Skip to main content
Log in

Evolution of increased larval competitive ability in Drosophila melanogaster without increased larval feeding rate

  • RESEARCH ARTICLE
  • Published:
Journal of Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Multiple experimental evolution studies on Drosophila melanogaster in the 1980s and 1990s indicated that enhanced competitive ability evolved primarily through increased larval tolerance to nitrogenous wastes and increased larval feeding and foraging rate, at the cost of efficiency of food conversion to biomass, and this became the widely accepted view of how adaptation to larval crowding evolves in fruitflies. We recently showed that populations of D. ananassae and D. n. nasuta subjected to extreme larval crowding evolved greater competitive ability without evolving higher feeding rates, primarily through a combination of reduced larval duration, faster attainment of minimum critical size for pupation, greater efficiency of food conversion to biomass, increased pupation height and, perhaps, greater urea/ammonia tolerance. This was a very different suite of traits than that seen to evolve under similar selection in D. melanogaster and was closer to the expectations from the theory of K-selection. At that time, we suggested two possible reasons for the differences in the phenotypic correlates of greater competitive ability seen in the studies with D. melanogaster and the other two species. First, that D. ananassae and D. n. nasuta had a very different genetic architecture of traits affecting competitive ability compared to the long-term laboratory populations of D. melanogaster used in the earlier studies, either because the populations of the former two species were relatively recently wild-caught, or by virtue of being different species. Second, that the different evolutionary trajectories in D. ananassae and D. n. nasuta versus D. melanogaster were a reflection of differences in the manner in which larval crowding was imposed in the two sets of selection experiments. The D. melanogaster studies used a higher absolute density of eggs per unit volume of food, and a substantially larger total volume of food, than the studies on D. ananassae and D. n. nasuta. Here, we show that long-term laboratory populations of D. melanogaster, descended from some of the populations used in the earlier studies, evolve essentially the same set of traits as the D. ananassae and D. n. nasuta crowding-adapted populations when subjected to a similar larval density at low absolute volumes of food. As in the case of D. ananassae and D. n. nasuta, and in stark contrast to earlier studies with D. melanogaster, these crowding-adapted populations of D. melanogaster did not evolve greater larval feeding rates as a correlate of increased competitive ability. The present results clearly suggest that the suite of phenotypes through which the evolution of greater competitive ability is achieved in fruitflies depends critically not just on larval density per unit volume of food, but also on the total amount of food available in the culture vials. We discuss these results in the context of an hypothesis about how larval density and the height of the food column in culture vials might interact to alter the fitness costs and benefits of increased larval feeding rates, thus resulting in different routes to the evolution of greater competitive ability, depending on the details of exactly how the larval crowding was implemented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson W. W. and Arnold J. 1983 Density-regulated selection with genotypic interactions. Am. Nat. 121, 649–655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Archana N. 2010 The genetic architecture of fitness-related traits in populations of three species of Drosophila subjected to selection for adaptation to larval crowding. Ph.D. thesis, Jawaharlal Nehru Centre for Advanced Scientific Research, Bengaluru, India.

  • Asmussen M. A. 1983 Density-dependent selection incorporating intraspecific competition. II. A diploid model. Genetics 103, 335–350.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Borash D. J., Gibbs A. G., Joshi A. and Mueller L. D. 1998 A genetic polymorphism maintained by natural selection in a temporally varying environment. Am. Nat. 151, 148–156.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Borash D. J., Teótonio H., Rose M. R. and Mueller L. D. 2000 Density-dependent natural selection in Drosophila: correlations between feeding rate, development time and viability. J. Evol. Biol. 13, 181–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borash D. J. and Ho G. T. 2001 Patterns of selection: stress resistance and energy storage in density-dependent populations of Drosophila melanogaster. J. Insect Physiol. 47, 1349–1356.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burnet B., Sewell D. and Bos M. 1977 Genetic analysis of larval feeding behaviour in Drosophila melanogaster. II. Growth relations and competition between selected lines. Genet. Res. 30, 149–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke B. 1972 Density-dependent selection. Am. Nat. 106, 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dey S., Bose J. and Joshi A. 2012 Adaptation to larval crowding in Drosophila ananassae leads to the evolution of population stability. Ecol. Evol. 2, 941–951.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Fellowes M. D. E., Kraaijeveld A. R. and Godfray H. C. J. 1998 Trade-off associated with selection for increased ability to resist parasitoid attack in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. B 265, 1553–1558.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fellowes M. D. E., Kraaijeveld A. R. and Godfray H. C. J. 1999 Association between feeding rate and parasitoid resistance in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 53, 1302–1305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gadgil M. and Bossert W. H. 1970 Life historical consequences of natural selection. Am. Nat. 104, 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joshi A. and Mueller L. D. 1988 Evolution of higher feeding rate in Drosophila due to density-dependent natural selection. Evolution 42, 1090–1092.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joshi A. and Mueller L. D. 1993 Directional and stabilizing density-dependent natural selection for pupation height in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 47, 176–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joshi A. and Mueller L. D. 1996 Density-dependent natural selection in Drosophila: trade-offs between resource acquisition and utilization. Evol. Ecol. 10, 463–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joshi A., Prasad N. G. and Shakarad M. 2001 K-selection, α-selection, effectiveness and tolerance in competition: density-dependent selection revisited. J. Genet. 80, 63–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Joshi A., Castillo R. B. and Mueller L. D. 2003 The contribution of ancestry, chance and past and ongoing selection to adaptive evolution. J. Genet. 82, 147–162.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur R. H. 1962 Some generalized theorems of natural selection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 48, 1893–1897.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur R. H. and Wilson E. O. 1967 The theory of island biogeography. Princeton University Press, Princeton, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller L. D. and Ayala A. J. 1981 Trade-off between r-selection and K-selection in Drosophila populations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 78, 1303–1305.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller L. D. and Sweet V. F. 1986 Density-dependent natural selection in Drosophila: evolution of pupation height. Evolution 40, 1354–1356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller L. D. 1988 Evolution of competitive ability in Drosophila by density-dependent natural selection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 85, 4383–4386.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller L. D. 1990 Density-dependent selection does not increase efficiency. Evol. Ecol. 4, 290–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller L. D., Graves J. L. and Rose M. R. 1993 Interactions between density-dependent and age-specific selection in Drosophila melanogaster. Func. Ecol. 7, 469–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller L. D. 1997 Theoretical and empirical examination of density-dependent selection. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 28, 269–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller L. D., Folk D. G., Nguyen N., Nguyen P., Lam P., Rose M. R. and Bradley T. J. 2005 Evolution of larval foraging behavior in Drosophila and its effect on growth and metabolic rates. Physiol. Entomol. 30, 262–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller L. D. 2009 Fitness, demography, and population dynamics in laboratory experiments. In Experimental evolution: concepts, methods and applications of selection experiments (ed. T. Jr Garland and M. R. Rose), pp. 197–216. University of California Press, Berkeley, USA.

