Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

N-terminal propeptide of type 3 collagen-based sequential algorithm can identify high-risk steatohepatitis and fibrosis in MAFLD

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Hepatology International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background and aims

With metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) incidence and prevalence sharply increasing globally, there is an urgent need for non-invasive diagnostic tests to accurately screen high-risk MAFLD patients for liver inflammation and fibrosis. We aimed to develop a novel sequential algorithm based on N-terminal propeptide of type 3 collagen (PRO-C3) for disease risk stratification in patients with MAFLD.

Methods

A derivation and independent validation cohort of 327 and 142 patients with biopsy-confirmed MAFLD were studied. We compared the diagnostic performances of various non-invasive scores in different disease states, and a novel sequential algorithm was constructed by combining the best performing non-invasive scores.

Results

For patients with high-risk progressive steatohepatitis (i.e., steatohepatitis + NAFLD activity score ≥ 4 + F ≥ 2), the AUROC of FAST score was 0.801 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.739–0.863), and the negative predictive value (NPV) was 0.951. For advanced fibrosis (≥ F3) and cirrhosis (F4), the AUROCs of ADAPT and Agile 4 were 0.879 (95%CI 0.825–0.933) and 0.943 (95%CI 0.892–0.994), and the NPV were 0.972 and 0.992. Sequential algorithm of ADAPT + Agile 4 combination was better than other combinations for risk stratification of patients with severe fibrosis (AUROC = 0.88), with similar results in the validation cohort. Meanwhile, in all subgroup analyses (stratifying by sex, age, diabetes, NAS, BMI and ALT), ADAPT + Agile 4 had a good diagnostic performance.

Conclusions

The new sequential algorithm reliably identifies liver inflammation and fibrosis in MAFLD, making it easier to exclude low-risk patients and recommending high-risk MAFLD patients for clinical trials and emerging pharmacotherapies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ALT:

Alanine aminotransferase

AST:

Aspartate aminotransferase

AAR:

Aspartate aminotransferase to alanine aminotransferase ratio

APRI:

Aspartate aminotransferase-platelet ratio index

AUROC:

Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve

BMI:

Body mass index

CI:

Confidence interval

DCA:

Decision curve analysis

FIB-4:

Fibrosis-4

FLIP:

Fatty liver inhibition of progression

MAFLD:

Metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease

NFS:

NAFLD fibrosis score

NPV:

Negative predictive value

PPV:

Positive predictive value

PRO-C3:

N-terminal propeptide of type 3 collagen

VCTE:

Vibration-controlled transient elastography

References

  1. Liu J, Ayada I, Zhang X, Wang L, Li Y, Wen T et al. Estimating global prevalence of metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease in overweight or obese adults. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022;20:e573–e582

  2. Eslam M, Sarin SK, Wong VW, Fan JG, Kawaguchi T, Ahn SH et al. The Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of metabolic associated fatty liver disease. Hep Intl. 2020;14:889–919

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Zheng KI, Fan JG, Shi JP, Wong VW, Eslam M, George J et al. From NAFLD to MAFLD: a "redefining" moment for fatty liver disease. Chin Med J. 2020;133:2271–2273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Méndez-Sánchez N, Bugianesi E, Gish RG, Lammert F, Tilg H, Nguyen MH et al. Global multi-stakeholder endorsement of the MAFLD definition. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022;7:388–390

  5. Méndez-Sánchez N, Díaz-Orozco L, Córdova-Gallardo J. Redefinition of fatty liver disease from NAFLD to MAFLD raised disease awareness: Mexican experience. J Hepatoly. 2021;75:221–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Eslam M, Sanyal AJ, George J. MAFLD: a consensus-driven proposed nomenclature for metabolic associated fatty liver disease.Gastroenterol. 2020;158:1999-2014.e1991

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Estes C, Anstee QM, Arias-Loste MT, Bantel H, Bellentani S, Caballeria J et al. Modeling NAFLD disease burden in China, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Spain, United Kingdom, and United States for the period 2016-2030. J Hepatol. 2018;69:896–904

