Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A framework to assess the dynamics of climate extremes on irrigation water requirement using machine learning techniques

  • Published:
Journal of Earth System Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A methodological framework has been proposed that consists of six different modules to compute and analyze the dynamics of climate-related extremes on irrigation water requirement (IWR) using machine learning techniques. These modules interactively supply information to compute irrigation water requirement, extreme indices, selection of appropriate indices, clustering of stations, and machine learning models to demonstrate the impact of rain and temperature-based extreme indices on water requirement for crops in a region. The proposed framework was implemented for the kharif paddy crop at 206 grids in the Mahanadi basin (Catchment area: 1.41 lakh km2) of India. The seasonal rainfall, daily temperature range (DT), maximum one-day rainfall (RX1D), simple daily intensity index (SDII), and mean daily minimum temperature (TxM) were found to be the most significant indices, and the whole region was categorized into three clusters. The extra tree regressor with different parameters was found to be the most suited regressor technique among all 17 models used in the analysis and able to predict IWR with more than 75% accuracy in testing and training. The proposed theoretical framework is capable of quantifying the impact of climate extremes on IWR for any crop and automation may be useful to field practitioners and policymakers to plan available water resources optimally.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adeyeri O E, Lawin A E, Laux P, Ishola K A and Ige S O 2019 Analysis of climate extreme indices over the Komadugu–Yobe basin, Lake Chad region: Past and future occurrences; Weather Clim. Extremes 23, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wace.2019.100194.

  • Aggarwal P K 2003 Impact of climate change on Indian agriculture; J. Plant Biol. 30(2) 189–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad Q, Biemans H, Moors E, Shaheen N and Masih I 2021 The impacts of climate variability on crop yields and irrigation water demand in South Asia; Water 13(1) 50, https://doi.org/10.3390/w13010050.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Bakri J, Suleiman A, Abdulla F and Ayad J 2011 Potential impact of climate change on rainfed agriculture of a semi-arid basin in Jordan; Phys. Chem. Earth A/B/C 36(5–6) 125–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander L, Yang H and Perkins S 2013 ClimPact: Indices and software, World Climate Programme; New South Wales University of Technology, 52p.

  • Ali S, Liu Y, Ishaq M, Shah T, Abdullah Ilyas A and Din I U 2017 Climate change and its impact on the yield of major food crops: Evidence from Pakistan; Foods 6(17) 39, https://doi.org/10.3390/foods6060039.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alidoost F, Su Z and Stein A 2019 Evaluating the effects of climate extremes on crop yield, production and price using multivariate distributions: A new copula application; Weather Clim. Extremes 26, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wace.2019.100227.

  • Allen R G, Pereira L S, Raes D and Smith M 1998 Crop evapotranspiration – Guidelines for computing crop water requirements; Rome, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, FAO Irrigation and drainage paper 56.

  • Asha Latha K V, Gopinath M and Bhat R S 2012 Impact of climate change on rainfed agriculture in India: A case study of Dharwad; Int. J. Environ. Sci. Dev. 3(4) 368–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asseng S, Ewert F, Rosenzweig C et al. 2013 Uncertainty in simulating wheat yields under climate change; Nat. Clim. Change 3 827–832.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baral S, Tripathy A K and Bijayasingh P 2011 Yield prediction using Artificial Neural Networks; In: Computer Networks and Information Technologies CNC (eds) Das V V, Stephen J and Chaba Y, Commun. Comput. Info. Sci. 142 Springer, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19542-6_57.

