Skip to main content
Log in

Between Elderly Parents and Grandchildren—Geographic Proximity and Trends in Four-Generation Families

  • Published:
Journal of Population Ageing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In an ageing society, families may have an important role in the caretaking and well-being of the elderly. Demographic changes have an impact on the size and structure of families; one aspect is how intergenerational support is distributed when there is a need for support to both older and younger generations at the same time. Another vital aspect of the provision of care for the elderly is geographic proximity. This study is oriented towards the potential “both-end carers” i.e. persons who have grandchildren in potential need of care while still having living ageing parents. The incidence of having grandchildren and having living parents at age 55 and the proximity between generations is described using Swedish register data. The results show that the share of 55-year-olds who are grandparents decreased dramatically from 70% to 35% between 1990 and 2005. As expected, more 55-year-olds have living parents—a proportion that increased from 37% to 47% during this period. As a result of delayed childbearing among the children of these cohorts, the likelihood of belonging to a four-generation family among 55-year-olds has not increased, despite increased longevity. Furthermore, most individuals live within daily reach of their kin and no evidence was found of a trend of increasing geographic distances between generations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The data has a very good coverage and include all legal residents in Sweden, independent of migration status or country of citizenship.

  2. However, for people who migrated to Sweden as adults the data rarely include links to parents, even if the parents are also residents in Sweden.

  3. Fortunately, our data enabled us to make the analysis on one-year age groups, in this way the period effects were not blurred by cohort effects which is the case if for instance 5 year age groups are used. To see if the patterns differed a lot between age groups we made separate analyses also for people aged 58 and found a similar trend of multigenerational structures as for whose aged 55 (see Fig. 3).

  4. The larger share with grandchildren nearby compared to those having parents nearby can be explained by the fact that you have a better chance to have at least one child nearby, since multiple children might live in different locations, while parents are often only in one location.

  5. If we instead of the oldest child had focused on the closest child, we would of course get a better picture of the proximity to potential care-givers and care-takers, but on the other hand we would end up with selection bias when analyzing the influence of various socio-demographic features on the distance between parents and adult children.

References

  • Agree, E., Bissett, B., & Rendall, M. S. (2003). Simultaneous care for parents and care for children among mid-life British women and men. Population Trends, 112, 29–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albertini, M., Kohli, M., & Vogel, C. (2007). Intergenerational transfers of time and money in European families: common patterns different regimes? Journal of European Social Policy, 17(4), 319–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alm-Stenflo, G. and Persson, L. 2002. Hur många barn får jag när jag blir stor? Barnafödande ur ett livsperspektiv. Statistiska centralbyrån 5. Örebro.

  • Bengtson, V. L. (2001). Beyond the nuclear family: the increasing importance of multigenerational bonds. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63(1), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bengtson, V. L., Rosenthal, C., & Burton, L. (1990). Families and aging: diversity and heterogeneity. In R. H. Binstock & L. K. George (Eds.), Handbook of aging and the social sciences (pp. 263–287). San Diego: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bucx, F., Van Wel, F., Knijn, T., & Hagendoorn, L. (2008). Intergenerational contact and the life course status of young adult children. Journal of Marriage and Family, 70(1), 144–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elder, G. H. (1994). Time, human agency, and social change: perspectives on the life course. Social Psychology Quarterly, 57(1), 4–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fors, S., & Lennartsson, C. (2008). Social mobility, geographical proximity and intergenerational family contact in Sweden. Ageing & Society, 28(02), 253–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grundy, E., & Henretta, J. C. (2006). Between elderly parents and adult children: a new look at the intergenerational care provided by the ‘sandwich generation’. Ageing & Society, 26(05), 707–722.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hägerstrand, T. (1975). On the definition of migration. In E. Jones (ed), Readings in Social Geography. Oxford University Press, 200–209.

  • Hägerstrand, T., Carlestam, G., Sollbe, B. and Perlenhem, L. (1991). Om tidens vidd och tingens ordning: texter av Torsten Hägerstrand. Byggforskningsrådet.

