Abstract
The benefits of green spaces on individuals’ health have been widely acknowledged due to their inherent natural qualities. Currently, university students are experiencing significantly higher levels of mental health problems than other social groups. There is a scarcity of studies examining the association between built environment factors and mental health issues among university students, particularly in the Chinese context. University campuses in China are physically isolated, secluded communities, and in this respect, they differ markedly from the spatial organisation patterns of Western universities. Therefore, this study focuses on the correlation between the extent of green space exposure within closed university campuses and the occurrence of mental health issues among resident students. A deep-learning methodology incorporating streetscape images, remote sensing data, and multilevel linear modelling is employed in order to facilitate a comprehensive analysis. The results demonstrate a negative correlation between green space exposure on campus and the level of mental health issues among university students. Individual socio-demographic characteristics, such as whether a person has a partner, are also found to influence the level of mental health issues that they experience. In addition, a significant relationship is found between travel patterns and mental health issues, with students who walked regularly having a lower incidence of mental health issues than those who drove. Our research indicates that, in order to foster healthier communities and enhance social inclusion, urban planners should prioritise the development of greener campuses and urban transport services to improve accessibility to green spaces.
Highlights
This study investigates the impacts of campus green space exposure on mental health issues.
The study participants comprised 811 students from 10 universities in Guangzhou, China.
An inverse correlation exists between exposure to green space within closed university campuses and the prevalence of mental health issues.
Personal characteristics and travel patterns have significant impacts on mental health.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
The benefits of urban greenery for health and well-being have been widely acknowledged and effectively incorporated into the domains of public health, urban planning, and design (Tokhmehchian & Gharehbaglou, 2019; Barton et al., 2015). A multitude of empirical investigations have demonstrated that exposure to natural green spaces positively influences people’s mental health and well-being (De Bell et al., 2017; Dzhambov et al., 2018; Hartig et al., 2014; Wang et al., 2019a; Yang et al., 2020, 2021; Yang, 2007). The World Health Organisation has highlighted the significant benefits of green space for the mental well-being of individuals (WHO, 2016). For example, according to the WHO (2010), active participation in physical activities within green environments has been found to mitigate depression and stress levels. Similarly, the presence of plants or other natural elements within a community can diminish stress and restore people’s spirits. A study by Van den Bosch and Meyer-Lindenberg (2019) investigated the relationship between outdoor green space and depression, and recognised the pivotal role that the former plays in influencing individuals’ mental health status. However, despite some studies claiming that increased exposure to green spaces mitigates mental health issues (Banay et al., 2019; Helbich et al., 2018; Hystad et al., 2019; Liu et al., 2021), this association has not been universally accepted (Boers et al., 2018; Taylor et al., 2018). De Vries et al. (2013) argued that the health benefits of green spaces may be mediated through factors such as social cohesion. Furthermore, the stable connection between green space exposure and mental health may exhibit more variability in diverse social cohorts, for example, older adults, adolescents, and students (Feng et al., 2022; Wang et al., 2019b).
The mental well-being of students has become an increasing concern in recent studies (Brown, 2016). Numerous studies have provided evidence indicating that an estimated 30–50% of university students worldwide experience at least one potential problem with mental health during their university career (Auerbach et al., 2018; Eisenberg et al., 2011; Said et al., 2013). A recent investigation of 11,954 Chinese university students showed that nearly a third (31.1%) of the participants met the diagnostic criteria for mental health issues (Yang et al., 2019). Furthermore, university students are deemed to be at a heightened risk of experiencing mental health issues compared to other demographic cohorts, although there is still no consensus as to why this is the case, which suggests a need for further research on the subject (Cvetkovski et al., 2012). A literature review examined 24 studies conducted from 1990 to 2010 and revealed that the average occurrence of depression among undergraduate students was 30.6%, a significantly elevated prevalence compared to the 9% prevalence observed within the population of the US as a whole (Ibrahim et al., 2013). Many studies have confirmed the benefits of having green spaces nearby on the mental health of students within educational settings (Collins et al., 2022; Kelz et al., 2015; Liu et al., 2022b). A study of 94 high school students in the US showed that being able to look out onto outdoor green spaces can mitigate stress (Li & Sullivan, 2016). Another study involving 120 students showed that students’ mental health was better in a natural outdoor setting than in an indoor environment (Greenwood & Gatersleben, 2016). However, most studies have examined the relationship between neighbourhood greenery or greenery within or near university or college campuses/premises and mental health. According to our literature review, few previous studies have focused on individuals who live in closed environments, and whose exposure to green space encompasses both residential and work/study areas. Consequently, the primary objective of this study is to investigate the relationship between green space within university campuses and the mental health issues of students residing on those campuses.
In China, the majority of university campuses can be characterised as self-contained enclaves, demarcated by perimeter walls and entrance gates, effectively segregating them from the adjacent urban living environment (Sun et al., 2018). To date, most Chinese universities have been structured and managed by the government departments responsible for providing most of the funding for their operation, including accommodation and other essential resources and amenities (Liu, 2017). This governance model has had the effect of making Chinese universities spatially autonomous from other entities, thus suggesting that Chinese university students might have a comparatively higher susceptibility to mental health issues. However, despite extensive research exploring the link between students’ mental well-being and built environment factors (see Dzhambov et al., 2021; Gorriz et al., 2022), few studies have attempted to investigate the mental health of university students residing on closed campuses, specifically those in China. Therefore, this research focuses on the environmental determinants present within closed campuses that influence the mental health and well-being of Chinese university students, and aims to establish a theoretical framework for mental healthcare interventions and associated measures that can be tailored to specific local contexts.
To date, a definitive consensus on the connection between green space and mental health and well-being has yet to be established. Several studies have found no statistically significant association between them (Boers et al., 2018; Gascon et al., 2017). This could be attributed to variations in the methodologies employed to quantify and assess exposure to green spaces. Green spaces are often assessed by remote satellite images, which involve quantifying the extent of the vegetation canopy present within a specific geographical region (Markevych et al., 2017; Mitchell et al., 2011; Huete et al., 2010). However, remote sensing measurements are limited in their ability to capture people’s daily exposure to green space (Lu, 2019; Ye et al., 2019) and, importantly, they ignore the vertical dimension of urban greenery. Many scholars have questioned whether satellite-based measurements can accurately assess green space exposure as perceived by people at ground level (Helbich et al., 2019; Li et al., 2018). Advancements in the field of computer science have facilitated improvements in the efficiency and accuracy of evaluating green spaces using streetscape images, in contrast to remote sensing data (Bai et al., 2022). Consequently, this approach has emerged as a viable and pragmatic substitute, which has been widely used in recent research (Liu et al., 2020; Rzotkiewicz et al., 2018). Digital map providers (e.g., Baidu Maps and Google Maps) can display neighbourhood-level street images online. Moreover, recent advancements in deep learning techniques have facilitated the automated recognition of elements of vegetation, such as trees and grass (Long et al., 2015; Yao et al., 2019). As a result, using deep learning technology to assess urban green spaces via street-view images offers a more comprehensive perspective than using remote sensing images. The quality of urban greenery can be enhanced using street-view images as they can show environmental conditions more accurately (Wu et al., 2022), while the quantity of urban greenery can be assessed by remote sensing data which can provide a 360-degree perspective of the area (Gonzales-Inca et al., 2022; Wang et al., 2019d). Therefore, we integrated streetscape images and remote-sensing data to comprehensively evaluate the quality and quantity of green space within the street environment on university campuses, thereby addressing the inherent limitations in terms of reliability associated with remotely sensed images.