  • Bautista F, Pacheco A and Dubrovina I 2019 Climate change indicators software for computing climate change indices for agriculture; Ecosistemas Y Recursos Agropecuarios 6(17) 343–351, https://doi.org/10.19136/era.a6n17.1770.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bodner G, Loiskandl W and Kaul H P 2007 Cover crop evapotranspiration under semi-arid conditions using FAO dual crop coefficient method with water stress compensation; Agr. Water Manag. 93(3) 85–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breiman L 2001 Random forests; Mach. Learn. 45(1) 5–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brouziyne Y, Abouabdillah A, Hirich A, Bouabid R, Zaaboul R and Benaabidate L 2018 Modeling sustainable adaptation strategies toward a climate-smart agriculture in a Mediterranean watershed under projected climate change scenarios; Agr. Syst. 162(C) 154–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Challinor A J, Smith M S and Thornton P 2013 Use of agro-climate ensembles for quantifying uncertainty and informing adaptation; Agr. For. Meteorol. 170 2–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Challinor A J, Watson J, Lobell D B, Howden S M, Smith D R and Chhetri N 2014 A meta-analysis of crop yield under climate change and adaptation; Nat. Clim. Change 4 287–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen M, Cui Y, Wang X, Xie H, Liu F, Luo T, Zheng S and Luo Y 2021 A reinforcement learning approach to irrigation decision-making for rice using weather forecasts; Agr. Water Manag. 250, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2021.106838.

  • Chu J T, Xia J, Xu C Y and Singh V P 2010 Statistical downscaling of daily mean temperature, pan evaporation and precipitation for climate change scenarios in Haihe River, China; Theor. Appl. Climatol. 99(1–2) 149–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn R J H, Alexander L V, Donat M G et al. 2020 Development of an updated global land in situ-based data set of temperature and precipitation extremes: HadEX3; J. Geophys. Res. 125(16), https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD032263.

  • Easterling D R, Meehl G A, Parmesan C, Changnon S A, Karl T R and Mearns L O 2000 Climate extremes: Observations, modelling, and impacts; Sci. 289 2068–2074.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Everingham Y L, Smyth C W and Inman-Bamber N G 2009 Ensemble data mining approaches to forecast regional sugarcane crop production; Agr. For. Meteorol. 149(3–4) 689–696, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AGRFORMET.2008.10.018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Food and Agriculture Organization 2009 CROPWAT Software, Food and Agriculture Organization, Land and Water Division, http://www.fao.org/nr/water/infores_databases_cropwat.html.

  • Freund Y and Schapire R E 1996 Experiments with a new boosting algorithm; Proc. 13th Int. Conf. Machine Learn. 96 148–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gandhi N and Armstrong L 2016 Applying data mining techniques to predict yield of rice in humid subtropical climatic zone of India; Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. on Computing for Sus. Global Dev., pp. 1901–1906.

  • Gaupp F, Pflug G, Hall J and Dadson S 2017 Dependency of crop production between global breadbaskets: A copula approach for the assessment of global and regional risk pools; Risk Anal. 37(11) 2212–2228, https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12761.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gbetibouo G and Hassan R 2005 Economic impact of climate change on major South African field crops: A Ricardian approach; Glob. Planet 47 143–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Girish L, Gangadhar S, Bharath T R, Balaji K S and Abhishek K T 2018 Crop yield and rainfall prediction in Tumakuru district using machine learning; Int. J. Res. Eng. Appl. Manag., https://doi.org/10.18231/2454-9150.2018.0805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez-Sanchez A, Frausto-Solis J and Ojeda-Bustamante W 2014 Predictive ability of machine learning methods for massive crop yield prediction; Spanish J. Agric. Res. 12(2) 313–328, https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2014122-4439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gumel D Y, Abdullah A M, Sood M et al. 2017 Assessing paddy rice yield sensitivity to temperature and rainfall variability in peninsular Malasiya using DSSAT model; Int. J. Appl. Environ. Sci. 12(8) 1521–1545.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves G H and Samani Z A 1985 Reference crop evapotranspiration from temperature; Appl. Eng. Agr. 1 96–99, https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.26773.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatfield J L and Prueger J H 2015 Temperature extremes: Effect on plant growth and development; Weather Clim. Extremes 10(A) 4–10, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wace.2015.08.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrera L L 2014 RClimTool user manual; Clima y sector agropecuario Colombiano, Colombia, 17p.

