Skip to main content
Log in

Investigating the Determinants of the Street Code and its Relation to Offending among Adults

  • Published:
American Journal of Criminal Justice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Theoretical and empirical consideration has long been given to the role of subcultural attitudes and how they relate to delinquency and crime. Recently, Anderson has reconceptualized these early attitudinal depictions by considering the formation and role of these specific attitudes or ‘code of the street’ among African-Americans in inner-city neighborhoods. A number of important findings have emerged from this literature, yet much remains to be considered. We contribute to this literature in three specific ways by examining: (1) the scope of street code attitudes across a wide variety of individuals—and not just inner-city African American (males) to assess the generalizability of these attitudes; (2) the correlates of street code attitudes; and (3) the extent to which street code attitudes mediate the relationship between various demographic and attitudinal (self-control) variables and crime. Theoretical implications and directions for future research are addressed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The sampling frame for this research is all US households with working land-line phones. Also, households with land-line numbers ported to cellular phones would be included in the sampling frame. Only one member of each household was interviewed. If a juvenile answered the phone, the interviewers asked for a parent to continue the interview.

  2. AAPOR response rate calculation RR6.

  3. Of increasing concern to survey research is the use of call-screening devices (Tuckell & O’Neill, 2002). The Data-Tel predictive dialer used in this research anticipates call screening devices used to indicate that a household is ineligible, commercially known as a “Tele-Zapper.” This software also passes calls that it deems as screened through the use of privacy blockers and screening services to an operator to determine the appropriate disposition code or action. This operator then continues the call normally.

  4. The prior crime index evinced strong positive skew, as 78% of respondents reported a zero frequency.

  5. We conceive of this measure as tapping into the perception of a lack of faith in the criminal justice system and one of its agents, the police. Consistent with the street code thesis argument, this item correlates as expected with the street code measure, r = .14 (p < .05).

  6. Recall that our original criminal offending measure was a count of the number of different criminal acts. Given the large skew (only one person reported committing three of the four offenses, and over 78% reported committing zero offenses), we dichotomized the criminal offending index to zero offenses vs. one or more offenses. A comparison of results using the dichotomous and variety measures produced substantively similar results.

References

  • Agnew, R. (1994). The techniques of neutralization and violence. Criminology, 32, 555–580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • American Association for Public Opinion Research. (2008). Standard definitions: Final dispositions of case codes and outcome rates for surveys. Ann Arbor: AAPOR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, E. (1994). The code of the streets. The Atlantic Monthly, 273, 81–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, E. (1999). Code of the street: Decency, violence, and the moral life of the inner city. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumer, E. P., Horney, J., Felson, R., & Lauritsen, J. (2003). Neighborhood disadvantage and the nature of violence. Criminology, 41, 39–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black, D. (1983). Crime as social control. American Sociological Review, 48, 34–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brezina, T., Agnew, R., Cullen, F. T., & Wright, J. P. (2004). A quantitative assessment of Elijah Anderson’s subculture of violence thesis and its contribution to youth violence research. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 2, 303–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunson, R. K. (2007). Police don’t like black people: African American young men’s accumulated police experiences. Criminology & Public Policy, 6, 71–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burton, L. M., & Jarrett, R. L. (2000). In the mix, yet on the margins: The place of families in urban neighborhood and child development research. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63, 114–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, D., & Nisbett, R. E. (1994). Self-protection and the culture of honor: Explaining southern violence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 551–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cullen, F. T., Fisher, B., & Applegate, B. (2000). Public opinion about punishment and corrections. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Crime and justice: A review of research (pp. 1–79). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gastil, R. D. (1971). Homicide and a regional subculture of violence. American Sociological Review, 36, 412–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottfredson, M. R., & Hirschi, T. (1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackney, S. (1969). Southern violence. In H. D. Graham & T. R. Gurr (Eds.), The history of violence in America (pp. 505–527). New York: Bantam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, L. A., & Short, J. F. (2005). Disputes involving youth street gang members: Micro- social contexts. Criminology, 43, 43–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, B. (2004). A typology of street criminal retaliation. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 41, 295–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kish, L. (1965). Survey sampling. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kubrin, C. E. (2005). Gangstas, thugs, and hustlas: Identifying the code of the street in rap music. Social Problems, 52, 360–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markowitz, F. E., & Felson, R. B. (1998). Social demographic differences in attitudes and violence. Criminology, 36, 117–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matsueda, R. L., Drakulich, K., & Kubrin, C. E. (2006). Race and neighborhood codes of violence. In R. D. Peterson, L. J. Krivo, & J. Hagan (Eds.), The many colors of crime (pp. 334–356). New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, W. B. (1958). Lower class culture as a generating milieu of gang delinquency. Journal of Social Issues, 14, 5–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, W. (2006). The streets: An alternative black male socialization institution. Journal of Black Studies, 36, 918–937.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piquero, A. R., Brame, R., Mazerolle, P., & Haapanen, R. (2002). Crime in emerging adulthood. Criminology, 40, 137–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piquero, A. R., Jennings, W. G., & Farrington, D. P. (2010). On the malleability of self-control: Theoretical and policy implications regarding a general theory of crime. Justice Quarterly, 27, 803–834.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, T., & Cullen, F. T. (2000). The empirical status of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory of crime: A meta-analysis. Criminology, 38, 931–964.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharkey, P. T. (2006). Navigating dangerous streets: The sources and consequences of street efficacy. American Sociological Review, 71, 826–846.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, E. A., Schreck, C. J., & Simons, R. L. (2006). I ain’t gonna let no one disrespect me: Does the code of the street reduce or increase violent victimization among African American adolescents? Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 43, 427–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, E. A., & Simons, R. L. (2006). Structure and culture in African-American adolescent violence: A partial test of the code of the street thesis. Justice Quarterly, 23, 1–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, E. A., & Simons, R. L. (2010). Race, code of the street, and violent delinquency: A multilevel investigation of neighborhood street culture and individual norms of violence. Criminology, 48, 569–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, E. A., Simons, R. L., & Conger, R. D. (2002). Assessing neighborhood and social psychological influences on childhood violence in an African American sample. Criminology, 40, 801–830.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, E. H. (1947). Criminology (4th ed.). Philadelphia: Lipincott.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tangney, J. P., Baumeister, R. F., & Boone, A. L. (2004). High self-control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades, and interpersonal success. Journal of Personality, 72, 271–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tourangeau, R. (2004). Survey research and societal change. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 775–802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuckell, P., & O’Neill, H. (2002). The vanishing respondent in telephone surveys. Journal of Advertising Research, 42, 26–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. R. (1990). Why people obey the law. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Census Bureau (2010). Census regions and divisions of the United States. Retrieved November 4, 2010, from http://www.census.gov/geo/www/us_regdiv.pdf.

  • Warner, B. D. (2003). The role of attenuated culture in social disorganization theory. Criminology, 39, 837–864.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weitzer, R. (1999). Citizen’s perception of police misconduct: Race and neighborhood context. Justice Quarterly, 16, 819–846.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfgang, M. E., & Ferracuti, F. (1981). The subculture of violence. Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alex R. Piquero.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Piquero, A.R., Intravia, J., Stewart, E. et al. Investigating the Determinants of the Street Code and its Relation to Offending among Adults. Am J Crim Just 37, 19–32 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-011-9115-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-011-9115-5

Keywords

Navigation