Skip to main content
Log in

What is Really Social Capital? A Critical Review

  • Published:
The American Sociologist Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper provides a critical review of the burgeoning literature on social capital. While our focus is primarily on social capital’s place in economics, we do consider its broader social science context. In recent years, social capital literature has produced many insights, however, a number of conceptual and empirical problems remain. In this setting, we trace a panorama of ideas of the principal theorists of social capital for then focusing us on the numerous critics whose it is the subject. Finally we provide recommendations for a prudent use of the concept.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Studies on social networks focused on the characteristics, the structure and the nature of the relationships: elements that characterize individuals.

  2. The two forms mutually reinforcing each other.

  3. The general idea, although not taking up by Putnam, is that of de Tocqueville (1986) according to which associations enable individuals to mobilize the power or means they can not have alone.

  4. It may be noted here that a change from a situation of personalized confidence/reciprocity to a situation of generalized trust/reciprocity is favourable for exchange because it reduces the cost of seeking information on the credibility of a partner.

  5. According to Putnam, social capital has declined in the USA for several reasons, the principal ones being the development of the female work, the increase in geographical mobility, the demographic changes such as divorces, fewer children, the disappearance of small and independent retailers, the development of individualized leisure, and especially the popularization of television. Certain studies, like that of Costa and Kahn (2001) seem to confirm an evolution into this direction, whereas others like that of Bianchi and Robinson (1997) are much more uncertain.

  6. As an example of cost for those who are outside the social interaction place, we can cite the case of organized crime.

  7. In addition, it may be noted here that some financial products deemed as capital are not either alienable, such as life insurances.

  8. For example, according to Ostrom (2000), what differentiates social capital from other forms of capital is that: 1) it does not wear out with use; 2) it is not easy to measure; 3) it is hard to build through external intervention; 4) national and regional government institutions strongly affect the level and type of social capital available to individuals to pursue long-term development efforts.

  9. An argument which can also be included to explain the formation of patronage in the Roman society or feudalism during the Middle Ages.

  10. Theory asserting that these entities are merely different facets of a same object.

  11. Public or private organization, established in a given society to meet a particular need, which have an official or legal value.

  12. Even when the group function is non economic.

  13. To explain this phenomenon, Durlauf and Fafchamps (2004) propose to consider that what makes the attraction of clubs and networks disappears when a certain threshold of “generalized” trust is reached.

  14. These factors are also used by Putnam (1995) to explain the social capital decline in the United States.

  15. For certain authors as Cattell (2001) and Hyden (2001), social capital formed by these modes of association is above all exclusive and grows organically from the social dynamics which characterize the society.

  16. In this respect, Fischer (2001) finds very little coherence among the different indicators of social capital used in the General Social Surveys (1972–1999): weak correlations and sometimes opposite trends.

References

  • Akerlof, G. (1984). An economic theorist’s book of tales. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Alesina, A., & Ferrara, E. (2000a). The determinants of Trust. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 7621.

