Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Maintenance treatment in advanced HER2-negative gastric cancer

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Clinical and Translational Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Survival for patients with advanced gastric cancer (GC) remains poor. Systemic chemotherapy which has reached a plateau stays the standard first-line (1L) treatment for advanced human epidermal growth-factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative GC. To maximize the benefit of 1L treatment, the concept of maintenance treatment is constantly being explored. In advanced HER2-negative GC, current clinical guidelines do not recommend a standard maintenance therapy strategy. In addition to the monotherapy maintenance with fluorouracil after 4–6 cycles of 1L chemotherapy, some agents that are active against novel targets have been evaluated in clinical trials for maintenance treatment. Whereas most of these trials do not reach their primary endpoints, they open new horizons for the 1L treatment of advanced HER2-negative GC. Therefore, we reviewed the clinical trials in the field of maintenance treatment in advanced HER2-negative GC and discussed some of the problems in clinical trials.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394–424. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21492.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin. 2020;70(1):7–30. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21590.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Katai H, Ishikawa T, Akazawa K, Isobe Y, Miyashiro I, Oda I, et al. Five-year survival analysis of surgically resected gastric cancer cases in Japan: a retrospective analysis of more than 100,000 patients from the nationwide registry of the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association (2001–2007). Gastric Cancer. 2018;21(1):144–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-017-0716-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Digklia A, Wagner AD. Advanced gastric cancer: current treatment landscape and future perspectives. World J Gastroenterol. 2016;22(8):2403–14. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v22.i8.2403.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Bang Y-J, Van Cutsem E, Feyereislova A, Chung HC, Shen L, Sawaki A, et al. Trastuzumab in combination with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for treatment of HER2-positive advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer (ToGA): a phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2010;376(9742):687–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61121-X.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Greig SL, Keating GM. Ramucirumab: a review in advanced gastric cancer. BioDrugs. 2015;29(5):341–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40259-015-0138-1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Scott LJ. Apatinib: a review in advanced gastric cancer and other advanced cancers. Drugs. 2018;78(7):747–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40265-018-0903-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Yang L, Wang Y, Wang H. Use of immunotherapy in the treatment of gastric cancer. Oncol Lett. 2019;18(6):5681–90. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2019.10935.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Muro K, Van Cutsem E, Narita Y, Pentheroudakis G, Baba E, Li J, et al. Pan-Asian adapted ESMO clinical practice guidelines for the management of patients with metastatic gastric cancer: a JSMO-ESMO initiative endorsed by CSCO, KSMO, MOS, SSO and TOS. Ann Oncol. 2019;30(1):19–33. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdy502.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. NCCN. National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology Gastric Cancer, Version 4. 2019. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/\(physician\_gls/default.aspx.\) 2019. Accessed 20 Dec 2019.

  11. Gridelli C, de Marinis F, Pujol J-L, Reck M, Ramlau R, Parente B, et al. Safety, resource use, and quality of life in paramount: a phase III study of maintenance pemetrexed versus placebo after induction pemetrexed plus cisplatin for advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2012;7(11):1713–21. https://doi.org/10.1097/JTO.0b013e318267cf84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bennouna J, Sastre J, Arnold D, Österlund P, Greil R, Van Cutsem E, et al. Continuation of bevacizumab after first progression in metastatic colorectal cancer (ML18147): a randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14(1):29–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70477-1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Goey KKH, Elias SG, van Tinteren H, Laclé MM, Willems SM, Offerhaus GJA, et al. Maintenance treatment with capecitabine and bevacizumab versus observation in metastatic colorectal cancer: updated results and molecular subgroup analyses of the phase 3 CAIRO3 study. Ann Oncol. 2017;28(9):2128–34. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdx322.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Qiu M-z, Wei X-l, Zhang D-s, Jin Y, Zhou Y-x, Wang D-s. Efficacy and safety of capecitabine as maintenance treatment after first-line chemotherapy using oxaliplatin and capecitabine in advanced gastric adenocarcinoma patients: a prospective observation. Tumour Biol J Int Soc Oncodev Biol Med. 2014;35(5):4369–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13277-013-1574-5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Eren OO, Ozturk MA, Sonmez OU, Oyan B. Safety, feasibility, and efficacy of capecitabine maintenance in patients with advanced gastric cancer: a retrospective study. Am J Ther. 2016;23(6):e1493–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/MJT.0000000000000156.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Wu J, Ryan T, Levinson B, Newman E, Hochster HS, Muggia F. Cisplatin with capecitabine: tolerance and activity in a phase I/II study preferentially enrolling patients with gastric cancer. Anticancer Res. 2012;32(3):939–45.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Cancer Japanese Gastric, A. Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines, 5th edition. Gastric Cancer. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-020-01042-y.