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Zheng KI, Eslam M, George J, Zheng MH. When a new definition overhauls perceptions of MAFLD related cirrhosis care. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2020;9:801–804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Rios RS, Zheng KI, Zheng MH. Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis and risk of hepatocellular carcinoma. Chin Med J. 2021;134:2911–2921

  10. Wang TY, Wang RF, Bu ZY, Targher G, Byrne CD, Sun DQ et al. Association of metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease with kidney disease. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2022;18:259–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fouad Y, Gomaa A, Semida N, Ghany WA, Attia D. Change from NAFLD to MAFLD increases the awareness of fatty liver disease in primary care physicians and specialists. J Hepatol. 2021;74:1254–1256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zheng KI, Zheng MH. The uprising of metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) in acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF). Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2021;10:857–859

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ekstedt M, Hagström H, Nasr P, Fredrikson M, Stål P, Kechagias S et al. Fibrosis stage is the strongest predictor for disease-specific mortality in NAFLD after up to 33 years of follow-up. Hepatol. 2015;61:1547–1554

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Shah AG, Lydecker A, Murray K, Tetri BN, Contos MJ, Sanyal AJ. Comparison of noninvasive markers of fibrosis in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;7:1104–1112

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Zheng KI, Sun DQ, Jin Y, Zhu PW, Zheng MH. Clinical utility of the MAFLD definition. J Hepatol. 2021;74:989–991

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wu XX, Zheng KI, Boursier J, Chan WK, Yilmaz Y, Romero-Gómez M et al. acNASH index to diagnose nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: a prospective derivation and global validation study. EClinicalMedicine. 2021;41:101145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Vilar-Gomez E, Chalasani N. Non-invasive assessment of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: Clinical prediction rules and blood-based biomarkers. J Hepatol. 2018;68:305–315

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Castera L, Friedrich-Rust M, Loomba R. Noninvasive assessment of liver disease in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Gastroenterol. 2019;156:1264-1281.e1264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Younossi ZM, Gramlich T, Liu YC, Matteoni C, Petrelli M, Goldblum J et al. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: assessment of variability in pathologic interpretations. Mod pathol 1998;11:560–565

  20. Ratziu V, Charlotte F, Heurtier A, Gombert S, Giral P, Bruckert E et al. Sampling variability of liver biopsy in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Gastroenterol. 2005;128:1898–1906

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Tang LJ, Ma HL, Eslam M, Wong GL, Zhu PW, Chen SD et al. Among simple non-invasive scores, Pro-C3 and ADAPT best exclude advanced fibrosis in Asian patients with MAFLD. Metabolism: Clin Exp. 2022;128:154958

  22. Eslam M, Wong GL, Hashem AM, Chan HL, Nielsen MJ, Leeming DJ et al. A sequential algorithm combining ADAPT and liver stiffness can stage metabolic-associated fatty liver disease in hospital-based and primary care patients. Am J Gastroenterol. 2021;116:984-993 2021;116:984–993

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Younossi ZS, Newsome P, Chan W, et al. Development and validation of Agile 3+: novel FibroScan based score for the diagnosis of advanced fibrosis in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. J Hepatol. 2021;75:S205–S293.

  24. Newsome PN, Sasso M, Deeks JJ, Paredes A, Boursier J, Chan WK et al. FibroScan-AST (FAST) score for the non-invasive identification of patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis with significant activity and fibrosis: a prospective derivation and global validation study. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;5:362–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Eslam M, Newsome PN, Sarin SK, Anstee QM, Targher G, Romero-Gomez M et al. A new definition for metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease: An international expert consensus statement. J Hepatol. 2020;73:202–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhou YJ, Gao F, Liu WY, Wong GL, Mahadeva S, Raihan Nik Mustapha N et al. Screening for compensated advanced chronic liver disease using refined Baveno VI elastography cutoffs in Asian patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Alimentary Pharmacol Ther. 2021;54:470–480

