on literature and art. In M. Zedong, selected works of Mao Zedong. Peking: Foreign Language Press.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ana Sinha.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of Interest/Competing Interests

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sinha, A., Lakhanpal, P. Rediscovering Fei Xiaotong: Blending Indigenous Chinese Thought and Western Social Science. Am Soc 53, 374–394 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-021-09526-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-021-09526-9

Keywords

Navigation