Skip to main content
Log in

Experimental investigation of surface integrity after wire electro-discharge machining of Ti–6Al–4V

  • Published:
Sādhanā Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article presents the relationship of machining parameters containing pulse-on time (Ton), pulse-off time (Toff), peak current (IP) and servo voltage (SV) on surface integrity characteristics, including white layer thickness (WLT), heat-affected zone (HAZ) and surface crack density (SCD) and also on material removal rate (MRR), after wire electric discharge machining of Ti–6Al–4V. Taguchi’s method was utilized to design the experiments, and response surface methodology (RSM) was employed for developing the empirical models. Results indicated that Ton and IP played a significant role on surface integrity characteristics. In addition, the microstructure of selected machined samples was analysed using a field emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM) and energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX) analysis. Accuracy of models was examined using residual analysis and confirmation runs. Finally, multi-response optimization of process parameters was obtained using desirability approach. Results can be used to improve the quality of the machined workpiece significantly to fulfil the requirements of the various industries. The novelty of this research is mainly investigation and multi-response optimization of all the surface integrity characteristics at the same time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

T on :

Pulse-on time

T off :

Pulse-off time

IP:

Peak current

SV:

Servo voltage

WLT:

White layer thickness

HAZ:

Heat-affected zone

SCD:

Surface crack density

MRR:

Material removal rate

RSM:

Response surface methodology

FESEM:

Field emission scanning electron microscope

EDX:

Energy-dispersive X-ray

WEDM:

Wire electrical discharge machining

ANOVA:

Analysis of variance

References

  1. Rao P V and Pawar P J 2009 Modelling and optimization of process parameters of wire electrical discharge machining. Proc. IMechE Part B: J. Eng. Manuf. 223: 1431–1440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ho K H, Newman S T and Allen R D 2005 STEP-NC compliant information modelling for wire electrical discharge machining component. Proc. IMechE Part B: J. Eng. Manuf. 219: 777–784

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hsieh J F 2011 Modelling tool path in wire electric discharge machining using Denavit–Hartenberg notation. Proc. IMechE Part B: J. Eng. Manuf. 225: 1063–1072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sarkar S, Ghosh K, Mitra S and Bhattacharyya B 2010 An integrated approach to optimization of WEDM combining single-pass and multipass cutting operation. Mater. Manuf. Process. 25(8): 799–807

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ghodsiyeh D, Golshan A and Shirvanehdeh J A 2013 Review on current research trends in wire electrical discharge machining (WEDM). Indian J. Sci. Technol. 6(2): 154–168

    Google Scholar 

  6. Boyer H E and Gall T L 1985 Metals handbook. Metals Park, Ohio: ASM Int., pp. 9.1–9.12

  7. Donachie Jr. M J 2000 Titanium – a technical guide, 2nd ed. Ohio: ASM Int., pp. 318–323

    Google Scholar 

  8. Goswami A and Kumar J 2014 Investigation of surface integrity, material removal rate and wire wear ratio for WEDM of Nimonic 80A alloy using GRA and Taguchi method. Eng. Sci. Technol. Int. J. 17: 173–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Newton T R, Melkote S N, Watkins T R, Trejo R M and Reister L 2009 Investigation of the effect of process parameters on the formation and characteristics of recast layer in wire-EDM of Inconel 718. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 513–514: 208–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kumar A, Kumar V and Kumar J 2013 Multi-response optimization of process parameters based on response surface methodology for pure titanium using WEDM process. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 68(9–11): 2645–2668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kumar A, Kumar V and Kumar J 2014 Surface integrity and material transfer investigation of pure titanium for rough cut surface after wire electro discharge machining. Proc. IMechE Part B: J. Eng. Manuf. 228(8): 880–901

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kumar A, Kumar V and Kumar J 2013 Investigation of machining parameters and surface integrity in wire electric discharge machining of pure titanium. Proc. IMechE Part B: J. Eng. Manuf. 227(7): 972–992

