Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Networks in Socially Embedded Local Food Supply: The Case of Retailer Co-operatives

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of Business Market Management

Abstract

This paper investigates network development in food retailing, in order to evaluate the role of retailer consumer co-operatives. Opportunity is seen to lie in niche (for example, local) markets and a social/ethical orientation. The method is single case and exploratory. Investigation shows that a co-operative can survive and add value as an alternative organizational form, when genuine social responsibility is experienced by a network consisting of the co-operative, its members, customers, suppliers and the community as a whole.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2004). Doing better at doing good: When, why, and how consumers respond to corporate social initiatives. California Management Review, 47(1), 9–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birchall, J. (1997). The international co-operative movement. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 497–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A. B. (1999). Corporate social responsibility: Evolution of a definitional construct. Business & Society, 38(3), 268–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, A., & Burt, S. (2003). Market sanctions, monitoring and vertical coordination within retailer-manufacturer relationships: The case of retail brand suppliers. European Journal of Marketing, 37(5/6), 668–689.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, M., & Chaddad, F. R. (2004). Redesigning cooperative boundaries: The emergence of new models. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 85, 1249–1253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Co-op. (2009a). The co-operative. Retrieved January 10, 2009, from http://www.co-operative.coop/.

  • Co-op. (2009b). About the co-op. Retrieved January 10, 2009, from http://www.cooponline.coop/about_intro_milestones.html. Co-op online.

  • Cox, A. (2004). The art of the possible: Relationship management in power regimes and supply chains. Supply Chain Management, 9(5), 346–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, K., & Burt, S. (2007). Consumer co-operatives and retail internationalization: Problems and prospects. International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, 35(2), 156–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Bakker, F. G. A., Groenewegen, P., & den Hond, F. (2005). A bibliometric analysis of 30 years of research and theory on corporate social responsibility and corporate social performance. Business & Society, 44(3), 283–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dey, I. (1993). Qualitative data analysis: A user friendly guide for social scientists. Routledge: London.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eliot, S. (1983). The crisis in the co-operative movement. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 11(4), 8–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eliot, S. (1985). The Coops’ road to recovery. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 13(4), 9–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Financial Times. (2009, June 10). Responsible business. Financial Times Special Report, pp. 1–7.

  • Free, C. (2007). Walking the talk? Supply chain accounting and trust among UK supermarkets and suppliers. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33, 629–662.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbert, M., Ruigrok, W., & Wicki, B. (2008). What passes as a rigorous case study? Strategic Management Journal, 29(13), 1465–1474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallsworth, A., & Bell, J. (2003). Retail change and the UK co-operative movement: New opportunity beckoning? International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research, 13(3), 301–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansmann, H. (1996). The ownership of enterprise. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, L. (2008). When CSR is in your DNA. Market Research Society, annual conference, (March 18 and 19). The Riverbank Park Plaza, London, MRS, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hingley, M. (2001). Relationship management in the supply chain. International Journal of Logistics Management, 12(2), 57–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hingley, M. (2005). Power to all our friends?: Learning to live with imbalance in UK supplier-retailer relationships. Industrial Marketing Management, 34(8), 848–858.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howe, W. S. (1998). Vertical market relations in the UK grocery trade: Analysis and government policy. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 26(6), 212–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ICA. (1995). International Cooperative Alliance statement on the co-operative identity. http://www.ica.coop/coop/principles.html. Accessed 10 July 2009.

  • IGD. (2007). Grocery market share 2007. http://www.igd-interactive.com/index. Accessed 10 Jan 2009.

  • Jones, P., Comfort, D., & Hillier, D. (2005). Corporate social responsibility and the UK’s top ten retailers. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 33(12), 882–892.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, P., Comfort, D., & Hillier, D. (2007). What’s in store? Retail marketing and corporate social responsibility. Marketing Intelligence and Planning, 25(1), 17–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krippendorff, K. (1980). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Sage: Calif.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang, T. (2003). Food industrialization and food power: Implications for food governance. Development Policy Review, 21(5–6), 555–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leaving a trace. (2008, October). Lincolnshire Life, pp. 52–53.

  • Lee, M.-Y., Fairhurst, A., & Wesley, S. (2009). Corporate social responsibility: A review of the top 100 US retailers. Corporate Reputation Review, 12(2), 140–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lincolnshire Co-op. (2007). Annual report and financial statements for the year to 1st September 2007. Lincolnshire Co-op, Tentercroft Street, Lincoln.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lincolnshire Co-op. (2009). Lincolnshire Co-operative Ltd. http://www.lincolnshire.coop/. Accessed 10 Jan 2009.

  • Lindgreen, A., Swaen, V., & Johnston, W. J. (2009). Corporate social responsibility: An empirical investigation of U.S. organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 85(Suppl. 2), 303–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maignan, I., Ferrell, O. C., & Ferrell, L. (2005). A stakeholder model for implementing social responsibility in marketing. European Journal of Marketing, 39(9–10), 956–977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meat the best. (2008, July 23). Lincolnshire Echo, p. 6.

  • Merlo, O., Bell, S. J., Menguc, B., & Whitwell, G. J. (2006). Social capital, customer service orientation and creativity in retail stores. Journal of Business Research, 59, 1214–1221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook, (2nd ed). Sage: Calif.

    Google Scholar 

  • Novkovic, S. (2008). Defining the co-operative difference. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 37, 2168–2177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Keefe, M., & Fearne, A. (2002). From commodity marketing to category management: Insights from the Waitrose category leadership program in fresh produce. Supply Chain Management, 7(5), 296–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M. Q. (1987), How to use qualitative methods in evaluation. Sage: Calif.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robson, I., & Rawnsley, V. (2001). Co-operation or coercion?: Supplier networks and relationships in the UK food industry. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 6(1), 39–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, S., & Ennis, S. (2000). Marketing-channel management. In K. Blois (Ed.), The Oxford textbook of marketing, (pp. 245–270). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sodano, V., & Hingley, M. (2008, May 28–30). The role of co-operatives and the corporate social responsibility (CSR) Agenda: A comparison of approaches in co-operative versus non-co-operative food supply. Paper presented at the Iaea2 conference: “Il ruolo della cooperazione nel sistema agroalimentare europeo”, Bologna.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Sage: Calif.

    Google Scholar 

  • USDA. (1997). Strengthening ethics within agricultural co-operatives. RBS Research Report 151.

  • Weber, R. P. (1985). Basic content analysis series: Quantitative applications in the social sciences, 49. Sage: Calif.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R. C. (2005). The Co-operative movement. (1st ed.). Ashgate: Hampshire.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (2003). Applications of case study research. (3rd ed.). Sage: Calif.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Business Management and Marketing, Harper Adams University College, Newport, UK

    Martin Hingley

Authors
  1. Martin Hingley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin Hingley.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hingley, M. Networks in Socially Embedded Local Food Supply: The Case of Retailer Co-operatives. J Bus Mark Manag 4, 111–128 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12087-010-0036-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12087-010-0036-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation