Skip to main content
Log in

Base Composition, Speciation, and Why the Mitochondrial Barcode Precisely Classifies

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Biological Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

While its mechanism and biological significance are unknown, the utility of a short mitochondrial DNA sequence as a “barcode” providing accurate species identification has revolutionized the classification of organisms. Since highest accuracy was achieved with recently diverged species, hopes were raised that barcodes would throw light on the speciation process. Indeed, a failure of a maternally donated, rapidly mutating, mitochondrial genome to coadapt its gene products with those of a paternally donated nuclear genome could result in developmental failure, thus creating a post-zygotic barrier leading to reproductive isolation and sympatric branching into independent species. However, the barcode itself encodes a highly conserved, species-invariant, protein, and the discriminatory power resides in the non-amino acid specific bases of synonymous codons. It is here shown how the latter could register changes in the oligonucleotide frequencies of nuclear DNA that, when they fail to match in pairing meiotic chromosomes, could reproductively isolate the parents (whose hybrid is sterile) so launching a primary divergence into two species. It is proposed that, while not itself contributing to speciation, the barcode sequence provides an index of the nuclear DNA oligonucleotide frequencies that drive speciation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W et al (1990) Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 215:403–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett SE, Davidson WS (1992) FINS (forensically important nucleotide sequences): a procedure for identifying the animal origin of biological specimens. Biotechniques 12:408–411

    Google Scholar 

  • Bar-Yaacov D, Hadjivasiliou Z, Levin L et al (2015) Mitochondrial involvement in vertebrate speciation? The case of mito-nuclear genetic divergence in chameleons. Genome Biol Evol 7:3322–3336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernardi G, Bernardi G (1986) Compositional constraints and genome evolution. J Mol Evol 24:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brbić M, Warnecke T, Kriško A, Supek F (2015) Global shifts in genome and proteome composition are very tightly coupled. Genome Biol Evol 7:1519–1532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chargaff E (1951) Structure and function of nucleic acids as cell constituents. Fed Proc 10:654–659

    Google Scholar 

  • Chase MW, Fay MF (2009) Barcoding of plants and fungi. Science 325:682–683

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crick F (1959) The present position of the coding problem. In: Brookhaven Symposia in Biology, No. 12, The structure and function of genetic elements. Biology Department, Brookhaven National Laboratory, pp 35–39

  • Dana A, Tuller T (2014) The effect of tRNA levels on decoding times of mRNA codons. Nucleic Acids Res 42:9171–9181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du M-Z, Wei W, Qin L et al (2017) Co-adaption of tRNA gene copy number and amino acid usage influences translation rates in three domains of life. bioRxiv Preprint: doi:10.1101/104570

  • Dubinkina VB, Ischenko DS, Ulyantsev VI et al (2016) Assessment of k-mer spectrum applicability for metagenomic dissimilarity analysis. BMC Bioinform 17:38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eo SH, DeWoody JA (2010) Evolutionary rates of mitochondrial genomes correspond to diversification rates and to contemporary species richness in birds and reptiles. Proc R Soc Lond B 277:3587–3592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eyre-Walker A (2017) Mitochondrial replacement therapy: are mito-nuclear interactions likely to be a problem? Genetics 205:1365–1372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forsdyke DR (1995) Relative roles of primary sequence and (G + C)% in determining the hierarchy of frequencies of complementary trinucleotide pairs in DNAs of different species. J Mol Evol 41:573–581

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsdyke DR (1996) Different biological species “broadcast” their DNAs at different (G + C)% “wavelengths”. J Theor Biol 178:405–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forsdyke DR (2001) The origin of species revisited. McGill-Queen’s University Press, Montreal

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsdyke DR (2013) Base composition, speciation and barcoding. Trends Ecol Evol 28: 73–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forsdyke DR (2016) Evolutionary bioinformatics, 3rd edn. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Forsdyke DR (2017) Speciation: Goldschmidt’s chromosomal heresy, once supported by Gould and Dawkins, is again reinstated. Biol Theor 12:4–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forsdyke DR, Bell SJ (2004) Purine-loading, stem-loops, and Chargaff’s second parity rule. A discussion of the application of elementary principles to early chemical observations. Appl Bioinform 3:3–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fournier P-E, Suhre K, Fournous G, Raoult D (2006) Estimation of prokaryote genomic DNA G + C content by sequencing universally conserved genes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 56:1025–1029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gershoni M, Templeton AR, Mishmar D (2009) Mitochondrial bioenergetics as a major motive force of speciation. Bioessays 31:642–650

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gershoni M, Fuchs A, Shani N et al (2010) Coevolution predicts direct interactions between mtDNA-encoded and nDNA-encoded subunits of oxidative phosphorylation complex I. J Mol Biol 404:158–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grantham R, Perrin P, Mouchiroud D (1986) Patterns in codon usage of different kinds of species. Oxford Surv Evol Biol 3:48–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Hebert PDN, Gregory TR (2005) The promise of DNA barcoding for taxonomy. Syst Biol 54:852–859

