Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Multicenter phase II clinical trial of preoperative capecitabine with concurrent radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Clinical and Translational Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

To assess pathologic complete response, sphincter preservation rates and toxicity profile of preoperative chemoradiation with capecitabine in resectable locally advanced rectal cancer.

Materials and methods

Fifty-eight patients from six Spanish centers were included (March 2004 to June 2005) with histological/cytological diagnosis of locally advanced rectal cancer, age between 18 and 80 years, ECOG 0–2, adequate bone marrow, renal and hepatic functions. Prior chemotherapy/radiotherapy was not allowed. Preoperative treatment was capecitabine 825 mg/m2 bid concomitant to radiotherapy (45 + 5.4 Gy boost over 5.5 weeks). Surgery was performed 4–8 weeks after completion of chemoradiotherapy.

Results

Fifty-eight patients were enrolled in this study: 60.3 % males, median age of 64.5 (30.9–78.7) years, 28.6 % with ECOG 0 and 71.4 % with ECOG 1. Median distance of tumor from the anal verge was 7 (1–12) cm. Fifty-two (89.6. %) patients completed preoperative chemoradiotherapy. Primary tumor and node downstaging occurred in 61.1 and 69.6 % of patients, respectively. Surgery was performed in 55 patients (94.8 %): 80 % had negative lymph nodes and 72.7 % underwent sphincter-preserving procedures. A pathologic complete response was observed in 10.5 % (95 % CI 2.5–18.5) of the patients. Main grade I–II toxicities were leucopenia (43.1 %), neutropenia (24.1 %), anemia (36.2 %), diarrhea (32.8 %) and skin disorders (5.1 %), from which diarrhea (6.9 %), leucopenia (1.7 %) and skin disorders (1.7 %) reached grade III. There were no grade IV toxicities.

Conclusions

Preoperative capecitabine-based chemoradiation is a well-tolerated and effective neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer that achieves encouraging rates of tumor downstaging.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Krook JE, Moertel CG, Gunderson LL (1991) Effective surgical adjuvant therapy for high-risk rectal carcinoma. N Engl J Med 324:709–715

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Sauer R, Becker H, Hohenberger W, Rödel C et al, German Rectal Cancer Study Group (2004) Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 351:1731–1740

    Google Scholar 

  3. Glynne-Jones R, Harrison M (2007) Locally advanced rectal cancer: what is the evidence for induction chemoradiation? Oncologist 12:1309–1318

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Piedbois P, Rougier P, Buyse M et al (1998) Efficacy of intravenous continuous infusion of fluorouracil compared with bolus administration in advanced colorectal cancer. Meta-analysis group in cancer. J Clin Oncol 16:301–308

    Google Scholar 

  5. Van Cutsem E, Cunningham D, Hoff PM et al (2001) Thymidine phosphorylase (TP) activation: convenience through innovation. Oncologist 6(suppl 4):1–2

    Google Scholar 

  6. Van Cutsem E, Twelves C, Cassidy J et al (2001) Oral capecitabine compared with intravenous fluorouracil plus leucovorin in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: results of a large phase III study. J Clin Oncol 19:4097–4106

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Liu G, Franssen E, Fitch MI, Warner E (1997) Patient preferences for oral versus intravenous palliative chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 15:5–110

    Google Scholar 

  8. Borner M, Scheithauer W, Twelves C et al (2001) Answering patients’ needs: oral alternatives to intravenous therapy. Oncologist 6(Suppl 4):6–12

    Google Scholar 

  9. Velenik V, Anderluh F, Oblak I et al (2006) Capecitabine as a radiosensitizing agent in neoadjuvant treatment of locally advanced resectable rectal cancer: prospective phase II trial. Croat Med J 47:693–700

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Dunst J, Reese T, Sutter T et al (2002) Phase I trial evaluating the concurrent combination of radiotherapy and capecitabine in rectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 20:3983–3991

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. de las Heras M, Arias F, del Moral R, Gómez-Millán J, Wals A, Alcántara P (2006) Phase II trial of preoperative capecitabine with concurrent radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 66(3 Supplement):S305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sawada N, Ishikawa T, Sekiguchi F et al (1999) X-ray irradiation induces thymidine phosphorylase and enhances the efficacy of capecitabine (Xeloda) in human cancer xenografts. Clin Cancer Res 5:2948–2953

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Bonnetain F, Bosset J, Gerard J (2011) An analysis of preoperative chemoradiotherapy with 5FU/leucovorin for T3-4 rectal cancer on survival in a pooled analysis of EORTC 22921 and FFCD 9203 trials. J Clin Oncol 29 (suppl;abstr 3506)

  14. Roh MS, Yothers MJ, O’Connell et al (2011) The impact of capecitabine and oxaliplatin in the preoperative multimodality treatment in patients with carcinoma of the rectum: NSABP R-04. J Clin Oncol 29 (suppl;abstr 3503)

  15. Hofheinz R, Wenz FK, Post A et al (2011) Capecitabine versus 5-fluorouracil-based (neo) adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for locally advanced rectal cancer: long-term results of a randomized, phase III trial. J Clin Oncol 29 (suppl;abstract 3504)

  16. Aschele C, Cionini L, Lonardi S et al (2011) Primary tumor response to preoperative chemoradiation with or without oxaliplatin in locally advanced rectal cancer: pathologic results of the STAR-01 randomized phase III trial. J Clin Oncol. doi:10.1200/JCO.2010.34.4911 (published online before print in May 23)

  17. Gérard JP, Azria D, Gourgou-Bourgade S et al (2010) Comparison of two neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy regimens for locally advanced rectal cancer: results of the phase III trial ACCORD 12/0405-Prodige 2. J Clin Oncol 28:1638–1644

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Weiser MR (2011) Rectal cancer trials: no movement. J Clin Oncol. doi:10.1200/JCO.2011.35.7053 (published online before print in May 23)

  19. Bengala C, Bettelli S, Bertolini F et al (2009) Epidermal growth factor receptor gene copy number, K-ras mutation and pathological response to preoperative cetuximab, 5-FU and radiation therapy in locally advanced rectal cancer. Ann Oncol 20:469–474

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Crane CH, Eng C, Feig BW, Das P et al (2010) Phase II trial of neoadjuvant bevacizumab, capecitabine, and radiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 76:824–830

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported in part by a grant from ROCHE España. The sponsors had no role in the design and conduct of the study, in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data or in the preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript. The authors’ work was independent of the funders. Writing and editing assistance was provided by Marta Mas (TFS Spain).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manuel de las Heras.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

de las Heras, M., Arias, F., del Moral-Avila, R. et al. Multicenter phase II clinical trial of preoperative capecitabine with concurrent radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. Clin Transl Oncol 15, 294–299 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-012-0915-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-012-0915-y

Keywords

Navigation