  • Alesina, A., & Ferrara, E. (2000b). Participation in heterogeneous communities. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115, 847–904.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Almond, G. A., & Verba, S. (1963). The civic culture. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K. J. (2000). Observations on social capital. In P. Dasgupta & I. Serageldin (Eds.), Social capital: A multifaceted perspective (pp. 3–5). Washington, D.C.: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bebbington, A. (1999). Capitals and capabilities: a framework for analyzing peasant viability, rural livelihoods and poverty. World Development, 27, 2021–2044.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertrand, M., & Mullainathan, S. (2001). Do people mean what they say? Implications for subjective survey data. The American Economic Review, 91(2), 67–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertrand, M., Luttmer, E., & Mullainathan, S. (2000). Network effects and welfare culture. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115, 1019–1055.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beugelsdijk, S., de Groot, H. L. F., & van Schaik, A. B. T. M. (2004). Trust and economic growth: a robustness analysis. Oxford Economic Papers, 56, 118–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bianchi, S., & Robinson, J. (1997). What did you do today? Children’s use of time, family composition, and the acquisition of social capital. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 59, 332–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bjornskov, C. (2006). The multiple facets of social capital. European Journal of Political Economy, 22, 22–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1980). Le capital social: notes provisoires. Actes de la Recherche en Sciences Sociales, 31, 2–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1984). Questions de sociologie. Paris: Minuit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowles, S., & Gintis, H. (2002). Social capital and community governance. The Economic Journal, 112(487), 419–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R. (1995). Le capital social, les trous structuraux et l’entrepreneur. Revue Française de Sociologie, 36(4), 599–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R. S. (2000). The network structure of social capital. In R. I. Sutton & B. M. Shaw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior, vol. 22. Greenwich: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cattell, V. (2001). Poor people, poor places, and poor health: the mediating role of social networks and social capital. Social Science & Medicine, 52, 1501–1516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chwe, M. (1999). Structure and strategy in collective action. The American Journal of Sociology, 105, 128–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Claibourn, M., & Martin, P. S. (2000). Trusting and joining? An empirical test of the reciprocal nature of social capital. Political Behavior, 22, 267–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. The American Journal of Sociology, 94(Supplement), 95–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collier, P. (1998). Social capital and poverty. Social Capital Initiative Working Paper 4. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.

  • Costa, D. L., & Kahn, M. E. (2001). Understanding the decline in social capital. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 8295.

  • Dasgupta, P. (2000). Economic progress and the idea of social capital. In P. Dasgupta & I. Serageldin (Eds.), Social capital: A multifaceted perspective (pp. 325–424). Washington, D.C.: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, P. (2003). Social capital and economic performance. Analytics. In E. Ostrom & T. K. Ahn (Eds.), Foundations of social capital. Northampton: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Tocqueville, A. (1986). De la démocratie en Amérique. Paris: Gallimard (first edition 1835).

    Google Scholar 

  • DeFilippis, J. (2001). The myth of social capital in community development. Housing Policy Debate, 12, 781–806.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durlauf, S. N. (1999). The case against ‘social capital’. Focus, 20(3), 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durlauf, S. N. (2002a). Bowling alone: a review essay. Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization, 47, 259–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durlauf, S. N. (2002b). On the empirics of social capital. The Economic Journal, 112(483), 459–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durlauf, S. N., & Fafchamps, M. (2004). Social capital. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 10485.

  • Easterly, W., & Levine, R. (1997). Africa’s growth tragedy: policies and ethnic divisions. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(4), 523–544.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fafchamps, M. (2002). Spontaneous market emergence. Topics in Theoretical Economics, Berkeley Electronic Press, 2(1):1045.

  • Fine, B. (1999). The development state is dead: long live social capital? Development and Change, 30(1), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, C. S. (2001). Bowling alone: What’s the score? Presented at the American Sociological Association Conference, Anaheim, California.

  • Foley, M., & Edwards, B. (1997). Escape from politics? Social theory and the social capital debate. The American Behavioral Scientist, 40(5), 550–561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franke, S. (2005). Measurement of social capital. Reference Document for Public Policy Research, Development and Evaluation. Policy Research Initiative, PRI project: Social capital as a public policy tool. Government of Canada, Ottawa.

  • Fukuyama, F. (1995). Social capital and the global economy. Foreign Affairs, 74(5), 89–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gebremedhin, B., Pender, J., & Tesfay, G. (2004). Collective action for grazing land management in crop-livestock mixed systems in the highlands of northern Ethiopia. Agricultural Systems, 82(3), 273–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geertz, C. (1963). Peddlers and Princes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Genovesi, A. (1769). Lezioni di commercio o sia d’economia civile con un ragionamento sull’agricoltura e un altro sul commercio universale. Venice: Bassano.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gittell, R., & Vidal, A. (1998). Community organizing: Building social capital as a development strategy. Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaeser, E., Laibson, D., & Sacerdote, B. (2000a). The economic approach to social capital. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 7728.

