Abstract
Geographic and temporal patterns of morphological and behavioral diversifications among species stimulated Darwin to propose a mechanism for evolutionary change through natural selection. Scientific developments have revealed an even more fundamental level of biological complexity: sequence variation in DNA. While genome projects yield spectacular insights into molecular evolution, they have targeted only a few species. In contrast, the Barcode of Life Initiative (BOLI) proposes a horizontal approach to genomics, examining short, standardized genome segments across the sweep of eukaryotic life, all 10 million species. BOLI will extend our understanding of evolution and speciation in varied ways. It will facilitate quantification of biological diversity by disclosing cryptic species and enabling a rapid survey of taxon diversity in groups that have hitherto received scant morphological examination. It will facilitate assignment of life history stages to known species and provide a first estimate of species ages. It will also reveal key features of the mitochondrial genome, because the evolutionary properties of barcodes relate to those in the mitochondrial genome as a whole, acting to flag taxonomic groups or species with unusual nucleotide composition or evolutionary rates. The growing volume of barcode records has revealed that sequence variability within species is generally much lower than divergence among species (barcoding gap), a pattern that occurs in diverse lineages, suggesting a pervasive evolutionary process. Low variability may reflect recurrent selective sweeps of favored mitochondrial variants propagating as single linkage units across species. If this hypothesis is substantiated, the implications are significant, particularly for our understanding of molecular evolution of mitochondrial DNA and its relationship with species delineation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Albu M, Min XJ, Hickey D, Golding B (2008) Uncorrected nucleotide bias in mtDNA can mimic the effects of positive Darwinian selection. Mol Biol Evol 25:2521–2524. doi:10.1093/molbev/msn224
Avise JC, Walker D (1999) Species realities and numbers in sexual vertebrates: perspectives from an asexually transmitted genome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:992–995
Bazin E, Glémin S, Galtier N (2006) Population size does not influence mitochondrial genetic diversity in animals. Science 312:570–572. doi:10.1126/science.1122033
Borisenko AV, Lim BK, Ivanova NV, Hanner RH, Hebert PDN (2008) DNA barcoding in surveys of small mammal communities: a field study in Suriname. Mol Ecol Notes 8:471–479. doi:10.1111/j.1471-8286.2007.01998.x
CBOL Plant Working Group (2009) A DNA barcode for land plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:12794–12797. doi:10.1073/pnas.0905845106
Clare EL, Kerr CR, von Königslöw TE, Wilson JJ, Hebert PDN (2008) Diagnosing mitochondrial DNA diversity: applications of a sentinel gene approach. Mol Ecol Res 66:362–367. doi:10.1007/s00239-008-9088-2
Collins FS, Morgaa M, Patrinos A (2003) The human genome project: lessons from large-scale biology. Science 300:286–290. doi:10.1126/science.1084564
Costa FO, Carvalho GR (2007) The Barcode of Life Initiative: synopsis and prospective societal impacts of DNA barcoding of fish. Genomics Soc Policy 3:29–40
Costa FO, deWaard JR, Boutillier J, Ratnasingham S, Dooh R, Hajibabaei M, Hebert PDN (2007) Biological identifications through DNA barcodes: the case of the Crustacea. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 64:272–295. doi:10.1139/F07-008
Costa FO, Henzler CM, Lunt DH, Whiteley N, Rock J (2009) Probing marine Gammarus (Amphipoda) taxonomy with DNA barcodes. Syst Biodivers 7:365–379. doi:10.1017/S1477200009990120
Dowling DK, Friberg U, Lindell J (2008) Evolutionary implications of non-neutral mitochondrial genetic variation. Trends Ecol Evol 23:546–554. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2008.05.011
Erpenbeck D, Hooper JNA, Wörheide G (2006) CO1 phylogenies in diploblasts and the ‘Barcoding of Life’—are we sequencing a suboptimal partition? Mol Ecol Notes 6:550–553. doi:10.1111/j.1471-8286.2005.02159.x
