Abstract
This study employs the Malmquist productivity index based on data envelopment analysis to measure and decompose total factor productivity (TFP) change into efficiency and technological change by province. Using annual observations of gross regional domestic product and factor inputs (labor, physical, and human capital) for 26 contiguous provinces, we find that over a quarter of them experienced negative TFP growth over 1990–2015 due to technological regress, which was barely offset by efficiency improvements. Three on-Java provinces—Jakarta, West Java, and East Java—contributed to national technological progress with full utilization and optimal allocation of resources at least once over the study period, except during 1995–2005, when Indonesia experienced a financial crisis and subsequent slow recoveries. Jakarta and West Java contributed in all other periods. Considering the high spatial density of urban economic activities in these three provinces, we conclude that urban agglomeration is influential for further regional technological growth in Indonesia.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The bootstrap DEA method, developed by Simar and Wilson (1999), reflects the unobserved decision-making units (DMUs) to address measurement errors; however, the bootstrap frontier generally lies above the conventional frontier and the score rarely becomes efficient. Our study’s objective is to identify the provinces achieving technological progress under efficient resource utilization and allocation. Thus, we apply the conventional DEA method.
Our cumulative index values measure successive changes from base year 1990 to year t, ECi0 [1990, t], TCi0 [1990, t], and MIi0 [1990, t] (t = 1990, …, 2015). When t = 1990, the cumulative indices are one. For example, the traditional form of MIi0 [\(t\), t +1] is not appropriate for observing chronological changes, as it does not satisfy the circular test: MIi0 [\(t\), t + 1] × MIi0 [\(t\) + 1, \(t\) + 2] ≠ MIi0 [\(t\), \(t\) + 2].
References
Angeriz, A., McCombie, J., Roberts, M.: Productivity, efficiency and technological change in European Union regional manufacturing: a data envelopment analysis approach. Manch. Sch. 74(4), 500–525 (2006)
Bhattacharjee, A., de Castro, E., Jensen-Butler, C.: Regional variation in productivity: a study of the Danish economy. J. Prod. Anal. 31(3), 195–212 (2009)
BPS (Badan Pusat Statistik): Statistical Yearbook of Indonesia. Jakarta (1990–2018)
Coelli, T.J., Prasada, R., Battese, G.E.: An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis, 2nd edn. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston (2005)
Esmara, H.: Regional income disparities. Bull. Indones. Econ. Stud. 11(1), 41–57 (1975)
Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., Norris, M., Zhang, A.: Productivity, technical progress, and efficiency change in industrialized countries. Am. Econ. Rev. 84(1), 66–83 (1994)
Hashimoto, A., Sugita, T., Haneda, S.: Evaluating shifts in Japan’s quality-of-life. Socio-Econ Plan. Sci. 43, 263–273 (2009)
Hill, H., Resosudarmo, B.P., Vidyattama, Y.: Indonesia’s changing economic geography. B Indones. Econ. Stud. 44(3), 407–435 (2008)
Isaksson, A.: The Unido world productivity database: an overview. Int. Product. Monit. 18, 38–50 (2009)
Kalirajan, K.P., Obwona, M.B., Zhao, S.: A decomposition of total factor productivity growth: the case of Chinese agricultural growth before and after reforms. Am. J. Agr. Econ. 78, 331–333 (1996)
Kataoka, M.: Capital stock estimates by province and interprovincial distribution in Indonesia. Asian Econ. J. 27(4), 409–428 (2013)
Kataoka, M.: Inequality convergence in inefficiency and interprovincial income inequality in Indonesia for 1990–2010: decentralization and spatial allocation policy of public investment in Indonesia. Asia Pacific J. Reg. Sci. 2(2), 297–313 (2018)
Kataoka, M.: Interregional allocation of capital with spillover effects in Indonesia’s pre- and post-crisis economy. In: Mulyaningsih, T., Resosudarmo, B.P. (eds.) Strengthening Regional and Local Economy, pp. 197–222. Indonesia Regional Science Association Book Series on Regional Development, Jakarta (2019)
Lewis, B.D., Oosterman, A.: The impact of decentralization on subnational government fiscal slack in Indonesia. Public Budg. Financ. 29, 27–47 (2009)
Li, G., Zeng, X., Zhang, L.: Study of agricultural productivity and its convergence across China’s regions. Rev. Reg. Stud. 38(3), 361–379 (2008)
Machek, O., Hnilica, J.: Total factor productivity approach in competitive and regulated world. Procedia Soc. Behv. Sci. 57, 223–230 (2012)
Margono, H., Sharma, S.C., Sylwester, K., Al-Qalawi, U.: Technical efficiency and productivity analysis in Indonesian provincial economies. Appl. Econ. 43(6), 663–672 (2011)
Mendez, C.: Regional efficiency convergence and efficiency clusters. Asia Pac. J. Reg. Sci. 4(2), 391–411 (2020)
Olomola, P.A., Osinubi, T.T.: Determinants of total factor productivity in Mexico, Indonesia, Nigeria, and Turkey (1980–2014). Emerg. Econ. Stud. 4(2), 192–217 (2018)
Simar, L., Wilson, P.W.: Estimating and bootstrapping Malmquist indices. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 115(3), 459–471 (1999)
Wei, Z., Hao, R.: The role of human capital in China’s total factor productivity growth: a cross-province analysis. Dev. Econ. 49(1), 1–35 (2011)
Yang, C.-H., Yang, C.-J., Chiu, C.-Y., Lin, H.-Y.: Resource allocation, structural change, and the dynamics of manufacturing productivity in Indonesia. Dev. Econ. 56(4), 297–327 (2018)
Acknowledgements
This work is supported by Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research C (26380308) from the Japan Society of the Promotion of Science. The author is grateful for Professor Mototsugu Fukushige’s comments on an earlier version of this paper. The author also thanks the three anonymous referees for their constructive comments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kataoka, M. Total factor productivity change in Indonesia’s provincial economies for 1990–2015: Malmquist productivity index approach. Lett Spat Resour Sci 13, 233–243 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12076-020-00256-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12076-020-00256-z