Abstract
Flood-plain wetlands are the seasonal water bodies formed along a river. These wetlands become active during the monsoon season, which frequently grow in size with seasonal floods and eventually dry up during the non-monsoon season. The flow interaction between flood-plain wetlands and the river sometimes vary over a very short period in response to rapid rise in the river water level due to high precipitation in its upstream catchment. Understanding the complex flow interactions between the river and its associated flood-plain wetlands with field-based measurements of wetland hydrologic characteristics is always a challenging task. To overcome these challenges, an attempt has been made to utilise Topex/Poseidon satellite altimetry-derived water levels into a hydrodynamic model (HEC-RAS) to study river and wetland flow interactions in the lower reach of the Kosi river in India. The satellite altimetry-derived water levels and Landsat satellite images on the Kosi wetlands are used to develop volume-elevation relation. HEC-RAS is setup over the study area and calibrated for different values of manning’s roughness coefficient (n) for the river bank and the main channel of the river for the period of 1993–1996. Unsteady flow simulations are carried out for different monsoon seasons to simulate daily river flow interaction (inflow/outflow) between river and wetlands. Statistical analysis is performed between the altimetry-derived and the model-simulated water levels. It is found that simulated water levels are in good agreement (\(R^{2}=0.87\), root mean square error of 0.84 m and Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency coefficient of 0.85) with altimetry-derived water levels. The analysis of simulations indicates that interactions between the wetland and the river are bidirectional with most of the flow coming out from the river during the month of August and leaving out from the wetlands during the month of September. The wetlands respond in three different ways, i.e., (i) gaining stage, (ii) wetland and river in equilibrium and (iii) loosing stage, which is reflected on water levels of the river and wetland. This study demonstrates complex interaction processes happening between the Kosi river and its surrounding wetlands.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alsdorf D E 2003 Water storage of the central Amazon floodplain measured with GIS and remote sensing imagery; Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr. 93(1) 55–66.
Barkau R L 1987 A mathematical model of unsteady flow through a dendritic network; PhD Dissertation, Department of Civil Engineering, Colorado State University, Ft. Collins, CO.
Birkett C M 1995 The contribution of TOPEX/POSEIDON to the global monitoring of climatically sensitive lakes; J. Geophys. Res.: Oceans (1978–2012) 100(C12) 25179–25179.
Birkett C M 1998 Contribution of the TOPEX NASA radar altimeter to the global monitoring of large rivers and wetlands; Water Resour. Res. 34(5) 1223–1239.
Chakraborty T, Kar R, Ghosh P and Basu S 2010 Kosi megafan: Historical records, geomorphology and the recent avulsion of the Kosi River; Quat. Int. 227(2) 143–160.
Chander S, Ganguly D, Dubey A K, Gupta P K, Singh R P and Chauhan P 2014 Inland water bodies monitoring using satellite altimetry over Indian region; Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 40(8) 1035.
Chow V T, Maidment D R and Mays L W 1988 Applied hydrology; McGraw-Hill, New York.
Crétaux J-F, Jelinski W, Stéphane C, Kouraev A, Vuglinski V, Bergé-Nguyen M and Gennero M-C et al. 2011 SOLS: A lake database to monitor in the near real time water level and storage variations from remote sensing data; Adv. Space Res. 47(9) 1497–1507.
Duan Z and Bastiaanssen W G M 2013 Estimating water volume variations in lakes and reservoirs from four operational satellite altimetry databases and satellite imagery data; Remote Sens. Environ. 134 403–416.
Dubey A K, Gupta P, Dutta S and Kumar B 2014 Evaluation of satellite-altimetry-derived river stage variation for the braided Brahmaputra River; Int. J. Remote Sens. 35(23) 7815–7827.
Dubey A K, Gupta P, Dutta S and Singh R P 2015a Water level retrieval using SARAL/AltiKa observations in the Braided Brahmaputra river, Eastern India; Mar. Geod. 38 (Suppl 1) 549–567.
