Skip to main content

Steroids in paediatric heart surgery: eminence or evidence-based practice?

Abstract

Steroids in paediatric heart surgery are given prophylactically to blunt the systemic inflammatory response induced by the extracorporeal circuit and to improve clinical outcomes. However, there is an ongoing controversy about the impact of steroids on clinical outcomes after paediatric heart surgery. The hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis is the primary neuroendocrine system activated during the stress of surgery. Relative adrenal insufficiency can accompany paediatric heart surgery; therefore, perioperative steroid supplementation is still administered by some centres. The studies that investigate the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis physiology during surgery have many limitations, and it is unclear how to define what is adrenal insufficiency. In this review, we focus on discussing the available evidence for steroid use in paediatric cardiac surgery.

Background

Most of the progress in cardiac surgery results from the discovery of heparin followed by the introduction of the cardiopulmonary by-pass machine that made possible open cardiac surgery [1]. However, quite early after its introduction in the 1950s, attempts were made to both understand and modulate the adverse effects of the extracorporeal circuit. Indeed, the first study of the effect of glucocorticoids in cardiac surgery was published by Replodge et al. in 1966. The authors looked at the effect of large doses of dexamethasone administered perioperatively in 20 children and adults undergoing heart surgery with the use of cardiopulmonary by-pass [2]. They found steroid recipients to have a lower beta-glucuronidase enzyme activity thus suggesting reduced lysosomal injury. However, there was no clear benefit in terms of clinical outcomes apart from noticing that the steroid recipient patients had a “better general appearance and state postoperatively”. Our current understanding of the response to surgery is that the contact of the blood with the extracorporeal circuit, the ischaemia-reperfusion injury, and endotoxemia induce a generalised immune system activation called the systemic inflammatory response. It is also believed that there is a balance between “good” inflammation that acts to prime the immune system and “bad” inflammation that could result in multiple end-organ failure and death [3]. In children, the surgical inflammatory response tends to be amplified due to their lower circulating blood volume compared to the size of the extracorporeal circuit and due to the frequent use of deep hypothermic arrest surgery and haemodilution [4]. According to several surveys of clinical practice, glucocorticoids are still widely used as a pharmacologic tool to modulate the inflammation [5]. Most of the centres do not administer steroids in every case but reserve their use for the most “high-risk” cases: neonates, deep hypothermic cardiac arrest surgery, and long cardiopulmonary by-pass [5]. Such indications vary widely between centres, and there is no consensus because of limited research in this area. Apart from this generalised, immune response to surgery, the stress of surgery is also accompanied by a neuroendocrine response. The primary neuroendocrine system activated during surgery is the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis (HPA) that produces the stress hormone cortisol. Therefore, another justification behind the use of steroids is to cover for the presumed perioperative relative adrenal insufficiency that can accompany cardiac surgery [6]. Finally, steroids are also administered to protect against brain injury during DHCA surgery. In the current review, we will discuss these three main areas of steroid use (Fig. 1). Another indication for steroid administration is immunosuppression after paediatric heart transplantation, but this area is not within the scope of this review.

Fig. 1
figure1

The main steroid indications in paediatric heart surgery

Methodology

We conducted a literature search using PubMed and MEDLINE databases. The search phrase included a combination of the following terms: “steroid”, “glucocorticoid”, “corticosteroid”, “dexamethasone”, “hydrocortisone”, “methylprednisolone”, “pediatric”, “paediatric”, “heart surgery”, “cardiac surgery”, “children”, “neonates”, “deep hypothermic circulatory arrest”, “adrenal”. The last search was conducted in November 2017. We identified additional articles by cross-referencing from author reference lists and published review papers. We have included all relevant articles assessing the effect of corticosteroids on inflammation, clinical outcomes, adrenal function, and brain injury during paediatric heart surgery with the use of cardiopulmonary by-pass.

Less inflammation, better clinical outcomes?

