Abstract
While its mechanism and biological significance are unknown, the utility of a short mitochondrial DNA sequence as a “barcode” providing accurate species identification has revolutionized the classification of organisms. Since highest accuracy was achieved with recently diverged species, hopes were raised that barcodes would throw light on the speciation process. Indeed, a failure of a maternally donated, rapidly mutating, mitochondrial genome to coadapt its gene products with those of a paternally donated nuclear genome could result in developmental failure, thus creating a post-zygotic barrier leading to reproductive isolation and sympatric branching into independent species. However, the barcode itself encodes a highly conserved, species-invariant, protein, and the discriminatory power resides in the non-amino acid specific bases of synonymous codons. It is here shown how the latter could register changes in the oligonucleotide frequencies of nuclear DNA that, when they fail to match in pairing meiotic chromosomes, could reproductively isolate the parents (whose hybrid is sterile) so launching a primary divergence into two species. It is proposed that, while not itself contributing to speciation, the barcode sequence provides an index of the nuclear DNA oligonucleotide frequencies that drive speciation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W et al (1990) Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 215:403–410
Bartlett SE, Davidson WS (1992) FINS (forensically important nucleotide sequences): a procedure for identifying the animal origin of biological specimens. Biotechniques 12:408–411
Bar-Yaacov D, Hadjivasiliou Z, Levin L et al (2015) Mitochondrial involvement in vertebrate speciation? The case of mito-nuclear genetic divergence in chameleons. Genome Biol Evol 7:3322–3336
Bernardi G, Bernardi G (1986) Compositional constraints and genome evolution. J Mol Evol 24:1–11
Brbić M, Warnecke T, Kriško A, Supek F (2015) Global shifts in genome and proteome composition are very tightly coupled. Genome Biol Evol 7:1519–1532
Chargaff E (1951) Structure and function of nucleic acids as cell constituents. Fed Proc 10:654–659
Chase MW, Fay MF (2009) Barcoding of plants and fungi. Science 325:682–683
Crick F (1959) The present position of the coding problem. In: Brookhaven Symposia in Biology, No. 12, The structure and function of genetic elements. Biology Department, Brookhaven National Laboratory, pp 35–39
Dana A, Tuller T (2014) The effect of tRNA levels on decoding times of mRNA codons. Nucleic Acids Res 42:9171–9181
Du M-Z, Wei W, Qin L et al (2017) Co-adaption of tRNA gene copy number and amino acid usage influences translation rates in three domains of life. bioRxiv Preprint: doi:10.1101/104570
Dubinkina VB, Ischenko DS, Ulyantsev VI et al (2016) Assessment of k-mer spectrum applicability for metagenomic dissimilarity analysis. BMC Bioinform 17:38
Eo SH, DeWoody JA (2010) Evolutionary rates of mitochondrial genomes correspond to diversification rates and to contemporary species richness in birds and reptiles. Proc R Soc Lond B 277:3587–3592
Eyre-Walker A (2017) Mitochondrial replacement therapy: are mito-nuclear interactions likely to be a problem? Genetics 205:1365–1372
Forsdyke DR (1995) Relative roles of primary sequence and (G + C)% in determining the hierarchy of frequencies of complementary trinucleotide pairs in DNAs of different species. J Mol Evol 41:573–581
Forsdyke DR (1996) Different biological species “broadcast” their DNAs at different (G + C)% “wavelengths”. J Theor Biol 178:405–417
Forsdyke DR (2001) The origin of species revisited. McGill-Queen’s University Press, Montreal
Forsdyke DR (2013) Base composition, speciation and barcoding. Trends Ecol Evol 28: 73–74
Forsdyke DR (2016) Evolutionary bioinformatics, 3rd edn. Springer, New York
Forsdyke DR (2017) Speciation: Goldschmidt’s chromosomal heresy, once supported by Gould and Dawkins, is again reinstated. Biol Theor 12:4–12
Forsdyke DR, Bell SJ (2004) Purine-loading, stem-loops, and Chargaff’s second parity rule. A discussion of the application of elementary principles to early chemical observations. Appl Bioinform 3:3–8
Fournier P-E, Suhre K, Fournous G, Raoult D (2006) Estimation of prokaryote genomic DNA G + C content by sequencing universally conserved genes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 56:1025–1029
Gershoni M, Templeton AR, Mishmar D (2009) Mitochondrial bioenergetics as a major motive force of speciation. Bioessays 31:642–650
Gershoni M, Fuchs A, Shani N et al (2010) Coevolution predicts direct interactions between mtDNA-encoded and nDNA-encoded subunits of oxidative phosphorylation complex I. J Mol Biol 404:158–171
