Abstract
In plotting the course for the discipline of sociology, sociologists over the past two decades have called for the practice of “public sociology” (Burawoy in American Sociological Review, 70(1), 4–28, 2005), for disciplinary convergence around a critical methodology (Carroll in Canadian Review of Sociology, 50(1), 1–26, 2013) and the devotion of our scholarly efforts to issues of social justice (Romero in American Sociological Review, 85(1), 1–30, 2020). While public, critical, and social justice-oriented work is important, these disciplinary mandates can serve to marginalize other types of sociological work that are valuable as well. In this climate, work coming from perspectives that are not as left leaning politically, or that does not seek to advance any political agenda may be seen as less valued or legitimate, and scholars who choose to separate their political agendas from their research may experience marginalization (McLaughlin in Canadian Journal of Sociology, 30(1), 1–40, 2005; Pawluch in The American Sociologist, 50, 204–219, 2019). Inspired by the work and doctoral mentorship of Dorothy Pawluch, this paper seeks to both understand the historical development of the field of Canadian sociology and consider the value and place of the interpretive tradition within it. Through reflecting on the research of others and my own experiences as a graduate student, I argue that the “chilly” climate Dorothy (Pawluch in The American Sociologist, 50, 204–219, 2019) alludes to for scholars who operate outside of a politically informed “social-justice agenda” does exist, but that mentorship can help mediate this chill for interpretive leaning students. Finally, I suggest that the branch of the interpretive tradition which asks researchers to suspend their own perspectives and privilege the position of others still has value for Canadian sociology. It can both produce deep, meaningful research contributions and provide students with tools for engaging in productive intellectual debate and transformative encounters with difference.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
At McMaster University, the area examinations which, after completion, Ph.D. students become doctoral candidates focusing exclusively on finishing their research.
References
Abbott, A. (2007). For humanist sociology. In D. Clawson, R. Zussman, J. Misra, N. Gerstel & R. Stokes (Eds.), Public sociology: fifteen eminent sociologists debate politics and the profession in the twenty-first century (pp. 195–209). University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.1525/california/9780520251373.001.0001
Baehr, P. (2012). Alien lives: Notes and quotations. Talk delivered at McMaster University.
Baehr, P. (2019). The unmasking style in social theory. Routledge.
Best, J. (2008). Historical development and defining issues. In J. A. Holstein & J. F. Gubrium (Eds.), Handbook of constructionist research (pp. 41–64). The Guilford Press.
Best, J. (2015). Beyond case studies: Expanding the constructionist framework for social problems research. Qualitative Sociology Review, 11(2), 18–33. http://www.qualitativesociologyreview.org/ENG/Volume33/QSR_11_2_Best.pdf
Bhambra, G. K., & Holmwood, J. (2021). Colonialism and modern social theory. Polity.
Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. University of California Press.
Burawoy, M. (2005). 2004 ASA presidential address: For public sociology. American Sociological Review, 70(1), 4–28.
Brym, R. J. (2002). Canadian sociology: An introduction to the upper thirteen. The American Sociologist, 33(1), 5–11. https://doi-org.libaccess.lib.mcmaster.ca/10.1007/s12108-002-1027-x
Carroll, W. K. (2013). Discipline, field, nexus: Re-visioning sociology. Canadian Review of Sociology, 50(1), 1–26. https://doi-org.libaccess.lib.mcmaster.ca/10.1111/cars.12000
Charmaz, C. (2014). Constructing grounded theory (2nd Ed.). Sage Publications.
Collins, R. (1998). The sociology of philosophies. Harvard University Press.
Cooley, C. H. (1922). Human nature and the social order. Charles Scribners Sons.
Coser, L. (1956). The functions of social conflict. Routledge.
Doucet, A. (2008). From her side of the gossamer wall(s): Reflexivity and relational knowing. Qualitative Sociology, 31, 73–87. https://doi-org.libaccess.lib.mcmaster.ca/10.1007/s11133-007-9090-9
Fader, A. (2009). Mitzvah girls: Bringing up the next generation of Hasidic Jews in Brooklyn. Princeton University Press.
Fuller, S. (2002). Social Epistemology (2nd Ed.). Indiana University Press.
Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Doubleday.
Gouldner, A. (1962). Anti-minotaur: The myth of a value-free sociology. Social Problems, 9(3), 199–213. https://doi-org.libaccess.lib.mcmaster.ca/10.2307/799230
Griffith, R. M. (2000). God’s daughters: Evangelical women and the power of submission. University of California Press.