  • Huntington T G 2006 Evidence for intensification of the global water cycle: Review and synthesis; J. Hydrol. 319(104) 83–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 2012 Managing the risks of extreme events and disasters to advance climate change adaptation (eds) Field C B, Barros V, Stocker T F, Qin D, Dokken D J, Ebi K L, Mastrandrea M D, Mach K J, Plattner G K, Allen S K, Tignor M and Midgley P M, A special report of working groups I and II of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 582p.

  • Jaiswal R K, Tiwari H L and Lohani A K 2017 Assessment of climate change impact on rainfall for studying water availability in upper Mahanadi catchment, India; J. Water Clim. Change 8(4) 755–770, https://doi.org/10.2166/wcc.2017.097.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaiswal R K, Lohani A K and Tiwari H L 2020 Development of framework for assessment of impact of climate change in a command of water resource project; J. Earth Syst. Sci. 129(58), https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-019-1328-x.

  • Jaiswal R K, Lohani A K and Galkate R V 2022 Rainfall and agro related climate extremes for water requirement in paddy grown Mahanadi basin of India; Agric. Res., https://doi.org/10.1007/s40003-022-00629-4

  • Jay J J, Eblen J and Zhang Y 2012 A systematic comparison of genome-scale clustering algorithms; BMC Bioinfor. 13(10) 1–12, https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-13-S10-S7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeong J H, Resop J P, Mueller N D, Fleisher D H, Yun K, Butler E E and Kim S H 2016 Random forests for global and regional crop yield predictions; PLoS ONE 11(6), https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0156571.

  • Joshi U R and Rajivan M 2006 Trends in precipitation extremes over India; National Climate Centre, India Meteorological Department, Pune.

  • Karthikeyan B, George D J, Manikandan G and Thomas T 2020 A comparative study on k-means clustering and agglomerative hierarchical clustering; Int. J. Emerging Trends Eng. Res. 8(5) 1600–1604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein Tank A, Zwiers F W and Zhang X 2009 Guidelines on analysis of extremes in a changing climate in support of informed decisions for adaptation: Technical Report; World Meteorological Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 55p.

  • Klompenburg T V, Kassahun A and Catal C 2020 Crop yield prediction using machine learning: A systematic literature review; Comp. Electron. Agr. 17, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2020.105709.

  • Kouadio L, Deo R C, Byrareddy V, Adamowski J F, Mushtaq S and Phuong Nguyen V 2018 Artificial intelligence approach for the prediction of Robusta coffee yield using soil fertility properties; Comp. Electron. Agr. 155 324–338, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPAG.2018.10.014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar A V and Kannth T V 2013 Estimation of influence of fertilizer nutrients consumption of the wheat crop yields in India: A data mining approach; Int. J. Eng. Ad. Technol. 3(2) 316–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar K K, Kumar K R, Ashrit R G, Deshpande N R and Hansen J W 2004 Climate impacts on Indian agriculture; Int. J. Climatol. 24 1375–1393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kunapuli S S, Rueda-Ayala V, Benavidez-Gutierrez G, Cordova-Cruzatty A, Cabrera A, Fernandez C and Maiguashca J 2015 Yield prediction for precision territorial management in maize using spectral data; Proc. Eur. Conf. Precision Agric. ECPA, pp. 199–206.

  • Kuraria A, Jharbade N and Soni M 2018 Centroid selection process using WCSS and Elbow method for k-mean clustering algorithm in data mining; Int. J. S. Res. Sci. Eng. Technol. 4(11) 190–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lal R 2005 Climate change, soil carbon dynamics, and global food security; In: Climate change and global food security (eds) Lal R, Stewart B, Uphoff N et al., CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp. 113–143.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lamichhane D, Dawadi B, Acharya R H, Pudasainee S and Shrestha I K 2020 Observed trends and spatial distribution in daily precipitation indices of extremes over the Narayani river basin, central Nepal; Appl. Ecol. Environ. Sci. 8(3) 106–118, https://doi.org/10.12691/aees-8-3-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Y and Wu H 2012 A clustering method based on k-means algorithm; Phys. Procedia 25 1104–1109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lobell D B and Gourdji S M 2012 The influence of climate change on global crop productivity; Plant Physiol. 160 1686–1697.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long H Z, Xu G, Du J, Zhu H, Yan T and Yu Y 2021 Flexible subspace clustering: A joint feature selection and k-means clustering framework; Big Data Res. 23, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bdr.2020.100170.