Felsenstein J (1978) Cases in which parsimony or compatibility methods will be positively misleading. Syst Zool 27:401–410. doi:10.1093/sysbio/27.4.401
Frézal L, Leblois R (2008) Four years of DNA barcoding: current advances and prospects. Infect Genet Evol 8:727–736. doi:10.1016/j.meegid.2008.05.005
Friedberg EC, Walker GC, Siede W (1995) DNA repair and mutagenesis. ASM Press, Washington, DC
Frose R, Pauly D (eds) (2009) FishBase. World Wide Web electronic publication. http://www.fishbase.org. Accessed 1 Aug 2009
Gaston KJ (2000) Global patterns in biodiversity. Nature 405:220–227. doi:10.1038/35012228
Gaston KJ (2006) The structure and dynamics of geographic ranges. Oxford Series in Ecology and Evolution. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Gómez A, Wright PJ, Lunt DH, Cancino JM, Carvalho GR, Hughes RN (2007) Mating trials validate the use of DNA barcoding to reveal cryptic speciation of a marine bryozoan taxon. Proc R Soc Lond B 274:199–207. doi:10.1098/rspb.2006.3718
Hajibabaei M, Janzen DH, Burns JM, Hallwachs W, Hebert PDN (2006) DNA barcodes distinguish species of tropical Lepidoptera. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:968–971. doi:10.1073/pnas.0510466103
Hajibabaei M, Singer GAC, Clare EL, Hebert PDN (2007) Design and applicability of DNA arrays and DNA barcodes in biodiversity monitoring. BMC Biol 5:24. doi:10.1186/1741-7007-5-24
Hassanin A (2006) Phylogeny of Arthropoda inferred from mitochondrial sequences: strategies for limiting the misleading effects of multiple changes in patterns and rates of substitution. Mol Phylogenet Evol 38:100–116. doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2005.09.012
Hebert PDN, Remigio EA, Colbourne JK, Taylor DJ, Wilson CC (2002) Accelerated molecular evolution in halophilic crustaceans. Evolution 56:909–926. doi:10.1111/j.0014-3820.2002.tb01404.x
Hebert PDN, Cywinska A, Ball SL, deWaard JR (2003a) Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proc R Soc Lond B 270:313–321. doi:10.1098/rspb.2002.2218
Hebert PDN, Ratnasingham S, deWaard JR (2003b) Barcoding animal life: cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 divergences among closely related species. Proc R Soc Lond B 270:596–599. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2003.0025
Hebert PDN, Penton EH, Burns J, Janzen DH, Hallwachs W (2004) Ten species in one: DNA barcoding reveals cryptic species in the neotropical skipper butterfly Astraptes fulgerator. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:14812–14817. doi:10.1073/pnas.0406166101
Ho SYW (2009) An examination of phylogenetic models of substitution rate variation among lineages. Biol Lett 5:421–424. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2008.0729
Isaac NJB, Mallet J, Mace GM (2004) Taxonomic inflation: its influence on macroecology and conservation. Trends Ecol Evol 19:464–469. doi:0.1016/j.tree.2004.06.004
Kerr KCR, Stoeckle CJ, Dove LA, Weigt CM, Francis HebertPDN (2007) Comprehensive DNA barcode coverage of North American birds. Mol Ecol Notes 7:535–543. doi:10.1111/j.1471-8286.2006.01670.x
Koutroumpa FA, Lieutier F, Roux-Morabito G (2009) Incorporation of mitochondrial fragments in the nuclear genome (Numts) of the longhorned beetle Monochamus galloprovincialis (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae). J Zool Syst Evol Res 47:141–148. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0469.2008.00492.x
Lin HC, Sanchez-Ortiz C, Hastings PA (2009) Colour variation is incongruent with mitochondrial lineages: cryptic speciation and subsequent diversification in a Gulf of California reef fish (Teleostei: Blennioidei). Mol Ecol 18:2476–2488. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2009.04188.x
Lukhtanov VA, Sourakov A, Zakharov EV, Hebert PDN (2009) DNA barcoding Central Asian butterflies: increasing geographical dimension does not significantly reduce the success of species identification. Mol Ecol Res 9:1302–1310. doi:10.1111/j.1755-0998.2009.02577.x
Min XJ, Hickey DA (2007) DNA barcodes provide a quick preview of mitochondrial genome composition. PLoS One 2:e325. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0000325
Moritz C, Cicero C (2004) DNA barcoding: promise and pitfalls. PLoS Biol 2:1529–1531. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0020354