Gross, N. (2013). Why are professors liberal and why do conservatives care. Harvard University Press.
Helmes-Hayes, R., & Milne, M. (2017). The institutionalization of symbolic interactionism in Canadian sociology, 1922–1979: Success at what cost? Canadian Journal of Sociology, 42(2): 145–196. https://www.jstor.org/stable/90011178
Jenkins, P. (2008). Moral panic: Changing concepts of the child molester in modern America. Yale University Press.
Lukianoff, G., & Haidt, J. (2018). The coddling of the American mind. Penguin Press.
Mahmood, S. (2005). Politics of piety: The Islamic revival and the feminist subject. Princeton University Press.
McGregor, D., Restoule, J., & Johnston, R. (Eds.). (2018). Indigenous research: Theories, practices and relationships. Canadian Scholars.
McLaughlin, N. (2005). Canada’s impossible science: Historical and institutional origins of the coming crisis in Anglo-Canadian sociology. Canadian Journal of Sociology, 30(1), 1–40. https://doi.org.libaccess.lib.mcmaster.ca/10.2307/4146156
McLuhan, A., & Puddephatt, A. J. (2017). Canadian symbolic interactionism on the global stage: A comment on Helmes-Hayes’ and Milne’s, the instutionalization of symbolic interactionism in Canadian sociology, 1922–1979. Canadian Journal of Sociology, 42(3), 325–335. https://doi.org/10.29173/cjs29368
Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society. The University of Chicago Press.
Meltzer, B. N., Petras, J. W., & Reynolds, L. T. (1975). Symbolic interactionism: Genesis, varieties and criticisms. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Michalski, J. H. (2016). The epistemological diversity of Canadian sociology. Canadian Journal of Sociology, 41(4), 525–556. https://doi.org/10.29173/cjs25706
Pawluch, D. (2019). On the unbearable lightness of being a constructionist. The American Sociologist, 50, 204–219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-019-9416-6
Prus, B. (1996). Symbolic interaction and ethnographic research. State University of New York Press.
Puddephatt, A. J., Kelly, B. W., & Adorjan, M. (2006). Unveiling the cloak of competence: Cultivating authenticity in graduate sociology. The American Sociologist, 37(3), 84–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-006-1024-6
Puddephatt, A. J., & Kleinknecht, S. (2020). A festschrift for William Shaffir: Guest editors’ introduction. Qualitative Sociology Review, 16(2), 6–13. https://czasopisma.uni.lodz.pl/qualit/article/view/7621/7319
Puddephatt, A. J., & McLaughlin, N. (2015). Critical nexus or pluralist discipline? Institutional ambivalence and the future of Canadian sociology. Canadian Review of Sociology, 52(3), 310–332. https://doi-org.libaccess.lib.mcmaster.ca/10.1111/cars.12079
Reynolds, L. T. (2003). Intellectual precursors. In L. T. Reynolds & N. J. Herman-Kinney (Eds.), The handbook of symbolic interactionism (pp. 39–58). AltaMira Press.
Romero, M. (2020). 2019 ASA presidential address: Sociology engaged in social justice. American Sociological Review, 85(1), 1–30. https://doi-org.libaccess.lib.mcmaster.ca/10.1177/0003122419893677
Shields, J. A., & Dunn, J. M. (2016). Passing on the right: Conservative professors in the liberal university. Oxford University Press.
Smith, C. (2014). The sacred project of American sociology. Oxford University Press.
Steeves, K. (2017). Experiencing a call to ministry: Changing trajectories, re-structuring life stories. Qualitative Sociology Review, 13(4), 48–68.
Thomas, W. I., & Thomas, D. S. (1928). The child in America: Behavior problems and programs. Knopf.
Turner, J. H. (2019). The more American sociology seeks to become a politically-relevant discipline, the more irrelevant it becomes to solving societal problems. The American Sociologist, 50, 456–487. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-019-09420-5
Weber, M. (2004). Science as a vocation (R. Livingstone, Trans.). Hackett Publishing Company. (Original work published 1919).
Weber, M. (1947). The theory of social and economic organization. Trans. AM Henderson & T Parsons. Oxford University Press.
Weinberg, D. (2008). The philosophical foundations of constructionist research. In J. A. Holstein & J. F. Gubrium (Eds.), Handbook of Constructionist Research (pp. 13–40). Guilford Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Steeves, K. Preserving a Place for Interpretive Work in Canadian Sociology: a Reflection on Dorothy Pawluch’s Contributions. Am Soc 53, 188–204 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-021-09518-9
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-021-09518-9