Introduction

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a clinical syndrome characterized by an abrupt decrease in kidney function, resulting in the accumulation of waste products and critical imbalances in fluid and electrolyte homeostasis. The term ‘AKI’ replaced ‘acute renal failure’ to encompass kidney dysfunction ranging from mildly elevated serum creatinine to severe forms requiring kidney replacement therapy (KRT) [1], emphasizing that even small increments in creatinine are associated with adverse short- and long-term outcomes.

Definitions and Staging

AKI has conventionally been defined and staged for severity based on serum creatinine and urine output (Table 1). The KDIGO criteria, which harmonize the AKIN with the RIFLE criteria, are most commonly used in adults and children [2]. The pediatric reference change value optimized criterion for AKI (pROCK), which is based on paired creatinine values in Chinese children admitted with nonrenal morbidities [3], might be more specific than KDIGO criteria in detecting ‘true’ AKI, but requires validation.

Table 1 Definitions and staging of acute kidney injury (AKI)
Full size table

Neonatal AKI is more difficult to identify. Serum creatinine at birth reflects maternal serum levels. Levels decline in the first few weeks, making ‘baseline’ creatinine dynamic. While sensitive, urine output is difficult to measure and is often preserved despite AKI due to tubular immaturity. The RIFLE and KDIGO definitions were adapted for neonates but require validation (Supplementary Table S1). In practice, an increase in creatinine by ≥ 0.3 mg/dL detects AKI better than a 50% rise in creatinine. A peak creatinine value of ≥ 2.5 mg/dL (~eGFR < 10 mL/min/1.73 m2) indicates severe AKI, and values ≥ 0.5 mg/dL at discharge are of concern [4].

Epidemiology

In a prospective report, AKI affected ~5% of hospitalized patients and ~30% of patients in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) [5]. Three multicenter studies inform on the global epidemiology of pediatric AKI. Using KDIGO criteria, the Assessment of Worldwide Acute Kidney Injury, Renal Angina, and Epidemiology (AWARE) study reported AKI in 26.9% of critically ill patients [6]. The Assessment of Worldwide Acute Kidney Injury Epidemiology in Neonates (AWAKEN) study reported AKI in 29.9% newborns, most commonly in those born at < 29 wk of gestation [7]. In the 0by25 Global Snapshot study, similar proportions of hospitalized patients had community-acquired and incident AKI [8]. Patients with AKI in low- and middle-income countries were older than their counterparts in high-income countries, usually had community-acquired AKI, and commonly had severe AKI [8].

Etiology and Risk Factors

Based on pathophysiology, AKI is categorized as prerenal or functional, renal or intrinsic, and postrenal or obstructive. The Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative network summarized the risk factors into environmental, socioeconomic/cultural, process of care, acute exposures, and inherent factors [9]. Risk factors, etiology, and outcomes of AKI differ between resource-limited and resource-sufficient regions and for community-acquired and hospital-acquired AKI. AKI in developing countries is often community-acquired, caused by diarrheal dehydration, infections (sepsis, malaria, dengue, scrub typhus, leptospirosis), hemolytic uremic syndrome, glomerulonephritis, snake envenomation, and toxic medications [5, 10, 11]. In contrast, hospital-acquired AKI is more common in the developed world and is often associated with major surgery, septicemia, and/or multiorgan failure [11].

AKI in neonates is most often prerenal and is caused by systemic hypoperfusion due to placental hypoperfusion, birth asphyxia, insensible losses (e.g., preterm neonates on phototherapy), diarrheal dehydration, third-space losses (sepsis, necrotizing enterocolitis), congenital heart disease, post-cardiac surgery, and following nephrotoxic therapies [7].

Evaluation

Investigations in critically ill patients with AKI are directed at identifying the etiology of AKI and screening for complications (Table 2). Urinary indices to discriminate functional from intrinsic AKI, e.g., urine sodium (</≥ 20 mEq/L), fractional excretion of sodium (< 1%/≥ 1%), fractional excretion of urea (< 35%/> 50%), osmolality (> 400/< 350 mOsm/kg) and specific gravity (> 1020/< 1012), have limited utility in patients receiving diuretics and/or IV fluids. A kidney biopsy is indicated when suspecting glomerulonephritis or interstitial nephritis with unexplained AKI and allograft dysfunction. Various tools have been used to identify critically ill patients without AKI or with mild AKI who are at risk of severe AKI, the need for KRT, and mortality (Table 3).

