Skip to main content
Log in

Hidden Markov Model for quantitative prediction of snowfall and analysis of hazardous snowfall events over Indian Himalaya

  • Published:
Journal of Earth System Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A Hidden Markov Model (HMM) has been developed for prediction of quantitative snowfall in Pir-Panjal and Great Himalayan mountain ranges of Indian Himalaya. The model predicts snowfall for two days in advance using daily recorded nine meteorological variables of past 20 winters from 1992–2012. There are six observations and six states of the model. The most probable observation and state sequence has been computed using Forward and Viterbi algorithms, respectively. Baum–Welch algorithm has been used for optimizing the model parameters. The model has been validated for two winters (2012–2013 and 2013–2014) by computing root mean square error (RMSE), accuracy measures such as percent correct (PC), critical success index (CSI) and Heidke skill score (HSS). The RMSE of the model has also been calculated using leave-one-out cross-validation method. Snowfall predicted by the model during hazardous snowfall events in different parts of the Himalaya matches well with the observed one. The HSS of the model for all the stations implies that the optimized model has better forecasting skill than random forecast for both the days. The RMSE of the optimized model has also been found smaller than the persistence forecast and standard deviation for both the days.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bardossy A and Plate E 1991 Modeling daily rainfall using semi-Markov representation of circulation pattern occurrence; J. Hydrol. 122 33–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bardossy A and Plate E 1992 Space–time model for daily rainfall using atmospheric circulation patterns; Water Resour. Res. 28 (4) 1247–1260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dimri A P, Niyogi D, Barros A P, Ridley J, Mohanty U C, Yasunari T and Sikka D R 2015 Western disturbances: A review; Rev. Geophys. 53. doi:10.1002/2014RG000460.

  • Dimri A P, Joshi P and Ganju A 2008 Precipitation forecast over western Himalaya using k-Nearest Neighbor Method; Int. J. Climatol. 28 1921–1931.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flecher C, Naveau P, Allard D and Brisson N 2010 A stochastic daily weather generator for skewed data; Water Resour. Res. 46 W07519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabriel K R and Neumann J 1962 A Markov chain model for daily rainfall occurrences at Tel-Aviv; Quart. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc. 88 85–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerlitz L, Conrad O and Bohner J 2015 Large-scale atmospheric forcing and topographic modification of precipitation rates over high Asia – a neural-network-based approach; Earth Syst. Dyn. 6 61–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guanche Y, Mınguez R and Mendez F 2013 Climate-based Monte Carlo simulation of trivariate sea states; Coast. Eng. 80 107–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gusain H S, Chand D, Thakur N, Singh A and Ganju A 2009 Snow avalanche climatology of Indian western Himalaya; International symposium on snow and avalanches (ISSA), 6–10 April, Manali, India.

  • Haberlandt U, Belli A and Bardossy A 2014 Statistical downscaling of precipitation using a stochastic rainfall model conditioned on circulation patterns – an evaluation of assumptions; Int. J. Climatol. 35 (3) 417–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hay L, McCabe J, Wolock D M and Ayers M A 1991 Simulation of precipitation by weather type analysis; Water Resour. Res. 27 493–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes J P and Guttorp P 1994 Incorporating spatial dependence and atmospheric data in a model of precipitation; J. Appl. Meteorol. 33 1503–1515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz R 1977 Precipitation as a chain-dependent process ; J. Appl. Meteorol. 16 671–676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolokotroni M, Ren X, Davies M and Mavrogianni A 2012 London’s urban heat island: Impact on current and future energy consumption in office buildings; Energy and Buildings 47 302–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Launay M, Brisson N, Beaudoin N and Mary B 2009 Conceptual basis, formalizations and parameterization of the STICS crop model; Editions Quae. 3 (7) 949–961.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang T J and Barros A P 2004 Winter storms in central Himalayas; J. Meteorol. Soc. Japan 82 (2) 829–844.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maraun D, Wetterhall F, Ireson A, Chandler R, Kendon E, Widmann M, Brienen S, Rust H, Sauter T and Themel M 2010 Precipitation downscaling under climate change: Recent developments to bridge the gap between dynamical models and the end user; Rev. Geophys. 48 (3).

  • Mares C, Mares I, Huebener H, Mihailescu M, Cubasch U and Stanciu P 2003 A Hidden Markov Model applied to the daily spring precipitation over the Danube Basin; Technical report UCI-ICS 03-27, Information and Computer Science, University of California.

  • Menegoz M, Gallee H and Jacobi H W 2013 Precipitation and snow cover in the Himalaya: From reanalysis to regional climate simulations; Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 17 3921–3936.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohanty U C and Dimri A P 2004 Location specific prediction of probability of occurrence and quantity of precipitation over western Himalayas; Wea. Forecast. 19 (3) 520–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson C 1981 Stochastic simulation of daily precipitation, temperature, and solar radiation; Water Resour. Res. 17 (1) 182–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rind D, Goldberg R and Ruedy R 1989 Change in climate variability in the 21st century; Climate Change 14 5–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Revenga C, Nackoney J, Hoshino E, Kura Y and Maidens J 2003 Watersheds of the world CD; IUCN, IWMI, Ramsar, World Resources Institute, Washington.