Mulligan CJ, Kitchen A, Miyamoto MM (2006) Comment on “Population size does not influence mitochondrial genetic diversity in animals”. Science 314:1390a. doi:10.1126/science.1132585
Nei M (2005) Selectionism and neutralism in molecular evolution. Mol Biol Evol 22:2318–2342. doi:10.1093/molbev/msk009
Nilsson RH, Kristiansson E, Ryberg M, Hallenberg N, Larsson K-H (2008) Intraspecific ITS variability in the Kingdom Fungi as expressed in the International Sequence Databases and its implications for molecular species identification. Evol Bioinf 4:193–201
Pfenninger M, Schwenk K (2007) Cryptic animal species animal species are homogeneously distributed among taxa and biogeographical regions. BMC Evol Biol 7:121. doi:10.1186/1471-2148-7-121
Purves DW (2009) The demography of range boundaries versus range cores in eastern US tree species. Proc R Soc Lond B 276:1477–1484. doi:10.1098/rspb.2008.1241
Sáez AG, Lozano E (2005) Body doubles. Nature 433:111. doi:10.1038/433111a
Savolainen V, Cowan RS, Vogler AP, Roderick GK, Lane R (2005) Towards writing the encyclopaedia of life: an introduction to DNA barcoding. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 360:1803–1980. doi:10.1098/rstb.2005.1730
Smith MA, Poyarkov NA, Hebert PDN (2008) CO1 DNA barcoding amphibians: take the chance, meet the challenge. Mol Ecol Res 8:235–246. doi:10.1111/j.1471-8286.2007.01964.x
Spooner DM (2009) DNA barcoding will frequently fail in complicated groups: an example in wild potatoes. Am J Bot 96:1177–1189. doi:10.3732/ajb.0800246
Theißen G (2009) Saltational evolution: hopeful monsters are here to stay. Theory Biosci 128:43–51. doi:10.1007/s12064-009-0058-z
Thomas JA, Welch JJ, Woolfit M, Bromham L (2006) There is no universal molecular clock for invertebrates, but rate variation does not scale with body size. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:7366–7371. doi:10.1073/pnas.0510261103
Valentini A, Pompanon F, Taberlet P (2008) DNA barcoding for ecologists. Trends Ecol Evol 24:110–117. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2008.09.011
Vences M, Thomas M, Bonett RM, Vieites DR (2005) Deciphering amphibian diversity through DNA barcoding: chances and challenges. Phil Trans R Soc B 360:1859–1868. doi:10.1098/rstb.2005.1717
Ward RD (2009) DNA barcode divergence among species and genera of birds and fishes. Mol Ecol Res 9:1077–1085. doi:10.1111/j.1755-0998.2009.02541.x
Ward RD, Costa FO, Holmes BH, Steinke D (2008) DNA barcoding shared fish species from the North Atlantic and Australasia: minimal divergence for most taxa, but Zeus faber and Lepidopus caudatus each probably constitute two species. Aquat Biol 3:71–78. doi:10.3354/ab00068
Ward RD, Hanner R, Hebert PDN (2009) The campaign to DNA barcode all fishes, FISH-BOL. J Fish Biol 74:329–356. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8649.2008.02080.x
Wares JP, Pringle JM (2008) Drift by drift: effective population size is limited by advection. BMC Evol Biol 8:235. doi:10.1186/1471-2148-8-235
Wares JP, Barber PH, Ross-Ibarra J, Sotka EE, Toonen RJ (2006) Mitochondrial DNA and population size. Science 314:1388–1389
Waugh J (2007) DNA barcoding in animal species: progress, potential and pitfalls. BioEssays 29:188–197. doi:10.1002/bies.20529
Zakharov EV, Lobo NF, Nowak C, Hellmann JJ (2009) Introgression as a likely cause of mtDNA paraphyly in two allopatric skippers (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae). Heredity 102:590–599. doi:10.1038/hdy.2009.26
Zemlak TS, Ward RD, Connell AD, Holmes BH, Hebert PDN (2009) DNA barcoding reveals overlooked marine fishes. Mol Ecol Res 9:237–242. doi:10.1111/j.1755-0998.2009.02649.x
Acknowledgments
F.O. Costa work was supported by grants from Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (PTDC/MAR/69892/2006) and from European Commission reference (PERG02-GA-2007-224890).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Costa, F.O., Carvalho, G.R. New insights into molecular evolution: prospects from the Barcode of Life Initiative (BOLI). Theory Biosci. 129, 149–157 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12064-010-0091-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12064-010-0091-y