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Puri A B and Bhattacharyya B 2005 Modeling and analysis of white layer depth in a wire-cut EDM process through response surface methodology. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 25: 301–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kumar A, Kumar V and Kumar J 2016 Surface crack density and recast layer thickness analysis in WEDM process through response surface methodology. Mach. Sci. Technol. Int. J. 20(2): 201–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Garg M P, Kumar A and Sahu C K 2017 Mathematical modeling and analysis of WEDM machining parameters of nickel-based super alloy using response surface methodology. Sadhana 42(6): 981–1005

    Google Scholar 

  16. Golshan A, Ghodsiyeh D and Izman S 2015 Multi-objective optimization of wire electrical discharge machining process using evolutionary computation method: effect of cutting variation. Proc. IMechE Part B: J. Eng. Manuf. 229(1): 75–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Padhee S, Nayak N, Panda S K, Dhal P R and Mahapatra S S 2012 Multi-objective parametric optimization of powder mixed electro-discharge machining using response surface methodology and non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm. Sadhana 37(2): 223–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Montgomery D C 2009 Design and analysis of experiments, 7th ed. Singapore: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 207–264

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lee H T and Tai T Y 2003 Relationship between EDM parameters and surface crack formation. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 142: 676–683

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Noordin M Y, Venkatesh V C, Sharif S, Elting S and Abdulla A 2004 Application of response surface methodology in describing the performance of coated carbide tools when turning AISI 1045 steel. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 145: 46–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Routara B, Bandyopadhyay A and Sahoo P 2009 Roughness modeling and optimization in CNC end milling using response surface method: effect of workpiece material variation. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 40: 1166–1180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sarkar S, Mitra S and Bhattacharyya B 2005 Parametric analysis and optimization of wire electrical discharge machining of γ-titanium aluminide alloy. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 159: 286–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kanlayasiri K and Boonmung S 2007 Effects of wire-EDM machining variables on surface roughness of newly developed DC 53 die steel: design of experiments and regression model. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 192–193: 459–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kanlayasiri K and Boonmung S 2007 An investigation on effects of wire-EDM machining parameters on surface roughness of newly developed DC53 die steel. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 187–188: 26–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lee S H and Li X P 2003 Study of the surface integrity of the machined workpiece in the EDM of tungsten carbide. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 139: 315–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hascalik A and Caydas U 2007 Electrical discharge machining of titanium alloy (Ti–6Al–4V). Appl. Surf. Sci. 253: 9007–9016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ghodsiyeh D, Golshan A and Izman S 2014 Multi-objective process optimization of wire electrical discharge machining based on response surface methodology. J. Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. 36(2): 301–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Sadeghi M, Razavi H, Esmaeilzadeh A and Kolahan F 2011 Optimization of cutting conditions in WEDM process using regression modelling and Tabu-search algorithm. Proc. IMechE Part B: J. Eng. Manuf. 225: 1825–1834

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Tosun N and Cogun C 2003 Analysis of wire erosion and workpiece surface roughness in wire electrical discharge machining. Proc. IMechE Part B: J. Eng. Manuf. 217: 633–642

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Tzeng C J, Yang Y K, Hsieh M H and Jeng M C 2011 Optimization of wire electrical discharge machining of pure tungsten using neural network and response surface methodology. Proc. IMechE Part B: J. Eng. Manuf. 225: 841–852

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Jia Y, Kim B S, Hu D J and Ni J 2010 Parametric study on near dry wire electro discharge machining of polycrystalline diamond-coated tungsten carbide material. Proc. IMechE Part B: J. Eng. Manuf. 224: 185–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Hascalik A and Caydas U 2004 Experimental study of wire electrical discharge machining of AISI D5 tool steel. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 148: 362–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Danial Ghodsiyeh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ghodsiyeh, D., Akbarzadeh, S., Izman, S. et al. Experimental investigation of surface integrity after wire electro-discharge machining of Ti–6Al–4V. Sādhanā 44, 196 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-019-1184-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-019-1184-z

Keywords

Navigation