Abstract
This research focuses on the analysis of the spatial distribution of 149 urban conflicts occurring between 1989 and 2000 in Quebec City, Canada. Specifically, the article explores the relationship between the spatial dynamics of the conflicts—in terms of frequency, duration, and intensity—and the following four dimensions of urban space: social composition; built environment; propensity to associate and to voice; and accessibility to various urban resources. The results of statistical analyses by means of a Kruskal–Wallis test and a Mann–Whitney test show, regardless of the dimension considered, to what extent certain areas are characterized by frequency, duration, or intensity of the conflict activity. Specifically, the results suggest that the degree of involvement of local people in a conflict varies very much depending on the nature of the social composition. Other findings show a relationship between areas with a high propensity to associate and to voice and a conflict activity that is more intense, more frequent, but not necessarily longer. These forms of social practices are thus testimony to the existence of know-how, i.e., a culture of conflict activity oriented towards efficiency.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The municipal mergers that occurred in January 2002 created a new and greater City of Quebec with eight boroughs and nearly 500,000 inhabitants. The data used in this paper, however, was collected prior to the year 2002. To distinguish the two, we will refer to the region under study as Quebec City.
This period covers the time when the municipal political party in power was the Rassemblement Populaire de Québec (Quebec People’s Party). Consequently, conflicts that occurred at this place and during this period belong to the same municipal political context.
This concept of places was inspired by works of Lecourt (2003).
A complete description of the procedures can be found in Pelletier et al. (2007).
References
Bacqué, M.-H., Rey, H., & Sintomer, Y. (2005). La démocratie participative, un nouveau paradigme de l’action publique? In M.-H. Bacqué, H. Rey & Y. Sintomer (Eds.), Gestion de proximité et démocratie participative. Une perspective comparative (pp. 9–46). Paris: La Découverte.
Caufield, J. (1994). City form and everyday life. Toronto’s gentrification and critical social practice. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Di Méo, G. (1993). Les paradigmes du quartier urbain. Sciences de la société, 30, 55–71.
Eastman, J. R. (2006). IDRISI technical reference manual. Worcester: Clark University.
Everitt, B. S. (1993). Cluster analysis (3rd ed.). New York: Halsted, Wiley.
Fareri, P. (2000). Ralentir. Notes sur l’approche participative du point de vue de l’analyse des politiques publiques. In O. Söderström, E. Cogato Lanza, R. J. Lawrence & G. Barbey (Eds.), L’usage du projet. Pratiques sociales et conception du projet urbain et architectural (pp. 17–37). Lausanne: Payot.
Hocke, P. (1999). Determining the selection bias in local and national newspaper reports on protest events. In D. Rucht, R. Koopmans & F. Neidhardt (Eds.), Acts of dissent: new developments in the study of protest (pp. 131–163). Lanham: Rowman & Littelfield.
Janelle, D. G. (1977). Structural dimensions in the geography of locational conflicts. The Canadian Geographer, 21(4), 311–328.
Janelle, D. G., & Millward, H. A. (1976). Locational conflict patterns and urban ecological structure. Tijdschrift voor Economishe en Sociale Geografie, 67(2), 102–113.
Joerin, F., Nembrini, A., Rey, M., & Desthieux, G. (2001a). Information et participation pour l’aménagement du territoire—Rôle des instruments d’aide à la décision. Revue internationale de géomatique, 11(3–4), 309–332.
Joerin, F., Thériault, M., Villeneuve, P. Y., & Begin, F. (2001b). Une procédure multicritère pour évaluer l’accessibilité aux lieux d’activité. Revue internationale de géomatique, 1(11), 69–104.
Joerin, F., Thériault, M., & Musy, A. (2001c). Using GIS and outranking multicriteria analysis for land-use suitability assessment. International Journal of Geographical Information Sciences, 15(2), 153–174.
Joerin, F., Pelletier, M., Trudelle, C., & Villeneuve, P. Y. (2005). Analyse spatiale des conflits urbains. Enjeux et contextes dans la région de Québec. Cahiers de Géographie du Québec, 49(138), 319–342.
Kruskal, W. H., & Wallis, W. A. (1952). Use of ranks in one-criterion variance analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 47(260), 583–621.
Lecourt, A. (2003). Les conflits d’aménagement : analyse théorique et pratiques à partir du cas breton. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Département de Géographie et Aménagement de l’Espace, Université de Rennes 2, Rennes.
Le Floch, Y. (2000). Approche spatiale et quantitative des risques de conflits entre riverains et maîtres d’ouvrages autoroutier. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Ecole Doctorale Hommes et Territoires, Université François Rabelais, Tour.
Ley, D., & Mercer, J. (1980). Locational conflict and the politics of consumption. Economic Geography, 56(2), 89–109.
Mann, H. B., & Whitney, D. R. (1947). On a test of whether one of two random variables is stochastically larger than the other. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 18(1), 50–60.
McAdam, D. (1986). Recruitment to high-risk activism: the case of freedom summer. The American Journal of Sociology, 92(1), 64–90.
McCarthy, J., McPhail, C., & Smith, J. (1996). Images of protest: dimensions of selection bias in media coverage of Washington demonstrations, 1982 and 1991. American Sociological Review, 61(3), 478–499.
Mercier, G. (2000). L’urbanisme des échecs urbanistiques: la rhétorique du renouveau du quartier Saint-Roch à Québec depuis 1990. In G. Sénécal & D. Saint-Laurent (Eds.), Les espaces dégradés (pp. 237–254). Sainte-Foy: Presses de l’Université du Québec.
Morin, R., & Rochefort, M. (1998). Quartier et lien social: des pratiques individuelles à l’action collective. Lien Social et Politiques, 39, 103–114.
Olzak, S. (1989). Analysis of events in the study of collective action. Annual Review of Sociology, 15, 119–141.
Pelletier, M. (2009). La décision territoriale en conflit: Analyse spatiale de l’activité conflictuelle, Ville de Québec, 1989 à 2000. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Ecole supérieure d’aménagement du territoire et de développement régional, Université Laval, Québec.
Pelletier, M., Joerin, F., & Villeneuve, P. Y. (2007). La décision territoriale en conflit. Ville de Québec, 1989 à 2000. Essai de modélisation spatiale. Environnement Urbain/Urban Environment, 1(2007), 77–95.
Richards, J. A. (1993). Remote sensing digital image analysis: An introduction (2nd ed.). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Rowe, G., & Frewer, L. J. (2005). A typology of public engagement mechanisms. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 30(2), 251–290.
Schussman, A., & Soule, S. A. (2005). Process and protest: accounting for individual protest participation. Social Forces, 84(2), 1083–1108.
Sneath, P. H. A., & Sokal, R. R. (1973). Numerical taxonomy: The principles and practice of numerical classification. San Francisco: Freeman.
Trudelle, C. (2005). Visibilité de la participation des femmes aux conflits urbains de Québec entre 1965–2000. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Ecole supérieure d’aménagement du territoire et de développement régional, Université Laval, Québec.
Villeneuve, P. Y., & Côté, G. (1994). Conflits de localisation et étalement urbain: y a-t-il un lien? Cahiers de Géographie du Québec, 38(105), 397–412.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix I
Appendix I
Results of relationships between each type of homogenous areas (Mann–Whitney test) for each of one dimensions of the urban environment and all three properties of conflict activity
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pelletier, M., Joerin, F., Kestens, Y. et al. Conflict Activity in the Neighborhoods of Quebec City (Canada), 1989–2000. Appl. Spatial Analysis 4, 173–199 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12061-010-9050-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12061-010-9050-8