  • Mueller L. D. and Cabral L. G. 2012 Does phenotypic plasticity for adult size versus food level in Drosophila melanogaster evolve in response to adaptation to different rearing densities? Evolution 66, 263–271.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller L. D. and Barter T. T. 2015 A model of the evolution of larval feeding rate in Drosophila driven by conflicting energy demands. Genetica. doi:10.1007/s10709-015-9818-5.

  • Nagarajan A., Natarajan S. B., Jayaram M., Thammanna A., Chari S., Bose J., Jois S. V. and Joshi A. 2016 Adaptation to larval crowding in Drosophila ananassae and Drosophila nasuta nasuta: increased larval competitive ability without increased larval feeding rate. J. Genet. (in press).

  • Pianka E. R. 1970 On r- and K−selection. Am. Nat. 104, 952–956.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prasad N. G., Shakarad M., Anitha D., Rajamani M. and Joshi A. 2001 Correlated responses to selection for faster development and early reproduction in Drosophila: the evolution of larval traits. Evolution 55, 1363–1372.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Prasad N. G. and Joshi A. 2003 What have two decades of laboratory life-history evolution studies on Drosophila melanogaster taught us. J. Genet. 82, 45–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rajamani M., Raghavendra N., Prasad N. G., Archana N., Joshi A. and Shakarad M. 2006 Reduced larval feeding rate is a strong evolutionary correlate of rapid development in Drosophila melanogaster. J. Genet. 85, 209–212.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rose M. R. and Charlesworth B. 1981 Genetics of life-history in Drosophila melanogaster. I. Sib analysis of adult females. Genetics 97, 173–186.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Rose M. R. 1984 Laboratory evolution of postponed senescence in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 38, 1004–1010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roughgarden J. 1971 Density-dependent natural selection. Ecology 52, 453–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarangi M. 2013 Preliminary investigations into the causes for alternative routes to the evolution of competitive ability in populations of Drosophila selected for adaptation to larval crowding. M.S. thesis, Jawaharlal Nehru Centre for Advanced Scientific Research, Bengaluru, India.

  • Shakarad M., Prasad N. G., Gokhale K., Gadagkar V., Rajamani M. and Joshi A. 2005 Faster development does not lead to correlated evolution of greater competitive ability in Drosophila melanogaster. Biol. Lett. 1, 91–94.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sheeba V. 2002 Probing the adaptive significance of circadian rhythms using Drosophila melanogaster. Ph.D. thesis, Jawaharlal Nehru Centre for Advanced Scientific Research, Bengaluru, India.

  • Sheeba V., Madhyastha N. A. A. and Joshi A. 1998 Oviposition preference for normal versus novel food resources in laboratory populations of Drosophila melanogaster. J. Biosci. 23, 93–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shiotsugu J., Leroi A. M., Yashiro H., Rose M. R. and Mueller L. D. 1997 The symmetry of correlated responses in adaptive evolution: an experimental study using Drosophila. Evolution 51, 163–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sokolowski M. B., Pereira H. S. and Hughes K. 1997 Evolution of foraging behavior in Drosophila by density-dependent selection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94, 7373–7377.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • StatSoft 1995 Statistica Vol. I: general conventions and statistics 1. StatSoft Inc., Tulsa, USA.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Larry Mueller for much helpful discussion, D. Ravi Teja, Avani Mital, N. Rajanna and M. Manjesh for help in the laboratory and N. G. Prasad for very helpful comments on early drafts of the manuscript. A. Nagarajan thanks the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, Government of India, for financial assistance in the form of Junior and Senior Research Fellowships. S. Dey and M. Sarangi were supported by doctoral fellowships from the Jawaharlal Nehru Centre for Advanced Scientific Research. This work was supported by funds from the Department of Science and Technology, Government of India, to A. Joshi. The preparation of the manuscript was supported in part by a J. C. Bose National Fellowship to A. Joshi.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to AMITABH JOSHI.

Additional information

[Sarangi M., Nagarajan A., Dey S., Bose J. and Joshi A. 2016 Evolution of increased larval competitive ability in Drosophila melanogaster without increased larval feeding rate. J. Genet. 95, xx–xx]

Manaswini Sarangi and Archana Nagarajan contributed equally to this work

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

SARANGI, M., NAGARAJAN, A., DEY, S. et al. Evolution of increased larval competitive ability in Drosophila melanogaster without increased larval feeding rate. J Genet 95, 491–503 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12041-016-0656-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12041-016-0656-8

Keywords

Navigation