  • Lyon B and Dewitt D G 2012 A recent and abrupt decline in the East Africa long rains; Geophys. Res. Lett. 39(2), https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL050337, 2012L027021of5.

  • Mahmood R and Jia S 2016 Assessment of impacts of climate change on the water resources of the transboundary Jhelum river basin of Pakistan and India; Water 8(6) 246, https://doi.org/10.3390/w8060246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milly P C D, Wetherald R T, Dunne K A and Delworth T L 2002 Increasing risk of great floods in a changing climate; Nature 415 514–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milly P C D, Dunne K A and Vecchia A V 2005 Global pattern of trends in streamflow and water availability in a changing climate; Nature 438 347–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mishra V, Bhatia U and Tiwari A D 2020 Bias-corrected climate projections for South Asia from Coupled Model Intercomparison Project-6; Sci. Data 7 338, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-020-00681-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mistry M N 2019 A high-resolution global gridded historical dataset of climate extreme indices; Data 4 41, https://doi.org/10.3390/data4010041.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohan S and Ramsundram N 2014 Climate change and its impact on irrigation water requirements on temporal scale; Irri. Drainage Syst. 3(1) 1–8, https://doi.org/10.4172/2168-9768.1000118.0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Na S, Xumin L and Yong G 2010 Research on k-means clustering algorithm: An improved k-means clustering algorithm; Third Int. Symp. Intel. Infor. Technol. and Sec. Infor., Jian, China, pp. 63–67, https://doi.org/10.1109/IITSI.2010.74.

  • Naikwade P V 2017 Impact of climate change on agricultural production in India: Effect on rice productivity; Biosci. Discov. 8(4) 897–914.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neha D and Vidavati B M 2015 A survey on applications of data mining using clustering techniques; Int. J. Comput. Appl. 16(2) 7–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng J and Wei Y 2007 Approximating k-means-type clustering via semidefinite programming; SIAM J. Optim. 18(1) 186–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng S, Huang J et al. 2004 Rice yield decline with higher night temperature from global warming; Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 101(27) 9971–9975, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.040372010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penman H L 1963 Vegetation and hydrology; Tech Communication No. 53. Commonwealth Bur of Soils. Harpenden, England, 125p.

  • Pereira L S and Alves I 2005 Crop water requirements; In: Encyclopedia of soils in the environment (ed.) Hillel D, Elsevier, Oxford, pp. 322–334.

  • Pereira L S and Alves I 2013 Crop water requirements; Ref. Module Earth Sys. Environ. Sci., https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-409548-9.05129-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao U V M, Rao A V M S, Rao G G S N, Satyanarayana T, Manikandan N and Venkateshwarlu B 2011 Impact of climate change on crop water requirement and adaptation strategies; In: Challenges and opportunities in agrometeorology (eds) Attri et al., Springer, Heidelberg, pp. 311–319.

  • Rawal U R and Jani C 2016 Implementing & improvisation of k-means clustering algorithm; Int. J. Comput. Sci. Mobile Comp. 5(5) 191–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rehman M A, Kang S, Nagabhatla N and Macnee R 2017 Impacts of temperature and rainfall variation on rice productivity in major ecosystems of Bangladesh; Agric. Food Secur. 6(10)https://doi.org/10.1186/s40066-017-0089-5.

  • Romashchenko M, Shatkowski A and Zhuravlev O 2016 Features of application of the Penman-Monteith method for conditions of a drip irrigation of the steppe of Ukraine (on example of grain corn); J. Water Land Dev31(1), https://doi.org/10.1515/jwld-2016-0043.