Dubey A K, Gupta P K, Dutta S and Singh R P 2015b An improved methodology to estimate river stage and discharge using Jason-2 satellite data; J. Hydrol. 529 1776–1787.
Frappart F, Seyler F, Martinez J M, Leon J G and Cazenave A 2005 Floodplain water storage in the Negro River basin estimated from microwave remote sensing of inundation area and water levels; Remote Sens. Environ. 99(4) 387–399.
Frappart F, Minh K D, L’Hermitte J, Cazenave A, Ramillien G, Le Toan T and Mognard-Campbell N 2006 Water volume change in the lower Mekong from satellite altimetry and imagery data; Geophys. J. Int. 167(2) 570–584.
Frappart F, Papa F, Güntner A, Susanna W, Ramillien G, Prigent C, Rossow W B and Bonnet M P 2010 Interannual variations of the terrestrial water storage in the Lower Ob’Basin from a multisatellite approach; Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss. 14(12) 2443–2453.
Frazier P, Page K, Louis J, Briggs S and Robertson A I 2003 Relating wetland inundation to river flow using Landsat TM data; Int. J. Remote Sens. 24(19) 3755–3770.
Getirana A C, Bonnet M P, Calmant S, Roux E, Rotunno Filho O C and Mansur W J 2009 Hydrological monitoring of poorly gauged basins based on rainfall–runoff modeling and spatial altimetry; J. Hydrol. 379(3–4) 205–219.
Gupta P, Dubey A K, Goswami N, Singh R P and Chauhan P 2015 Use of SARAL/AltiKa observations for modeling river flow; Mar. Geod. 38 (Suppl 1) 614–625.
Junk W, Bayley P B and Sparks R E 1989 The flood pulse concept in river–floodplain systems; In: Proceedings of the international large river symposium (LARS) (ed.) Dodge D P, Canadian Special Publication of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, Vol. 106, pp. 110–127.
Karim F, Kinsey-Henderson A, Wallace J, Arthington A H and Pearson R G 2012 Modelling wetland connectivity during overbank flooding in a tropical floodplain in north Queensland, Australia; Hydrol. Process. 26(18) 2710–2723.
Karim F, Kinsey-Henderson A, Wallace J, Godfrey P, Arthington A H and Pearson R G 2014 Modelling hydrological connectivity of tropical floodplain wetlands via a combined natural and artificial stream network; Hydrol. Process. 28(23) 5696–5710.
Koblinsky C J, Clarke R T, Brenner A C and Frey H 1993 Measurement of river level variations with satellite altimetry; Water Resour. Res. 29(6) 1839–1848.
Leon J G, Calmant S, Seyler F, Bonnet M P, Cauhopé M, Frappart F and Fraizy P 2006 Rating curves and estimation of average water depth at the upper Negro River based on satellite altimeter data and modeled discharges; J. Hydrol. 328(3–4) 481–496.
Papa F, Prigent C, Durand F and Rossow W B 2006 Wetland dynamics using a suite of satellite observations: A case study of application and evaluation for the Indian Subcontinent; Geophys. Res. Lett. 33(8).
Papa F, Durand F, Rossow W B, Rahman A and Bala S K 2010 Satellite altimeter-derived monthly discharge of the Ganga–Brahmaputra River and its seasonal to interannual variations from 1993 to 2008; J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans 115(C12).
Roux E, Cauhope M, Bonnet M P, Calmant S, Vauchel P and Seyler F 2008 Daily water stage estimated from satellite altimetric data for large river basin monitoring/estimation de hauteurs d’eau journalières a partir de données d’altimétrie radar pour la surveillance des grands basins fluviaux; Hydrol. Sci. J. 53(1) 81–99.
Shiklomanov A I, Lammers R B and Vörösmarty, C J 2002 Widespread decline in hydrological monitoring threatens Pan-Arctic research; EOS Trans. Am. Geophys. Union 83 13–16.