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. EASL-EASD-EASO Clinical Practice Guidelines for the management of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. J Hepatol 2016;64:1388–1402

  28. Kleiner DE, Brunt EM, Van Natta M, Behling C, Contos MJ, Cummings OW et al. Design and validation of a histological scoring system for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatol. 2005;41:1313–1321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Fukusato T, Fukushima J, Shiga J, Takahashi Y, Nakano T, Maeyama S et al. Interobserver variation in the histopathological assessment of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Hepatol Res. 2005;33:122–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Bedossa P. Utility and appropriateness of the fatty liver inhibition of progression (FLIP) algorithm and steatosis, activity, and fibrosis (SAF) score in the evaluation of biopsies of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatol. 2014;60:565–575

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Daniels SJ, Leeming DJ, Eslam M, Hashem AM, Nielsen MJ, Krag A et al. ADAPT: An algorithm incorporating PRO-C3 accurately identifies patients with NAFLD and advanced fibrosis. Hepatol. 2019;69:1075–1086

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Wai CT, Greenson JK, Fontana RJ, Kalbfleisch JD, Marrero JA, Conjeevaram HS et al. A simple noninvasive index can predict both significant fibrosis and cirrhosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Hepatol. 2003;38:518–526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Sterling RK, Lissen E, Clumeck N, Sola R, Correa MC, Montaner J et al. Development of a simple noninvasive index to predict significant fibrosis in patients with HIV/HCV coinfection. Hepatol. 2006;43:1317–1325

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Angulo P, Hui JM, Marchesini G, Bugianesi E, George J, Farrell GC et al. The NAFLD fibrosis score: a noninvasive system that identifies liver fibrosis in patients with NAFLD. Hepatol. 2007;45:846–854

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Harrison SA, Oliver D, Arnold HL, Gogia S, Neuschwander-Tetri BA. Development and validation of a simple NAFLD clinical scoring system for identifying patients without advanced disease. Gut. 2008;57:1441–1447

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Angulo P, Kleiner DE, Dam-Larsen S, Adams LA, Bjornsson ES, Charatcharoenwitthaya P et al. Liver fibrosis, but no other histologic features, is associated with long-term outcomes of patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Gastroenterol. 2015;149:389–397.e310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Friedman SL, Ratziu V, Harrison SA, Abdelmalek MF, Aithal GP, Caballeria J et al. A randomized, placebo-controlled trial of cenicriviroc for treatment of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis with fibrosis. Hepatol. 2018;67:1754–1767

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Ratziu V, Harrison SA, Francque S, Bedossa P, Lehert P, Serfaty L et al. Elafibranor, an Agonist of the Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-α and -δ, Induces Resolution of Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis Without Fibrosis Worsening. Gastroenterol. 2016;150:1147–1159.e1145

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Wang TY, George J, Zheng MH. Metabolic (dysfunction) associated fatty liver disease: more evidence and a bright future. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2021;10:849–852

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Hsu C, Caussy C, Imajo K, Chen J, Singh S, Kaulback K et al. Magnetic Resonance vs Transient Elastography Analysis of Patients With Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: A Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis of Individual Participants. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;17:630–637.e638

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Noureddin M, Truong E, Gornbein JA, Saouaf R, Guindi M, Todo T et al. MRI-based (MAST) score accurately identifies patients with NASH and significant fibrosis. J Hepatol. 2022;76:781–787

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Imajo K, Kessoku T, Honda Y, Tomeno W, Ogawa Y, Mawatari H et al. Magnetic Resonance Imaging More Accurately Classifies Steatosis and Fibrosis in Patients With Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Than Transient Elastography. Gastroenterol. 2016;150:626–637.e627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Shirabe K, Bekki Y, Gantumur D, Araki K, Ishii N, Kuno A et al. Mac-2 binding protein glycan isomer (M2BPGi) is a new serum biomarker for assessing liver fibrosis: more than a biomarker of liver fibrosis. J Gastroenterol 2018;53:819–826