In order to fill these research gaps and overcome the aforementioned limitations, this study focuses on the association between campus green space and mental health issues among university students by employing a comprehensive approach that encompasses remote sensing data, streetscape images, deep learning techniques, and multilevel linear modelling. The study population was nested in ten universities within the Guangzhou Higher Education Mega Centre (HEMC), which is characterised by a high density of university campuses. This study offers two main contributions. Firstly, it employs deep learning techniques and remote sensing data to quantify the green spaces within university campuses. This comprehensive approach facilitates the evaluation of both the quality and quantity of green space. Secondly, it links the mental health and well-being of university students on closed campuses with green space, complementing the findings of previous research studies. We focus on the impact of enclosed living environments on the association between green space and the mental health and well-being of university students. Thus, we believe that this study can add to the findings of previous studies and further advance the development of knowledge about the relationship between urban greenery and mental health, as well as improving the health and well-being of individuals.
Case Study, Data and Methodology
Research area
Guangzhou HEMC, situated in southern China, encompasses a substantial population comprising more than 250,000 students and teaching personnel (Hu et al., 2012). Guangzhou HEMC is located in the Panyu district of downtown Guangzhou which is well-served by public transport services (Fig. 1). Guangzhou HEMC consists of a very densely distributed group of universities, with many facilities on the island designated almost exclusively for the benefit of the university students and staff. As most of the trees and vegetation in Guangzhou are evergreen or semi-evergreen, this enabled the problem of seasonal colour changes to be avoided. Given its distinctive demographic context and spatial arrangement, Guangzhou HEMC serves as an exemplary study area for examining the mental health status of university students residing within closed campus environments.
Data Collection
Individual Demographic data
A questionnaire was conducted in May and June 2021 to collect individual data from students who live on the campus. We also submitted an ethical approval form and a risk assessment form, which were approved by UCL’s ethics committee. The survey was formulated following the guidelines outlined by Regmi et al. (2017), to streamline the process of collecting responses. We developed a questionnaire containing questions designed to elicit demographic data such as age, education, and gender, as well as questions about travel ability and travel patterns such as whether the respondent possessed a driving licence or a public transport card, and users’ main mode of travel. Following a manual screening process that eliminated 154 invalid participants, a comprehensive set of 811 valid responses was successfully collected from 10 universities within Guangzhou HEMC.
Street-View Images
According to Lu et al. (2019), street-view images hold promise as indicators of pedestrians’ perceptions of their surrounding environments. Due to the unavailability of Google in China, this study utilised Baidu Maps to obtain street-view images (referred to as BSV). Baidu Maps provides an extensive collection of street-view images encompassing over 300 Chinese cities (Zhou et al., 2019), making it a valuable and reliable alternative data source of high quality. The panoramic street-view API interface provided by Baidu Maps allowed us to collect images facing in all directions, which made the measurement of green space more accurate. The image processing was carried out as follows. Firstly, road vector elements were imported throughout the study area using ArcGIS software. Secondly, sampling points were generated along the street network to determine the locations for capturing images, with their corresponding coordinates recorded using ArcGIS software. The sampling points were divided evenly across the vector elements of the streets, taking into account the size of the survey area (Fig. 2). We selected sampling points along the streets because the streetscape images were taken by vehicles. This also made it easier to measure green space exposure because, in most cases, people walked along the streets. After removing 27 images that did not provide an accurate reflection of aspects of the street, such as those that were obscured by large objects and those that were over- or under-exposed, 1,316 sample images were obtained from Baidu Maps.
Remote Sensing Data
The NDVI has been widely employed in previous research (Almanza et al., 2012; Orban et al., 2017) to evaluate exposure to greenery exposure based on remotely sensed images. The NDVI is derived from the reflectance measurements in the near-infrared band and visible spectrum, obtained through satellite images (Wu et al., 2021). In this study, the NDVI values were computed using Landsat 8 with a resolution of 30 m. The resulting NDVI values ranged from − 1 to 1, with higher values indicating increased exposure to greenery.
Methods
Deep Learning Technology
Semantic segmentation, a deep learning technique that is widely applied in urban studies, has been widely utilised to assess greenery from street-view images (Cheng et al., 2017; Helbich et al., 2021; Li et al., 2015; Wang et al., 2021b) using methods such as FCN-8s and U-Net (Badrinarayanan et al., 2017; Middle et al., 2019; Zhou et al., 2019). Yao et al. (2019) applied FCN-8s to carry out the semantic segmentation of street-view images and yielded satisfactory results in terms of assessing environmental perceptions. Therefore, following Yao et al.‘s (2019) approach, we employed FCN-8s to estimate green space exposure from street-view images (further details are provided in the subsequent section). This allowed us to identify a comprehensive range of over 150 object categories (Long et al., 2015), including trees and vehicles. The FCN-8s method enables pixel-level prediction of the semantic properties of objects (Badrinarayanan et al., 2017). The green space index (GSI) for each sampling point was measured by computing the ratio of pixels within various green space categories to the total number of pixels in the respective street-view image. The GSI for each campus was computed using ArcGIS software (Li & Ghosh, 2018).
Variables
Following previous studies (Liu et al., 2022a; Wang et al., 2019c), mental health issues (MHI) were selected as the dependent variable in our study. Respondents were required to answer 4 questions regarding the following aspects of their mental health: depression, nervousness, distraction and frustration, using a mental health rating scale. They were asked to rank them in order of severity from 0 to 4, meaning that the results ranged from possible totals of 0 to 16, which were recorded as continuous variables. Higher values indicated more severe mental health issues. The Cronbach’s alpha value for the scale was 0.7.
Table 1 shows the definitions and descriptive analysis of all the variables included in this study. To account for potential confounding factors, demographic variables were controlled for, in line with prior studies (Liu et al., 2020; Wang et al., 2021a). Additionally, in order to explore the impact of travel factors on psychological well-being, travel-related variables such as ownership of a driving licence, possession of a public transport card, and the primary mode of travel, were also taken into account as control variables. Given the mandatory requirement for Chinse university students to reside in on-campus dormitories, the data were stratified based on the geographical location of the respective campuses where they resided, thus providing a structural framework for the analysis.