  • Schiemann R, Luthi D and Schar C 2009 Seasonality and interannual variability of the westerly in the Tibetan Plateau region; J. Climate 22 2940–2957.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh D, Dimri A P and Ganju A 2008 An analogue method for simultaneous prediction of surface weather parameters at a specific location in the western Himalaya in India; Meteorol. Appl. 15 (4) 491–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srikanthan R and McMahon T 2001 Stochastic generation of annual, monthly and daily climate data: A review; Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss. 5 (4) 653–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Todorovic P and Woolhiser D A 1975 A stochastic model of n-day precipitation; J. Appl. Meteorol. 14 17–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilks D and Wilby R 1999 The weather generation game: A review of stochastic weather models; Progr. Phys. Geogr. 23 (3) 329–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilks D 2010 Use of stochastic weather generators for precipitation downscaling; Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 1 (6) 898–907.

  • Wilks D 2012 Stochastic weather generators for climate-change downscaling, part II: Multivariable and spatially coherent multisite downscaling; Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 3 (3) 267–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson L, Lettenmaier D and Skyllingstad E 1992 A hierarchical stochastic model of large-scale atmospheric circulation patterns and multiple station daily precipitation; J. Geophys. Res. 97 (D3) 2791–2809.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zorita E, Hughes J P, Lettenmaier D P and Von Storch H 1995 Stochastic characterization of regional circulation pattern for climate model diagnosis and estimation of local precipitation; J. Climate 8 1023–1042.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge Director, SASE for facilitating and encouraging this work. Dr Hemendra Gosain is duly acknowledged for his valuable suggestions to improve the paper. Field data collection teams of Snow and Avalanche Study Establishment are acknowledged for collecting data in adverse climatic conditions of the Himalaya during winter. The authors are thankful to the reviewers for their valuable suggestions and positive criticism, which helped to improve the quality of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J C JOSHI.

Additional information

Corresponding editor: Ashok Karumuri

Appendix (Categorical forecast verification of six category event)

Appendix (Categorical forecast verification of six category event)

In table A1, the total number of observed events in category-1 are given by:

$$\mathrm{A}1=\mathrm{C}11+\mathrm{C}12+\mathrm{C}13+\mathrm{C}14+\mathrm{C}15+\mathrm{C}16. $$

The total number of forecasted events in category-1 are given by:

$$\mathrm{B}1=\mathrm{C}11+\mathrm{C}21+\mathrm{C}31+\mathrm{C}41+\mathrm{C}51+\mathrm{C}61. $$

In a similar fashion, total number of observed and forecasted events in all the six categories are calculated. The total number of events are given by:

$$\begin{array}{@{}rcl@{}} \mathrm{T}{}&=&{} \mathrm{C}11+\mathrm{C}12+\mathrm{C}13+\mathrm{C}14+\mathrm{C}15+\mathrm{C}16\\ &=&{}\mathrm{C}11+\mathrm{C}21+\mathrm{C}31+\mathrm{C}41+\mathrm{C}51+\mathrm{C}61. \end{array} $$

The forecast verification measures, derived from table A1 are:

Percentage correct (PC)

$$\begin{array}{@{}rcl@{}} \text{PC}\!\!\!&=&\!\!\!({\kern-.5pt}(\mathrm{C}11{\kern-.5pt}+{\kern-.5pt}\mathrm{C}22{\kern-.5pt}+{\kern-.5pt}\mathrm{C}33{\kern-.5pt}+{\kern-.5pt}\mathrm{C}44{\kern-.5pt}+{\kern-.5pt}\mathrm{C}55{\kern-.5pt}+{\kern-.5pt}\mathrm{C}66){\kern-.5pt}\\&&\!\!\!\times\,{\kern-.5pt} {100}{\kern-.5pt} /{\kern-.5pt} {\mathrm{T}}){\kern-.5pt}\% . \end{array} $$

Critical success index (CSI) in different categories

$$\text{CSI-}\!1 = \frac{\text{C}11}{(\text{A}1+\text{B}1-\text{C}11)}$$
$$\text{CSI-2} = \text{C}22/(\text{A}2+\text{B}2-\text{C}22)$$
$$\text{CSI-3} = \text{C}33/(\text{A}3+\text{B}3-\text{C}33)$$
$$\text{CSI-4} = \text{C}44/(\text{A}4+\text{B}4-\text{C}44)$$
$$\text{CSI-5} = \text{C}55/(\text{A}5+\text{B}5-\text{C}55)$$
$$\text{CSI-6} = \text{C}66/(\text{A}6+\text{B}6-\text{C}66)$$

Heidke skill score (HSS)

$$\begin{array}{@{}rcl@{}} \text{HSS}\!\!\!\! &=&\!\!\!\! ((\text{C}11+\text{C}22+\text{C}33+\text{C}44+\text{C}55+\text{C}66)\\ &&{} -\!(\text{A}\!\times\! \text{B}1\,+\,\text{A}2\! \times\! \text{B}2\,+\,\text{A}3\! \times\! \text{B}3\,+\,\text{A}4\!\times\! \text{B}4\,+\,\text{A}5\\ &&{}\times\! \text{B}5\,+\,\text{A}6\!\times\! \text{B}6)/\text{T})/ (\text{T}\,-\,(\text{A}1\!\times\! \text{B}1\,+\,\text{A}2\!\times\! \text{B}2\\ &&{}\,+\,\text{A}3\!\times\! \text{B}3\,+\,\text{A}4\!\times\!\text{B}4\,+\,\text{A}5\!\times\! \text{B}5\,+\,\text{A}6\!\times\! \text{B}6){}/{}\text{T}). \end{array} $$
Table A1 6 × 6 contingency table of observed vs. forecasted events.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

JOSHI, J.C., TANKESHWAR, K. & SRIVASTAVA, S. Hidden Markov Model for quantitative prediction of snowfall and analysis of hazardous snowfall events over Indian Himalaya. J Earth Syst Sci 126, 33 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-017-0810-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-017-0810-6

Keywords

Navigation