  18. Park SR, Kim M-J, Nam B-H, Kim CG, Lee JY, Cho S-J, et al. A randomised phase II study of continuous versus stop-and-go S-1 plus oxaliplatin following disease stabilisation in first-line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic gastric cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2017;83:32–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2017.06.008.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lu Z, Zhang X, Liu W, Liu T, Hu B, Li W, et al. A multicenter, randomized trial comparing efficacy and safety of paclitaxel/capecitabine and cisplatin/capecitabine in advanced gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer. 2018;21(5):782–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-018-0809-y.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Haag G-M, Stocker G, Quidde J, Jaeger D, Lordick F. Randomized controlled trial of S-1 maintenance therapy in metastatic esophagogastric cancer—the multinational MATEO study. BMC Cancer. 2017;17(1):509. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3497-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Chung HC, Arkenau H-T, Lee J, Rha SY, Oh D-Y, Wyrwicz L, et al. Avelumab (anti-PD-L1) as first-line switch-maintenance or second-line therapy in patients with advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer: phase 1b results from the JAVELIN Solid Tumor trial. J Immunother Cancer. 2019;7(1):30. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40425-019-0508-1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Moehler M, Ryu M-H, Dvorkin M, Lee K-W, Coşkun HŞ, Wong R. Maintenance avelumab versus continuation of first-line chemotherapy in gastric cancer: JAVELIN Gastric 100 study design. Future Oncol. 2019;15(6):567–77. https://doi.org/10.2217/fon-2018-0668.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Moehler MH. Results of the JAVELIN Gastric 100 phase 3 trial: avelumab maintenance following first-line (1L) chemotherapy (CTx) vs continuation of CTx for HER2- advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer (GC/GEJC). https://meetings.asco.org/gi/abstracts-posters. 2020. Accessed 23 Jan 2020.

  24. Ohtsu A, Shah MA, Van Cutsem E, Rha SY, Sawaki A, Park SR, et al. Bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy as first-line therapy in advanced gastric cancer: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III study. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(30):3968–76. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2011.36.2236.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Meulendijks D, de Groot JWB, Los M, Boers JE, Beerepoot LV, Polee MB, et al. Bevacizumab combined with docetaxel, oxaliplatin, and capecitabine, followed by maintenance with capecitabine and bevacizumab, as first-line treatment of patients with advanced HER2-negative gastric cancer: A multicenter phase 2 study. Cancer. 2016;122(9):1434–43. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.29864.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Wöll E, Thaler J, Keil F, Gruenberger B, Hejna M, Eisterer W. Oxaliplatin/irinotecan/bevacizumab followed by docetaxel/bevacizumab in inoperable locally advanced or metastatic gastric cancer patients-\(AGMT\_GASTRIC-3\). Anticancer Res. 2017;37(10):5553–8. https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.11987.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Di Bartolomeo M, Niger M, Morano F, Corallo S, Antista M, Tamberi S, et al. Assessment of Ramucirumab plus paclitaxel as switch maintenance versus continuation of first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced HER-2 negative gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancers: the ARMANI phase III trial. BMC Cancer. 2019;19(1):283. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-019-5498-3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Chibaudel B, Maindrault-Goebel F, Lledo G, Mineur L, André T, Bennamoun M, et al. Can chemotherapy be discontinued in unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer The GERCOR OPTIMOX2 Study. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(34):5727–33. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2009.23.4344.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. André T, Tournigand C, Mineur L, Fellague-Chebra R, Flesch M, Mabro M, et al. Phase II study of an optimized 5-fluorouracil-oxaliplatin strategy (OPTIMOX2) with celecoxib in metastatic colorectal cancer: a GERCOR study. Ann Oncol. 2007;18(1):77–81. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdl336.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Cicero G, De Luca R, Dieli F. Progression-free survival as a surrogate endpoint of overall survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. OncoTargets Ther. 2018;11:3059–63. https://doi.org/10.2147/OTT.S151276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Giessen C, Laubender RP, Ankerst DP, Stintzing S, Modest DP, Mansmann U, et al. Progression-free survival as a surrogate endpoint for median overall survival in metastatic colorectal cancer: literature-based analysis from 50 randomized first-line trials. Clin Cancer Res Off J Am Assoc Cancer Res. 2013;19(1):225–35. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.Ccr-12-1515.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Gyawali B, Hey SP, Kesselheim AS. A comparison of response patterns for progression-free survival and overall survival following treatment for cancer with PD-1 inhibitors: a meta-analysis of correlation and differences in effect sizes. JAMA Netw Open. 2018;1(2):e180416e. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.0416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Fuchs CS, Doi T, Jang RW, Muro K, Satoh T, Machado M, et al. Safety and efficacy of pembrolizumab monotherapy in patients with previously treated advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer: phase 2 clinical KEYNOTE-059 Trial. JAMA Oncol. 2018;4(5):e180013e. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.0013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Rojkó L, Reiniger L, Téglási V, Fábián K, Pipek O, Vágvölgyi A, et al. Chemotherapy treatment is associated with altered PD-L1 expression in lung cancer patients. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2018;144(7):1219–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-018-2642-4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Song Z, Yu X, Zhang Y. Altered expression of programmed death-ligand 1 after neo-adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with lung squamous cell carcinoma. Lung Cancer. 2016;99:166–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2016.07.013.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Bang YJ, Cho JY, Kim YH, Kim JW, Di Bartolomeo M, Ajani JA, et al. Efficacy of sequential ipilimumab monotherapy versus best supportive care for unresectable locally advanced/metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer. Clin Cancer Res Off J Am Assoc Cancer Res. 2017;23(19):5671–8. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.Ccr-17-0025.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81403220), Tianjin Health and family planning-high level talent selection and training project, Tianjin Science and Technology Plan Projects (No. 17ZXMFSY00190) and Tianjin Traditional Chinese Medicine Research Project, Tianjin health and family planning commission (No. 2017003).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. Kong.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Research involving human participants and/or animals

N/A.

Informed consent

Our study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of First Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University of TCM, Tianjin, China.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yao, Y., Deng, R., Liao, D. et al. Maintenance treatment in advanced HER2-negative gastric cancer. Clin Transl Oncol 22, 2206–2212 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-020-02379-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-020-02379-7

Keywords

Navigation