Abstract
A phase-space formulation of quantum mechanics is proposed by constructing two representations (identified as pq and qp) in terms of the Glauber coherent states, in which phase-space wave functions (probability amplitudes) play the central role, and position q and momentum p are treated on equal footing. After finding some basic properties of the pq and qp wave functions, the quantum operators in phase-space are represented by differential operators, and the Schrödinger equation is formulated in both pictures. Afterwards, the method is generalized to work with the density operator by converting the quantum Liouville equation into pq and qp equations of motion for two-point functions in phase-space. A coordinate transformation between those points allows one to construct a cell in phase-space, whose central point can be treated as a parameter. In this way, one gets equations of motion describing the evolution of one-point functions in phase-space. Finally, it is shown that some quantities obtained in this paper are related in a natural way with cross-Wigner functions, which are constructed with either the position or the momentum wave functions.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
D F Styer, M S Balkin, K M Becker, M R Burns, C E Dudley, S T Forth, J S Gaumer, M A Kramer, D C Oertel, L H Park, M T Rinkoski, C T Smith, and T D Wotherspoon, Am. J. Phys. 70(3), 288 (2002) http://dx.doi.org/10.1119/1.1445404
R J Glauber, Phys. Rev. 131(6), 2766 (1963) http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.131.2766
M Hillery, R F O’Connell, M O Scully, and E P Wigner, Phys. Rep. 106(3), 121 (1984) http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0370-1573(84)90160-1
Y S Kim and M E Noz, Phase space picture of quantum mechanics. Group theoretical approach, Lecture notes in physics (World Scientific, Singapore, 1991) Vol. 40
D Dragoman, Phys. Scr. 72(4), 290 (2005) http://dx.doi. org/10.1238/Physica.Regular.072a00290
C K Zachos, D B Fairlie and T L Curtright (Eds), Quantum mechanics in phase space. An overview with selected papers, World scientific series in 20th century physics (World Scientific Publishing Co., 2005) Vol. 34, http://www. worldscientific.com/worldscibooks/10.1142/5287
T L Curtright, D B Fairlie and C K Zachos, A concise treatise on quantum mechanics in phase space (World Scientific Publishing Co. and Imperial College Press, 2014), ISBN 978- 98114520430
W P Schleich, Quantum optics in phase space (Wiley-VCH Verlag Berlin, 2001), ISBN: 978-3-527-63500-9
K Husimi, Proceedings of the Physico-Mathematical Society of Japan, 3rd Series 22(4), 264 (1940) http://goo.gl/yDbV3c
K Takahashi, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 98, 109 (1989) http://dx.doi.org/10.1143/PTPS.98.109
D Campos, J D Urbina, and C Viviescas, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 33, 6129 (2000) http://iopscience.iop.org/0305-4470/33/35/304
V Bargmann, Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 14(3), 187 (1961) http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cpa.3160140303
G Torres-Vega and J H Frederick, J. Chem. Phys. 93(12), 8862 (1990)
G Torres-Vega and J H Frederick, J. Chem. Phys. 93(4), 3103 (1993)
J E Harriman, J. Chem. Phys. 100(5), 3651 (1994) http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.466353
K B Møller, T G Jørgensen, and G Torres-Vega, J. Chem. Phys. 106(17), 7228 (1997) http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.473684
J J Wlodarz, J. Chem. Phys. 100(10), 7476 (1994) http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.466891
Q -S Li and X -G Hu, Phys. Scr. 51(4), 417 (1995) http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0031-8949/51/4/001
M Ban, J. Math. Phys. 39(4), 1744 (1998) http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.532262
M A Gosson, J. Phys. A 38, 9263 (2005) http://stacks.iop.org/ 0305-4470/38/i=42/a=007
T B Smith, J. Phys. A 39(6), 1469 (2006) http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0305-4470/39/6/019
A J Bracken and P Watson, J. Phys. A 43(39), 395304 (2010) http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1751-8113/43/39/395304
W H Louisell, Quantum statistical properties of radiation (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1973), ISBN-10: 0471547859
W-M Zhang, D H Fen, and R Gilmore, Rev. Mod. Phys. 62(4), 867 (1990) http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.62.867
N Mukunda, Pramana – J. Phys. 56(2–3), 245 (2001) http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12043-001-0122-9
A D Ribeiro, F Parisio, and M A M de Aguiar, J. Phys. A 42(10), 105301 (2009) http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1751-8113/42/10/105301
K E Cahill and R J Glauber, Phys. Rev. 177(5), 1857 (1969) http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.177.1857
J G Kirkwood, Phys. Rev. 44(1), 31 (1933) http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.44.31
N L Balazs and B K Jennings, Phys. Rep. 104(6), 347 (1984) http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0370-1573(84)90151-0
H -W Lee, Phys. Rep. 259(3), 147 (1995) http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ 0370-1573(95)00007-4
B Tsirelson, Analytic function, Encyclopedia of Mathematics, http://goo. gl/Uc6iOZ
D Campos, Interconexíon entre las funciones de onda en representacíon de coordenadas, impulsos y estados coherentes (1996), http://www.bdigital.unal.edu.co/35028/1/35260-138008-1-PB.pdf
L C Papaloucas, Prog. Theor. Phys. 95(1), 37 (1995) http://Ptp.oxfordjournals.org/content/95/1/37.full.pdf
F Bopp, Werner Heisenberg und die Physik unserer Zeit (Vieweg + Teubner Verlag, 1961), chap.: Statistische Mechanik bei Störung des Zustands eines phyikalischen System durch die Beobachtung, pp. 128–149, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-05439-9
R Kubo, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn 19(11), 2127 (1964) http://doi.org/10. 1143/JPSJ.19.2127
M A de Gosson and S M Gosson, Phys. Lett. A 376(4), 293 (2012) http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2011.11.007
Acknowledgements
The author is very grateful to the researchers whose constructive comments have helped in improving the theoretical formulation presented in this article.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix A. Proof of (75) and (82)
Appendix A. Proof of (75) and (82)
To demonstrate the second equality in (75), consider a pure state described by the momentum wave function \(\tilde {\Psi }(p, t)\). The Fourier transform of the μth partial derivative of \(\tilde {\Psi }(p, t)\) with respect to p is denoted as Φ μ (q,t) and given by
which is simply related to the position wave function Ψ(q,t). Using the inverse Fourier transform of (A.1), the functions \(\tilde {\Psi }^{(\mu )}(p^{\prime } \! -\! \frac {1}{2} p, t)\) and \(\tilde {\Psi }^{(\eta )}(p^{\prime } + \frac {1}{2} p, t)\) are written as Fourier transforms of Φ μ (x,t) and Φ η (X,t), and inserted in (75), in the definition of ρ μ η (q ′, p ′, t). One performs the integration over p by invoking the integral representation of the Dirac delta function, and reorganizes the resulting integral over x by introducing a change of variable of the form \(\frac {1}{2}q = q^{\prime } - x\) (see figure 1). Afterwards, the second equality in (A.1) is used, and the resulting expression is reorganized by means of the identity
Finally, by considering all the pure states involved in the density operator \(\hat {\rho }(t)\), given by (55), one obtains the second equality in (75).
A similar procedure allows to demonstrate the second equality in (82). Instead of (A.1), one now uses the expression
and the identity
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
CAMPOS, D. On phase-space representations of quantum mechanics using Glauber coherent states. Pramana - J Phys 87, 27 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12043-016-1230-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12043-016-1230-x