Table 1 presents an overview of the respondents’ characteristics. The average mental health issues score (MHI) of the respondents was 7.88. The mean Green Space Index (GSI) across all ten university campuses was calculated as 17.04%, indicating that the level of greenery within Guangzhou HEMC is comparatively low. In terms of demographic attributes, the respondents had an average age of 22 years, with 83.1% holding a Bachelor’s degree or below. Approximately half of the respondents (50%) had an income of less than 2,000 RMB per month, while only 10% earned more than 4,000 RMB per month. Females constituted slightly over half of the sample, and approximately one-third had a local household registration (37%). Additionally, 35.3% of the respondents reported having a partner. In terms of travel characteristics, 52%, 71%, and 47% of the respondents possessed a driving licence, a public transport card, and a monthly sharebike card, respectively. Almost a third of the respondents travelled mainly by bicycle (30%) and metro (29%), with the fewest number travelling by car (6%).
Data Analyses
In this study, multilevel linear regression modelling was employed to investigate the relationship between green space exposure and mental health issues among university students (Raudenbush & Bryk, 2002), following methodologies established in previous studies (Liu et al., 2020; Wu et al., 2021). In the models, there was a hierarchical relationship whereby individuals categorised as level 1 were incorporated within the structure of university campuses, which were designated as level 2. The average variance inflation factor (VIF) of the variables in the models was found to be 1.96. In this study, a stepwise approach was adopted to examine the relationship between green space exposure and the mental health of university students. Firstly, Model 1 included only independent and socioeconomic variables. Given the potential link between travel behaviour and mental health established in prior research (Mackett, 2021a), the ability to travel variable was subsequently incorporated into Model 1, which then became Model 2. In the third iteration, individual travel patterns were further controlled for in Model 2, which in turn became Model 3. This sequential modelling approach allowed an exploration of how individual travel characteristics moderated the relationship between campus green space exposure and the mental well-being of university students to be undertaken.
Robustness Tests
We then conducted additional robustness tests on Model 3 to ensure the stability of the results (Models 4–6). Firstly, we quartiled the mental health issues variable and re-ran the regression (Model 4). Secondly, taking into account the potential effects of financial pressures on mental health issues among university students (Högberg, 2021), individuals with a monthly income exceeding 4,000 RMB were excluded from the sample, and the adjusted models were re-estimated (Model 5). Subsequently, given that levels of educational attainment have been shown to have an impact on mental health (Jiang et al., 2020), respondents with a Master’s degree or higher were excluded from the sample, and the regression analysis was re-run (Model 6).
Results
Street-view Greenery Results
The visual results obtained using image segmentation and GSI are shown below. Figure 3 depicts a subset of the outcomes derived from the segmentation procedure employing FCN-8s. The model that was used effectively delineated various components of the urban built environment, including streets and buildings, as well as elements of vegetation such as lawns and trees, with a high level of precision.
Figure 4 shows a plot of the GSI derived from the analysis of street-view images and the NDVI generated from remote sensing images of Guangzhou HEMC. The continuous surface image of the GSI was generated by interpolation in ArcGIS software. A distinct difference in the spatial distribution of the two indicators can be observed.
Baseline Results
Table 2 presents the results of the multilevel linear regression models. Model 1 examined the association between respondents’ mental health issues and the underlying demographic variables. The results from all three models consistently showed a negative correlation between campus green space and respondents’ mental health issues, while controlling for other variables. More specifically, undergraduates exhibited a higher likelihood of experiencing mental health issues compared to postgraduates (Coef. = -0.548, S.E.= 0.262). Additionally, respondents with a partner had a higher probability of experiencing mental health issues (Coef. = 0.875, S.E. = 0.209). Conversely, socio-demographic factors such as gender, age, and monthly income did not have statistically significant impacts on respondents’ mental health.
Model 2 included respondents’ transportation abilities, while the main travel mode variable was subsequently incorporated in Model 3. The findings from the three models consistently showed that individuals exposed to a greater quantity and quality of green space were less likely to experience psychological issues (GSI: Model 1: Coef. = -0.656, S.E. = 0.103; Model 2: Coef. = -0.655, S.E. = 0.101; Model 3: Coef. = -0.655, S.E. = 0.099; NDVI: Model 1: Coef. = -1.183, S.E. = 0.272; Model 2: Coef. = -1.167, S.E. = 0.269; Model 3: Coef. = -1.130, S.E. = 0.264). In order to explore how the travel behaviours of university students affect the association between campus greenery and their psychological well-being, travel characteristics were introduced in Models 2 and 3. The results showed that most of the travel behaviour variables did not significantly influence the relationship between campus greenery and mental health issues. However, a correlation between travel patterns and mental health issues among university students was found. More specifically, respondents who regularly travelled on foot demonstrated better mental health than those who predominantly used cars as a method of transportation (Model 3: Coefficient = -1.266, Standard Error = 0.458). No significant disparities in mental health were observed for the other modes of travel.
Robustness Check
Table 3 provides a summary of the robustness tests that were used to examine the relationship between campus greenery and mental health issues among university students at Guangzhou HEMC. Although slight variations in the coefficients were observed, the statistical significance of the association between campus greenery and mental health issues persisted, and the coefficients remained consistent across Models 4–6 in the robustness tests.
Discussion
Main Findings
To investigate the association between green space exposure and the mental health of university students, this study employed street-view images to evaluate green spaces and accurately determine individuals’ perceived exposure to such environments. Controlling for individual socio-demographic variables, we observed a negative relationship between exposure to campus greenery and mental health issues among Chinese university students. Our findings corroborate various theories, such as attention recovery theory (Kaplan & Kaplan, 1989) and stress reduction theory (Ulrich et al., 1991), which have been proposed to elucidate the positive impact of exposure to greenery on mental well-being. Similar findings have been reported by other scholars (Triguero-Mas et al., 2015; Liu et al., 2019a, 2023), including those investigating the mental health of adolescents (Li & Sullivan, 2016; Zhang et al., 2022). For example, Liu et al. (2022b) examined the psychological well-being of university students residing on campus and found that campus green spaces positively contributed to their mental well-being.
In addition to the role played by green spaces in relation to mental health, our study identified a significant relationship between travel patterns and mental health issues among university students. This finding aligns with existing literature highlighting the positive effects of physical activity, such as walking, on mental well-being (Bai et al., 2021; Wang et al., 2023). Walking not only promotes physical health but also provides opportunities for relaxation, reflection, and connection with one’s surroundings, which may help to reduce levels of mental health problems in individuals. Surprisingly, we also found that individual socio-demographic characteristics, specifically whether a person has a partner, have been shown to influence the level of mental health issues that they experience. However, the specific mechanisms underlying this relationship require further exploration. These additional factors add depth to our understanding of the relationship between exposure to green space and mental health among university students.