Table 2 Evaluation in patients with AKI
Full size table
Table 3 Tools used to stratify risk of developing severe acute kidney injury (AKI)
Full size table

Fluid Overload

Fluid overload may not just indicate but also lead to AKI by affecting multiple organs, e.g., increased intra-abdominal pressure compromises gas exchange, myocardial performance, intestinal function, and renal perfusion, and delayed wound healing promotes inflammation. Meta-analyses of observational studies indicate that the degree of fluid overload correlates with mortality, with a 19% increase in risk for every liter of fluid overload (34 studies, 31,076 adults) and 6% for every percentage point increment (44 studies, 7507 children) [12, 13]. Fluid overload was associated with an increased risk of mechanical ventilation and AKI in critically ill children [13] and neonates (17 studies, 4772 neonates) [14]. While a threshold of > 10% defines ‘clinically significant’ fluid overload that merits KRT, lower values may also impact outcomes.

Renal Angina Index

The renal angina index (RAI), a product of the risk and injury scores assessed 8–12 h after ICU admission, has emerged as a satisfactory bedside tool to predict the occurrence of severe AKI in patients admitted to PICU (Table 3). A meta-analysis (22 studies, 14,001 children) found that RAI > 8 predicts day 3 severe AKI with 86% sensitivity and 77% specificity (AUC 0.88), and the need for KRT with 82% sensitivity and 74% specificity (AUC 0.85) [15].

Furosemide Stress Test (FST)

In early AKI, the response to furosemide might indicate tubular integrity. It was first described in critically ill adults, in whom a urine output of < 200 mL over 2 h following 1 mg/kg IV furosemide satisfactorily predicted stage-3 AKI (87.1% sensitivity, 84.1% specificity, and AUC 0.87) [16]. Subsequent studies confirm that FST outperforms conventional biomarkers in predicting progression to stage-3 AKI, the need for KRT, and mortality, allowing decisions on postponing KRT until conventionally indicated [17]. A meta-analysis (11 studies, 1366 critically ill adults) found that FST predicts AKI progression and the need for KRT with respective sensitivity and specificity of 81% vs. 84% and 88% vs. 77% [18]. However, FST is not validated in children. In three retrospective studies, urine output following IV furosemide predicted severe AKI in infants after cardiac surgery [19,20,21]. In a prospective study on 51 critically ill children with AKI stages 1–2, using a threshold of > 2 mL/kg urine over 2 h after furosemide administration, FST outperformed plasma NGAL and proenkephalin in predicting severe AKI and the need for KRT [22]. Larger prospective pediatric studies are necessary before FST is applied bedside.

Biomarkers

Despite decades of research, a troponin-like diagnostic and predictive biomarker for pediatric AKI remains elusive. NGAL remains the most widely tested biomarker in children. In a meta-analysis of 56 studies investigating 49 biomarkers in 8617 children post-cardiac surgery, the urine NGAL to creatinine ratio had the highest diagnostic odds ratio (91%) with 91.3% sensitivity and 89.7% specificity [23], and combining it with RAI improved the diagnostic accuracy for severe AKI [15].

Dynamic Risk Prediction and Combination Tools

Dynamic models of AKI risk prediction that improved AKI recognition based on electronic inpatient records in individual studies include alerts for nephrotoxin exposure (e.g., NINJA), AKI care bundles [24], the four-pronged FOKIS (correlates with mortality; Table 3) [25], and a neonatal risk score (STARZ; predicts AKI with 82% sensitivity and 91.7% specificity) [26]. Experts recommend that clinical assessment and investigations be combined with biochemical and functional biomarkers to stratify the risk of severe AKI and inform decisions on its prevention and management [27].

Management

This section discusses important concerns in the nondialytic management of AKI, excluding the management of complications and specific etiologies of AKI.

Fluid Management

Assessment of volume status is critical in all patients with AKI. While hypovolemia, e.g., following diarrheal dehydration, is detrimental, fluid overload is associated with adverse outcomes. The quantity, rate, and type of fluids to be used in critically ill patients is debated. Since hyperchloremia is associated with tubular injury, delayed recovery of kidney function, and increased mortality, balanced/buffered crystalloids with lower chloride concentrations have been preferred, although evidence is awaited [28]. The use of hydroxylethyl starch or IV albumin is not recommended [28]. Fluid stewardship, following ‘ROSE’ (resuscitation, optimization, stabilization, and evaluation/deresuscitation) for fluid therapy in septic shock, and attention to the four D’s (drug, duration, dosing, and de-escalation) is suggested [29].

