Abstract
The gene as the solution to the debate over the level at which natural selection acts has often been termed as too reductionist, but is this a valid criticism? Exploring this question in the context of nonlinearity illuminates not only the debate over the unit of natural selection but also the broader debate on reductionism versus holism in science.
Similar content being viewed by others
Suggested Reading
John Brockman (ed.) The Third Culture: Beyond the Scientific Revolution (online edition at http://www.edge.org/documents/ThirdCulture/d-Contents.html)
B Rosemary Grant and Peter R Grant, What Darwin’s Finches Can Teach Us about the Evolutionary Origin and Regulation of Biodiversity, Bioscience, Vol. 53, No.10, pp.965–975, 2003.
Richard Dawkins, The Extended Phenotype, Oxford University Press, 1982.
James Gleick, Chaos: Making a New Science, Abacus, 1993.
Richard Dawkins, The Selfish Gene, Oxford University Press, 1976.
Fritjof Capra, The Web of Life, Flamingo, 1997.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Ambika Kamath is a third year undergraduate student at Amherst College, USA, majoring in biology. She is interested in understanding how evolutionary forces shape organisms, their behaviour, and their interactions with other organisms. She is currently studying the biogeography and evolution of gender dimorphism in the plant genus Lycium (Solanaceae).
An erratum to this article is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12045-009-0118-1.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Karanth, A. What is the unit of natural selection?. Reson 14, 1047–1059 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12045-009-0100-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12045-009-0100-y