Throughout the years, several studies measured the effect of glucocorticoids on markers of inflammation but most importantly tried to correlate the effect on clinical outcomes. Some studies found that steroids can blunt inflammation [7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14] while others found the opposite [15]. Most importantly, it is unclear to what degree this presumed “anti-inflammatory” effect also translates into better clinical outcomes [7, 10, 13]. Firstly, it is very difficult to characterise the multifaceted nature of the SIRS response whereby a variety of cytokines are activated and interact in a rather complex, unpredictable manner [16]. Secondly, we know that the use of steroids is subject to huge variability in the practice between centres and this is also reflected in the design of the studies that use various types of steroids, various regimens, or routes of administration thus making more difficult the correlation between inflammation and clinical outcomes [5, 17]. Thirdly, the available studies are small-sized and display a variability between the endpoints measured (e.g. inflammation or clinical outcomes measured as a primary or the secondary outcome). Finally, it is likely that a standard corticosteroid regimen given to all patients might not address the individual, host inflammatory response and it is likely that the approach to SIRS will have to be personalised rather one-for-all regimen [18].

There are several small size, randomised trials of steroids versus placebo conducted on children of various ages or just neonates [8,9,10, 19,20,21]. Their results are conflictive with some trials reporting benefit [8, 11, 19, 21] while others reporting no effect on clinical outcomes [7, 9, 13, 20]. The results of an ongoing trial on 190 neonates are still awaited and hopefully will give us more information [22]. Several studies focused at the effect of the route, dose, or timing of steroid administration. One small RCT study found no dose-effect of steroids on clinical outcomes [9]. Another RCT found no differences between the single intraoperative dose of steroid and double (pre-operative and intraoperative doses) [23]. One study investigated the effect of steroid administered intravenously versus steroid in prime and found no differences [24]. Due to the limitations of the randomised evidence described above, the resulting meta-analyses are of limited value too [25, 26]. Some of the studies cited above focused on neonate patients only. This is because this group is particularly vulnerable to CPB insult due to (1) a distinct inflammatory response, (2) because of an immaturity of the HPA axis that prevents them to mount an adequate stress response. A recent systematic review of the literature found no clear benefit of steroid use in this particular group of patients [27].

The use of steroids will continue to be a matter of intense debate until we have the results of large, multicentre, randomised controlled trials that are able to detect any treatment effect in the context of congenital heart surgery that is performed nowadays with a very low morbidity and mortality. These trials will need to be similar in design to the large steroid trials in adult cardiac surgery [28].

Are steroids worth the risk?

Because of the lack of adequately powered studies, it is difficult to assess the short-term risk of steroid administration. However, several large registry retrospective studies of children undergoing heart surgery found no effect of steroids on clinical outcomes; furthermore, some raised concerns about infection in the steroid-treated groups [29,30,31,32]. Notably, the Pasquali et al. study retrospectively analysed a population of almost 46,730 children undergoing heart surgery and found no significant benefit of steroids. Furthermore, the steroids were associated with increased morbidity in the lower risk patient groups [29]. In other patient groups, there is emerging evidence that steroids have potential risks. A recently published retrospective study of more than half a million adults that received a short-term course of steroids found an increase in the rates of sepsis, venous thromboembolism, and fractures [33]. One RCT in children with premature lung disease found early administration of steroids to have a detrimental effect on neuromotor and cognition of outcomes if children were followed up to school age [34]. Another RCT in a similar group of patients with respiratory distress found steroids to be associated with increased incidence of cerebral palsy and developmental delay [35].Therefore, there is a need to design studies with long-term follow-up aimed at measuring effect of steroids on neurocognition.