  • Rosenzweig C, Elliott J, Deryng D, Ruane A C, Müller C, Arneth A, Boote K J, Folberth C, Glotter M and Khabarov N 2014 Assessing agricultural risks of climate change in the 21st century in a global gridded crop model intercomparison; Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 111 3268–3273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roshani A, Parak F and Esmaili H 2021 Trend analysis of climate change compound indices in Iran; Water Clim. Ch. 12(3) 801–816, https://doi.org/10.2166/wcc.2020.213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salman S A, Shahid S, Afan H A, Shiru M S, Al-Ansar N and Yaseen Z M 2020 Changes in climatic water availability and crop water demand for Iraq region; Sustainability 12(8), https://doi.org/10.3390/su12083437.

  • Sardha S and Sujatha P 2016 Analysis and significance study of clustering techniques; Int. J. Emerging Technol. Eng. Res. 4(9) 31–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar I H 2021 Machine learning: Algorithms, real-world applications and research directions; SN Comput. Sci. 2 160, https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-021-00592-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwalbert R A, Amado T, Corassa G, Pott L P, Prasad P V and Ciampitti I A 2020 Satellite-based soybean yield forecast: Integrating machine learning and weather data for improving crop yield prediction in southern Brazil; Agr. For. Meteorol. 284, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2019.107886.

  • Shahhosseini M, Hu G and Huber I 2021 Coupling machine learning and crop modeling improves crop yield prediction in the US Corn Belt; Sci. Rep. 11 1606, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-80820-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma A, Sharma D and Panda S K 2022 Assessment of spatiotemporal trend of precipitation indices and meteorological drought characteristics in the Mahi River basin, India; J. Hydrol. 605, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.127314.

  • Sidhu R K, Kumar R and Rana P S 2020 Machine learning based crop water demand forecasting using minimum climatological data; Multimedia Tools Appl. 79(19–20) 13,109–13,124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song X, Lu F, Xiao W, Zhu K, Zhou Y and Xie Z 2019 Performance of 12 reference evapotranspiration estimation methods compared with the Penman–Monteith method and the potential influences in northeast China; Meteorol. Appl. 26(1) 83–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun J, Di L, Sun Z, Shen Y and Lai Z 2019 County-level soybean yield prediction using deep CNN-LSTM model; Sensors 19(20) 4363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tirkey S T, Ghosh M, Pandey A C and Shekhar S 2018 Assessment of climate extremes and its long term spatial variability over the Jharkhand state of India; Egypt J. Remote Sens. Space Sci. 21(1) 49–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Virnodkar S S, Pachghare V K, Patil V C and Jha S K 2020 Remote sensing and machine learning for crop water stress determination in various crops: A critical review; Precision Agr. 21 1121–1155, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-020-09711-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogal E, Donat M G, Alexander L V, Meinshausen M, Ray D K, Karoly D, Meinshausen N and Frieler K 2019 The effects of climate extremes on global agricultural yields; Environ. Res. Lett. 14 054010, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab154b.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe T, Cullmann J, Pathak C S, Turunen M, Emami K, Ghinassi G and Siddiqi Y 2018 Management of climatic extremes with focus on floods and droughts in agriculture; J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 67 29–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Water and Power Consultancy Services (WAPCOS) 2015 Environmental impact assessment studies for Arpa Bhaisajhar barrage project, District-Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, Vol-1 Final EIA report; WAPCOS, Gurugram.

  • Wilby R L, Dawson C W and Barrow E M 2002 SDSM – A decision support tool for the assessment of regional climate change impacts; Environ. Modeling Soft. 17(2) 145–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Meteorological Association (WMO) 2009 Guidelines on analysis of extremes in a changing climate in support of informed decisions for adaptation; WMO, Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu C, Yan B, Yu R, Yu B, Zhou X, Yu Y and Chen N 2021 K-means clustering algorithm and its simulation based on distributed computing platform; Complexity, https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/9446653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xystrakis F and Matzarakis A 2011 Evaluation of 13 empirical reference potential evapotranspiration equations on the island of Crete in southern Greece; J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 137(4) 211–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang X, Alexander L, Hegerl G C, Jones P, Tank A K, Peterson T C, Trewin B and Zwiers F W 2011 Indices for monitoring changes in extremes based on daily temperature and precipitation data; Climate Ch. 2 851–870, https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang G X and Yang F 2004 RClimDex (1.0) User manual; Climate Research Branch Environment, Downsview, Ontario, Canada.

