Skip to main content
Log in

The influence of rare earth (RE) dopants on structural, optical and gas sensing properties of spray deposited PbO thin films, where RE = Ce, Nd and Eu

  • Published:
Pramana Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the present work, rare earth (RE)-doped PbO thin films are characterised for their structural, morphological, electrical, optical and gas sensing properties. Thin films of PbO and Ce-, Nd- and Eu-doped PbO are deposited on a glass substrate using ultrasonic spray pyrolysis technique. We have considered 1, 5 and 10 mol% concentration of RE elements in PbO. X-ray diffraction patterns confirmed the formation of polycrystalline PbO and RE-doped PbO thin films with tetragonal structure. Scanning electron micrographs and optical absorption spectra of RE-doped PbO thin films revealed the decrease in average particle size and band gap with an increase in RE dopant concentration in PbO. The band gap of undoped PbO thin film is 2.58 eV. The concentration-dependent variations in the band gap of RE:PbO thin film are observed. The band gap of RE:PbO varies from 1.75 to 3.05 eV. At room temperature, the RE:PbO systems are found to be highly sensitive towards a wide concentration range (333 to 3330 ppm) of \(\hbox {CO}_2\) compared to the undoped PbO film. Ce- and Nd-doped PbO thin films show enhanced sensitivity towards \(\hbox {CO}_{{2}}\) gas compared to Eu-doped PbO thin films. At room temperature, significant increase in the gas sensor response of doped samples have been corroborated to their increased surface area, morphological changes and oxygen vacancies present.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J K H Orbeck and R J Hamers, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 38, 021001 (2020)

  2. M Martos, J Morales, L Sanchez, R Ayouchi, D Leinen, F Martin and J Barrado, Electrochim. Acta 46, 2939 (2001)

  3. E Alnabi and F Hashim, TEST Eng. Manag. 83, 22026 (2020)

  4. S K Pasha, K Chidambaram, L J Kennedy and J J Vijaya, Sensor. Trans. J. 122, 113 (2010)

  5. S Aze, J-M Vallet, V Detallem, O Grauby and A Baronnet, Phase Transit. 81, 145 (2008)

  6. B Jaffe, R Roth and S Marzullo, J. Res. Natl Bur. Stand. 55, 239 (1955)

  7. W H Dumbaugh and J C Lapp, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 75, 2315 (1992)

  8. A V Borhade, D R Tope and B K Uphade, E-J. Chem. 9, 705 (2012)

  9. F Hashim and A Mohaimeed, Al-Quadisiyah J. Pure Sci. 23, 175 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  10. S Venkaratraj, J Geurts, H Weis, O Kappertz, W Njoroge, R Jayavel and M Wuttig, J. Vac. Sci. Tech. A Vacc. Surf. Films. 19, 2870 (2001)

  11. M Suganya, V Narasimman, J Srivind, V Nagarethinam, K Usharani and A Balu, J. Elect. Devices 15, 1842 (2015)

  12. M Liao, S Takemoto, Z Xiao, Y Toda, T Tada, S Ueda, T Kamiya and H Hosono, J. Appl. Phys. 119, 165701-1 (2016)

  13. Y Kalandaragh, J. Semicond. Technol. Sci. 18, 91 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. A Aliakbari, E Najafi, M Amini and S Ng, Monatsh. Chem. 145, 1277 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. G Joshi, S Pasha and K Chindambaram, Compos. Interface. 20, 331 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. V Suryawanshi, A Varpe and M Deshpande, Thin Solid Films 645, 87 (2018)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. M Mythili and K Arulmozhi, J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 25, 3984 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. D Daksh and Y Agrawal, Rev. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 5, 1 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. P Sakthivel, S Asaithambi, G Karuppaiah, S Sheikfareed, R G Yuvakkumar and G Ravi, J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 30, 9999 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. W Guan, N Tang, K He, X Hu, M Li and K Li, Front. Chem. 8, 76 (2020)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. G Xi, Y Peng, L Xu, M Zhang, W Yu and Y Qian, Inorg. Chem. Commun. 7, 607 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Y-F Sun, S-B Liu, F-L Meng, J-Y Liu, Z Jin, L-T Kong and J-H Liu, Sensors 12, 2610 (2012)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. S Mahajan and S Jagtap, Appl. Mater. Today 18, 1 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  24. C Wang, L Yin, L Zhang, D Xiang and R Guo, Sensors 10, 2088 (2010)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. A Mirzaei, H W Kim, S S Kim and G Neri, Chemsensors 7, 56 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. M Y Rezk, J Sharma and M R Gartia, Nanomater. 10, 2251 (2020)

  27. C Willa, A Schmid, D Briand, J Yuan and D Koziej, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9, 25553 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. National Research Council (NRC), Natl Acad. Press 5, 112 (2008)

  29. K Azuma, N Kagi, U Yanagi and H Osawa, Env. Int. 121, 51 (2018)

  30. G S Thool, A K Singh, R S Singh, A Gupta and M A B H Susan, J. Saudi Chem. Soc. 18, 712 (2014)

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support by the BCUD, Pune. Authors are thankful S. P. Pune University, Pune and Department of Physics, Kavayitri Bahinabai Chaudhari North Maharashtra University, Jalgaon for providing characterisation facilities.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Suryawanshi, V.N., Varpe, A.S. & DESHPANDE, M.D. The influence of rare earth (RE) dopants on structural, optical and gas sensing properties of spray deposited PbO thin films, where RE = Ce, Nd and Eu. Pramana - J Phys 96, 38 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12043-021-02280-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12043-021-02280-0

Keywords

PACS

Navigation