Steroids and the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis

In the context of congenital heart surgery, steroids are given not only to blunt inflammation but also as supplementation for what is called relative adrenal insufficiency [36]. The pathogenesis of this entity is indeed a matter of intense debate, and as a consequence, there are no agreed diagnostic criteria [36]. In the context of critical illness, most of the diagnostic tests rely on assessing the cortisol levels measured at a few time points and the response to a synthetic adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) injection [37]. Nowadays, there is an increased recognition of the importance of biological clocks and hormone rhythms necessary for adequate physiological regulation [38]. Underlying the well-known circadian cortisol rhythm there is a fine, ultradian cortisol pulsatility [39]. Therefore, such frequent variations in the cortisol concentration make the ACTH tests inaccurate because they rely on a just few time-point measurements that can be taken either at the peak or trough of the pulse [40]. Several studies tried to assess the HPA axis during surgery [41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51]. Some used a few time cortisol measurements or just ACTH stimulation tests and tried to correlate their findings with clinical outcomes. In addition to limitations of the ACTH tests already described, some of these studies use variable ACTH test doses making interpretation more difficult [52]. Moreover, a major, common limitation of most of the studies that tried to characterise relative adrenal failure in children undergoing heart surgery is that these patients received steroids at induction making impossible an accurate assessment of the HPA axis.

Certainly, there is a need for studies aimed at understanding the basic HPA axis physiology during surgery. Such studies will need to be able to characterise cortisol pulsatility by using frequent cortisol measurements during the perioperative period, in children of various ages, that have not received any perioperative steroids. Once we understand HPA axis function during surgery, more studies aimed at the correlation of the hormone rhythms with clinical endpoints are required.

Steroids, neuroprotection, and impact on neurocognitive outcomes

Steroids are still used to treat brain oedema associated with brain tumours and were used for a long time in the treatment of head injuries until the large CRASH trial demonstrated that they can have detrimental effects [53,54,55]. Naturally, steroids are being used in cases with deep hypothermic circulatory arrest (DHCA) to provide neuroprotection [5]. However, the evidence in this area is only limited to in vitro [56] or in vivo, animal studies [57, 58]. Two studies used piglet models of DHCA arrest to assess the effect of steroids on brain injury. While one study found benefit [58], the other one found steroid administration to be detrimental [57]. These studies used different steroid regimens, DHCA experimental protocols, and methodologies to assess neuroprotection thus making difficult to draw any conclusions. The limited evidence in this high-risk group warrants the need for more clinical research powered to measure the effect of steroids on neuroprotection.

Conclusions

In the current review, we discussed the evidence for steroid use in paediatric cardiac surgery in the three main indication areas: effect on inflammation and clinical outcomes, the effect on adrenal function, and on neuroprotection. Due to the difficulty in characterising the complex inflammatory response to surgery, the current studies aimed to correlate the inflammatory effect of steroids with clinical outcomes remain limited. There is a lack of large randomised controlled trial powered to look at clinical outcomes. While there are some large registry studies looking at the effect of steroids on clinical outcomes, these remain limited by their retrospective design. Despite a wealth of data on the use of steroids in paediatric heart surgery, the current studies are conflicting and have many limitations thus leaving clinicians without any guidance. There is a limited understanding of the HPA axis physiology during the perioperative periods; therefore, we do not have an adequate diagnostic test to diagnose relative adrenal failure. We do not know if this entity even exists. Most of the studies aimed at assessing HPA axis during cardiac surgery are undertaken in patients already receiving steroids and use few cortisol measurements over long periods of times. Due to such limitations, we are unable to characterise the dynamic nature of the HPA axis response during the perioperative periods and to understand if steroids do play a role or not. The future research studies should aim at measuring cortisol levels at very frequent intervals to define the HPA axis function in the perioperative period. The least studied effect of steroids is on neuroprotection during DHCA surgery, and more research aimed at this high-risk group is needed.

References

  1. 1.

    Cooley DA, Frazier OH. The past 50 years of cardiovascular surgery. Circulation [Internet]. American Heart Association, Inc.; 2000 [cited 2017 Nov 2];102:IV87-93. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11080137.

  2. 2.

    Replogle RL, Gazzaniga AB, Gross RE. Use of corticosteroids during cardiopulmonary bypass: possible lysosome stabilization. Circulation. 1966;33:I86–92.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Laffey JG, Boylan JF, Cheng DC. The systemic inflammatory response to cardiac surgery: implications for the anesthesiologist. Anesthesiology. 2002 ;97:215–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Nicholas Kouchoukos,Eugene Blackstone,Frank Hanley JK. Myocardial Management During Cardiac Surgery with Cardiopulmonary Bypass. Kirklin/Barratt-Boyes Card. Surg. Elsevier; 2012. p. 150–2.

