Abstract
The study has focused on the role of working fluids (air, water and FC-72) on the cooling of discrete heated modules under free, forced and mixed convection medium. Three non-identical protruding discrete heat sources are arranged at different positions on a substrate board following golden mean ratio (GMR). Numerical simulations for these heat sources are carried out using a commercial software (ANSYS-Icepak R-15) to simulate their flow and temperature fields under three different modes of heat transfer. Results suggest that the temperature of the heat sources is a strong function of their size, position on the substrate board, the velocity of the fluid and type of working fluid used. A correlation has been proposed for the temperature of these heat sources keeping in mind their strong dependence on the afore-mentioned parameters. It has been found that water can be used for better heat removal from the heat sources due to its high boiling point. The whole idea gives a clear insight to the electronic cooling engineers regarding the selection of working fluids and modes of heat transfer for the cooling of electronic components.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Peterson G P and Ortega A 1990 Thermal control of electronic equipment and devices. Adv. Heat Transf. 20: 181–314
Reynell M 1990 Major causes for failure of electronic components. U.S. Air Force Avionics Integrity Program
Lasance C J and Simons R E 2005 Advances in high-performance cooling for electronics. Electron. Cool. Mag. 11: 22–39
Overholt M R, McCandless A, Kelly K W, Becnel C and Motakef S 2005 Micro-jet arrays for cooling of electronic equipment. In: Proceedings of the 3rd ASME International Conference on Micro-channels and Mini-channels, pp. 249–252
Mahaney H V, Incropera F P and Ramadhyani S 2007 Measurement of mixed-convection heat transfer from an array of discrete sources in a horizontal rectangular channel with and without surface augmentation. Exp. Heat Transf. 3: 215–237
Hotta T K, Muvvala P and Venkateshan S P 2013 Effect of surface radiation heat transfer on the optimal distribution of discrete heat sources under natural convection. Heat Mass Transf. 49: 207–217
Fabbri M and Dhir V K 2005 Optimized heat transfer for high power electronic cooling using arrays of the microjet. ASME J. Heat Transf. 127: 760–769
Wang D, Yu E and Pezekwas A 1990 A computational study of two-phase jet impingement cooling of an electronic chip. In: Proceedings of the 15th Annual IEEE Semiconductor Thermal Measurement and Management Symposium, pp. 10–15
Baker E 1972 Liquid cooling of microelectronic devices by free and forced convection microelectronic and reliability. Microelectron. Reliab. 11: 213–222
Leena R, Renjith R V and Prakash M J 2015 Experimental and numerical investigations on steady and unsteady jet impingement cooling for high power electronics. IEEE Trans. Components, Packag. Manuf. Technol. 5: 636–640
Heindel T J, Ramadhyani S and Incropera F R 1995 Conjugate natural convection from an array of discrete heat sources part-I – two and three dimensional model validations. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 16: 501–510
Incropera F P, Kerby J S, Moffatt D F and Ramadhyani S 1986 Convective heat transfer from discrete heat sources in a rectangular channel. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 29: 1051–1058
Joshi Y, Wilson T and Hazard S J 1989 An experimental study of natural convection cooling of an array of heated protrusions in a vertical channel in water. ASME J. Electron. Packag. 111: 33–40
Sharma C S, Zimmermann S, Tiwari M K, Michel B and Poulikakos D 2012 Optimal thermal operation of liquid-cooled electronic chips. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 55: 1957–1969
Bhowmik H and Tou K W 2005 Study of transient forced convection heat transfer from discrete heat sources in an FC-72 cooled vertical channel. Int. J. Therm. Sci. 44: 499–505
Park K A and Bergles A E 1987 Natural convection heat transfer characteristics of simulated microelectronic chips. ASME J. Electron. Packag. 109: 90–96
Liu Y and Phan-Thien N 2000 An optimum spacing problem for three chips mounted on a vertical substrate in an enclosure. Numer. Heat Transf. Part A Appl. 37: 613–630
Roache P J 1994 Perspective: a method for uniform reporting of grid refinement studies. J. Fluid Eng. 116: 405–413
fluorinert-electronic-liquid-fc-72.pdf
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendices
Nomenclature
- g :
-
acceleration due to gravity, 9.81 m/\(\hbox {s}^{2}\)
- Gr :
-
Grashof number, \(\dfrac{g \beta \Delta T L^3}{\nu ^2}\)
- h :
-
heat transfer coefficient, W/\(\hbox {m}^{2}\hbox { K}\)
- k :
-
thermal conductivity, W/m K
- L :
-
length of the heat source, m
- q :
-
heat flux, W/\(\hbox {m}^{2}\)
- \(\textit{q}^*\) :
-
non-dimensional heat flux, \(\dfrac{\Delta T_{ref}}{T_{\infty }}\)
- Q :
-
heat supplied, W
- Re :
-
Reynolds number, \(\dfrac{V L}{\nu ^2}\)
- Ri :
-
Richardson number, \(\dfrac{Gr}{Re^2}\)
- T :
-
temperature, K
- V :
-
velocity of fluid, m/s
- \(\textit{V}^*\) :
-
non-dimensional velocity, \(\dfrac{V}{V_{max}}\)
Greek symbols
- \(\beta \) :
-
isobaric thermal expansion coefficient of fluid, \(\dfrac{1}{T_{mean}}\), \(\hbox {K}^{-1}\)
- \(\Delta T_{ref}\) :
-
reference temperature, \(\dfrac{q L}{k_f}\), K
- \(\nu \) :
-
kinematic viscosity of fluid, \(\hbox {m}^2\)/s
- \(\theta \) :
-
non-dimensional temperature, \(\dfrac{T_{max} - T_{\infty }}{\Delta T_{ref}}\)
Subscripts
- \(\infty \) :
-
ambient
- f:
-
fluid
- max:
-
maximum
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
PATIL, N.G., HOTTA, T.K. Role of working fluids on the cooling of discrete heated modules: a numerical approach. Sādhanā 43, 187 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-018-0950-7
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-018-0950-7