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hebert PDN, Cywinska A, Ball SL, de Waard JR (2003a) Biological identifications through barcodes. Proc R Soc Lond B 270:313–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hebert PDN, Ratnasingham S, deWaard JR (2003b) Barcoding animal life: cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 divergences among closely related species. Proc R Soc Lond B 270(Suppl 1):S96–S99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hebert PDN, Stoeckle MY, Zemlak TS, Francis CM (2004) Identification of birds through DNA barcodes. PLoS Biol 2(e312):1657–1663

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedges SB, Marina J, Suleski JM et al (2015) Tree of life reveals clock-like speciation and diversification. Mol Biol Evol 32:835–845

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hershberg R, Petrov DA (2009) General rules for optimal codon choice. PLoS Genet 5:e1000556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill GE (2016) Mitonuclear coevolution as the genesis of speciation and the mitochondrial DNA barcode gap. Ecol Evol 6:5831–5842

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lane N (2009) On the origin of barcodes. Nature 462:272–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee S-J, Mortimer JR, Forsdyke DR (2004) Genomic conflict settled in favour of the species rather than of the gene at extreme GC% values. Appl Bioinform 3:219–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Min XJ, Hickey DA (2007) DNA barcodes provide a quick preview of mitochondrial genome composition. PLoS ONE 2:e325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mishmar D, Ruiz-Pesini E, Mondragon-Palomino M et al (2006) Adaptive selection of mitochondrial complex I subunits during primate radiation. Gene 378:11–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muto A, Osawa S (1987) The guanine and cytosine content of genomic DNA and bacterial evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 84:166–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orgel LE, Crick FHC, Sapienza C (1980) Selfish DNA. Nature 288:645–646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pesole G, Gissi C, De Chirico A, Saccone C (1999) Nucleotide substitution rate of mammalian mitochondrial genomes. J Mol Evol 48:427–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reese VR, Forsdyke DR (2016) Meiotic pairing inadequacies at the levels of X chromosome, gene, or base: Epigenetic tagging for transgenerational error-correction guided by a future homologous duplex. Biol Theor 11:150–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogerson AC (1991) There appear to be conserved constraints on the distribution of nucleotide sequences in cellular genomes. J Mol Evol 32:24–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roux C, Fraïsse C, Romiguier J et al (2016) Shedding light on the grey zone of speciation along a continuum of genetic divergence. PLoS Biol 14:e2000234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan MT, Hoogenraad NJ (2007) Mitochondrial-nuclear communications. Annu Rev Biochem 76:701–722

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaap T (1971) Dual information in DNA and the evolution of the genetic code. J Theor Biol 32:293–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt TR, Wu W, Goodman M, Grossman LI (2001) Evolution of nuclear and mitochondrial encoded subunit interaction in cytochrome c oxidase. Mol Biol Evol 18:563–569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singer GA, Hickey DA (2000) Nucleotide bias causes a genomewide bias in the amino acid composition of proteins. Mol Biol Evol 17:1581–1588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sloan DB, Havird JC, Sharbrough J (2017) The on-again, off-again relationship between mitochondrial genomes and species boundaries. Mol Ecol 26:2212–2236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoeckle MY, Thaler DS (2014) DNA barcoding works in practice but not in (neutral) theory. PLoS ONE 9:e100755

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss S (2006) The barcode of life takes flight. Univ Aff 47(4):10–19. http://stephenstrauss.ca/index.php/articles/the-barcode-of-life

  • Sueoka N (1961) Compositional correlations between deoxyribonucleic acid and protein. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 26:35–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sueoka N (1995) Intrastrand parity rules of DNA base composition and usage biases of synonymous codons. J Mol Evol 40:318–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun Y, Tamarit D, Andersson SGE (2016) Switches in genomic GC content drive shifts of optimal codons under sustained selection on synonymous Sites. Genome Biol Evol. doi:10.1093/gbe/evw201

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward RD, Holmes BW (2007) An analysis of nucleotide and amino acid variability in the barcode region of cytochrome c oxidase I (cox1) in fishes. Mol Ecol Notes 7:899–907

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward RD, Hanner R, Hebert PDN (2009) The campaign to DNA barcode all fishes, FISH-BOL. J Fish Biol 74:329–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zavala A, Naya H, Romero H et al (2005) Genomic GC content prediction in prokaryotes from a sample of genes. Gene 357:137–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Queen’s University hosts my web pages that display items from the early speciation literature (http://post.queensu.ca/~forsdyke/evolutio.htm or https://archive-it.org/collections/7641). The BioRxiv preprint server posted an early version of this paper (doi:10.1101/116814).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Donald R. Forsdyke.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Forsdyke, D.R. Base Composition, Speciation, and Why the Mitochondrial Barcode Precisely Classifies. Biol Theory 12, 157–168 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13752-017-0267-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13752-017-0267-5

Keywords

Navigation