  5. 5.

    Allen M, Sundararajan S, Pathan N, et al. Anti-inflammatory modalities: their current use in pediatric cardiac surgery in the United Kingdom and Ireland. Pediatr Crit Care Med. ; 2009;10:341–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Green ML, Koch J. Adrenocortical function in the postoperative pediatric cardiac surgical patient. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2012;24:285–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Amanullah MM, Hamid M, Hanif HM, et al. Effect of steroids on inflammatory markers and clinical parameters in congenital open heart surgery: a randomised controlled trial. Cardiol Young. . 2016;26:506–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Bronicki RA, Backer CL, Baden HP, Mavroudis C, Crawford SE, Green TP. Dexamethasone reduces the inflammatory response to cardiopulmonary bypass in children. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000;69:1490–5.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Varan B, Tokel K, Mercan S, Dönmez A, Aslamaci S. Systemic Inflammatory Response Related to Cardiopulmonary Bypass and Its Modification by Methyl Prednisolone: High Dose Versus Low Dose. Pediatr Cardiol. 2002;23:437–41.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Lindberg L, Forsell C, Jogi P, Olsson AK. Effects of dexamethasone on clinical course, C-reactive protein, S100B protein and von Willebrand factor antigen after paediatric cardiac surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2003;90:728–32.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Heying R, Wehage E, Schumacher K, et al. Dexamethasone pretreatment provides antiinflammatory and myocardial protection in neonatal arterial switch operation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012;93:869–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Schroeder VA, Pearl JM, Schwartz SM, Shanley TP, Manning PB, Nelson DP. Combined Steroid Treatment for Congenital Heart Surgery Improves Oxygen Delivery and Reduces Postbypass Inflammatory Mediator Expression. Circulation. 2003;107:2823–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Keski-Nisula J, Pesonen E, Olkkola KT, et al. Methylprednisolone in Neonatal Cardiac Surgery: Reduced Inflammation Without Improved Clinical Outcome. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013;95:2126–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Bocsi J, Hänzka M-C, Osmancik P, et al. Modulation of the cellular and humoral immune response to pediatric open heart surgery by methylprednisolone. Cytom Part B. 2011;80B:212–20.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Gessler P, Hohl V, Carrel T, et al. Administration of steroids in pediatric cardiac surgery: impact on clinical outcome and systemic inflammatory response. Pediatr Cardiol. 2005;26:595–600.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Jaffer U, Wade RG, Gourlay T. Cytokines in the systemic inflammatory response syndrome: a review. HSR Proc Intensive Care Cardiovasc Anesth. 2010;2:161–75.

  17. 17.

    Checchia PA, Bronicki RA, Costello JM, Nelson DP. Steroid use before pediatric cardiac operations using cardiopulmonary bypass: an international survey of 36 centers. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2005;6:441–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Huber JN, Hilkin BM, Hook JS, et al. Neutrophil Phenotype Correlates With Postoperative Inflammatory Outcomes in Infants Undergoing Cardiopulmonary Bypass. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2017;18:1145–1152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Toledo-Pereyra LH, Lin CY, Kundler H, Replogle RL. Steroids in heart surgery: a clinical double-blind and randomized study. Am Surg. 1980;46:155–60.

  20. 20.

    Checchia Pa, Backer CL, Bronicki RA, et al. Dexamethasone reduces postoperative troponin levels in children undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass. Crit Care Med. 2003;31:1742–5.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Ando M, Park IS, Wada N, Takahashi Y. Steroid Supplementation: A Legitimate Pharmacotherapy After Neonatal Open Heart Surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;80:1672–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Graham EM. Corticosteroid Therapy in Neonates Undergoing Cardiopulmonary Bypass [Internet]. Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01579513?term=steroid+neonates&rank=3

  23. 23.