  • Glaeser, E., Laibson, D., Scheinkman, J. A., & Soutter, C. L. (2000b). Measuring trust. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115, 811–846.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. The American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: the problem of embedded-ness. The American Journal of Sociology, 91, 481–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. (1990). The old and the new economic sociology: A history and an agenda. In R. Friedland & A. F. Robertson (Eds.), Beyond the marketplace: Rethinking economy and society. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grootaert, C. (1999). Social capital, household welfare, and poverty in Indonesia. Local Level Institutions Working Paper 6, Washington, D.C.: World Bank.

  • Grootaert, C., & Narayan, D. (2000). Local institutions, poverty and household welfare in Bolivia. Local Level Institutions Working Paper 9. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.

  • Grootaert, C., & van Bastelaer, T. (2001). Understanding and measuring social capital: A synthesis of findings and recommendations. World Bank Social Capital Initiative Working Paper 24.

  • Grootaert, C., Oh, G. T., & Swamy, A. (1999). Social “Capital and outcomes in Burkina Faso”. Local Level Institutions Working Paper 7. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.

  • Grootaert, C., Narayan, D., Nyhan Jones, V., & Woolcock, M. (2004). Measuring Social Capital: An Integrated Questionnaire. World Bank Working Paper 18.

  • Haddad, L., & Maluccio, J. A. (2003). Trust, membership in groups, and household welfare: evidence from KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 51, 573–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harpham, T. (1994). Urbanization in mental health in developing countries: a research role for social scientists, public health professionals and social psychiatrists. Social Science & Medicine, 39(2), 233–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harriss, J., & de Renzio, P. (1997). Missing link or analytically missing? The concept of social capital: an introductory bibliographic essay. Journal of International Development, 9(7), 919–937.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helliwell, J. F., & Putnam, R. (1995). Economic growth and social capital in Italy. Eastern Economic Journal, 21, 295–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hume, D. (1978). A treatise of human nature. Oxford: Oxford University Press (first edition 1740).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyden, G. (2001). The social capital crash in the periphery: an analysis of the current predicament in sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of Socio-Economics, 30, 161–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, R. (1997). Modernization and postmodernization: Cultural, economic, and political change in 43 societies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S., McMillan, J., & Woodruff, C. (2000). Courts and relational contracts. Working Paper graduate school of international relations and pacific studies, UCSD.

  • Kennedy, B., Kawachi, I., & Brainerd, E. (1998). The role of social capital in the Russian mortality crisis. World Development, 26(11), 2029–2043.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knack, S. (2003). Groups, growth and trust: cross-country evidence on the Olson and Putnam hypotheses. Public Choice, 117, 341–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knack, S., & Keefer, P. (1997). Does social capital have an economic payoff? A cross-country investigation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112, 1251–1288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kranton, R. (1996). Reciprocal exchange: a self-sustaining system. The American Economic Review, 86(4), 830–851.