The utilisation of street-view images to investigate the impact of the natural environment on mental well-being has gained considerable traction in recent research (Helbich et al., 2019; Villeneuve et al., 2018). While this novel approach is becoming increasingly popular, our study revealed that both streetscape greenery and the NDVI exhibited negative associations with mental health issues. Similar findings have been reported in other studies (Helbich et al., 2019; Larkin & Hystad, 2018). Additionally, Taylor et al. (2018) confirmed the association between the NDVI and psychological well-being in a study conducted in Australia; however, this same relationship was not observed in two cities in New Zealand that were also investigated. The underlying reasons for the disparities between the streetscape and remote sensing images may need further investigation, although the findings of our study imply that both approaches may effectively capture different facets of green space.
Mental Health Issues Among University Students
This paper yielded the following findings regarding the mental well-being of university students. First, from an ecological perspective, many scholars have found that green space may have different effects on various social groups (Gubbels et al., 2014; Kremers et al., 2006). However, in our study, we found that campus green space exposure significantly mitigates mental health issues among university students, challenging the findings of previous research suggesting that the effects vary across different demographic groups (Helbich et al., 2019, 2021). Our study demonstrated a consistent positive association between green space exposure and mental health across different population groups, thereby challenging previous research.
Second, previous studies have claimed that the effects of green space exposure on mental health may differ according to individual demographic characteristics (Högberg, 2021; Jiang et al., 2020). By comparing the results of our study with previous research on mental health in Guangzhou and China (Chen & Yuan, 2020; Liu et al., 2019b; Wang et al., 2021c; Xiao et al., 2020), we observed a notable difference in the mental health levels of university students and both the general population and older adults. Specifically, the mental health level of university students in Guangzhou appeared to be significantly lower than those of both comparison groups. Furthermore, the difference in mental health levels between the university student group and these comparison groups was notably larger, indicating a distinct disparity in mental well-being among university students. However, our study did not find any connection between mental health and gender among university students, contrary to previous findings for other social groups (Buttazzoni et al., 2022; Feng et al., 2022). It is unclear why our findings challenge previous evidence about gender differences, but it could potentially be attributed to the restricted living environment of the Chinese university students who participated in the research (Sun et al., 2018). These findings underscore the unique mental health challenges faced by university students in Guangzhou compared to other demographic groups within the region.
Third, our findings suggest an association between travel characteristics and mental well-being, with regular walkers experiencing better mental health than those who primarily relied on driving. This relationship may be attributed to the well-established link between mental well-being and physical activity (Cao & Hickman, 2019; Gubbels et al., 2016; Manley et al., 2021; Triguero-Mas et al., 2015). Furthermore, green space may facilitate physical activity, which in turn benefits mental health (Hunter et al., 2015; Mytton et al., 2012; Sallis et al., 2016). Therefore, further research is warranted to investigate physical activity as a potential mediator in the relationship between mental well-being and exposure to greenery.
Policy Implications
Our study suggests several policy implications for public health and urban development. Firstly, the results demonstrate the positive influence of green space on mitigating mental health issues, emphasising the importance of integrating green space into urban development. To foster a healthy community, policymakers and urban planners should prioritise the effects of urban green space, especially in urban areas (Ziari et al., 2018; Kim & Park, 2014). Existing research has indicated that an accessible green environment positively influences well-being and travel behaviour (Lotfata et al., 2023; Ta et al., 2021; Zhou et al., 2022), which aligns with our findings regarding the relationship between exposure to greenery and mental well-being (Buttazzoni et al., 2022). Consequently, it is not solely a matter of increasing the quantity of green space but also improving its accessibility. In future urban planning, emphasis should be placed on the development of accessible green spaces, including rooftop gardens and pedestrian greenways (Han, 2007). Additionally, for individuals residing in constrained environments, indoor greenery is vital for enhancing their well-being. Secondly, this study underscores the association between factors associated with the natural environment and the mental well-being of young individuals. The continued impact of adolescent mental health development on individuals in adulthood has been established by Culpin et al. (2022), and this phenomenon may have implications for the long-term growth, prosperity and sustainability of society. As built environment factors can be predictors of mental health, policymakers and urban designers need to pay more attention to environmental changes that may affect the well-being of young people. Finally, this study found a link between individuals’ mental health and travel patterns, which confirms Mackett’s (2021a) assertion that mental health issues can limit people’s travel mode choices. Mackett’s study of people with mental health issues found that making improvements to the transport infrastructure and services facilitated travel for this group (Mackett, 2021b). Therefore, policymakers should take the needs of vulnerable people into account and improve urban transport services to try to achieve the goal of greater social inclusion.
Limitations
The study also has a few limitations. Firstly, the characteristics of the research site are unique to China. Most Chinese university campuses are closed, gated communities, which is not the case for Western universities. Therefore, the findings of this study might not be applicable to some Western countries. Secondly, respondents’ exposure to green spaces was calculated using street-view images of university campuses, so the calculations may not be as accurate as those obtained using the Global Positioning System. This could compromise our ability to identify a stable and reliable link between green space and university students’ mental well-being. Thirdly, the data collection was carried out in 2021, during a period marked by various COVID-19 restrictions, which may have influenced levels of well-being among students. Therefore, it is essential to consider the potential impact of COVID-19 on our findings. Fourthly, while our study relied on street-view images by using deep learning techniques to assess green space availability, it is important to acknowledge that other methodologies, such as street network analysis (Chen & Chang, 2015; Xiao et al., 2017), mobile phone data (Guo et al., 2019; Lin et al., 2021; Xiao et al., 2019), and GIS techniques (Fan et al., 2017), have also been explored in recent research, especially in China. These alternative approaches offer unique insights into green space access and utilisation patterns, which may provide additional perspectives on the relationship between green spaces and mental health. Incorporating these innovative approaches in future research could lead to a more comprehensive understanding of the complexities surrounding access to green space.
Conclusions
University campuses in China are characterised by a spatial organisation pattern that differs from those in other countries worldwide, meaning that students who study there may experience additional mental health issues. This study explored the relationship between exposure to visible forms of campus green space and mental health issues among university students on closed university campuses. We examined this relationship using streetscape images, remotely sensed images, deep learning techniques and multilevel linear regression models, as well as investigating the link between the individual characteristics of university students and their mental well-being. The results showed that exposure to campus greenery significantly mitigates the level of mental health issues among university students. Our analysis revealed that individual socio-demographic characteristics such as educational attainment and whether one has a partner influence individuals’ mental health status, while individual travel patterns were also associated with mental health issues. From a methodological perspective, our study showed that using remote sensing or streetscape images to measure green space does not affect the stable association between green space and mental well-being. To create a healthier community and achieve greater social inclusion, urban planners need to focus on increasing green space exposure and improving urban transport services.
