Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with dose-dense MVAC in muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a tertiary center experience

  • RESEARCH ARTICLE
  • Published:
Clinical and Translational Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) patients has proven beneficial in overall survival. However, the optimal regimen is still a matter of debate.

Materials and methods

In this retrospective analysis, we evaluate the results obtained in 42 patients treated in our center with 4 cycles of neoadjuvant dose-dense methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (dd-MVAC) followed by radical cystectomy from August 2015 to October 2020. All patients had cT2 or higher non-metastatic MIBC. Clinical and pathological outcomes are reported.

Results

Of the 42 patients, 90.5% were men (n = 38) and the mean age was 65 years. All of them had ECOG 0–1 at diagnosis and most tumors had an initial clinical stage T2N0 (76%). Thirty-six patients (85.7%) completed 4 cycles of neoadjuvant treatment, and 21.4% required a dose reduction. The most frequent adverse event (AE) was grade 1–2 asthenia (81%), while neutropenia was the most frequent grade 3 or higher AE (38%). Complete pathological response (ypT0, ypN0) was achieved in 50% of patients (n = 21), and down-staging was observed in 57.1% (n = 24). Only one patient presented radiological progressive disease during neoadjuvant treatment (2.4%), and after a mean follow-up time of 31.5 months, 33.3% of patients experienced disease recurrence.

Conclusions

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with 4 cycles of dd-MVAC is an effective regimen with high rates of pathological complete responses and down-staging along with an acceptable toxicity profile. DD-MVAC should be considered as an alternative to cisplatin and gemcitabine in patients with good clinical performance status.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author, ID.

References

  1. Global Cancer Observatory (GLOBOCAN 2020). Estimated Cancer Incidence, Mortality and Prevalence Worldwide in 2020. http://globocan.iarc.fr (25 October 2021).

  2. Stein JP, Lieskovsky G, Cote R, Groshen S, Feng AC, Boyd S, et al. Radical cystectomy in the treatment of invasive bladder cancer. long-term results in patients. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19(3):666–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Moschini M, Karnes RJ, Sharma V, Gandaglia G, Fossati N, Dell’Oglio P, et al. Patterns and prognostic significance of clinical recurrences after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: a 20-year single center experience. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2016;42:735–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Grossman HB, Natale RB, Tangen CM, Speights VO, Vogelzand NJ, Trump DL, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus cystectomy compared with cystectomy alone for locally advanced bladder cancer. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:859–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Advanced Bladder Cancer Meta-analysis Collaboration. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in invasive bladder cancer: update of a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data advanced bladder cancer meta-analysis collaboration. Eur Urol. 2005;48:202–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Yin M, Joshi M, Meijer RP, Glantz M, Holder S, Harvey HA, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a systematic review and two-step meta-analysis. Oncologist. 2016;21(6):708–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Kassouf W, Spiess PE, Brown GA, Munsell MF, Grossman HB, Siefker-Radtke A, et al. P0 stage at radical cystectomy for bladder cancer is associated with improved outcome independent of traditional clinical risk factors. Eur Urol. 2007;52:769–74.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Rosenblatt R, Sherif A, Rintala E, Wahlqvist R, Ullén A, Nilsson S, et al. Pathologic downstaging is a surrogate marker for efficacy and increased survival following neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radical cystectomy for muscle-invasive urothelial bladder cancer. Eur Urol. 2012;61(6):1229–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2011.12.010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Petrelli F, Coinu A, Cabiddu M, Ghilardi M, Vavassori I, Barni S. Correlation of pathologic complete response with survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in bladder cancer treated with cystectomy: a meta-analysis. Eur Urol. 2014;65:350–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chang SS, Bochner BH, Chou R, Dreicer R, Kamat AM, Lerner SP, et al. Treatment of non-metastatic muscle-invasive bladder cancer: AUA/ASCO/ASTRO/SUO Guideline. J Urol. 2017;198(3):552–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2017.04.086.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Witjes A, Bruins H, Cathomas R, Compérat EM, Cowan NC, Gakis G, et al. European Association of Urology Guidelines on Muscle-Invasive and Metastatic Bladder Cancer. Eur Urol 2020.