    Graham EM, Atz AM, McHugh KE, et al. Preoperative steroid treatment does not improve markers of inflammation after cardiac surgery in neonates: Results from a randomized trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;147:902–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Keski-Nisula J, Suominen PK, Olkkola KT, et al. Effect of timing and route of methylprednisolone administration during pediatric cardiac surgical procedures. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2015;99:180–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Scrascia G, Rotunno C, Guida P, et al. Perioperative steroids administration in pediatric cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials*. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2014;15:435–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Robertson-Malt S, El Barbary M. Prophylactic steroids for paediatric open-heart surgery: a systematic review. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2008;6:391–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Fudulu D, Schadenberg A, Angelini G, Stoica S. Perioperative use of steroids in neonatal heart surgery: Evidence based practice or tradition? Ann Med Surg. 2016;9:67–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Whitlock RP, Devereaux PJ, Teoh KH, et al. Methylprednisolone in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass (SIRS): A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2015;386:1243–53.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Pasquali SK, Hall M, Li JS, et al. Corticosteroids and outcome in children undergoing congenital heart surgery: analysis of the Pediatric Health Information Systems database. Circulation. 2010;122:2123–30.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Pasquali SK, Li JS, He X, et al. Perioperative Methylprednisolone and Outcome in Neonates Undergoing Heart Surgery. Pediatrics. 2012];129:e385–91.

  31. 31.

    Dreher M, Glatz AC, Kennedy A, Rosenthal T, Gaynor JW. A Single-Center Analysis of Methylprednisolone Use during Pediatric Cardiopulmonary Bypass. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2015;47:155–9.

  32. 32.

    Elhoff JJ, Chowdhury SM, Zyblewski SC, Atz AM, Bradley SM, Graham EM. Intraoperative Steroid Use and Outcomes Following the Norwood Procedure: An Analysis of the Pediatric Heart Network’s Public Database. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2016;17:30–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Waljee AK, Rogers MAM, Lin P, et al. Short term use of oral corticosteroids and related harms among adults in the United States: population based cohort study. BMJ. 2017;357:j1415.

  34. 34.

    Yeh TF, Lin YJ, Lin HC, et al. Outcomes at School Age after Postnatal Dexamethasone Therapy for Lung Disease of Prematurity. N Engl J Med. 2004 ;350:1304–13.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Shinwell ES, Karplus M, Reich D, et al. Early postnatal dexamethasone treatment and increased incidence of cerebral palsy. Arch Dis Child. Fetal Neonatal. 2000;83:177F-81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Boonen E, Bornstein SR, Van den Berghe G. New insights into the controversy of adrenal function during critical illness. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. [Internet]. Elsevier Ltd; 2015;3:805–15.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Annane D, Sébille V, Troché G, Raphaël JC, Gajdos P, Bellissant E. A 3-Level Prognostic Classification in Septic Shock Based on Cortisol Levels and Cortisol Response to Corticotropin. JAMA.. 2000;283:1038-45.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    The Nobel Assembly at Karolinska Institutet. The Nobel Assembly at Karolinska Institutet has today decided to award the 2017 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine jointly to Jeffrey C . Hall , Michael Rosbash and Michael W . Young for their discoveries of molecular mechanisms controlling the circadian. 2017.

  39. 39.

    Spiga F, Walker JJ, Terry JR, Lightman SL. HPA axis-rhythms. Compr. Physiol. 2014;4:1273–98.

  40. 40.