References
Almanza, E., Jerrett, M., Dunton, G., Seto, E., & Ann Pentz, M. (2012). A study of community design, greenness, and physical activity in children using satellite, GPS and accelerometer data. Health and Place, 18(1), 46–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.HEALTHPLACE.2011.09.003.
Auerbach, R. P., Mortier, P., Bruffaerts, R., Alonso, J., Benjet, C., Cuijpers, P., Demyttenaere, K., Ebert, D. D., Green, J. G., Hasking, P., Murray, E., Nock, M. K., Pinder-Amaker, S., Sampson, N. A., Stein, D. J., Vilagut, G., Zaslavsky, A. M., & Kessler, R. C. (2018). WHO world mental health surveys international college student project: Prevalence and distribution of mental disorders. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 127(7), 623–638. https://doi.org/10.1037/ABN0000362.
Badrinarayanan, V., Kendall, A., & Cipolla, R. (2017). SegNet: A deep Convolutional Encoder-Decoder Architecture for Image Segmentation. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 39(12), 2481–2495. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2016.2644615.
Bai, Y., Cao, M., Wang, R., Liu, Y., & Wang, S. (2022). How street greenery facilitates active travel for university students. Journal of Transport and Health, 26, 101393. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JTH.2022.101393.
Banay, R. F., James, P., Hart, J. E., Kubzansky, L. D., Spiegelman, D., Okereke, O. I., Spengler, J. D., & Laden, F. (2019). Greenness and depression incidence among older women. Environmental Health Perspectives, 127(2), 027001. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP1229.
Barton, H., Thompson, S., Burgess, S., & Grant, M. (2015). The Routledge handbook of planning for health and well-being: Shaping a sustainable and healthy future. Routledge.
Boers, S., Hagoort, K., Scheepers, F., & Helbich, M. (2018). Does residential Green and Blue Space promote recovery in psychotic disorders? A cross-sectional study in the Province of Utrecht, the Netherlands. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2018(15(10)), 2195. https://doi.org/10.3390/IJERPH15102195.
Brown, P. (2016). The invisible problem? Improving students’ mental health. Higher Education Policy Institute.
Buttazzoni, A., Dean, J., & Minaker, L. (2022). Urban design and adolescent mental health: A qualitative examination of adolescent emotional responses to pedestrian- and transit-oriented design and cognitive architecture concepts. Health and Place, 76, 102825. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.HEALTHPLACE.2022.102825.
Cao, M., & Hickman, R. (2019). Urban transport and social inequities in neighbourhoods near underground stations in Greater London. Transportation Planning and Technology, 42(5), 419–441.
Chen, J., & Chang, Z. (2015). Rethinking urban green space accessibility: Evaluating and optimizing public transportation system through social network analysis in megacities. Landscape and Urban Planning, 143, 150–159.
Chen, Y., & Yuan, Y. (2020). The neighborhood effect of exposure to blue space on elderly individuals’ mental health: A case study in Guangzhou, China. Health & Place, 63, 102348.
Cheng, L., Chu, S., Zong, W., Li, S., Wu, J., & Li, M. (2017). Use of Tencent Street View Imagery for Visual Perception of streets. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 6(9), 265. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi6090265.
Collins, C., Haase, D., Heiland, S., & Kabisch, N. (2022). Urban green space interaction and wellbeing–investigating the experience of international students in Berlin during the first COVID-19 lockdown. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 70, 127543.
Culpin, I., Heuvelman, H., Rai, D., Pearson, R. M., Joinson, C., Heron, J., Evans, J., & Kwong, A. S. F. (2022). Father absence and trajectories of offspring mental health across adolescence and young adulthood: Findings from a UK-birth cohort. Journal of Affective Disorders, 314, 150–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2022.07.016.
Cvetkovski, S., Reavley, N. J., & Jorm, A. F. (2012). The prevalence and correlates of psychological distress in Australian tertiary students compared to their community peers. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 46(5), 457–467. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004867411435290.
De Bell, S., Graham, H., Jarvis, S., & White, P. (2017). The importance of nature in mediating social and psychological benefits associated with visits to freshwater blue space. Landscape and Urban Planning, 167, 118–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LANDURBPLAN.2017.06.003.
De Vries, S., Van Dillen, S. M., Groenewegen, P. P., & Spreeuwenberg, P. (2013). Streetscape greenery and health: Stress,social cohesion and physical activity as mediators. Social Science & Medicine, 94, 26–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.06.030.
Dzhambov, A. M., Markevych, I., Tilov, B. G., & Dimitrova, D. D. (2018). Residential greenspace might modify the effect of road traffic noise exposure on general mental health in students. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 34, 233–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.UFUG.2018.06.022.
Dzhambov, A. M., Lercher, P., Browning, M. H. E. M., Stoyanov, D., Petrova, N., Novakov, S., & Dimitrova, D. D. (2021). Does greenery experienced indoors and outdoors provide an escape and support mental health during the COVID-19 quarantine? Environmental Research, 196, 110420. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENVRES.2020.110420.
Eisenberg, D., Hunt, J., Speer, N., & Zivin, K. (2011). Mental health service utilization among college students in the United States. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 199(5), 301–308. https://doi.org/10.1097/NMD.0B013E3182175123.
Fan, P., Xu, L., Yue, W., & Chen, J. (2017). Accessibility of public urban green space in an urban periphery: The case of Shanghai. Landscape and Urban Planning, 165, 177–192.
Feng, X., Astell-Burt, T., Standl, M., Flexeder, C., Heinrich, J., & Markevych, I. (2022). Green space quality and adolescent mental health: Do personality traits matter? Environmental Research, 206, 112591. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENVRES.2021.112591.
Gascon, M., Zijlema, W., Vert, C., White, M. P., & Nieuwenhuijsen, M. J. (2017). Outdoor blue spaces, human health and well-being: A systematic review of quantitative studies. International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health, 220(8), 1207–1221. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJHEH.2017.08.004.
Gonzales-Inca, C., Pentti, J., Stenholm, S., Suominen, S., Vahtera, J., & Käyhkö, N. (2022). Residential greenness and risks of depression: Longitudinal associations with different greenness indicators and spatial scales in a Finnish population cohort. Health & Place, 74, 102760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2022.102760.
Gorriz, J. M., Zhang, Y., Tchounwou, P. B., Trevino, J. E., Monsur, M., Lindquist, C. S., & Simpson, C. R. (2022). Student and nature interactions and their impact on Mental Health during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2022(19(9)), 5030. https://doi.org/10.3390/IJERPH19095030.
Greenwood, A., & Gatersleben, B. (2016). Let’s go outside! Environmental restoration amongst adolescents and the impact of friends and phones. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 48, 131–139.