Siddique-E-Akbor A H M, Hossain F, Lee H and Shum C K 2011 Inter-comparison study of water level estimates derived from hydrodynamic–hydrologic model and satellite altimetry for a complex deltaic environment; Remote Sens. Environ. 115(6) 1522–1531.
Sinha R 2008 Kosi: Rising waters, dynamic channels and human disasters; Economic and Political Weekly, pp. 42–46.
Sinha R, Sripriyanka K, Jain V and Mukul M 2014 Avulsion threshold and planform dynamics of the Kosi River in north Bihar (India) and Nepal: A GIS framework; Geomorphology 216 157–170.
Stokstad E 1999 Scarcity of rain, stream gages threatens forecasts; Science 285 1199.
Verron J, Bonnefond P, Aouf L, Birol F, Bhowmick S A, Calmant S, Conchy T, Crétaux J F, Dibarboure G, Dubey A K and Faugère Y 2018 The benefits of the Ka-band as evidenced from the SARAL/AltiKa altimetric mission: Scientific applications; Remote Sens. 10(2) 163.
Wen L, Macdonald R, Morrison T, Hameed T, Saintilan N and Ling J 2013 From hydrodynamic to hydrological modelling: Investigating long-term hydrological regimes of key wetlands in the Macquarie Marshes, a semi-arid lowland floodplain in Australia; J. Hydrol. 500 45–61.
Zhang J, Xu K, Yang Y, Qi L, Hayashi S and Watanabe M 2006 Measuring water storage fluctuations in Lake Dongting, China, by Topex/Poseidon satellite altimetry; Environ. Monit. Assess. 115(1–3) 23–37.
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to the Central Water Commission (CWC) board of India for providing the bathymetry (river cross-section) and gauge data of the Kosi river. The authors also express their sincere gratitude towards the Space Applications Centre (SAC), Ahmedabad (ISRO), for funding the research through SARAL/Altika utilisation project.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Corresponding editor: Subimal Ghosh
Appendix: Field campaign (Kosi river)
Appendix: Field campaign (Kosi river)
The field campaign was done to understand in detail about the river–wetlands behaviour — a field cum interaction survey was conducted in the month of December 2014. The downstream wetlands in the study area were chosen to conduct the field survey. The river was completely within the main channel and flood plain was dry with partial vegetation on it. It was found that the wetland bed is composed of silty clay. During the survey, we approached the local people living nearby the wetlands to inquire about the response of the wetland for varying flood pulses in the nearby Kosi river. It was clear from the discussion that wetlands were formed in monsoon season and gradually dry up in the non-monsoon season. The gradual discharge of flow from wetland to river and wetland with no connectivity was also observed in the field. Table A1 represents the minimum and maximum depth of water in the wetland during different seasons collected from various local people in Nagrah village. Table A1 clearly indicates that the water depth variation in wetland during monsoon season was between 10 and 17 ft, i.e., 3–5 m, and in post-monsoon season, it was about 4 ft (1.2 m). Water depth in the wetland was also measured at different points along the longitudinal direction and the average depth was found to be 0.85 m.
The experience of extreme floods was shared by the local people, which occurred during the period of 1980s, 1990s and in recent years 2002 and 2003. They described that during the flood, these wetlands play an important role by gaining water from the river and act as a buffer for excess water. Wetlands were found to be integral part of the society living nearby. People were using water for multiple purposes such as irrigation (corn fields), domestic needs, livestock consumption (cattle and goat) and other household-related works. It is also a major source of income through fishing activity for the nearby people. The field cum interaction-based survey provided vital information in understanding the behaviour of wetland in terms of depth during monsoon and beginning of the post-monsoon season. The livelihood dependence of the people from the wetland was also observed in various ways.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chembolu, V., Dubey, A.K., Gupta, P.K. et al. Application of satellite altimetry in understanding river–wetland flow interactions of Kosi river. J Earth Syst Sci 128, 89 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-019-1099-4
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-019-1099-4