Diuretics and Adjunctive Therapies

A meta-analysis (28 trials, 3228 adults with or at risk for AKI) showed that intermittent IV furosemide did not influence rates of AKI, need for KRT, or death [30]. Continuous infusion of low-dose furosemide in early AKI did not alter the progression of AKI or to KRT in adults or children [31, 32]. In the absence of clear benefit, diuretics should not be used to prevent and/or treat AKI, and KRT should be initiated when indicated [33].

There is insufficient evidence to support the use of mannitol, dopamine, fenoldopam, atrial natriuretic peptide, nesiritide, or rasburicase in preventing AKI or the need for KRT [33]. The only evidence-based intervention to prevent AKI is theophylline (single IV dose of 5–8 mg/kg within an hour of birth) in neonates with severe perinatal asphyxia [33].

Drug Dosing and Nephrotoxic Medications

Drug dosing is difficult in critically ill patients with AKI due to altered pharmacokinetics, reduced clearances, extracorporeal removal during KRT, and dynamic organ functions. Evidence to guide dosing for most drugs is limited, especially for children. Antibiotic dosing while on KRT follows recommendations for adults [34]. For other medications, dosing while on continuous KRT (CKRT) assumes either a clearance of ~20–50 mL/min/1.73 m2 or is estimated from the CKRT effluent rate [35]. Where feasible, therapeutic drug monitoring should support decisions regarding dosing. Electronic alerts (‘NINJA’, ‘Baby NINJA’) following use of nephrotoxic medications (Supplementary Table S2) reduce the incidence of drug-induced AKI [36].

Nutrition

Almost one-third of critically ill patients are severely malnourished; prevailing nutritional practices meet two-thirds of energy and one-third of protein requirements, fluid restriction accentuates underfeeding, and nutrient clearances are increased in CKRT [37]. Achieving nutritional goals enterally versus parenterally was linked to improved survival, while high protein intake does not retard renal recovery [38]. According to international guidelines, enteral nutrition is preferred and should commence preferably within 2 d, targeting calories at 120%–130% of basal metabolic needs, and protein intake of 2–3 g/kg/d [39]. Frequent review of the nutritional prescription, reassessing anthropometry, and monitoring blood levels of urea nitrogen, electrolytes, glucose, and lipids help achieve the nutritional goals.

Kidney Replacement Therapy

Timing of KRT

KRT should be promptly initiated in patients with AKI presenting with features of fluid overload > 10%, pulmonary edema, uremia (urea > 200 mg/dL) with encephalopathy, persistent hyperkalemia (potassium > 6 mEq/L), metabolic acidosis (pH < 7.15), and refractory or symptomatic hyponatremia or severe hyperuricemia or hyperphosphatemia associated with tumor lysis syndrome (TLS). Similarly, initiating KRT promptly in patients with hyperammonemia/metabolic decompensation in cases of inborn errors of metabolism (e.g., propionic acidemia, methylmalonic acidemia), or poisoning and intoxications (e.g., lithium, salicylate, valproic acid, metformin) improves outcomes.

The timing of initiation of KRT, in the absence of the above-mentioned factors, is debatable. Five recent RCTs in adult patients have reported the risks and benefits of early versus late initiation of KRT, and a meta-analysis (10 trials, 2143 adults) failed to find any benefit from initiating KRT early [40]. Rates of dialysis dependence and treatment-related adverse events were higher in patients initiated on KRT early. However, waiting until KRT was indicated urgently, was associated with higher mortality in AKIKI-2. These results cannot be extrapolated to pediatric patients, in whom retrospective studies have associated delayed initiation of KRT with adverse outcomes [41, 42]. From a practical perspective, it seems prudent to initiate KRT if oliguria and azotemia persist beyond 48–72 h, even in the absence of clinical or metabolic complications of AKI.

Modalities of KRT

The advantages and disadvantages of different modalities of KRT are summarized in Table 4 and discussed below. The choice of modality in critically ill children is guided more by patient size, hemodynamic stability, the feasibility of securing vascular access and appropriately sized dialysis catheters, and available technical expertise for extracorporeal therapies, than dialysis efficiency [43]. Hence, intermittent hemodialysis is preferred in hemodynamically stable older children, and peritoneal dialysis is favored in young infants in whom vascular access, dialyzer size, and the nonavailability of suitable machines preclude hemodialysis. In hemodynamically unstable patients, prolonged intermittent KRT is preferred over PD, which is inefficient in the presence of mesenteric ischemia.