  12. Donat SM. Integrating perioperative chemotherapy into the treatment of muscle-invasive bladder cancer: strategy versus reality. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2009;7(1):40–7. https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2009.0003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Reardon ZD, Patel SG, Zaid HB, Stimson CJ, Resnick MJ, Keegan KA, et al. Trends in the use of perioperative chemotherapy for localized and locally advanced muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a sign of changing tides. Eur Urol. 2015;67(1):165–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lavery HJ, Stensland KD, Niegisch G, Albers P, Droller MJ. Pathological T0 following radical cystectomy with or without neo-adjuvant chemotherapy: a useful surrogate. J Urol. 2014;191(4):898–906.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Choueiri TK, Jacobus S, Bellmunt J, Qu A, Appleman LJ, Tretter C, et al. Neoadjuvant dose-dense methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin and cisplatin with pegfilgrastim support in muscle invasive urothelial cancer: pathologic, radiologic and biomarker correlates. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32:1882–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Pouessel D, Chevret S, Rolland F, Gravis G, Geoffrois L, Roubaud G, et al. Standard or accelerated methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin and cisplatin as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced urothelial bladder cancer: does dose intensity matter? Eur J Cancer. 2016;54:69–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. von der Maase H, Sengelov L, Roberts JT, Ricci S, Dogliotti L, Oliver T, et al. Long-term survival results of a randomized trial comparing gemcitabine plus cisplatin, with methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, plus cisplatin in patients with bladder cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(21):4602–8. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2005.07.757.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Zargar H, Espiritu PN, Fairey AS, Mertens LS, Dinney CP, Mir MC, et al. Multicenter assessment of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Eur Urol. 2015;67(2):241–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Galsky MD, Pal SK, Chowdhury S, Harshman LC, Crabb SJ, Wong YN, et al. Retrospective international study of cancers of the Urothelial tract (RISC) investigators. comparative effectiveness of gemcitabine plus cisplatin versus methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, plus cisplatin as neoadjuvant therapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Cancer. 2015;121(15):2586–93. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.29387.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Plimack ER, Hoffman-Censits JH, Viterbo R, Trabulsi EJ, Ross EA, Greenberg RE, et al. Accelerated methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin and cisplatin is safe effective and efficient neoadjuvant treatment for muscle invasive bladder cancer results of a multicenter phase II study with molecular correlates of response and toxicity. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32:1895–901.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Zargar H, Shah JB, Van Rhijn BW, Daneshmand S, Bivalacqua TJ, Spiess PE, et al. Neoadjuvant dose dense MVAC versus gemcitabine and cisplatin in patients with cT3-4a N0M0 bladder cancer treated with radical cystectomy. J Urol. 2018;199:1452–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Pfister C, Gravis G, Flechon A, Soulié M, Guy L, Laguerre B, et al. Dose-dense methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin and cisplatin (dd-MVAC) or gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC) as perioperative chemotherapy for patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC): Results of the GETUG/AFU VESPER V05 phase III trial. ESMO Congress 2021 (16–21 September).

  23. Brant A, Kates M, Chappidi MR, Patel HD, Sopko NA, Netto GJ, et al. Pathologic response in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer: Is therapeutic effect owing to chemotherapy or TURBT? Urologic Oncology: Seminars Original Investigations. 2017;35(34):e17-34.e25.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Mmeje CO, Benson CR, Nogueras-González GM, Jayaratna IS, Gao J, Siefker-Radtke AO, et al. Determining the optimal time for radical cystectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. BJU Int. 2018;122(1):89–98.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Rouanne M, Bajorin DF, Hannan R, Galsky MD, Williams SB, Necchi A, et al. Rationale and outcomes for neoadjuvant immunotherapy in urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. Eur Urol Oncol. 2020;3(6):728–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ignacio Duran.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors did not receive support from any organization for the submitted work and have no relevant or nonfinancial interests to disclose.

Ethical approva (Research involving human participants and/or animals) and Informed consent

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Serrano, M., Muñoz-Unceta, N., Alonso, L.A. et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with dose-dense MVAC in muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a tertiary center experience. Clin Transl Oncol 26, 549–553 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-023-03277-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-023-03277-4

Keywords

Navigation