Skip to main content
Log in

The dynamical mixing of light and pseudoscalar fields

  • Published:
Pramana Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We solve the general problem of mixing of electromagnetic and scalar or pseudoscalar fields coupled by axion-type interactions L int = g ϕ ϕε μναβ F μν F αβ. The problem depends on several dimensionful scales, including the magnitude and direction of background magnetic field, the pseudoscalar mass, plasma frequency, propagation frequency, wave number, and finally the pseudoscalar coupling. We apply the results to the first consistent calculations of the mixing of light propagating in a background magnetic field of varying directions, which show a great variety of fascinating resonant and polarization effects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J N Clarke, G Karl and P J S Watson, Can. J. Phys. 60, 1561 (1982)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. P Sikivie, Phys. Rev. Lett. 51, 1415 (1983); Phys. Rev. D32, 2988 (1985); Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 783 (1988)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. L Maiani, R Petronzio and E Zavattini, Phys. Lett. B175, 359 (1986)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. D Harari and P Sikivie, Phys. Lett. B289, 67 (1992)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. G Raffelt and L Stodolsky, Phys. Rev. D37, 1237 (1988)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. R Bradley, J Clarke, D Kinion, L J Rosenberg, K van Bibber, S Matsuki, M Mück and P Sikivie, Rev. Mod. Phys. 75, 777 (2003)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. E D Carlson and W D Garretson, Phys. Lett. B336, 431 (1994)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. S Kar, P Majumdar, S SenGupta and A Sinha, Euro. Phys. J. C23, 357 (2002)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. S Kar, P Majumdar, S SenGupta and S Sur, Class. Quant. Grav. 19, 677 (2002)

    Article  MATH  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. P Majumdar and S SenGupta, Class. Quant. Grav. 16, L89 (1999)

    Article  MATH  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. P Das, P Jain and S Mukherjee, hep-ph/0011279, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A16, 4011 (2001)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. N D Hari Dass and K V Shajesh, Phys. Rev. D65, 085010 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  13. A K Ganguly, Ann. Phys. 321, 1457 (2006)

    Article  MATH  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. G G Raffelt, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 49, 163 (1999), hep-ph/9903472

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. J W Brockway, E D Carlson and G G Raffelt, Phys. Lett. B383, 439 (1996), astro-ph/9605197

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. J A Grifols, E Masso and R Toldra, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 2372 (1996)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. L J Rosenberg and K A van Bibber, Phys. Rep. 325, 1 (2000)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. P Jain, S Panda and S Sarala, Phys. Rev. D66, 085007 (2002), hep-ph/0206046

  19. C Csaki, N Kaloper and J Terning, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 161302 (2002), hep-ph/0111311

    Google Scholar 

  20. B A Bassett and M Kunz, Phys. Rev. D69, 101305 (2004), astro-ph/0312443

  21. Da-Shin Lee, W Lee and Kin-Wang Ng, Phys. Lett. B542, 1 (2002)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. S Das, P Jain, R P Ralston and R Saha, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 0506, 002 (2005)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. We may let ϕ also be a scalar field given parity violation

  24. W-M Yao et al, J. Phys. G33, 1 (2006)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. D Dicus, E Kolb, V Teplitz and R Wagoner, Phys. Rev. D18, 1829 (1978); Phys. Rev. D22, 839 (1980)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. G Raffelt and D Dearborn, Phys. Rev. D36, 2211 (1987)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. D Dearborn, D Schramm and G Steigman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 26 (1986)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. J Ellis and K Olive, Phys. Lett. B193, 525 (1987)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. G Raffelt and D Seckel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 1793 (1988)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. M Turner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 1797 (1988)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  31. H-T Janka, W Keil, G Raffelt and D Seckel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 2621 (1996)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. W Keil, H T Janka, D N Schramm, G Sigl, M S Turner and J Ellis, Phys. Rev. D56, 2419 (1997)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  33. M I Vysotsky, Ya B Zeldovich, M Yu Khlopov and V M Chechetkin, JETP Lett. 27, 502 (1978)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  34. P Jain and S Mandal, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D15, 2095 (2006)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  35. A K Ganguly, P Jain, S Mandal and S Stokes, Phys. Rev. D76, 025026 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  36. H J Lipkin, Phys. Lett. B579, 355 (2004), hep-ph/0304187, hep-ph/0212093

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  37. L Stodolsky, Phys. Rev. D58, 036006 (1998)

  38. S Mohanty and S N Nayak, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 4038 (1993)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  39. M Born and E Wolf, Principles of optics (Pergamon Press, New York, 1989)

    Google Scholar 

  40. P Ghosh, Rotation and accretion powered pulsars, World Scientific Series in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 10 (2007)

  41. We decline to develop a 3 × 3 density matrix including the longitudinal mode, as unlikely to be observed in these circumstances

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pankaj Jain.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Das, S., Jain, P., Ralston, J.P. et al. The dynamical mixing of light and pseudoscalar fields. Pramana - J Phys 70, 439–456 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12043-008-0060-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12043-008-0060-x

Keywords

PACS Nos

Navigation