    Google Scholar 

  • La Ferrara, E. (2002). Inequality and group participation: theory and evidence from rural Tanzania. Journal of Public Economics, 85, 235–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1997). Trust in large organizations. The American Economic Review, 87, 333–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, N. (1990). Social resources and social mobility: A structural theory of status attainment. In R. L. Breiger (Ed.), Social mobility and social structure (pp. 247–271). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, N. (1995). Les ressources sociales: une théorie du capital social. Revue Française de Sociologie, 36(4), 685–704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, N. (1999). Building a network theory of social capital. Connections, 22(1), 28–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, N. (2001). Social capital: A theory of social structure and action. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loury, G. (1977). A dynamic theory of racial income differences. In P. Wallace & A. M. La Mond (Eds.), Women, minorities, and employment discrimination. Lexington: Heath.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, J., Due, P., Muntaner, C., & Davey Smith, G. (2000). Social capital—is it a good investment strategy for public health? Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 54, 404–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maluccio, J. A., Haddad, L., & May, J. (2000). Social “Capital and Household welfare in South Africa 1993–1998”. Journal of Development Studies, 36, 54–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. (1953). Œuvres complètes. Le capital: Critique de l’économie politique […] Le procès de l’ensemble de la production capitaliste. Paris: Éditions Sociales.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mauro, P. (1995). Corruption and growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110, 681–712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mercklé, P. (2004). Sociologie des réseaux sociaux. Paris: Éditions La Découverte, Collection Repères.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narayan, D., & Pritchett, L. (1999). Cents and sociability: household income and social capital in rural Tanzania. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 47(4), 871–897.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newton, K. (1997). Social capital and democracy. The American Behavioral Scientist, 40(5), 575–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2001). Du bien-être des nations: le rôle du capital humain et social. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M. (1982). The rise and decline of nations. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Onyx, J., & Bullen, P. (2000). Measuring social capital in five communities. The Journal of Applied Behavioural Science, 36, 23–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. (2000). Social capital: A fad or a fundamental concept? In P. Dasgupta & I. Serageldin (Eds.), Social capital: A multifaceted perspective. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pareto, V. (1966). Manuel d’économie politique. Genève: Droz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paxton, P. (1999). Is social capital declining in the United States? A multiple indicator assessment. The American Journal of Sociology, 105, 88–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ponthieux, S. (2006). Le capital social. Paris: Éditions La Découverte, Collection Repères.

    Google Scholar 

  • Portes, A. (1998). Social capital: its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Portes, A., & Landolt, P. (1996). The downside of social capital. The American Prospects, 26, 18–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, B. (2002). Social capital and factors affecting civic engagement as reported by leaders of voluntary organizations. The Social Science Journal, 39, 119–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. D. (1995). Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. Journal of Democracy, 6(1), 65–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. D., Leonardi, R., Nanetti, R., & Pavoncello, F. (1983). Explaining institutional secrets: the case of Italian regional government. The American Political Science Review, 77(1), 55–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. D., Leonardi, R., & Nanetti, R. Y. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robins, L. (1932). An essay on the nature and significance of economic science. New York: MacMillan, St Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rupasingha, A., Goetz, S. J., & Freshwater, D. (2006). The production of social capital in US counties. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 35, 83–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. (1991). Recherches sur la nature et les causes de la richesse des nations. Paris: Flammarion (first edition 1790).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobel, J. (2002). Can we trust social capital? Journal of Economic Literature, 40, 139–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J. E. (1999). Formal and informal institutions. In P. Dasgupta & I. Serageldin (Eds.), Social capital: A multifaceted perspective (pp. 59–68). Washington, D.C.: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stolle, D. (1998). Bowling together, bowling alone: the development of generalized trust in voluntary associations. Political Psychology, 19, 497–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stolle, D. (2001). Getting to trust. An analysis of the importance of institutions, families, personal experiences and group membership. In P. Dekker & E. M. Uslaner (Eds.), Social capital and participation in everyday life. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. R. (2000). The old-boy network and the young-gub effect. International Economic Review, 41(4), 871–891.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uslaner, E. M. (2002). The moral foundations of trust. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whiteley, P. (2000). Economic growth and social capital. Political Studies, 48, 443–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woolcock, M. (1998). Social capital and economic development: toward a theoretical synthesis and policy framework. Theory and Society, 27, 151–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamagishi, T. (1988). The provision of a sanctioning system in the United States and Japan. Social Psychology Quarterly, 51(3), 265–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamagishi, T., Cook, K., & Watabe, M. (1998). Uncertainty, trust, and commitment formation in the United States and Japan. The American Journal of Sociology, 104, 165–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas G. Poder.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Poder, T.G. What is Really Social Capital? A Critical Review. Am Soc 42, 341–367 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-011-9136-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-011-9136-z

Keywords

JEL

Navigation