Students and Perceived School Safety: The Impact of School Security Measures
- 2.5k Downloads
Although secondary school violence has actually decreased, public concern over student safety is still prevalent. One response to publicized school violence has been the implementation of security measures (metal detectors, cameras) and policies (visitor sign in, locked doors). While these changes may decrease school violence, little research has examined the effect these security measures have on student perceptions of school safety. Utilizing the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health (AddHealth), this study found that metal detectors and the number of visible security measures employed in school were associated with a decrease in student reports of feeling safe. Students who were male, White, had higher GPAs, and reported feeling safe in their neighborhood were more likely to report feeling safe at school, while those who experienced prior victimizations, had larger class sizes, and who attended schools that had disorder problems were more likely to report not feeling safe at school.
KeywordsSchool safety School security measures AddHealth Student perceptions
This research uses data from Add Health, a program project directed by Kathleen Mullan Harris and designed by J. Richard Udry, Peter S. Bearman, and Kathleen Mullan Harris at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, and funded by grant P01-HD31921 from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, with cooperative funding from 23 other federal agencies and foundations. Special acknowledgment is due Ronald R. Rindfuss and Barbara Entwisle for assistance in the original design. Information on how to obtain the Add Health data files is available on the Add Health website (http://www.cpc.unc.edu/addhealth). No direct support was received from grant P01-HD31921 for this analysis. The authors would like to thank Lynn Addington, John Sloan III, Heith Copes, and the two anonymous reviewers for their comments on a draft of this manuscript.
- Alvarez, A., & Bachman, R. (1997). Predicting the fear of assault at school and while going to and from school in an adolescent population. Violence and Victims, 12(1), 69–86.Google Scholar
- DeVoe, J. F., & Bauer, L. (2010). Student victimization in U.S. schools: Results from the 2007 school crime supplement to the national crime victimization survey (NCES 2010–319). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.Google Scholar
- Ferraro, K. F. (1995). Fear of crime: Interpreting victimization risk. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
- Green, M. W. (1999). Research Report: The appropriate and effective use of security technologies in U.S. schools. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice. NCJ 178265.Google Scholar
- Hofmann, D. A., & Gavin, M. B. (1998). Centering decisions in hierarchical linear models: Implications for research in organizations. Journal of Management, 24(5), 623–640.Google Scholar
- Kakar, S. (1998). Schools: Criminal activity and security measures administration. Journal of Security Administration, 21(2), 55–73.Google Scholar
- Kenney, D. J., & Watson S. (1999). Crime in the schools: Reducing conflict with student problem solving. Research in Brief. U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice.Google Scholar
- Kreft, I., & De Leeuw, J. (2007). Introducing multilevel modeling. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
- Lawrence, R. (2007). School crime and juvenile justice (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- McDevitt, J., & Panniello, J. (2005). National assessment of the school resource officer programs: Survey of students in three large new SRO programs. National Institute of Justice final report. http://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/209270.pdf. Accessed 27 January 2011.
- Phaneuf, S. W. (2009). Security in schools: Its effect on students. El Paso: LFB Scholarly Publishing, LLC.Google Scholar
- Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
- Robers, S., Zhang, J., & Truman, J. (2010). Indicators of school crime and safety: 2010 (NCES 2011-002/NCJ 230812). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S., Department of Education, and Bureau of Justice Statistics, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice.Google Scholar
- Setoodeh, R. (2009). The Columbine generation. Newsweek, April 6.Google Scholar
- Sullivan, W. (2006). Eyeing the unspeakable and forgiving. U.S. News and World Report, October 16.Google Scholar
- Udry, J. R., Bearman, P. S., & Harris, K. M. (2008). Add Health study design. http://www.cpc.unc.edu/projects/addhealth/design. Accessed 3 December 2008.
- University of North Carolina Population Center (2009). Design facts at a glance. http://www.cpc.unc.edu/projects/addhealth/design/designfacts . Accessed 7 April 2009.
- University of North Carolina Population Center (2010). How do I code gender changes between Wave I and Wave II? http://www.cpc.unc.edu/projects/addhealth/faqs/aboutdata. Accessed 15 July 2010.
- Van Belle, G. (2002). Statistical rules of thumb. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Wallace, L. H., & May, D. C. (2005). The impact of parental attachment and feelings of isolation on adolescent fear of crime at school. Adolescence, 40(159), 457–474.Google Scholar
- Warr, M. (2000). Fear of crime in the United States: Avenues for research and policy. In D. Duffee (Ed.), Criminal Justice 2000, vol. 4, Measurement and analysis of crime and justice (pp. 451–489). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.Google Scholar