Gubbels, J. S., van Kann, D. H. H., de Vries, N. K., Thijs, C., & Kremers, S. P. J. (2014). The next step in health behavior research: The need for ecological moderation analyses - an application to diet and physical activity at childcare. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 11(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-11-52/TABLES/1.
Gubbels, J. S., Kremers, S. P. J., Droomers, M., Hoefnagels, C., Stronks, K., Hosman, C., & de Vries, S. (2016). The impact of greenery on physical activity and mental health of adolescent and adult residents of deprived neighborhoods: A longitudinal study. Health and Place, 40, 153–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.HEALTHPLACE.2016.06.002.
Guo, S., Song, C., Pei, T., Liu, Y., Ma, T., Du, Y., Chen, J., Fan, Z., Tang, X., Peng, Y., & Wang, Y. (2019). Accessibility to urban parks for elderly residents: Perspectives from mobile phone data. Landscape and Urban Planning, 191, 103642.
Han, B. H. (2007). Environment-Ecological Planning for Development of the Seoul Eco-city. International Journal of Urban Sciences, 11(2), 168–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/12265934.2007.9693617.
Hartig, T., Mitchell, R., De Vries, S., & Frumkin, H. (2014). Nature and health. Annual Review of Public Health, 35, 207–228.
Helbich, M., Klein, N., Roberts, H., Hagedoorn, P., & Groenewegen, P. P. (2018). More green space is related to less antidepressant prescription rates in the Netherlands: A bayesian geoadditive quantile regression approach. Environmental Research, 166, 290–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENVRES.2018.06.010.
Helbich, M., Yao, Y., Liu, Y., Zhang, J., Liu, P., & Wang, R. (2019). Using deep learning to examine street view green and blue spaces and their associations with geriatric depression in Beijing, China. Environment International, 126, 107–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2019.02.013.
Helbich, M., Poppe, R., Oberski, D., van Zeylmans, M., & Schram, R. (2021). Can’t see the wood for the trees? An assessment of street view- and satellite-derived greenness measures in relation to mental health. Landscape and Urban Planning, 214, 104181. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LANDURBPLAN.2021.104181.
Högberg, B. (2021). Educational stressors and secular trends in school stress and mental health problems in adolescents. Social Science and Medicine, 270, 113616. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SOCSCIMED.2020.113616.
Hu, J., Zhong, G., Cheng, Z., & Wang, D. (2012). GIS-based road safety evaluation model for cyclist in campus of higher education Mega Center. IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems Proceedings ITSC, 1127–1131. https://doi.org/10.1109/ITSC.2012.6338868.
Huete, A., Didan, K., van Leeuwen, W., Miura, T., & Glenn, E. (2010). MODIS Vegetation Indices. Remote Sensing and Digital Image Processing, 11, 579–602. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6749-7_26.
Hunter, R. F., Christian, H., Veitch, J., Astell-Burt, T., Hipp, J. A., & Schipperijn, J. (2015). The impact of interventions to promote physical activity in urban green space: A systematic review and recommendations for future research. Social Science and Medicine, 124, 246–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.11.051.
Hystad, P., Payette, Y., Noisel, N., & Boileau, C. (2019). Green space associations with mental health and cognitive function. Environmental Epidemiology, 3(1), e040. https://doi.org/10.1097/EE9.0000000000000040.
Ibrahim, A. K., Kelly, S. J., Adams, C. E., & Glazebrook, C. (2013). A systematic review of studies of depression prevalence in university students. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 47(3), 391–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JPSYCHIRES.2012.11.015.
Jiang, W., Lu, Y., & Xie, H. (2020). Education and mental health: Evidence and mechanisms. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 180, 407–437. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JEBO.2020.09.032.
Kaplan, R., & Kaplan, S. (1989). The experience of nature: A psychological perspective. Cambridge University Press.
Kelz, C., Evans, G. W., & Röderer, K. (2015). The restorative effects of redesigning the schoolyard: A multi-methodological, quasi-experimental study in rural Austrian middle schools. Environment and Behavior, 47(2), 119–139.
Kim, H. B., & Park, J. H. (2014). The structure of the green certification scheme for the neighbourhood and application to the new town development: The case of Magok, Seoul, Korea. International Journal of Urban Sciences, 18(3), 373–382. https://doi.org/10.1080/12265934.2014.923780.
Kremers, S. P. J., de Bruijn, G. J., Visscher, T. L. S., van Mechelen, W., de Vries, N. K., & Brug, J. (2006). Environmental influences on energy balance-related behaviors: A dual-process view. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 3(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-3-9/FIGURES/1.
Larkin, A., & Hystad, P. (2018). Evaluating street view exposure measures of visible green space for health research. Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology, 29(4), 447–456. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41370-018-0017-1.
Li, X., & Ghosh, D. (2018). Associations between body mass index and urban green streetscape in Cleveland, Ohio, USA. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(10), 2186. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15102186.
Li, D., & Sullivan, W. C. (2016). Impact of views to school landscapes on recovery from stress and mental fatigue. Landscape and Urban Planning, 148, 149–158.
Li, X., Zhang, C., Li, W., Ricard, R., Meng, Q., & Zhang, W. (2015). Assessing street-level urban greenery using Google Street View and a modified green view index. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 14(3), 675–685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2015.06.006.
Li, D., Deal, B., Zhou, X., Slavenas, M., & Sullivan, W. C. (2018). Moving beyond the neighborhood: Daily exposure to nature and adolescents’ mood. Landscape and Urban Planning, 173, 33–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LANDURBPLAN.2018.01.009.
Lin, Y., Zhou, Y., Lin, M., Wu, S., & Li, B. (2021). Exploring the disparities in park accessibility through mobile phone data: Evidence from Fuzhou of China. Journal of Environmental Management, 281, 111849.
Liu, X. (2017). The governance in the development of public universities in China. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 39(3), 266–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2017.1300122.
Liu, Y., Wang, R., Grekousis, G., Liu, Y., Yuan, Y., & Li, Z. (2019a). Neighbourhood greenness and mental wellbeing in Guangzhou, China: What are the pathways? Landscape and Urban Planning, 190, 103602.
Liu, Y., Wang, R., Xiao, Y., Huang, B., Chen, H., & Li, Z. (2019b). Exploring the linkage between greenness exposure and depression among Chinese people: Mediating roles of physical activity, stress and social cohesion and moderating role of urbanicity. Health & Place, 58, 102168.
Liu, Y., Wang, R., Lu, Y., Li, Z., Chen, H., Cao, M., Zhang, Y., & Song, Y. (2020). Natural outdoor environment, neighbourhood social cohesion and mental health: Using multilevel structural equation modelling, streetscape and remote-sensing metrics. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 48, 126576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2019.126576.