Table 4 Modalities of kidney replacement therapy (KRT) for acute kidney injury (AKI)
Full size table

Peritoneal Dialysis

Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is a simple and inexpensive modality of KRT that is feasible in low- resource settings, infants, and hemodynamically unstable patients. PD is relatively contraindicated in patients with recent abdominal surgery, peritonitis, or an inguinal hernia. PD is less preferred when rapid clearance is required, e.g., in severe hyperammonemia. The International Society of Peritoneal Dialysis (ISPD) recently provided optimal and minimum standards for peritoneal access, dialysate fluids, and PD prescription for children with AKI [44]. A soft (Tenckhoff) catheter, inserted surgically or bedside using the Seldinger technique, is preferred over rigid (stiff) catheters and improvisations (nasogastric tube, intercostal drain) [44]. Measures to avoid peritonitis include administering an antibiotic dose 30 min before catheter insertion, removing rigid catheters within 72 h, preferring automated cyclers over manually operated open systems, and using closed dialysate circuits for manual cycles (Y-connections in older children and ready-made closed circuits with buretrols in infants). Commercially prepared dialysates are preferred to locally prepared fluids [44]. Higher than usual dextrose concentrations (1.5%–1.7%) are used if the ultrafiltration target is not met. Bicarbonate-based solutions are preferred to lactate-containing solutions in patients with hepatic dysfunction, hemodynamic instability, and worsening metabolic acidosis. The dwell volume should be 30–40 mL/kg (800–1100 mL/m2), except if initiating PD soon after surgical catheter placement, when short (10–15 mL/kg) dwells are preferred to avoid leakage. The dwell duration depends on ultrafiltration and solute removal targets; e.g., it is 20–30 min in the presence of hyperkalemia and acidosis and lengthened to 2–3 h once azotemia improves. Patients are monitored closely for dehydration, hypervolemia or sepsis, and for electrolytes, pH and glucose every 8–12 h.

Continuous-flow peritoneal dialysis is considered when conventional PD is ineffective, particularly when dwell volume is limited by post-surgery status or high ventilatory settings. The prescription comprises low dwell volumes (10–20 mL/kg, high dialysate flow (50–100 mL/min per 1.73 m2), and slow ultrafiltration (2.5 mL/min per 1.73 m2) [44].

Intermittent Hemodialysis

Hemodialysis enables rapid and efficient solute clearance and ultrafiltration, making it the most suited modality for hemodynamically stable patients with vascular access, particularly in urgent settings, e.g., poisoning, TLS, hyperammonemia, pulmonary edema. Therapy is intermittent (3–4 h daily), allowing downtime for diagnostic procedures. However, hemodialysis requires technical expertise, especially with pediatric patients. Hemodialysis is difficult in young children in the absence of pediatric-specific equipment and large-bore vascular access, typically a double-lumen hemodialysis catheter in the internal jugular or femoral vein; subclavian access carries the risk of stenosis.

The hemodialysis prescription is similar in AKI and CKD and aimed at maximizing solute clearance and fluid removal without causing adverse events [45]. The prescription varies by the child’s size, including dialyzer size (0.7–1 × body surface area), tubings (neonatal, pediatric, or adult lines), and rates of blood flow (4–8 mL/kg/min), dialysate flow (1.5–2 × blood flow rate), and ultrafiltration (≤ 0.2 mL/kg/min or ≤ 5% weight). The dialysate composition may require alteration for severe hypernatremia or hyperkalemia. Session length and frequency are guided by the solute and ultrafiltration targets. If the extracorporeal blood volume, estimated by the dialyzer size and tubings, exceeds 10% of the blood volume, the circuit is primed with blood, 5% albumin, or saline to avoid intradialytic hypotension. Frequent assessment of dry weight, close monitoring of vital signs, and noninvasive blood volume monitoring enable safe ultrafiltration.

Continuous Kidney Replacement Therapy

CKRT is preferred in critically ill, hemodynamically unstable patients since it permits gradual and continuous solute clearance and ultrafiltration, thus avoiding rapid solute fluxes, which carry risks of intradialytic hypotension and raised intracranial pressure, while allowing liberal use of boluses, infusions and adequate nutritional support. However, CKRT is not uniformly available across PICUs due to the requirement of expensive equipment, consumables, and technical expertise.