  • Zhou Y, Zwahlen F, Wang Y and Li Y 2010 Impact of climate change on irrigation requirements in terms of groundwater resources; Hydrogeol. J. 18(7) 1571–1582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu X and Troy T J 2018 Agriculturally relevant climate extremes and their trends in the world’s major growing regions; Earth Fut. 6(4) 656–672, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017EF000687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors are thankful to World Bank and National Hydrology Project for funding the special study under NHP. Thanks are also due to Dr J V Tyagi Director NIH for overall support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

R K Jaiswal is responsible for the idea of research, model building, and manuscript preparation, and A K Lohani has contributed to data analysis and manuscript refinement.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R K Jaiswal.

Additional information

Communicated by Riddhi Singh

Appendix

Appendix

1.1 A1. Rainfall extreme indices

1.1.1 A1.1 Annual total wet-day precipitation (PRCPTOT)

The annual total wet-day precipitation (PRCPTOT) may be defined as the total rainfall at any station during wet days and can be represented by the following expression:

$${PRCPTOT}_{j}=\sum\limits_{i=1}^{n}{R}_{ij}$$
(A1)

where PRCPTOTj is the total precipitation for the jth year and Rij is the daily precipitation greater than or equal to 2 mm for the ith day in the jth year.

1.1.2 A1.2 Number of rainy days (RD)

The number of rainy days, which is a significant index for water resource planning, is described as days with rainfall above a threshold limit, which in this case is 2 mm. If Rij is the amount of regular rainfall on the ith day of the jth period/year, then the number of rainy days (RDj) for the ith season/year is:

$${RD}_{j}=\text{Count}\left[{R}_{ij}>2\,\text{mm}\right].$$
(A2)

1.1.3 A1.3 Maximum one-day rainfall (RX1D)

The one-day maximum rainfall is significant for drainage design and flood studies. The maximum one-day rainfall (RX1D) can be expressed as the highest one-day rainfall. Let Rij be the daily rainfall on the ith day of jth period/year, the maximum one-day rainfall for the jth period (RX1Dj) will be:

$${RX\textit{1}D}_{j}=\mathrm{Max}\left[\textit{R}_{\textit{ij}}\right].$$
(A3)

1.1.4 A1.4 Maximum 5-day rainfall (RX5D)

The maximum 5-day rainfall may be defined as the highest accumulated rainfall during the consecutive 5-day period. Let R5ij be the total rainfall of the ith interval for the 5 days in the jth period/year. Here, i is the last day of the 5-day interval. The RX5Dj can be defined as:

$${RX\textit{5}D}_{j}=\mathrm{Max}\left[\textit{R5}_{\textit{ij}}\right].$$
(A4)

1.1.5 A1.5 Very wet days (R95P)

The number of days with rainfall exceeding the 95th percentile of the long term is known as very wet days (R95P). Let Rij be the precipitation series of the wet days (Rij > 2 mm) in = 1, 2, 3, …, n period/year. The probability analysis of RWj is used to compute the 95 percentile (R95). Now, the moderate wet days will be the count of the days where rainfall is greater than R95 in the Rij series.

$${R\textit{95}P}_{j}=\sum_{i=1}^{n}\mathrm{Count}\left[\textit{R}_{\textit{ij}}>\textit{R}_{95}\right].$$
(A5)

1.1.6 A1.6 Contribution from very wet days (R95PTOT)

It is usually expressed in percentage or friction as the ratio of total rainfall in a cycle that comes from very wet days to total rainfall during the period.