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This paper was funded by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82070588), High Level Creative Talents from Department of Public Health in Zhejiang Province (S2032102600032) and Project of New Century 551 Talent Nurturing in Wenzhou. GT is supported in part by grants from the School of Medicine, University of Verona, Verona, Italy. CDB is supported in part by the Southampton NIHR Biomedical Research Centre (IS-BRC-20004), UK. Vincent Wong is supported in part by a Direct Grant from The Chinese University of Hong Kong (2020.045). ME and JG are supported by the Robert W. Storr Bequest to the Sydney Medical Foundation, University of Sydney; a National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (NHMRC) Program Grant (APP1053206), an Investigator Grant (APP1196492) and Project and ideas grants (APP2001692, APP1107178 and APP1108422).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

L-JT: conceptualization, investigation, data curation, and writing—original draft. GL: conceptualization and writing—original draft. ME: investigation, writing—review and editing. P-WZ: data curation, writing—review and editing. S-DC: data curation, writing—review and editing. HH-WL: data curation and writing—review and editing. O-YH: data curation and writing—review and editing. GL-HW: investigation and writing—review and editing. Y-JZ: investigation and writing—review and editing. MK: investigation and writing—review and editing. DJL: investigation and writing—review and editing. PJ: investigation and writing—review and editing. CW: investigation and writing—review and editing. H-YY: investigation, writing—review and editing. CDB: investigation, writing—review and editing. GT: investigation and writing—review and editing. JG: conceptualization, methodology, and writing—review and editing. VW-SW: conceptualization, methodology, investigation, writing—review and editing, and project administration. M-HZ: conceptualization, methodology, investigation, data curation, writing—review and editing, and project administration. All authors contributed to the manuscript for important intellectual content and approved the final submission of the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Vincent Wai-Sun Wong or Ming-Hua Zheng.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Although the PRO-C3 ELISA test was carried out at Nordic Bioscience under a research collaboration, we confirm that cohort generation, research conceptualization, analysis, and manuscript drafting were carried out independently of the Nordic Bioscience team. ADAPT has not been developed as a proprietary test. The PRO-C3 ELISA test is not currently commercially available, but can be obtained as a Nordic Bioscience research test for research use only. Diana Julie Leeming and Morten Karsdal are employed by, and own stock at Nordic Bioscience. Grace Lai-Hung Wong and Vincent Wai-Sun Wong have served as speakers and/or consultants for Echosens. Liang-Jie Tang, Gang Li, Mohammed Eslam, Pei-Wu Zhu, Sui-Dan Chen, Howard Ho-Wai Leung, Ou-Yang Huang, Yu-Jie Zhou, Pei Jiang, Cong Wang, Hai-Yang Yuan, Christopher D. Byrne, Giovanni Targher, Jacob George and Ming-Hua Zheng have no conflicts of interest.

Informed consent

The study was approved by the institutional review boards of both centres and all participants gave their written informed consent.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Figure 1.

The AUROC of FAST, ADAPT and Agile 4 scores in the derivation cohort. (TIF 622 KB)

Supplementary Figure 2.

The dual cut-off approach of FAST, ADAPT and Agile 4 scores in the derivation cohort. (TIF 469 KB)

Supplementary file3 (DOCX 22 KB)

Supplementary file4 (DOCX 26 KB)

Supplementary file5 (DOCX 23 KB)

Supplementary file6 (DOCX 19 KB)

Supplementary file7 (DOCX 19 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tang, LJ., Li, G., Eslam, M. et al. N-terminal propeptide of type 3 collagen-based sequential algorithm can identify high-risk steatohepatitis and fibrosis in MAFLD. Hepatol Int 17, 190–201 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12072-022-10420-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12072-022-10420-w

Keywords

Navigation