Abstract
This paper presents the technical, environmental, and economic evaluation of integrating various combinations of renewable energy sources-based systems in the expansion of a district heating and cooling network of a Technology Park near Barcelona in Spain. At present, a combined heat and power plant running on fossil fuels serves the heating, cooling, and electricity demand of the Park. However, this energy demand is expected to increase substantially in the coming years. EnergyPRO software was used to model the energy demand growth till 2030. Validation of the software application was done by making a base model using real plant data from the year 2014. The software was then used to project the energy supply based on three 15-year scenarios, having different combinations of renewable energy technologies, from 2016 until 2030. Primary energy consumption, CO2 emissions, and the net present value obtained in each scenario were used to decide the best combinations of renewable energy sources. The results of the study showed that presently, biomass boilers combined with absorption chillers and supported with solar thermal cooling are the most competitive technologies in comparison to ground source heat pumps for large DHC networks. This is mainly because of the lower primary energy consumption (624,380 MWh/year in 2030 vs. 665,367 MWh/year), higher net present value (NPV) (222 million € vs. 178 million €), and lower CO2 emissions (107,753 tons/year in 2030 vs. 111,166 tons/year) obtained as a result of the simulations.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- ηel :
-
Electrical efficiency (%)
- ηth :
-
Thermal efficiency (%)
- c:
-
Cooling
- h:
-
Heating
- th:
-
Thermal
- el:
-
Electric
- BAU:
-
Business as usual
- CAPEX:
-
Capital expenditure
- CHP:
-
Combined heat and power
- CO2 :
-
Carbon dioxide
- COP:
-
Coefficient of performance
- DH:
-
District heating
- DHC:
-
District heating and cooling
- EBITDA:
-
Earnings before interests, taxes depreciation, and amortization
- EU:
-
European Union
- GHG:
-
Greenhouse gas
- GSHPs:
-
Ground source heat pumps
- IT:
-
Information technology
- KPIs:
-
Key performance indicators
- NZEBs:
-
Net zero energy buildings
- P & L:
-
Profit and loss
- PEF:
-
Primary energy factor
- PTCs:
-
Parabolic trough collectors
- RES:
-
Renewable energy sources
- SCBC:
-
Solar cooling and biomass cooling
- TES:
-
Thermal energy storage
References
Ajuntament de Barcelona (2002). “Pla de Millora Energética de Barcelona”, Barcelona.
Angrisani, G., Diglio, G., Sasso, M., Calise, F., & Dentice d’Accadia, M. (2016). Design of a novel geothermal heating and cooling system: energy and economic analysis. Energy Conversion and Management, 108, 144–159.
Arslan, O., & Kose, R. (2010). Exergoeconomic optimization of integrated geothermal system in Simav, Kutahya. Energy Conversion and Management, 51(4), 663–676.
Baghernejad, A., Yaghoubi, M., & Jafarpur, K. (2016). Exergoeconomic optimization and environmental analysis of a novel solar-trigeneration system for heating, cooling and power production purpose. Solar Energy, 134, 165–179.
Boissavy, C. (2015). “Cost and return on investment for geothermal heat pump systems in France”, no. April, pp. 19–25.
Buoro, D., Pinamonti, P., & Reini, M. (2014). Optimization of a distributed cogeneration system with solar district heating. Applied Energy, 124, 298–308.
Dagdougui, H., Minciardi, R., Ouammi, A., Robba, M., & Sacile, R. (2012). Modeling and optimization of a hybrid system for the energy supply of a green building. Energy Conversion and Management, 64, 351–363.
Dapena, C. (2016). “Consorci Urbanístic del Centre Direccional de Cerdanyola del Vallès ,Parc de l’Alba (personal communication)”.
De Carli, M., Galgaro, A., Pasqualetto, M., & Zarrella, A. (2014). Energetic and economic aspects of a heating and cooling district in a mild climate based on closed loop ground source heat pump. Applied Thermal Engineering, 71(2), 895–904.
E. y T. Ministerio de Industria (2014). “Factores de emisión de CO2 y coeficientes de paso a energía primaria de diferentes fuentes de energía final consumidas en el sector de edificios en España (in Spanish)”.
EMD International A/S (1998). “EnergyPRO”.
European Central Bank (2010). “Monetary policy”.
European Commission (2014a). “Buildings - European commission,” Energy.
European Commission (2014b). “Energy requirements for IT equipment - Renewit : Renewit”.
European Commission (2015). “EUR-Lex - 32012 L0027 - EN - EUR-Lex”.
European Commission (2017). “2030 climate & energy framework _ climate action”.
FuturENERGY (2016). “Hospital de Mollet, energy efficiency and sustainability - FuturEnergy”.
Gunn, J. S., Ganz, D. J., & Keeton, W. S. (2012). Biogenic vs. geologic carbon emissions and forest biomass energy production. GCB Bioenergy, 4(3), 239–242.
Hakkaki-Fard, A., Eslami-Nejad, P., Aidoun, Z., & Ouzzane, M. (2015). A techno-economic comparison of a direct expansion ground-source and an air-source heat pump system in Canadian cold climates. Energy, 87, 49–59.
Institut Català d’Energia (ICAEN) (2010). “Guia de desenvolupament de projectes de xarxes de Districte de Calor i Frio”.
International Energy Agency (IEA) (2014). “Technology roadmap - solar photovoltaic energy”.
International Energy Agency (IEA) (2015). Energy policies of IEA countries - Spain 2015 Review.
Kazagic, A., Merzic, A., Redzic, E., & Tresnjo, D. (2019). Optimization of modular district heating solution based on CHP and RES - demonstration case of the municipality of Visoko. Energy, 181, 56–65.