Liu, Y., Lu, S., Guo, Y., Ho, H. C., Song, Y., Cheng, W., Chui, C. H. K., Chan, O. F., Chiu, R. L. H., Webster, C., & Lum, T. Y. S. (2021). Longitudinal associations between neighbourhood physical environments and depressive symptoms of older adults in Hong Kong: The moderating effects of terrain slope and declining functional abilities. Health & Place, 70, 102585.
Liu, Q., Liu, Z., Lin, S., & Zhao, P. (2022a). Perceived accessibility and mental health consequences of COVID-19 containment policies. Journal of Transport and Health, 25, 101354. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JTH.2022.101354.
Liu, Q., Luo, S., Shen, Y., Zhu, Z., Yao, X., Li, Q., Tarin, M. W. K., Zheng, J., & Zhuo, Z. (2022b). Relationships between students’ demographic characteristics, perceived naturalness and patterns of use associated with campus green space, and self-rated restoration and health. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 68, 127474.
Liu, Y., Pan, Z., Liu, Y., & Li, Z. (2023). Can living in an age-friendly neighbourhood protect older adults’ mental health against functional decline in China? Landscape and Urban Planning, 240, 104897.
Long, J., Shelhamer, E., & Darrell, T. (2015). Fully convolutional networks for semantic segmentation. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 3431–3440.
Lotfata, A., Tao, R., & Su, Y. (2023). Evaluating the walking accessibility of Cook County’s public schools to use as open space. International Journal of Urban Sciences, 27(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/12265934.2022.2072940.
Lu, Y. (2019). Using Google Street View to investigate the association between street greenery and physical activity. Landscape and Urban Planning, 191, 103435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.08.029.
Lu, Y., Yang, Y., Sun, G., & Gou, Z. (2019). Associations between overhead-view and eye-level urban greenness and cycling behaviors. Cities, 88, 10–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.01.003.
Mackett, R. L. (2021a). Mental health and travel behaviour. Journal of Transport and Health, 22, 101143. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JTH.2021.101143.
Mackett, R. L. (2021b). Policy interventions to facilitate travel by people with mental health conditions. Transport Policy, 110, 306–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2021.06.014.
Manley, E., Filomena, G., & Mavros, P. (2021). A spatial model of cognitive distance in cities. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 35(11), 2316–2338.
Markevych, I., Schoierer, J., Hartig, T., Chudnovsky, A., Hystad, P., Dzhambov, A. M., de Vries, S., Triguero-Mas, M., Brauer, M., Nieuwenhuijsen, M. J., Lupp, G., Richardson, E. A., Astell-Burt, T., Dimitrova, D., Feng, X., Sadeh, M., Standl, M., Heinrich, J., & Fuertes, E. (2017). Exploring pathways linking greenspace to health: Theoretical and methodological guidance. Environmental Research, 158, 301–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENVRES.2017.06.028.
Mitchell, R., Astell-Burt, T., & Richardson, E. A. (2011). A comparison of green space indicators for epidemiological research. Journal of Epidemiol Community Health, 65(10), 853–858. https://doi.org/10.1136/JECH.2010.119172.
Mytton, O. T., Townsend, N., Rutter, H., & Foster, C. (2012). Green space and physical activity: An observational study using Health Survey for England data. Health and Place, 18(5), 1034–1041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2012.06.003.
Orban, E., Sutcliffe, R., Dragano, N., Jöckel, K. H., & Moebus, S. (2017). Residential surrounding greenness, Self-Rated Health and interrelations with aspects of Neighborhood Environment and Social relations. Journal of Urban Health, 94(2), 158–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11524-016-0112-3/TABLES/3.
Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical Linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Sage.
Regmi, P. R., Waithaka, E., Paudyal, A., Simkhada, P., & van Teijlingen, E. (2017). Guide to the design and application of online questionnaire surveys. Nepal Journal of Epidemiology, 6(4), 640–644. https://doi.org/10.3126/nje.v6i4.17258.
Rzotkiewicz, A., Pearson, A. L., Dougherty, B., Shortridge, A., & Wilson, N. (2018). Systematic review of the use of Google Street View in health research: Major themes, strengths, weaknesses and possibilities for future research. Health and Place, 52, 240–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.HEALTHPLACE.2018.07.001.
Said, D., Kypri, K., & Bowman, J. (2013). Risk factors for mental disorder among university students in Australia: Findings from a web-based cross-sectional survey. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 48(6), 935–944. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00127-012-0574-X/TABLES/4.
Sallis, J. F., Cerin, E., Conway, T. L., Adams, M. A., Frank, L. D., Pratt, M., Salvo, D., Schipperijn, J., Smith, G., Cain, K. L., Davey, R., Kerr, J., Lai, P. C., Mitáš, J., Reis, R., Sarmiento, O. L., Schofield, G., Troelsen, J., van Dyck, D., de Bourdeaudhuij, I., & Owen, N. (2016). Physical activity in relation to urban environments in 14 cities worldwide: A cross-sectional study. The Lancet, 387(10034), 2207–2217. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01284-2.
Sun, C., Cheng, J., Lin, A., & Peng, M. (2018). Gated university campus and its implications for socio-spatial inequality: Evidence from students’ accessibility to local public transport. Habitat International, 80, 11–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.HABITATINT.2018.08.008.
Ta, N., Li, H., Zhu, Q., & Wu, J. (2021). Contributions of the quantity and quality of neighborhood green space to residential satisfaction in suburban Shanghai. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 64, 127293. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.UFUG.2021.127293.
Taylor, L., Hahs, A. K., & Hochuli, D. F. (2018). Wellbeing and urban living: Nurtured by nature. Urban Ecosystems, 21(1), 197–208. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11252-017-0702-1/TABLES/8.
Tokhmehchian, A., & Gharehbaglou, M. (2019). Biophilic perception in urban green spaces (Case study: El Gölü Park, Tabriz). International Journal of Urban Sciences, 23(4), 568–585. https://doi.org/10.1080/12265934.2019.1568284.
Triguero-Mas, M., Dadvand, P., Cirach, M., Martínez, D., Medina, A., Mompart, A., Basagaña, X., Gražulevičiene, R., & Nieuwenhuijsen, M. J. (2015). Natural outdoor environments and mental and physical health: Relationships and mechanisms. Environment International, 77, 35–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENVINT.2015.01.012.
Ulrich, R. S., Simons, R. F., Losito, B. D., Fiorito, E., Miles, M. A., & Zelson, M. (1991). Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 11(3), 201–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80184-7.
Van den Bosch, M., & Meyer-Lindenberg, A. (2019). Environmental Exposures and Depression: Biological Mechanisms and Epidemiological Evidence. Https://Doi.Orghttps://Doi.Org/10.1146/Annurev-Publhealth-040218-044106, 40, 239–259. https://doi.org/10.1146/ANNUREV-PUBLHEALTH-040218-044106.