  • Hagestad, G. O., & Uhlenberg, P. (2007). The impact of demographic changes on relations between age groups and generations: A comparative perspective. In K. W. Schaie & P. Uhlenberg (Eds.), Social structures: Demographic changes and the well-being of older persons. New York: Springer Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halleröd, B. (2006). Resursomfördelning mellan generationer: utbyte av gåvor och tjänster mellan föräldrar och barn. In J. Vogel & L. Häll (Eds.), Äldres levnadsförhållanden. Arbete, ekonomi, hälsa och sociala nätverk 1980–2003 (pp. 257–270). Örebro: Statistiska centralbyrån.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hank, K. (2007). Proximity and contacts between older parents and their children: A European comparison. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69(1), 157–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hantrais, L., Philipov, D. and Billari, F. C. (2005). Policy implications of changing family formation. Directorate General III—Social Cohesion 49.

  • Harper, S. (2003). Changing families as European societies age. European Journal of Sociology, 44(2), 155–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harper, S. (2005). Grandparenthood. In M. L. Johnson (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of age and ageing (pp. 422–428). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hoff, A. (2007). Patterns of intergenerational support in grandparent-grandchild and parent-child relationships in Germany. Ageing and Society, 27(05), 643–665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Künemund, H. (2006). Changing welfare states and the “Sandwich Generation”: Increasing burden for the next generation? International Journal of Ageing and Later Life, 1(2), 11–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larsson, K., & Thorslund, M. (2006). Chapter 8: old people’s health. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 34(3 supp 67), 185–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laslett, P. (1997). Interpreting the demographic changes. Philosophical Transactions: Biological Sciences, 352(1363), 1805–1809.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leeson, G. W. (2004). Sociale natværk. Ældre Sagens 4.

  • Malmberg, G. and Pettersson, A. (2007). Distance to elderly parents: Analyses of Swedish register data. Demographic Research, Volume 17: Book II: Articles 19 to 30, Special Collection 6, 17, 679.

  • Matthews, S. H. and Sun, R. (2006). Incidence of Four-Generation Family Lineages: Is Timing of Fertility or Mortality a Better Explanation? The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences, 61(2), 99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meil, G. (2006). The Consequences of the development of a Beanpole Kin structure on exchanges between generations: The Case of Spain. Journal of Family Issues, 27(8), 1085–1099.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, M., & Grundy, E. (2003). Mothers with living children and children with living mothers: the role of fertility and mortality in the period 1911–2050. Population Trends, 112, 36–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettersson, A., & Malmberg, G. (2009). Adult children and elderly parents as mobility attractions in Sweden. Population, Space and Place, 15(4), 343–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Statistics Sweden. (2007). The multi-generation register 2006 A description of contents and quality.

  • Statistics Sweden. www.scb.se 2009-06-17

  • Statistics Sweden. www.scb.se 2010-02-02

  • Sundström, G., Johansson, L. (2004). Framtidens anhörigomsorg. Kommer de anhöriga vilja, kunna, orka ställa upp för de äldre i framtiden? Stockholm, National Board of Health and Welfare.

  • Sundström, G., Malmberg, B., & Johansson, L. (2006). Balancing family and state care: neither, either or both? The case of Sweden. Ageing and Society, 26(5), 767–782.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szebehely, M. (2006). Informella hjälpgivare. In J. Vogel & L. Häll (Eds.), Äldres levnadsförhållanden. Arbete, ekonomi, hälsa och sociala nätverk 1980–2003 (pp. 435–461). Örebro: Statistiska centralbyrån.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trommsdorff, G., & Nauck, B. (2006). Demographic changes and parent–child relationships. Parenting, 6(4), 343–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wachter, K. W. (1997). Kinship resources for the elderly. Philosophical Transactions: Biological Sciences, 325, 1811–1817.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westland, N. (2008). Meet the Supergrandparents. The Times. August 26

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emma Lundholm.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lundholm, E., Malmberg, G. Between Elderly Parents and Grandchildren—Geographic Proximity and Trends in Four-Generation Families. Population Ageing 2, 121–137 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12062-010-9022-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12062-010-9022-4

Keywords

Navigation