Keçebaş, A., & Hepbasli, A. (2014). Conventional and advanced exergoeconomic analyses of geothermal district heating systems. Energy and Buildings, 69, 434–441.
LOGSTOR (2019). “Calculator for insulation on LOGSTOR pipes.” [Online]. Available: https://www.logstor.com/service-support/tools/logstor-calculator. [Accessed: 09-Jun-2019].
Lund, H., Šiupšinskas, G., & Martinaitis, V. (2005). Implementation strategy for small CHP-plants in a competitive market: the case of Lithuania. Applied Energy, 82(3), 214–227.
Martínez, M. E. and Martín-gómez, C. (2013). “Reasons why district energy systems were not extended in Spain”, in 39th World Congress on Housing Science Changing Needs, Adaptive Buildings, Smart Cities. Politecnico di Milano, Italy.
Nielsen, S., & Möller, B. (2012). Excess heat production of future net zero energy buildings within district heating areas in Denmark. Energy, 48(1), 23–31.
Østergaard, P. A. (2012). Comparing electricity, heat and biogas storages’ impacts on renewable energy integration. Energy, 37(1), 255–262.
Rämä, M., & Wahlroos, M. (2018). Introduction of new decentralised renewable heat supply in an existing district heating system. Energy, 154, 68–79.
Rammsy, A. (2016). “Absolicon solar collectors AB (personal communication, 2016)”. Stockholm.
Ross, S., Westerfield, R., & Jordan, B. (2014). Fundamentals of Corporate Finance, 11th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Schmidt, T. and Miedaner, O. (2012). “Solar district heating guidelines - Storage,” Solar district heating guidelines.
Shirazi, A., Taylor, R. A., White, S. D., & Morrison, G. L. (2016). A systematic parametric study and feasibility assessment absorption chillers for heating and cooling applications. Energy Conversion and Management, 114, 258–277.
Soltero, V.M. (2016). “Evaluation of the potential for district heating cogeneration in Spain as a tool for economy decarbonization,” pp. 1–21.
Spain: electricity prices for households (2010–2018). | Statistic. [Online]. Available: https://www.statista.com/statistics/418085/electricity-prices-for-households-in-spain/. [Accessed: 08-Jun-2019].
Streckiene, G., Martinaitis, V., Andersen, A. N., and Katz, J. (2009). “Feasibility of CHP-plants with thermal stores in the German spot market,” vol. 86, pp. 2308–2316.
Tan, M. and Keçebas, A. (2014). “Thermodynamic and economic evaluations of a geothermal district heating system using advanced exergy-based methods,” vol. 77, pp. 504–513.
Torchio, M. F. (2015). Comparison of district heating CHP and distributed generation CHP with energy, environmental and economic criteria for Northern Italy. Energy Conversion and Management, 92, 114–128.
Ulseth, R. and Pedersen, L. (2006). “Method for load modelling of heat and electricity demand”, in 10th International Symposium on District Heating and Cooling, no. September.
Wang, H., Yin, W., Abdollahi, E., Lahdelma, R., & Jiao, W. (2015). Modelling and optimization of CHP based district heating system with renewable energy production and energy storage. Applied Energy, 159, 401–421.
Acknowledgment
The paper has been written in the framework of the Smart ReFlex project (Smart and Flexible 100% Renewable District Heating and Cooling Systems for European Cities), co-funded by the Intelligent Energy Europe Programme of the European Union by means of Grant Agreement number IEE/13/434/SI2.674873. As a consequence, the EnergyPRO software, which is sponsored by EMD International A/S for SMARTREFLEX, has been used to develop energy calculations. Carlos Dapena, Project Manager from Consorci Urbanístic del Centre Direccional de Cerdanyola del Vallès (Parc de l’ Alba), and José Antonio Gómez, General Manager of ST4 Plant in Parc de l’Alba from Grupo San José, have contributed providing data about real performance and future development planning of DHC in Parc de l’Alba.
The authors are thus thankful to all the aforementioned entities and persons who have contributed indirectly to the writing of this paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix
Appendix
For the ST-4 plant at Parc de l’ Alba, revenues from heating, cooling and electricity sales comprise of capacity payments and a variable price. Additionally, heating and cooling sale revenues comprise of a connection payment. The connection costs are paid just once whenever a new consumer in Parc de l’ Alba signs an agreement to buy heating and cooling from the plant. The capacity payment refers to payment made every year by the consumer in accordance with the power they have contracted from the plant. Finally, the variable price is payment made by the consumer for each unit of energy purchased.
Table 19 and Table 20 show details of all these revenues for the year 2015.
All expenses of the plant are shown in Table 21 and Table 22 for 2015. Note that Parc de l’ Alba pays only the marginal electricity production cost when it buys from the electric grid and hence the large difference between the revenue it earns per unit energy by selling to the grid, compared to what it pays per unit when it needs to purchase from the grid.
Fuel prices provided to the EnergyPRO models from 2016 to 2030 are shown in Table 23 (Dapena 2016).
The specifications of different categories of energy consumers at Parc de l’ Alba, including current and future ones, are shown in Table 24 , including the year in which they will be connected to the DHC network.
EnergyPRO does not have the capability to dimension the distribution network because the return and supply temperatures of the fluids in the network cannot be input to the simulation models. For this purpose, LOGSTOR calculator, which is an internet-based program, was used for calculating the heating and cooling line losses. The major information used for calculating the losses is shown in Table 25. Note that the various sections of the DHC network had varying pipe diameters.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Asim, M., Saleem, S., Imran, M. et al. Thermo-economic and environmental analysis of integrating renewable energy sources in a district heating and cooling network. Energy Efficiency 13, 79–100 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-019-09832-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-019-09832-9