The principles of solute clearance and ultrafiltration in CKRT are similar to those of intermittent hemodialysis but include lower flow rates. The most commonly used modes include slow continuous ultrafiltration (SCUF), continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH), continuous venovenous hemodialysis (CVVHD) and continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) (Fig. 1). Two modalities (CVVH and CVVHD) rely on replacement fluid to mediate predominantly convective clearance. The choice of modality is guided by therapy goals (ultrafiltration versus solute clearance), available circuits, and physician preference. While a conventional dose of KRT is a dialysis fluid rate of 2000 mL/1.73 m2/h, in settings such as hyperammonemia, higher doses (4000–8000 mL/1.73 m2/h) are preferred. Circuit priming averts the risk of hypotension with high extracorporeal volumes. Outcomes do not differ significantly among various modalities [46].

Fig. 1
figure 1

Circuit diagrams for the various modes of continuous kidney replacement therapy (CKRT). Blood flows from left to right from the patient to the blood pump and then to the filter, from which it is returned to the patient. a Slow continuous ultrafiltration (SCUF): In this modality, there is no diffusive clearance and only ultrafiltrate (UF) is generated across the filter; this method is preferred for isolated UF removal when kidney function is normal. b Continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH): Replacement fluid is run either pre- or post-filter in a volume to replace the effluent; excess effluent is removed to ensure the UF desired for negative fluid balance; clearance is convective rather than diffusive. c Continuous venovenous hemodialysis (CVVHD): Blood flows across the filter in a countercurrent fashion with the dialysate fluid, and the effluent predominantly consists of dialysate fluid with minimal, if any, UF, as in intermittent hemodialysis. d Continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF): This modality combines CVVH with CVVHD, such that the blood and dialysis fluid run in counter-current directions, the replacement fluid is either pre- or post-filter, and the effluent comprises the dialysate and replacement fluids

Full size image

Prolonged Intermittent Therapies

Sustained low-efficiency dialysis (SLED) is a form of prolonged intermittent renal replacement therapy (PIRRT), combining the advantages of intermittent hemodialysis and CKRT [47]. SLED utilizes conventional hemodialysis machines, dialyzers, and tubings, but the blood and dialysate flow rates are lower (QB: 3–5 mL/kg/min; ≤ 150 mL/min in older children; QD: ≤ 2 times the QB; ≤ 300 mL/min in older children) and the sessions are longer (6–12 h). SLED achieves similar solute clearance and ultrafiltration as conventional hemodialysis without inducing hemodynamic instability in critically ill patients. The minimum dialysate rate is limited by the lack of pediatric-specific dialysis machines. Ultrafiltration goals (rate ≤ 0.2 mL/kg/min) and the need for anticoagulation and circuit priming are similar to hemodialysis. SLED may be performed daily or on alternate days at the physician’s discretion. The addition of convective clearance, as in hemodiafiltration (SLEDD-F) improves solute clearances.

Given its accessibility, lower cost, shorter session length and lesser technical complexity, SLED is increasingly preferred over CKRT in adult and pediatric critically ill patients. A meta-analysis (11 studies, 1160 critically ill adults) found that SLED and CKRT were associated with similar ultrafiltration and comparable lengths of hospital stay and rates of mortality, dialysis dependence, and renal recovery [48]. Based on experience with 203 children in three retrospective and two prospective series, SLED appears safe, effective, and feasible in critically ill pediatric patients [47, 49, 50].

Anticoagulation

Anticoagulation is necessary to prevent clotting in extracorporeal circuits, particularly with small catheters and low blood flow and/or high ultrafiltration rates. Anticoagulation is particularly challenging during CKRT, which requires prolonged circuit patency at slow blood flow rates. Unfractionated heparin is used most commonly and is injected into the circuit as an IV bolus, followed by its infusion or intermittent boluses [51]. In patients with coagulopathy, intermittent flushes with saline can be used to keep the circuit patent during intermittent hemodialysis and short SLED sessions; however, this limits ultrafiltration. Citrate-based protocols, allowing regional anticoagulation limited to the circuit rather than systemic, are particularly useful in patients with coagulopathy on CKRT. A meta-analysis on anticoagulation indicates that regional citrate anticoagulation provides better circuit and filter life than heparin [51]. However, careful titration is essential to prevent hypocalcemia, and dose adjustments are required in the presence of hepatic dysfunction. Less established options of anticoagulation include low molecular weight heparin, prostacyclin, direct thrombin inhibitors (argatroban), fondaparinux, and nafamostat [51].

