Skip to main content
Log in

On high-resolution manoeuvres control via trajectory optimization

  • Published:
Sādhanā Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This research is on a realization of control approach in line with the trajectory optimization for the purpose of dealing with overactuated spacecraft in the process of the high-resolution manoeuvres. The idea behind the research is to realize closed control loops to cope with the rotational angles and the corresponding angular rates, synchronously, to handle the spacecraft manoeuvres. It is to be noted that the traditional techniques may not have sufficient merit to deal with such a complicated process, suitably. The proposed trajectory optimization is designed to provide the three-axis referenced commands, in finite burn, for transferring the aforementioned overactuated spacecraft from the initial orbit to its final outcomes in the orbital transfer process. The outcomes are realized through the variations of the orbital parameters, including the inclination, the eccentricity, the angular momentum, the semi-major axis and so on, in the high-resolution manoeuvres. It aims to get the system under control to guarantee the performance of the three-dimensional rotational angles tracking to be desirable, instantly. The contribution of the research is to make the high-thrust optimization trajectory, which is organized in association with the new configuration of the three-axis attitude control approach, to be applicable to manage the present overactuated spacecraft in the procedure of high-resolution orbital transfer process. The investigated outcomes of the research are efficient and competitive along with the potential materials through a series of experiments, as long as the desirable tracking performance in the three-dimensional space manoeuvres is apparently guaranteed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Olds A D, Kluever C A and Cupples M L 2007 Interplanetary mission design using differential evolution. J. Spacecr. Rockets 44(5): 1060–1070

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Balkanyi L R and Spurlock O F 1993 DUKSUP—a high-thrust trajectory optimization code. NASA Lewis Research Center, Cleveland, OH

    Google Scholar 

  3. Yue X, Ma Y, Zhang X and Geng Z 2013 Trajectory optimization of continuous-thrust spacecraft round trip flights via pseudo spectral method. In: Proceedings of the 32nd Chinese control conference (CCC), 2240–2244

  4. Yam C H, Di Lorenzo D and Izzo D 2010 Constrained global optimization of low-thrust interplanetary trajectories. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC), 1–7

  5. Jiang X Y, Zhang H B and Tang G J 2013 A novel low-thrust trajectory optimization approach based on virtual gravitational body. In: Proceedings of the Chinese automation congress (CAC), 295–299

  6. Jiang X Y, Lian Y J, Zhang H B and Tang G J 2013 A multi-impulse extended method for low-thrust trajectory optimization. In: Proceedings of the international conference on recent advances in space technologies (RAST), 36–368

  7. Bando M and Yamakawa H 2010 Low-thrust trajectory optimization using second-order generating functions. In: Proceedings of the SICE annual conference, 804–810

  8. Dai R, Maximoff J and Mesbahi M 2013 Optimal trajectory generation for establishing connectivity in proximity networks. IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst. 49(3): 1968–1981

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Tian B, Fan W, Su R and Zong Q 2015 Real-time trajectory and attitude coordination control for reusable launch vehicle in reentry phase. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 62(3): 1639–1650

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Curtis H D 2010 Orbital mechanics for engineering students. Elsevier Aerospace Engineering Series, Butterworth-Heinemann, Burlington

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sidi M J 1997 Spacecraft dynamics and control: a practical engineering approach. Aircraft Industries Ltd. and Aviv University, Cambridge Aerospace Series 7. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

  12. He S, Wang W, Lin D and Lei H 2016 Robust output feedback control design for autonomous spacecraft rendezvous with actuator faults. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. I: J. Syst. Control Eng. 230(6): 578–587

    Google Scholar 

  13. Huang X, Yan Y, Zhou Y and Xu H 2015 Output feedback sliding mode control of Lorentz-augmented spacecraft hovering using neural networks. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. I: J. Syst. Control Eng. 229(10): 939–948

    Google Scholar 

  14. Song Z, Li H and Sun K 2014 Finite-time control for nonlinear spacecraft attitude based on terminal sliding mode technique. ISA Trans. 53(1): 117–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lu K and Xia Y 2013 Adaptive attitude tracking control for rigid spacecraft with finite-time convergence. Automatica 49(12): 3591–3599

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Yang Y 2012 Spacecraft attitude determination and control: quaternion based PDLQR method. Annu. Rev. Control 36(2): 198–219

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Mazinan A H, Pasand M and Soltani B 2015 Full quaternion based finite-time cascade attitude control approach via pulse modulation synthesis for a spacecraft. ISA Trans. 58: 567–585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Zou A M and Kumar K D 2011 Adaptive fuzzy fault-tolerant attitude control of spacecraft. Control Eng. Pract. 19(1): 10–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hu Q, Li B and Zhang Y 2013 Robust attitude control design for spacecraft under assigned velocity and control constraints. ISA Trans. 52(4): 480–493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Cai H and Huang J 2014 The leader-following attitude control of multiple rigid spacecraft systems. Automatica 50(4): 1109–1115

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Kuo Y L and Wu T L 2012 Open-loop and closed-loop attitude dynamics and controls of miniature spacecraft using pseudo wheels. Comput. Math. Appl. 64(5): 1282–1290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhang X, Liu X and Zhu Q 2014 Attitude control of rigid spacecraft with disturbance generated by time varying exo-systems. Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 19(7): 2423–2434

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to express the best and the warmest regards to the respected editors of Sadhana and Springer Publisher as well as the respected anonymous reviewers, for suggesting their impressive, constructive, desirable and technical comments on the present investigation. Moreover, Dr. Mazinan sincerely appreciates the Islamic Azad University (IAU), South Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran, which played a significant role in the process of paper investigation and organization. Maryam Aghaei Sarchali, Miss Mohadeseh Mazinan and also Mr. Mohammad Mazinan in the same area are greatly appreciated.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A H Mazinan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mazinan, A.H., Shahi, M. On high-resolution manoeuvres control via trajectory optimization. Sādhanā 42, 245–255 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-017-0599-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-017-0599-7

Keywords

Navigation