$${R\textit{95}PTOT}_{j}=\frac{\sum_{i=1}^{n}{R}_{ij}>{R\textit{95}P}_{j}}{W}$$
(A6)

1.1.7 A1.7 Simple daily intensity index (SDII)

The simple daily intensity index (SDII) is the mean precipitation that occurred during wet days. Let, RWj be the daily precipitation on a rainy day where precipitation ≥ 2 mm in any and rainfall days is W in any jth period. The simple daily intensity index (SDIIj) for the jth period/year can be computed using the following equation:

$${SDII}_{j}=\frac{\sum {R}_{Wj}}{W}.$$
(A7)

1.1.8 A1.8 Consecutive dry days (CDD)

The consecutive dry days (CDDj) for any jth period can be described as the maximum number of days with rainfall <1 mm.

1.1.9 A1.9 Consecutive wet days (CWD)

Consecutive wet days (CWDj) for any jth period is the longest wet spell that may be defined as the maximum number of days where rainfall is equal to or more than 1 mm.

1.2 A2. Temperature extreme indices

1.2.1 A2.1 Mean daily maximum temperature (TxX)

The average of maximum temperatures for any jth period/cycle is the mean daily maximum temperature (TxX), which can be described as:

$${TxX}_{j}=\frac{\sum_{i=1}^{n}{TX}_{ij}}{n}$$
(A8)

where TxXj is the mean daily maximum temperature at the jth period, TXij is the maximum daily temperature on the ith day of the jth period and n is the total number of days in a period.

1.2.2 A2.2 Mean daily minimum temperature (TxM)

The mean daily minimum temperature may be defined as the average minimum temperature for any jth period and can be defined as:

$${TxM}_{j}=\frac{\sum_{i=1}^{n}{TM}_{ij}}{n}$$
(A9)

where TxMj is the mean daily maximum temperature at the jth period, TMij is the minimum daily temperature on the ith day of the jth period and n is the total number of days in a period.

1.2.3 A2.3 Hot days (TX90P)

Hot days (TX90Pj) may be defined as the fraction or percentage when the maximum temperature is higher than the 90th percentile value of the maximum temperature.

$${TX\textit{90}P}_{j}=\frac{\sum_{i=1}^{n}{\mathrm{Count}}\left[{TX}_{ij}>{\textit{TX}}_{\textit{90}}\right]}{n}*100$$
(A10)

where TXij is the maximum temperature on the ith day of the jth period and TX90 is the 90th percentile maximum temperature of the long-term period.

1.2.4 A2.4 Warm nights (TN90P)

Warm nights (TN90Pj) may be defined as the fraction or percentage when the minimum temperature is higher than the 90th percentile value of minimum temperature.

$${TN\textit{90}P}_{j}=\frac{\sum_{i=1}^{n}{\text{Count}}\left[{TM}_{ij}>{TM}_{\textit{90}}\right]}{n}*100$$
(A11)

where TMij is the minimum temperature on the ith day of the jth period and TM90 is the 90th percentile maximum temperature of the long-term period.

1.2.5 A2.5 Daily temperature range (DT)

The daily temperature range (DTj) may be defined as the mean difference between the maximum and minimum temperature.

$${DT}_{j}=\frac{\sum_{i=1}^{n}\left[{TX}_{\textit{ij}}-{TM}_{ij}\right]}{n}.$$
(A12)

1.2.6 A2.6 Warm spell duration indicator (WSDI)

The warm spell duration indicator (WSDI) implies a long-term warm period and is characterized as the number of days with a maximum temperature greater than the 90th percentile value for six or more consecutive days.

1.2.7 A2.7 Cold spell duration indicator (CSDI)

The cold spell duration indicator (CSDI) shows a long-term cold period and is characterized as the number of days with a minimum temperature below the 10th percentile value for six or more consecutive days.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jaiswal, R.K., Lohani, A.K. A framework to assess the dynamics of climate extremes on irrigation water requirement using machine learning techniques. J Earth Syst Sci 132, 40 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-022-02044-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-022-02044-3

Keywords

Navigation