Grantham R, Perrin P, Mouchiroud D (1986) Patterns in codon usage of different kinds of species. Oxford Surv Evol Biol 3:48–81
Hebert PDN, Gregory TR (2005) The promise of DNA barcoding for taxonomy. Syst Biol 54:852–859
Hebert PDN, Cywinska A, Ball SL, de Waard JR (2003a) Biological identifications through barcodes. Proc R Soc Lond B 270:313–322
Hebert PDN, Ratnasingham S, deWaard JR (2003b) Barcoding animal life: cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 divergences among closely related species. Proc R Soc Lond B 270(Suppl 1):S96–S99
Hebert PDN, Stoeckle MY, Zemlak TS, Francis CM (2004) Identification of birds through DNA barcodes. PLoS Biol 2(e312):1657–1663
Hedges SB, Marina J, Suleski JM et al (2015) Tree of life reveals clock-like speciation and diversification. Mol Biol Evol 32:835–845
Hershberg R, Petrov DA (2009) General rules for optimal codon choice. PLoS Genet 5:e1000556
Hill GE (2016) Mitonuclear coevolution as the genesis of speciation and the mitochondrial DNA barcode gap. Ecol Evol 6:5831–5842
Lane N (2009) On the origin of barcodes. Nature 462:272–274
Lee S-J, Mortimer JR, Forsdyke DR (2004) Genomic conflict settled in favour of the species rather than of the gene at extreme GC% values. Appl Bioinform 3:219–228
Min XJ, Hickey DA (2007) DNA barcodes provide a quick preview of mitochondrial genome composition. PLoS ONE 2:e325
Mishmar D, Ruiz-Pesini E, Mondragon-Palomino M et al (2006) Adaptive selection of mitochondrial complex I subunits during primate radiation. Gene 378:11–18
Muto A, Osawa S (1987) The guanine and cytosine content of genomic DNA and bacterial evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 84:166–169
Orgel LE, Crick FHC, Sapienza C (1980) Selfish DNA. Nature 288:645–646
Pesole G, Gissi C, De Chirico A, Saccone C (1999) Nucleotide substitution rate of mammalian mitochondrial genomes. J Mol Evol 48:427–434
Reese VR, Forsdyke DR (2016) Meiotic pairing inadequacies at the levels of X chromosome, gene, or base: Epigenetic tagging for transgenerational error-correction guided by a future homologous duplex. Biol Theor 11:150–157
Rogerson AC (1991) There appear to be conserved constraints on the distribution of nucleotide sequences in cellular genomes. J Mol Evol 32:24–30
Roux C, Fraïsse C, Romiguier J et al (2016) Shedding light on the grey zone of speciation along a continuum of genetic divergence. PLoS Biol 14:e2000234
Ryan MT, Hoogenraad NJ (2007) Mitochondrial-nuclear communications. Annu Rev Biochem 76:701–722
Schaap T (1971) Dual information in DNA and the evolution of the genetic code. J Theor Biol 32:293–298
Schmidt TR, Wu W, Goodman M, Grossman LI (2001) Evolution of nuclear and mitochondrial encoded subunit interaction in cytochrome c oxidase. Mol Biol Evol 18:563–569
Singer GA, Hickey DA (2000) Nucleotide bias causes a genomewide bias in the amino acid composition of proteins. Mol Biol Evol 17:1581–1588
Sloan DB, Havird JC, Sharbrough J (2017) The on-again, off-again relationship between mitochondrial genomes and species boundaries. Mol Ecol 26:2212–2236
Stoeckle MY, Thaler DS (2014) DNA barcoding works in practice but not in (neutral) theory. PLoS ONE 9:e100755
Strauss S (2006) The barcode of life takes flight. Univ Aff 47(4):10–19. http://stephenstrauss.ca/index.php/articles/the-barcode-of-life
Sueoka N (1961) Compositional correlations between deoxyribonucleic acid and protein. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 26:35–43
Sueoka N (1995) Intrastrand parity rules of DNA base composition and usage biases of synonymous codons. J Mol Evol 40:318–325
Sun Y, Tamarit D, Andersson SGE (2016) Switches in genomic GC content drive shifts of optimal codons under sustained selection on synonymous Sites. Genome Biol Evol. doi:10.1093/gbe/evw201
Ward RD, Holmes BW (2007) An analysis of nucleotide and amino acid variability in the barcode region of cytochrome c oxidase I (cox1) in fishes. Mol Ecol Notes 7:899–907
Ward RD, Hanner R, Hebert PDN (2009) The campaign to DNA barcode all fishes, FISH-BOL. J Fish Biol 74:329–356
Zavala A, Naya H, Romero H et al (2005) Genomic GC content prediction in prokaryotes from a sample of genes. Gene 357:137–143
Acknowledgements
Queen’s University hosts my web pages that display items from the early speciation literature (http://post.queensu.ca/~forsdyke/evolutio.htm or https://archive-it.org/collections/7641). The BioRxiv preprint server posted an early version of this paper (doi:10.1101/116814).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Forsdyke, D.R. Base Composition, Speciation, and Why the Mitochondrial Barcode Precisely Classifies. Biol Theory 12, 157–168 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13752-017-0267-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13752-017-0267-5