    Gibbison B, Angelini GD, Lightman SL. Dynamic output and control of the hypothalamic-pituitaryadrenal axis in critical illness and major surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2013;111:347–60.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Kucera V, Hampl R, Stárka L. Corticoids during hypothermic open-heart operations in children. Horm. Metab. Res. [Internet]. Germany; 1986;18:577–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Anand KJ, Hansen DD, Hickey PR. Hormonal-metabolic stress responses in neonates undergoing cardiac surgery. Anesthesiology. 1990;73:661–70.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Gajarski RJ, Stefanelli CB, Graziano JN, Kaciroti N, Charpie JR, Vazquez D. Adrenocortical response in infants undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass and circulatory arrest. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2010;11:44–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Garcia X, Bhutta AT, Dyamenahalli U, Imamura M, Jaquiss RDB, Prodhan P. Adrenal insufficiency in hemodynamically unstable neonates after open-heart surgery. Congenit. Heart Dis. 2010;5:422–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Wald EL, Preze E, Eickhoff JC, Backer CL. The effect of cardiopulmonary bypass on the hypothalamicpituitary- adrenal axis in children. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2011;12:190–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Verweij EJ, Hogenbirk K, Roest AAW, van Brempt R, Hazekamp MG, de Jonge E. Serum cortisol concentration with exploratory cut-off values do not predict the effects of hydrocortisone administration in children with low cardiac output after cardiac surgery. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2012;15:685–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Schiller O, Dagan O, Birk E, et al. Adrenal insufficiency in children undergoing heart surgery does not correlate with more complex postoperative course. Pediatr Cardiol. 2013;34:1860–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Crow SS, Oliver WCJr, Kiefer JA, et al. Dexamethasone levels predict cortisol response after infant cardiopulmonary bypass. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;147:475–81.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Bangalore H, Ocampo EC, Rodriguez LM, et al. Serum cortisol and early postoperative outcome after stage-1 palliation for hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2014;15:211–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Crawford JH, Hull MS, Borasino S, et al. Adrenal insufficiency in neonates after cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. Paediatr Anaesth. ; 2017;27:77–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Maeda T, Takeuchi M, Tachibana K, Nishida T, Kagisaki K, Imanaka H. Steroids Improve Hemodynamics in Infants With Adrenal Insufficiency After Cardiac Surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2016;30:936–41.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Graham EM, Bradley SM. First nights, the adrenal axis, and steroids . J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017;153: 1164–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Ryken TC, McDermott M, Robinson PD, et al. The role of steroids in the management of brain metastases: A systematic review and evidence-based clinical practice guideline. J Neurooncol. 2010;96:103–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Baigent C, Bracken M, Chadwick D, et al. Final results of MRC CRASH, a randomised placebocontrolled trial of intravenous corticosteroid in adults with head injury - outcomes at 6 months. Lancet. 2005;365:1957–9.

  55. 55.

    Muzha I, Filipi N, Lede R, et al. Effect of intravenous corticosteroids on death within 14 days in 10008 adults with clinically significant head injury (MRC CRASH trial): Randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2004;364:1321–8.

  56. 56.

    Schmitt KRL, Kern C, Berger F, Ullrich O, Hendrix S, Abdul-Khaliq H. Methylprednisolone attenuates hypothermia- and rewarming-induced cytotoxicity and IL-6 release in isolated primary astrocytes, neurons and BV-2 microglia cells. Neurosci Lett. 2006;404:309–14.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Schubert S, Stoltenburg-Didinger G, Wehsack A, et al. Large-Dose Pretreatment with Methylprednisolone Fails to Attenuate Neuronal Injury After Deep Hypothermic Circulatory Arrest in a Neonatal Piglet Model. Anesth Analg.2005;101:1311–8. 60. Langley SM, Chai PJ, Jaggers JJ, Ungerleider RM. Preoperative high dose methylprednisolone attenuates the cerebral response to deep hypothermic circulatory arrest. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. ; 2000;17:279–86.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Langley SM, Chai PJ, Jaggers JJ, Ungerleider RM. Preoperative high dose methylprednisolone attenuates the cerebral response to deep hypothermic circulatory arrest. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. ; 2000;17:279–86.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The study was supported by the British Heart Foundation and the NIHR Bristol Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Centre.

Funding

The study was supported by the British Heart Foundation and the NIHR Bristol Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Centre.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel Fudulu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Not required.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fudulu, D., Lightman, S., Caputo, M. et al. Steroids in paediatric heart surgery: eminence or evidence-based practice?. Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 34, 483–487 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12055-018-0670-y

Download citation

Keywords

  • Steroids
  • Clinical outcomes
  • Relative adrenal insufficiency