Villeneuve, P. J., Ysseldyk, R. L., Root, A., Ambrose, S., Dimuzio, J., Kumar, N., Shehata, M., Xi, M., Seed, E., Li, X., Shooshtari, M., & Rainham, D. (2018). Comparing the normalized difference vegetation index with the Google street view measure of vegetation to assess associations between greenness, walkability, recreational physical activity, and health in Ottawa, Canada. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/IJERPH15081719.
Wang, R., Helbich, M., Yao, Y., Zhang, J., Liu, P., Yuan, Y., & Liu, Y. (2019a). Urban greenery and mental wellbeing in adults: Cross-sectional mediation analyses on multiple pathways across different greenery measures. Environmental Research, 176, 108535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2019.108535.
Wang, R., Lu, Y., Zhang, J., Liu, P., Yao, Y., & Liu, Y. (2019b). The relationship between visual enclosure for neighbourhood street walkability and elders’ mental health in China: Using street view images. Journal of Transport and Health, 13, 90–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JTH.2019.02.009.
Wang, R., Yuan, Y., Liu, Y., Zhang, J., Liu, P., Lu, Y., & Yao, Y. (2019c). Using street view data and machine learning to assess how perception of neighborhood safety influences urban residents’ mental health. Health and Place, 59, 102186. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.HEALTHPLACE.2019.102186.
Wang, P., Meng, Y. Y., Lam, V., & Ponce, N. (2019d). Green space and serious psychological distress among adults and teens: A population-based study in California. Health & Place, 56, 184–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2019.02.002.
Wang, L., Zhou, Y., Wang, F., Ding, L., Love, P. E. D., & Li, S. (2021a). The influence of the built environment on people’s Mental Health: An empirical classification of causal factors. Sustainable Cities and Society, 74, 103185. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCS.2021.103185.
Wang, R., Feng, Z., Pearce, J., Yao, Y., Li, X., & Liu, Y. (2021b). The distribution of greenspace quantity and quality and their association with neighbourhood socioeconomic conditions in Guangzhou, China: A new approach using deep learning method and street view images. Sustainable Cities and Society, 66, 102664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102664.
Wang, R., Feng, Z., Pearce, J., Zhou, S., Zhang, L., & Liu, Y. (2021c). Dynamic greenspace exposure and residents’ mental health in Guangzhou, China: From over-head to eye-level perspective, from quantity to quality. Landscape and Urban Planning, 215, 104230.
Wang, X., Liu, Y., Yao, Y., Zhou, S., Zhu, Q., Liu, M., Luo, W., & Helbich, M. (2023). Associations between streetscape characteristics at Chinese adolescents’ activity places and active travel patterns on weekdays and weekends. Journal of Transport & Health, 31, 101653.
WHO. (2010). Global recommendations on physical activity for health. World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241599979.
WHO. (2016). Urban green spaces and health. WHO Regional Office for Europe. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/345751.
Wu, W., Yao, Y., Song, Y., He, D., & Wang, R. (2021). Perceived influence of street-level visible greenness exposure in the work and residential environment on life satisfaction: Evidence from Beijing, China. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 62, 127161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127161.
Wu, J., Peng, Y., Liu, P., Weng, Y., & Lin, J. (2022). Is the green inequality overestimated? Quality reevaluation of green space accessibility. Cities, 130, 103871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.103871.
Xiao, Y., Wang, Z., Li, Z., & Tang, Z. (2017). An assessment of urban park access in Shanghai–implications for the social equity in urban China. Landscape and Urban Planning, 157, 383–393.
Xiao, Y., Wang, D., & Fang, J. (2019). Exploring the disparities in park access through mobile phone data: Evidence from Shanghai, China. Landscape and Urban Planning, 181, 80–91.
Xiao, Y., Miao, S., Sarkar, C., Fan, L., & Li, Z. (2020). Do neighborhood ties matter for residents’ mental health in affordable housing: Evidence from Guangzhou. China Cities, 100, 102666.
Yang, B. E. (2007). The role of landscape architecture in the creation and management of the environment-friendly cities in Korea. International Journal of Urban Sciences, 11(2), 156–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/12265934.2007.9693616.
Yang, L., Ao, Y., Ke, J., Lu, Y., & Liang, Y. (2021). To walk or not to walk? Examining non-linear effects of streetscape greenery on walking propensity of older adults. Journal of Transport Geography, 94, 103099. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2021.103099.
Yang, T., Barnett, R., Fan, Y., & Li, L. (2019). The effect of urban green space on uncertainty stress and life stress: A nationwide study of university students in China. Health and Place, 59, 102199. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.HEALTHPLACE.2019.102199.
Yang, L., Liu, J., Lu, Y., Ao, Y., Guo, Y., Huang, W., Zhao, R., & Wang, R. (2020). Global and local associations between urban greenery and travel propensity of older adults in Hong Kong. Sustainable Cities and Society, 63, 102442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102442.
Yao, Y., Liang, Z., Yuan, Z., Liu, P., Bie, Y., Zhang, J., Wang, R., Wang, J., & Guan, Q. (2019). A human-machine adversarial scoring framework for urban perception assessment using street-view images. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 33(12), 2363–2384. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2019.1643024.
Ye, Y., Richards, D., Lu, Y., Song, X., Zhuang, Y., Zeng, W., & Zhong, T. (2019). Measuring daily accessed street greenery: A human-scale approach for informing better urban planning practices. Landscape and Urban Planning, 191, 103434. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LANDURBPLAN.2018.08.028.
Zhang, Y., Zhao, J., Mavoa, S., Erika, I., Clark, T. C., Crengle, S., & Smith, M. (2022). Urban green space and mental well-being of Aotearoa New Zealand adolescents: A path analysis (p. 100085). Wellbeing, Space and Society.
Zhou, H., He, S., Cai, Y., Wang, M., & Su, S. (2019). Social inequalities in neighborhood visual walkability: Using street view imagery and deep learning technologies to facilitate healthy city planning. Sustainable Cities and Society, 50, 101605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101605.
Zhou, M., Wang, D., & Guan, X. (2022). Co-evolution of the built environment and travel behaviour in Shenzhen, China. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 107, 103291. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TRD.2022.103291.
Ziari, K., Pourahmad, A., Mehrabani, F., B., & Hosseini, A. (2018). Environmental sustainability in cities by biophilic city approach: A case study of Tehran. International Journal of Urban Sciences, 22(4), 486–516. https://doi.org/10.1080/12265934.2018.1425153.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic Supplementary Material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Bai, Y., Wang, R., Yang, L. et al. The Impacts of Visible Green Spaces on the Mental well-being of University Students. Appl. Spatial Analysis (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12061-024-09578-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12061-024-09578-7