Extracorporeal Therapy in Infants

Delivering KRT to infants is challenging since conventional hemodialysis equipment is designed for adults, with extracorporeal volumes and calibration errors that are unacceptably high for children < 17 kg body weight. Three machines, namely the Cardiorenal Pediatric Emergency Dialysis Machine (CARPEDIEM®), Newcastle Infant Dialysis and Ultrafiltration System (NIDUS®), and Aquadex®, can perform KRT in neonates and young infants using low extracorporeal blood volume and a slow blood flow rate while permitting precise calibration of ultrafiltration. Multicenter retrospective data confirm their safety and feasibility in infants with AKI [52, 53]. However, these machines are not marketed in India, and most centers use conventional machines, e.g., Prismaflex®, to deliver CKRT to infants.

Specific Settings

AKI affects 36.2% (95% CI 18.8–55.8) patients with acute or acute-on chronic liver failure, chiefly as functional AKI or acute tubular necrosis following gastrointestinal bleeding, vomiting, and hepatorenal syndrome [54]. Volume expansion with fluids and albumin, loop diuretics, and vasoconstrictors (vasopressin, octreotide) are useful in hepatorenal syndrome. Beyond conventional indications, KRT is considered in the presence of hyperammonemia and hepatic encephalopathy. CKRT is preferred to intermittent hemodialysis since it permits the slow, continuous removal of ammonia, thus reducing the risk of cerebral edema [54]. Anticoagulation is avoided in the presence of coagulopathy. In the absence of conventional extracorporeal liver support (molecular adsorbent recirculating system, Prometheus, single-pass albumin dialysis) for fulminant acute liver failure, therapeutic plasma exchanges might serve as a bridge to liver transplantation [55].

During acute metabolic crises in inborn errors of metabolism, toxic metabolites like ammonia and leucine accumulate rapidly, leading to cerebral edema and neurological sequelae. CKRT has an effective modality to remove these metabolites and is initiated in patients with (i) rapidly deteriorating neurological status and blood ammonia > 150 μmol/L; (ii) moderate or severe encephalopathy; or (iii) persistently high ammonia levels > 400 μmol/L; (iv) rapid rise to > 300 μmol/L, despite adequate medical measures (protein restriction; nitrogen scavengers, e.g., sodium benzoate) [56]. CVVHD is recommended, with blood and dialysate flow rates of 30–50 mL/min and ≥ 2500–3000 mL/1.73 m2/h, respectively, and a dialysate to blood flow rate ratio of > 1.5 [56]. While intermittent hemodialysis also clears metabolites rapidly, it carries the risks of post-session rebound and intradialytic hypotension. Peritoneal dialysis is less effective and unreliable in clearing large metabolites (e.g., organic acids) [56].

AKI is an important component of the Cairo–Bishop criteria used to define and classify TLS. Risk stratification, adequate hydration, and routine and early use of allopurinol and/or rasburicase have reduced its incidence. The threshold for KRT initiation is low; chief indications include refractory hyperkalemia, hyperphosphatemia, hyperuricemia, metabolic acidosis, and fluid overload unresponsive to diuretics [57].

Mechanisms for AKI in COVID-19 include hypoxia, hypotension, inflammation associated with a cytokine storm, and exposure to nephrotoxic agents. About 10% of children hospitalized with COVID-19 developed AKI, of which the majority were mild and uncommonly merited KRT [58]. The PCRRT workgroup has outlined key considerations when managing critically ill children with COVID-19 and AKI [59].

Outcomes

Recent multicenter studies show that AKI in critically ill children is independently associated with prolonged ICU or hospital stay and high mortality, with stepwise increments by AKI stage [6,7,8]. Mortality is higher in developing countries, correlating inversely with per capita income and health expenditure [1, 8]. In a systematic review of five studies on severe AKI requiring KRT in children, the cumulative incidence (95% CI) per 100 patient-years of reduced GFR (< 90 mL/min/1.73 m2), proteinuria, hypertension and kidney failure were 6.3 (5.1–7.5), 3.1 (2.1–4.1), 1.4 (0.9–2.1), and 0.9 (0.6–1.4), respectively, underscoring the importance of prolonged follow up for development of CKD in patients with AKI [60].